Trump rages as his former 'SleazeBag disbarred lawyer' spills the beans to grand jury

[White 6]

Clinton shoving cigars up inside of intern in the WH:
- SNOWFLAKES: 'What a President does on his own time is his business!'

Trump on a late-night TV show jokes how some women are so impressed by money they would let rich men grab them by the vagina.
- SNOWFLAKES: 'Trump is disgusting, a misogynist...'

Biden is exposed for havi g actually physically grabbed a woman - an intern/aide - by her vagina.
- SNOWFLAKES: 'B...b...but Trump'

Photo of Trump with his daughter sitting on his lap,brags how artractive his daughter is...
- SNOWFLAKES: 'Trump is incestuous, disgusting, a pedophile
Incestuous, pedophile Biden is exposed for having showered with his young daughter
- SNOWFLAKES: 'B...b...but Trump'
Trump once head hiw Epstein made sexual advances on an underaged yiyng girl in his hotel, and Clinton threw him out and banned him from his hotel
daughter
- SNOWFLAKES: 'Trump is a pedophile, a close friend and client of Epstein's'
Bill Clinton was exposed as a pedophile, frequent fluer on the Lolita Express, and frequent visitor oh Pedo Island, a picture of himin in Monica Lewinski's blue dress hung in the lobby of the main house on Epsteon's Pedo Island ... Biden showered with his young daughter and constantly sniffs / gropes young kids
- SNOWFLAKES: 'B...b...but Trump'
Hunter Biden made incestuous home movies and shared porn links with 'the Big Guy'
- SNOWFLAKES: 'B...b...but Trump' ... 'Fake News'


If it all wasn't do disgusting it would by hypocritical / ironic

You are easyt65. On a thread titled Trump rages as his former 'SleazeBag disbarred lawyer' spills the beans to grand jury Whataboutism is all you got? I've seen you do better, dude. Step it up.

 

[easyt65]

You are easyt65. On a thread titled Trump rages as his former 'SleazeBag disbarred lawyer' spills the beans to grand jury Whataboutism is all you got? I've seen you do better, dude. Step it up.

Pointing out the actual FACTS is all that is needed.

Actual documented history proves while falsely accusing others of doing what THEY do, Democrats are some lying, sick, incestuous, pedophile m*er f*ers.

 

[BackAgain]

Like I said, trumper would think him a god and live vicariously through his exploits, as vows before God, fidelity to a wife that had given birth to his son, within that 4 month period, don't mean sht to a trumper. eh? Just because he would do something sleazy, and pay to withhold it from the public, before the election, doesn't mean he do anything else sleazy, illegal and try to keep it hidden while in office, right?

Wipe the spittle from your phone or keyboard. Try posting again when you’re lucid.

 

[White 6]

Pointing out the actual FACTS is all that is needed.

Actual documented history proves while falsely accusing others of doing what THEY do, Democrats are some lying, sick, incestuous, pedophile m*er f*ers.

Yeah, right, and even if you have to go back 28 years to find it, and we all remember how much trouble he got into. You are not a dumb guy, by any means, so you know your are using some kind of justification, by going back to a time when close to 40% + of US population wasn't even born. It's a weak justification that still doesn't justify anything. But if it suits your partisanship, know yourself out.

 

[Winston]

No ma’am. You are a fucking imbecile.

Did you mean “either” or “whether?” You dipshit.

Who cares?

Just because your head has made a nest in your colon doesn’t mean that others emulate you.

I’m not a poser nor do I pretend to be anything. I leave that to dead scrotum shit birds like you.

Neither. But it is fun to tweak you thin-skinned pussies.

Your realm. Not mine. Not agreeing with you is a sign of intelligence.

At least the President I support can speak. Your hero, Brandon the Potato, can’t speak worth shit. At all.


Zzz.


No. He didn’t at all, really or otherwise.

You’re in full babble mode, Winnie.

Not what he said. So you’re also a liar.

He may or may not have fucked Stormy. You seem overly concerned with the size of his penis.

You’re jealous that he lasts longer than you.

You have this cute penchant for run-on babbling.

Did you mean “want?” I’m pretty sure you meant “either,” this time. Tell us more about your opinions on intelligence, Winnie.

Nope. No nexus there. What (or whether) she knew is irrelevant. Still.

Not gonna happen, pinhead.

I interrupt your wet dream to remind you that what an asshole such as you “hopes” for simply doesn’t control.

You couldn’t even pass a course in babble.

Thank you so much for proving my point. Spelling and grammar Nazi, check. I am four drinks in so sorry if I made a mistake. And I love your rebuttal to the fact that they are going to call Melania to the stand, "not going to happen", how long did it take you to come up with that bullshit? And it is complete ignorance to claim what she knew is irrelevant. Again, Trump's lawyers have admitted the payment and claim it was to keep Melania from finding out about the affair. If she knew that blows that argument all to hell, it is most certainly relevant and I swear to God, even my 14 year old grandson could figure that shit out.

