Trump Regimes Amazing List Of Crimes Keeps Getting Longer, But We Can't Afford To Look Away

[lantern2814]

When will this “AMAZING LIST” have a crime on it?

Six former wrestlers say Rep. Jim Jordan knew about abusive OSU doctor

Despite the former coach's claims that he knew nothing of sexual misconduct allegations against team doctor Richard Strauss, multiple wrestlers say they witnessed him being told directly.

www.cnn.com

And those statements were recanted when they were reminded that false statements to Congress count as perjury. Doesn’t help that more than one of those telling the stories were convicted criminals.

Link?

It’s too easy.

Former OSU wrestler who accused Rep. Jim Jordan of ignoring abuse changes story

A former Ohio State University wrestler on Thursday appeared to recant his claim that Republican congressman Jim Jordan — when he was an assistant coach — knew that the team doctor was sexually abusing the athletes.

www.nbcnews.com

Former Ohio State wrestler clarifies he doesn't know if Rep. Jordan knew of abuse

WASHINGTON — One of the wrestlers who accused Rep. Jim Jordan of knowing about accusations that a doctor at Ohio State University was sexually

www.dispatch.com

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

I stopped reading at "reign of terror against non white migrants"

It's all fantasy and science fiction. There isn't one actual crime listed.

Socialism

Rural Americans: Disabled or just Desperate? | Project E3

Rural Americans experienced the most rapid increase in disability rates, with as many as one-third of working-age adults living on monthly disability checks

projecte3.com

So where's the crime, asshole?

Obstruction of Justice
Efforts to fire Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a “credible witness” in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This “would qualify as an obstructive act” if the firing “would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.”

Nexus (p. 89): “Substantial evidence” indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that “his conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.”

Intent (p. 89): “Substantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]”

F. Efforts to curtail Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 97): Trump’s effort to force Sessions to confine the investigation to only investigating future election interference “would qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.” “Taken together, the President’s directives indicate that Sessions was being instructed to tell the Special Counsel to end the existing investigation into the President and his campaign[.]”

Nexus (p. 97): At the relevant point, “the existence of a grand jury investigation supervised by the Special Counsel was public knowledge.”

Intent (p. 97): “Substantial evidence” indicates that Trump’s efforts were “intended to prevent further investigative structiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct
Quote

Sadly for you, Mule-er was asked point blank if he was obstructed. The answer was NO. Case closed.

Attempted Obstruction is a crime

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

When will this “AMAZING LIST” have a crime on it?

Six former wrestlers say Rep. Jim Jordan knew about abusive OSU doctor

Despite the former coach's claims that he knew nothing of sexual misconduct allegations against team doctor Richard Strauss, multiple wrestlers say they witnessed him being told directly.

www.cnn.com

And those statements were recanted when they were reminded that false statements to Congress count as perjury. Doesn’t help that more than one of those telling the stories were convicted criminals.

Link?

It’s too easy.

Former OSU wrestler who accused Rep. Jim Jordan of ignoring abuse changes story

A former Ohio State University wrestler on Thursday appeared to recant his claim that Republican congressman Jim Jordan — when he was an assistant coach — knew that the team doctor was sexually abusing the athletes.

www.nbcnews.com

Former Ohio State wrestler clarifies he doesn't know if Rep. Jordan knew of abuse

WASHINGTON — One of the wrestlers who accused Rep. Jim Jordan of knowing about accusations that a doctor at Ohio State University was sexually

www.dispatch.com

That is two guys

 

[lantern2814]

I stopped reading at "reign of terror against non white migrants"

It's all fantasy and science fiction. There isn't one actual crime listed.

Socialism

Rural Americans: Disabled or just Desperate? | Project E3

Rural Americans experienced the most rapid increase in disability rates, with as many as one-third of working-age adults living on monthly disability checks

projecte3.com

So where's the crime, asshole?

Obstruction of Justice
Efforts to fire Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a “credible witness” in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This “would qualify as an obstructive act” if the firing “would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.”

Nexus (p. 89): “Substantial evidence” indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that “his conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.”

