So you are either going to give credit to the performance of the economy of the sitting president or you are not for ANY president. You can't have it both ways.
I've said that if you give me $10T in debt, I promise you I would have the economy BOOMING. Would it be a legitimate economy or a paper tiger in which I toss future generations under the bus for todays trip to the trough? Obama lost hundreds of thousands of manufacturing jobs while Trump added. This is not a coincidence based on Trumps focus on manufacturing. With high consumer and business confidence comes investment in actually making things.
Performance is measured by performing. Trump has done almost nothing that can be directly linked, as cause and effect, to the creation of hundreds of thousands of jobs.
And exactly what is it that Obama did to improve the economy? As Romney said in his campaign against Obama, it's not the governments job to create jobs...that is precisely what he tried to do, with money he didn't have! The establishment knows it, but they want some of this money to hand out too, Trump isn't going to follow that.
I will tell you how Obama's policies helped...his friends and donors.
He took all of the debt that the former entire history of American presidents had taken to accumulate and he doubled it. Yes, that's right, doubled the entire National debt in eight short years, what took a couple of hundred to create.
Then, rather than invest in infrastructure and improving American efficiency he gave the money to failed businesses and others who couldn't compete against China or were skirting the rules. He invested in pet projects and propping up failed businesses. He didn't want to confront the cash cow that is China while Americans were having their jobs exported, no, that would take leadership and tell company leaders that empowering the enemy is not good for America. So he simply borrowed like a drunk sailor and handed the money out. This is the biggest threat to American sovereignty, it's National debt. It jeopardizes everything, including maintaining the U.S greenback as the global standard, we already saw B.R.I.C try and push an alternative global dollar standard.
So, I do not dislike Obama, I don't think he was a bad man, but he was a poor economist. His first couple of years he righted a ship, but he didn't address the underlying problems, not at all. The economy was heavily regulate and inefficient, not allowed to let loose. He did this because his choices were nothing more than borrowing to his hearts content while holding noone to account. Bush had his DOJ go after crooked CEO's, did Obama? I hope he did.
In short, he was not responsible at all for the economy artificially looking good, your grandkids were responsible, after all, they were funding it.