 

[easyt65]

Yeah, right, and even if you have to go back 28 years to find it, and we all remember how much trouble he got into. You are not a dumb guy, by any means, so you know your are using some kind of justification, by going back to a time when close to 40% + of US population wasn't even born. It's a weak justification that still doesn't justify anything. But if it suits your partisanship, know yourself out.

You don't have to go back 28 years to see all the evidence of Democrat perversion, sickness, incest, sexual impropriety, pedophilia, etc...

The Democrats actually created a Committee whose sole reason for existing was to hide Democrat sexual harrassnent, sexual assault, and other sexual impropriety and to pay for the silence of their victims with TAX DOLLARS...

Don't try to act like this is NOT 'a huge f*in' deal' or that it never happened.

Then, as mentioned, you have high ranking Democrats (to include Biden) sexually assaulting women / interns, showeting with their daughters, screwing kids, making porn films with their family members.

Add in the Democrats killing, screwing, indoctrinating, grooming, mutilating the genitals of, groping, sniffing, and trafficking of childten...

As I accurately pointed out, recorded history - RECENT recorded history - proves Democrats are some sick, incestuous, pedophile m*er f*ers ... who attempt to distract / defend themselves by falsely accusing others of doing what THEY have done / do.

 

[White 6]

You don't have to go back 28 years to see all the evidence of Democrat perversion, sickness, incest, sexual impropriety, pedophilia, etc...

The Democrats actually created a Committee whose sole reason for existing was to hide Democrat sexual harrassnent, sexual assault, and other sexual impropriety and to pay for the silence of their victims with TAX DOLLARS...

Don't try to act like this is NOT 'a huge f*in' deal' or that it never happened.

Then, as mentioned, you have high ranking Democrats (to include Biden) sexually assaulting women / interns, showeting with their daughters, screwing kids, making porn films with their family members.

Add in the Democrats killing, screwing, indoctrinating, grooming, mutilating the genitals of, groping, sniffing, and trafficking of childten...

As I accurately pointed out, recorded history - RECENT recorded history - proves Democrats are some sick, incestuous, pedophile m*er f*ers ... who attempt to distract / defend themselves by falsely accusing others of doing what THEY have done / do.

I already recognized your "whataboutism". None of that relates to "Trump rages as his former 'SleazeBag disbarred lawyer' spills the beans to grand jury". You sure you don't have anything related to the thread to say here?

 

[BackAgain]

Thank you so much for proving my point. Spelling and grammar Nazi, check. I am four drinks in so sorry if I made a mistake.

You’re an idiot. You also can’t count. And correcting your numerous misused words, typos and grammar errors isn’t remotely akin to your moronic use of the word “Nazi.”

And I love your rebuttal to the fact that they are going to call Melania to the stand, "not going to happen"

It isn’t. Your pathetic reason for assuming she has any material or relevant evidence to offer is as nonsensical as you are.

how long did it take you to come up with that bullshit?

Correcting your bullshit is effortless and quick.

And it is complete ignorance to claim what she knew is irrelevant.

It is irrelevant. Your ignorance is astounding. But funny AF.

Again, Trump's lawyers have admitted the payment

So what?

and claim it was to keep Melania from finding out about the affair.

Ok. Again, so what?

If she knew that blows that argument all to hell,

Not if they didn’t know that she was aware of it — for example. One of many.

it is most certainly relevant

Nope. Still irrelevant.

and I swear to God, even my 14 year old grandson could figure that shit out.

Maybe the kid is as stupid as you are.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

I already recognized your "whataboutism". None of that relates to "Trump rages as his former 'SleazeBag disbarred lawyer' spills the beans to grand jury". You sure you don't have anything related to the thread to say here?

He's lucky a Mod doesn't see his off-topic posts and delete them~

 

[easyt65]

I already recognized your "whataboutism". None of that relates to "Trump rages as his former 'SleazeBag disbarred lawyer' spills the beans to grand jury". You sure you don't have anything related to the thread to say here?

It deals with Cohen and Democrats payheticaly using a disgraced
Perjurwr to go after Trump ... again...it deals with the pathetic hypocrisy and the desparation of Democrats proven to have done far worse attempting to do anytjing it takes to 'get Trump'.

 

[White 6]

It deals with Cohen and Democrats payheticaly using a disgraced
Perjurwr to go after Trump ... again...it deals with the pathetic hypocrisy and the desparation of Democrats proven to have done far worse attempting to do anytjing it takes to 'get Trump'.

Cohen was called to testify to a Grand Jury as, he had information for the grand jury relating to Person No 1 and involvement in the payoff, not prosecuted at the time as person no. 1 was a sitting president, and has direct relation to "Trump rages as his former 'SleazeBag disbarred lawyer' spills the beans to grand jury". Throwing a tantrum to change the subject of the thread will not help your outrage. Perhaps you should start a thread of your own to vent your frustration that a grand jury is looking into it, to see if there were felonies committed by anyone involved, before the statute of limitations runs out.

I point out again, since you cannot change reality and cannot change the subject of the thread from
Trump rages as his former 'SleazeBag disbarred lawyer' spills the beans to grand jury".