Intent (p. 89): “Substantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]”

F. Efforts to curtail Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 97): Trump’s effort to force Sessions to confine the investigation to only investigating future election interference “would qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.” “Taken together, the President’s directives indicate that Sessions was being instructed to tell the Special Counsel to end the existing investigation into the President and his campaign[.]”

Nexus (p. 97): At the relevant point, “the existence of a grand jury investigation supervised by the Special Counsel was public knowledge.”

Intent (p. 97): “Substantial evidence” indicates that Trump’s efforts were “intended to prevent further investigative structiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct
Quote

Sadly for you, Mule-er was asked point blank if he was obstructed. The answer was NO. Case closed.

Attempted Obstruction is a crime

Well, Mule-er himself said he wasn’t obstructed. You claiming he’s lying?

 

[dudmuck]

I stopped reading at "reign of terror against non white migrants"

It's all fantasy and science fiction. There isn't one actual crime listed.

Socialism

Rural Americans: Disabled or just Desperate? | Project E3

Rural Americans experienced the most rapid increase in disability rates, with as many as one-third of working-age adults living on monthly disability checks

projecte3.com

So where's the crime, asshole?

Obstruction of Justice
Efforts to fire Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a “credible witness” in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This “would qualify as an obstructive act” if the firing “would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.”

Nexus (p. 89): “Substantial evidence” indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that “his conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.”

Intent (p. 89): “Substantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]”

F. Efforts to curtail Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 97): Trump’s effort to force Sessions to confine the investigation to only investigating future election interference “would qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.” “Taken together, the President’s directives indicate that Sessions was being instructed to tell the Special Counsel to end the existing investigation into the President and his campaign[.]”

Nexus (p. 97): At the relevant point, “the existence of a grand jury investigation supervised by the Special Counsel was public knowledge.”

Intent (p. 97): “Substantial evidence” indicates that Trump’s efforts were “intended to prevent further investigative structiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct
Quote

Sadly for you, Mule-er was asked point blank if he was obstructed. The answer was NO. Case closed.

Mueller did not say no, he said:

“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment.”

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

When will this “AMAZING LIST” have a crime on it?

Six former wrestlers say Rep. Jim Jordan knew about abusive OSU doctor

Despite the former coach's claims that he knew nothing of sexual misconduct allegations against team doctor Richard Strauss, multiple wrestlers say they witnessed him being told directly.

www.cnn.com

And those statements were recanted when they were reminded that false statements to Congress count as perjury. Doesn’t help that more than one of those telling the stories were convicted criminals.

Link?

It’s too easy.

Former OSU wrestler who accused Rep. Jim Jordan of ignoring abuse changes story

A former Ohio State University wrestler on Thursday appeared to recant his claim that Republican congressman Jim Jordan — when he was an assistant coach — knew that the team doctor was sexually abusing the athletes.

www.nbcnews.com

Former Ohio State wrestler clarifies he doesn't know if Rep. Jordan knew of abuse

WASHINGTON — One of the wrestlers who accused Rep. Jim Jordan of knowing about accusations that a doctor at Ohio State University was sexually

www.dispatch.com

Those comments stand in contrast to a report in The Wall Street Journal in July in which he was quoted saying: “There’s no way unless he’s got dementia or something that he’s got no recollection of what was going on at Ohio State. I have nothing but respect for this man, I love this man, but he knew as far as I’m concerned

 

[lantern2814]

I stopped reading at "reign of terror against non white migrants"

It's all fantasy and science fiction. There isn't one actual crime listed.

Socialism

Rural Americans: Disabled or just Desperate? | Project E3

Rural Americans experienced the most rapid increase in disability rates, with as many as one-third of working-age adults living on monthly disability checks

projecte3.com

So where's the crime, asshole?

Obstruction of Justice
Efforts to fire Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a “credible witness” in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This “would qualify as an obstructive act” if the firing “would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.”

Nexus (p. 89): “Substantial evidence” indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that “his conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.”

Intent (p. 89): “Substantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]”

F. Efforts to curtail Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 97): Trump’s effort to force Sessions to confine the investigation to only investigating future election interference “would qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.” “Taken together, the President’s directives indicate that Sessions was being instructed to tell the Special Counsel to end the existing investigation into the President and his campaign[.]”

Nexus (p. 97): At the relevant point, “the existence of a grand jury investigation supervised by the Special Counsel was public knowledge.”

Intent (p. 97): “Substantial evidence” indicates that Trump’s efforts were “intended to prevent further investigative structiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct
Quote

Sadly for you, Mule-er was asked point blank if he was obstructed. The answer was NO. Case closed.

Mueller did not say no, he said:

“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment.”

Wrong as usual. Mueller was asked point blank and answered NO. Prosecutors don’t state people are innocent. Charge or don’t charge. Poor Mule-er never had anything. Trump been arrested yet?

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

I stopped reading at "reign of terror against non white migrants"

It's all fantasy and science fiction. There isn't one actual crime listed.

Socialism

Rural Americans: Disabled or just Desperate? | Project E3

Rural Americans experienced the most rapid increase in disability rates, with as many as one-third of working-age adults living on monthly disability checks

projecte3.com

So where's the crime, asshole?

Obstruction of Justice
Efforts to fire Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a “credible witness” in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This “would qualify as an obstructive act” if the firing “would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.”

Nexus (p. 89): “Substantial evidence” indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that “his conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.”

Intent (p. 89): “Substantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]”

F. Efforts to curtail Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 97): Trump’s effort to force Sessions to confine the investigation to only investigating future election interference “would qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.” “Taken together, the President’s directives indicate that Sessions was being instructed to tell the Special Counsel to end the existing investigation into the President and his campaign[.]”

Nexus (p. 97): At the relevant point, “the existence of a grand jury investigation supervised by the Special Counsel was public knowledge.”

Intent (p. 97): “Substantial evidence” indicates that Trump’s efforts were “intended to prevent further investigative structiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct
Quote

Sadly for you, Mule-er was asked point blank if he was obstructed. The answer was NO. Case closed.

Attempted Obstruction is a crime

Well, Mule-er himself said he wasn’t obstructed. You claiming he’s lying?

He said the Obstruction didn't work

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

I stopped reading at "reign of terror against non white migrants"

It's all fantasy and science fiction. There isn't one actual crime listed.

Socialism

Rural Americans: Disabled or just Desperate? | Project E3

Rural Americans experienced the most rapid increase in disability rates, with as many as one-third of working-age adults living on monthly disability checks

projecte3.com

So where's the crime, asshole?

Obstruction of Justice
Efforts to fire Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a “credible witness” in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This “would qualify as an obstructive act” if the firing “would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.”

Nexus (p. 89): “Substantial evidence” indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that “his conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.”

Intent (p. 89): “Substantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]”

F. Efforts to curtail Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 97): Trump’s effort to force Sessions to confine the investigation to only investigating future election interference “would qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.” “Taken together, the President’s directives indicate that Sessions was being instructed to tell the Special Counsel to end the existing investigation into the President and his campaign[.]”

Nexus (p. 97): At the relevant point, “the existence of a grand jury investigation supervised by the Special Counsel was public knowledge.”

Intent (p. 97): “Substantial evidence” indicates that Trump’s efforts were “intended to prevent further investigative structiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct
Quote

Sadly for you, Mule-er was asked point blank if he was obstructed. The answer was NO. Case closed.

Mueller did not say no, he said:

“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment.”

Wrong as usual. Mueller was asked point blank and answered NO. Prosecutors don’t state people are innocent. Charge or don’t charge. Poor Mule-er never had anything. Trump been arrested yet?

Link?

 

[lantern2814]

When will this “AMAZING LIST” have a crime on it?

Six former wrestlers say Rep. Jim Jordan knew about abusive OSU doctor

Despite the former coach's claims that he knew nothing of sexual misconduct allegations against team doctor Richard Strauss, multiple wrestlers say they witnessed him being told directly.

www.cnn.com

And those statements were recanted when they were reminded that false statements to Congress count as perjury. Doesn’t help that more than one of those telling the stories were convicted criminals.

Link?

It’s too easy.