 

[easyt65]

Cohen was called to testify to a Grand Jury as, he had information for the grand jury relating to Person No 1 and involvement in the payoff, not prosecuted at the time as person no. 1 was a sitting president, and has direct relation to "Trump rages as his former 'SleazeBag disbarred lawyer' spills the beans to grand jury". Throwing a tantrum to change the subject of the thread will not help your outrage. Perhaps you should start a thread of your own to vent your frustration that a grand jury is looking into it, to see if there were felonies committed by anyone involved, before the statute of limitations runs out.

I point out again, since you cannot change reality and cannot change the subject of the thread from
Trump rages as his former 'SleazeBag disbarred lawyer' spills the beans to grand jury".

I agree, no.matter how much Democrats attempt to re-write history THEY CAN'T!

Trump does not need to 'rage' because Democrats are once again attempting to use a 2-time proven Perjuror / 1-time convicted Perjuror as a 'witness' agsinst Trump.

In his last 2 times used as a 'witness', under oath, against Trump, Cohen committed perjury BOTH times and went to prison for one of them.

The 2nd time Cohen committed perjury was ON HIS WAY TO PRISON.

In complete desperation Democrats attempted to use Cohen as a witness AGAIN against Trump...and it failed miserably.

Cohen was caight commiting Perjury AGAIN, and D-Adam Schiff was exoposed for having coached Cohen for 12 hours prior to is testimony.

Cohen has LESS THAN ZERO CREDIBILITY.

 

[White 6]

I agree, no.matter how much Democrats attempt to re-write history THEY CAN'T!

Trump does not need to 'rage' because Democrats are once again attempting to use a 2-time proven Perjuror / 1-time convicted Perjuror as a 'witness' agsinst Trump.

In his last 2 times used as a 'witness', under oath, against Trump, Cohen committed perjury BOTH times and went to prison for one of them.

The 2nd time Cohen committed perjury was ON HIS WAY TO PRISON.

In complete desperation Democrats attempted to use Cohen as a witness AGAIN against Trump...and it failed miserably.

Cohen was caight commiting Perjury AGAIN, and D-Adam Schiff was exoposed for having coached Cohen for 12 hours prior to is testimony.

Cohen has LESS THAN ZERO CREDIBILITY.

Agreed, but it is up to the grand jury and the process. My understanding is courts have lots of felons testify and it is up to defense to point out the flaw in the testimony and then the jury sorts it out. This isn't even the jury, yet, just the grand jury. You and I both know, Trump will rage, whether it means anything or not, so his rage is baked into the cake.

 

[easyt65]

Agreed, but it is up to the grand jury and the process. My understanding is courts have lots of felons testify and it is up to defense to point out the flaw in the testimony and then the jury sorts it out.

If I was Cohen I would refuse to be paraded in front of another court / committee again by the 'Get Trump' crowd, especially after the last 2 times went.

Defense attorneys will crucify him, destroying his credibility, easily pointing out the last 2 times he testified against Trump he committed perjury BOTH times, going to prison already for 1 of them.

Does he REALLY want to be humiliated or risk going to prison again?

 

[White 6]

If I was Cohen I would refuse to be paraded in front of another court / committee again by the 'Get Trump' crowd, especially after the last 2 times went.

Defense attorneys will crucify him, destroying his credibility, easily pointing out the last 2 times he testified against Trump he committed perjury BOTH times, going to prison already for 1 of them.

Does he REALLY want to be humiliated or risk going to prison again?

If he played it straight, it is unlikely he will go back to prison or face additional charges, no matter how much Donny rages, and probably has an agreement.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

If he played it straight, it is unlikely he will go back to prison or face additional charges, no matter how much Donny rages, and probably has an agreement.

You can bet the Fixer has an agreement.
Only issue i can see is that he's so obviously pissed at Trump--one might think that the liar would lie...to get even~

 

[easyt65]

If he played it straight, it is unlikely he will go back to prison or face additional charges, no matter how much Donny rages, and probably has an agreement.

Again, Cohen could look at a wall-mounted clock inside the court room and tell the correct time, and his testimony would not matter shit because he is a convicted perjuror with a proven criminal bias against Trump.

 

[basquebromance]

 

[White 6]

You can bet the Fixer has an agreement.
Only issue i can see is that he's so obviously pissed at Trump--one might think that the liar would lie...to get even~

Yep, and that is what the 12 people got to figure out, if it goes that far.

 

[White 6]

Again, Cohen could look at a wall-mounted clock inside the court room and tell the correct time, and his testimony would not matter shit because he is a convicted perjuror with a proven criminal bias against Trump.

I'm pretty sure defense lawyers would make that line of attack on his credibility, unless Donny uses the same type of lawyers he used after the 2020, when he thought the matter would be decided by public opinion instead of real legal work with facts and evidence in front of a judge, instead of lawyers declining to even admit they were charging fraud. I figure he'll used real lawyers if it happens as it is not about staying in office or retiring to the golf club, but going to the golf club or possibly going to jail. Who knows? If it went to trial, and he actually beat the payoff wrap, he would have a stick to beat up on the Dems without end. I think he would use real lawyers instead of incompetent hacks that volunteered, even if he had to pay for his on legal bills for a change.