Former OSU wrestler who accused Rep. Jim Jordan of ignoring abuse changes story

A former Ohio State University wrestler on Thursday appeared to recant his claim that Republican congressman Jim Jordan — when he was an assistant coach — knew that the team doctor was sexually abusing the athletes.

www.nbcnews.com

Former Ohio State wrestler clarifies he doesn't know if Rep. Jordan knew of abuse

WASHINGTON — One of the wrestlers who accused Rep. Jim Jordan of knowing about accusations that a doctor at Ohio State University was sexually

www.dispatch.com

Those comments stand in contrast to a report in The Wall Street Journal in July in which he was quoted saying: “There’s no way unless he’s got dementia or something that he’s got no recollection of what was going on at Ohio State. I have nothing but respect for this man, I love this man, but he knew as far as I’m concerned

Doesn’t matter. He recanted when confronted. Funny what those perjury penalties will do.

 

[bripat9643]

I stopped reading at "reign of terror against non white migrants"

It's all fantasy and science fiction. There isn't one actual crime listed.

Socialism

Rural Americans: Disabled or just Desperate? | Project E3

Rural Americans experienced the most rapid increase in disability rates, with as many as one-third of working-age adults living on monthly disability checks

projecte3.com

So where's the crime, asshole?

RADDATZ: The New York Times reported on that August conversation. And the president denied it, tweeting, "I never told John Bolton that the aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens." Is the president lying?

BOLTON: Yes he is. And it's not the first time, either. This is why I think it's important to get these kinds of facts out on the table. The president's talked about what he wants the people to hear about Ukraine. He's talked about what he wants the people to hear about Iran, about North Korea, about Russia, about China.

I think -- you know, foreign governments are not gonna be fascinated by what they read in my book. And I don't think President Trump really fears what foreign governments are gonna read in the book. He fears what the American people are gonna read.
Seeking campaign contributions from a foreigner

The question is whether Bolton is lying. Since he's trying to sell a book, the answer is mostly likely "yes."

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

I stopped reading at "reign of terror against non white migrants"

It's all fantasy and science fiction. There isn't one actual crime listed.

Socialism

Rural Americans: Disabled or just Desperate? | Project E3

Rural Americans experienced the most rapid increase in disability rates, with as many as one-third of working-age adults living on monthly disability checks

projecte3.com

So where's the crime, asshole?

Obstruction of Justice
Efforts to fire Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a “credible witness” in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This “would qualify as an obstructive act” if the firing “would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.”

Nexus (p. 89): “Substantial evidence” indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that “his conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.”

Intent (p. 89): “Substantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]”

F. Efforts to curtail Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 97): Trump’s effort to force Sessions to confine the investigation to only investigating future election interference “would qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.” “Taken together, the President’s directives indicate that Sessions was being instructed to tell the Special Counsel to end the existing investigation into the President and his campaign[.]”

Nexus (p. 97): At the relevant point, “the existence of a grand jury investigation supervised by the Special Counsel was public knowledge.”

Intent (p. 97): “Substantial evidence” indicates that Trump’s efforts were “intended to prevent further investigative structiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct
Quote

Sadly for you, Mule-er was asked point blank if he was obstructed. The answer was NO. Case closed.

Attempted Obstruction is a crime

Well, Mule-er himself said he wasn’t obstructed. You claiming he’s lying?

https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2019-07-24/robert-mueller-trump-could-be-indicted-after-leaving-office

Mueller: Trump Could Be Indicted After Leaving Office
The former special counsel reaffirmed that while President Donald Trump cannot be indicted while in office, he could face criminal charges as a private citizen after leaving the presidency.

By Alan Neuhauser
|
July 24, 2019, at 11:14 a.m.

 

[bripat9643]

I stopped reading at "reign of terror against non white migrants"

It's all fantasy and science fiction. There isn't one actual crime listed.

Socialism

Rural Americans: Disabled or just Desperate? | Project E3

Rural Americans experienced the most rapid increase in disability rates, with as many as one-third of working-age adults living on monthly disability checks

projecte3.com

So where's the crime, asshole?

One focus of the investigation includes whether Trump inflated the value of certain properties to obtain bank loans and deflated the value of those same properties to pay lower taxes, sources have told ABC News.

Vance has twice fought all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court to gain access to eight years' worth of Trump's personal and business tax returns

So? Vance is a douchebag.

 

[bripat9643]

I stopped reading at "reign of terror against non white migrants"

It's all fantasy and science fiction. There isn't one actual crime listed.

Socialism

Rural Americans: Disabled or just Desperate? | Project E3

Rural Americans experienced the most rapid increase in disability rates, with as many as one-third of working-age adults living on monthly disability checks

projecte3.com

So where's the crime, asshole?

Obstruction of Justice
Efforts to fire Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a “credible witness” in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This “would qualify as an obstructive act” if the firing “would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.”

Nexus (p. 89): “Substantial evidence” indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that “his conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.”

Intent (p. 89): “Substantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]”

F. Efforts to curtail Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 97): Trump’s effort to force Sessions to confine the investigation to only investigating future election interference “would qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.” “Taken together, the President’s directives indicate that Sessions was being instructed to tell the Special Counsel to end the existing investigation into the President and his campaign[.]”

Nexus (p. 97): At the relevant point, “the existence of a grand jury investigation supervised by the Special Counsel was public knowledge.”

Intent (p. 97): “Substantial evidence” indicates that Trump’s efforts were “intended to prevent further investigative structiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct
Quote

Sadly for you, Mule-er was asked point blank if he was obstructed. The answer was NO. Case closed.

Mueller did not say no, he said:

“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment.”

He later recanted that accusation when Barr asked him point blank.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

I stopped reading at "reign of terror against non white migrants"

It's all fantasy and science fiction. There isn't one actual crime listed.

Socialism

Rural Americans: Disabled or just Desperate? | Project E3

Rural Americans experienced the most rapid increase in disability rates, with as many as one-third of working-age adults living on monthly disability checks

projecte3.com

So where's the crime, asshole?

RADDATZ: The New York Times reported on that August conversation. And the president denied it, tweeting, "I never told John Bolton that the aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens." Is the president lying?

BOLTON: Yes he is. And it's not the first time, either. This is why I think it's important to get these kinds of facts out on the table. The president's talked about what he wants the people to hear about Ukraine. He's talked about what he wants the people to hear about Iran, about North Korea, about Russia, about China.

I think -- you know, foreign governments are not gonna be fascinated by what they read in my book. And I don't think President Trump really fears what foreign governments are gonna read in the book. He fears what the American people are gonna read.
Seeking campaign contributions from a foreigner

The question is whether Bolton is lying. Since he's trying to sell a book, the answer is mostly likely "yes."

Trump only picks the best people

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

I stopped reading at "reign of terror against non white migrants"

It's all fantasy and science fiction. There isn't one actual crime listed.

Socialism

Rural Americans: Disabled or just Desperate? | Project E3

Rural Americans experienced the most rapid increase in disability rates, with as many as one-third of working-age adults living on monthly disability checks

projecte3.com

So where's the crime, asshole?

One focus of the investigation includes whether Trump inflated the value of certain properties to obtain bank loans and deflated the value of those same properties to pay lower taxes, sources have told ABC News.

Vance has twice fought all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court to gain access to eight years' worth of Trump's personal and business tax returns

So? Vance is a douchebag.

Link?

 

[bripat9643]

I stopped reading at "reign of terror against non white migrants"

It's all fantasy and science fiction. There isn't one actual crime listed.

Socialism

Rural Americans: Disabled or just Desperate? | Project E3

Rural Americans experienced the most rapid increase in disability rates, with as many as one-third of working-age adults living on monthly disability checks

projecte3.com

So where's the crime, asshole?

RADDATZ: The New York Times reported on that August conversation. And the president denied it, tweeting, "I never told John Bolton that the aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens." Is the president lying?

BOLTON: Yes he is. And it's not the first time, either. This is why I think it's important to get these kinds of facts out on the table. The president's talked about what he wants the people to hear about Ukraine. He's talked about what he wants the people to hear about Iran, about North Korea, about Russia, about China.

I think -- you know, foreign governments are not gonna be fascinated by what they read in my book. And I don't think President Trump really fears what foreign governments are gonna read in the book. He fears what the American people are gonna read.
Seeking campaign contributions from a foreigner

The question is whether Bolton is lying. Since he's trying to sell a book, the answer is mostly likely "yes."

Trump only picks the best people

So you believe Bolton is lying?

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

I stopped reading at "reign of terror against non white migrants"

It's all fantasy and science fiction. There isn't one actual crime listed.

Socialism

Rural Americans: Disabled or just Desperate? | Project E3

Rural Americans experienced the most rapid increase in disability rates, with as many as one-third of working-age adults living on monthly disability checks

projecte3.com

So where's the crime, asshole?

Obstruction of Justice
Efforts to fire Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a “credible witness” in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This “would qualify as an obstructive act” if the firing “would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.”

Nexus (p. 89): “Substantial evidence” indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that “his conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.”

Intent (p. 89): “Substantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]”

F. Efforts to curtail Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 97): Trump’s effort to force Sessions to confine the investigation to only investigating future election interference “would qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.” “Taken together, the President’s directives indicate that Sessions was being instructed to tell the Special Counsel to end the existing investigation into the President and his campaign[.]”

Nexus (p. 97): At the relevant point, “the existence of a grand jury investigation supervised by the Special Counsel was public knowledge.”

Intent (p. 97): “Substantial evidence” indicates that Trump’s efforts were “intended to prevent further investigative structiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct
Quote

Sadly for you, Mule-er was asked point blank if he was obstructed. The answer was NO. Case closed.

Mueller did not say no, he said:

“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment.”

He later recanted that accusation when Barr asked him point blank.

Link?

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

I stopped reading at "reign of terror against non white migrants"

It's all fantasy and science fiction. There isn't one actual crime listed.

Socialism

Rural Americans: Disabled or just Desperate? | Project E3

Rural Americans experienced the most rapid increase in disability rates, with as many as one-third of working-age adults living on monthly disability checks

projecte3.com

So where's the crime, asshole?

RADDATZ: The New York Times reported on that August conversation. And the president denied it, tweeting, "I never told John Bolton that the aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens." Is the president lying?

BOLTON: Yes he is. And it's not the first time, either. This is why I think it's important to get these kinds of facts out on the table. The president's talked about what he wants the people to hear about Ukraine. He's talked about what he wants the people to hear about Iran, about North Korea, about Russia, about China.

I think -- you know, foreign governments are not gonna be fascinated by what they read in my book. And I don't think President Trump really fears what foreign governments are gonna read in the book. He fears what the American people are gonna read.
Seeking campaign contributions from a foreigner

The question is whether Bolton is lying. Since he's trying to sell a book, the answer is mostly likely "yes."

Trump only picks the best people

So you believe Bolton is lying?

Is trump lying about picking the best people?

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

When will this “AMAZING LIST” have a crime on it?

Six former wrestlers say Rep. Jim Jordan knew about abusive OSU doctor

Despite the former coach's claims that he knew nothing of sexual misconduct allegations against team doctor Richard Strauss, multiple wrestlers say they witnessed him being told directly.

www.cnn.com

And those statements were recanted when they were reminded that false statements to Congress count as perjury. Doesn’t help that more than one of those telling the stories were convicted criminals.

Link?

It’s too easy.

Former OSU wrestler who accused Rep. Jim Jordan of ignoring abuse changes story

A former Ohio State University wrestler on Thursday appeared to recant his claim that Republican congressman Jim Jordan — when he was an assistant coach — knew that the team doctor was sexually abusing the athletes.

www.nbcnews.com

Former Ohio State wrestler clarifies he doesn't know if Rep. Jordan knew of abuse

WASHINGTON — One of the wrestlers who accused Rep. Jim Jordan of knowing about accusations that a doctor at Ohio State University was sexually

www.dispatch.com

Those comments stand in contrast to a report in The Wall Street Journal in July in which he was quoted saying: “There’s no way unless he’s got dementia or something that he’s got no recollection of what was going on at Ohio State. I have nothing but respect for this man, I love this man, but he knew as far as I’m concerned

Doesn’t matter. He recanted when confronted. Funny what those perjury penalties will do.

Two recanted.