Trump offers a compromise with PP

[Luddly Neddite]

“Planned Parenthood says it rejected the informal offer, noting that federal funds cannot be used for abortions anyway.”

Which is like saying people on Federal assistance do not spend their money on booze or drugs instead of food.

No, it enables them to splurge on unnecessary items.

https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...od-keep-federal-funding-if-it-halts-abortions

Fascist.

MYOB

 

[OldLady]

Trump offers Planned Parenthood funds if it halts abortions

Sounds good to me!

That's not a compromise. That's arm twisting, which PP will not succumb to.

Then lose the money. It's the taxpayers money not PPs. Elections have consequences and this is one of them. PP will fold - it's always about the money.

Abortion is a legal medical procedure. Tax payers don't have any business deciding which legal medical procedures they will fund and which they won't. Your side will not get away with this.

Tax payers have every right to decide how tax dollars are spent. Your days of telling Americans what they will and must do are over.

It is your side trying to tell American women what they will and must do with their bodies and their lives. It's not going to go over well. Just warning ya.

 

[emilynghiem]

“Planned Parenthood says it rejected the informal offer, noting that federal funds cannot be used for abortions anyway.”

Which is like saying people on Federal assistance do not spend their money on booze or drugs instead of food.

No, it enables them to splurge on unnecessary items.

https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...od-keep-federal-funding-if-it-halts-abortions

Weatherman2020
Let taxpayers CHOOSE by a system of matching funds.

Promote the Nurturing Network model as an equal recipient to match federal funds like Planned Parenthood gets.
Let taxpayers donate to the programs of their choice, and then match those with federal funds.

No one is keeping you from donating your entire wealth to PP.

Dear Weatherman2020 That's right
Why not set up separate tax options where citizens can CHOOSE
whether to fund Right to Life or Right to Health Care.
Since these are both beliefs, people should have a choice
what policies to fund and to be under. Exactly.

This also goes for funding life in prison or the death penalty.
Why not reward states that reduce their crime rates and costs
by investing those resources into health care and medical education and services.

Under RICO victims of trafficking and organized crime can claim restitution
such as property and assets used in the criminal activities.

why not apply this to seize resources back from crime
and invest in education and services that prevent crime
by breaking the cycle of poverty addiction and abuse?

 

[Weatherman2020]

“Planned Parenthood says it rejected the informal offer, noting that federal funds cannot be used for abortions anyway.”

Which is like saying people on Federal assistance do not spend their money on booze or drugs instead of food.

No, it enables them to splurge on unnecessary items.

https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...od-keep-federal-funding-if-it-halts-abortions

Fascist.

MYOB

Too bad leftists give so little to charity, they could fund abortions.

 

[Weatherman2020]

“Planned Parenthood says it rejected the informal offer, noting that federal funds cannot be used for abortions anyway.”

Which is like saying people on Federal assistance do not spend their money on booze or drugs instead of food.

No, it enables them to splurge on unnecessary items.

https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...od-keep-federal-funding-if-it-halts-abortions

Weatherman2020
Let taxpayers CHOOSE by a system of matching funds.

Promote the Nurturing Network model as an equal recipient to match federal funds like Planned Parenthood gets.
Let taxpayers donate to the programs of their choice, and then match those with federal funds.

No one is keeping you from donating your entire wealth to PP.

Dear Weatherman2020 That's right
Why not set up separate tax options where citizens can CHOOSE
whether to fund Right to Life or Right to Health Care.
Since these are both beliefs, people should have a choice
what policies to fund and to be under. Exactly.

This also goes for funding life in prison or the death penalty.
Why not reward states that reduce their crime rates and costs
by investing those resources into health care and medical education and services.

Under RICO victims of trafficking and organized crime can claim restitution
such as property and assets used in the criminal activities.

why not apply this to seize resources back from crime
and invest in education and services that prevent crime?

Speaking of leftists who have no desire to give to charities.

 

[emilynghiem]

“Planned Parenthood says it rejected the informal offer, noting that federal funds cannot be used for abortions anyway.”

Which is like saying people on Federal assistance do not spend their money on booze or drugs instead of food.

No, it enables them to splurge on unnecessary items.

https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...od-keep-federal-funding-if-it-halts-abortions

Fascist.

MYOB

^ If public tax money is used
it IS Weatherman2020's equal business if he pays taxes ^

Are you going to play the Fascist and decide
who gets to decide where "other peoples" taxes go?
Luddly Neddite

Love and hugs from Emily
Can we be friends yet?

 

[DOTR]

“Planned Parenthood says it rejected the informal offer, noting that federal funds cannot be used for abortions anyway.”

Which is like saying people on Federal assistance do not spend their money on booze or drugs instead of food.

No, it enables them to splurge on unnecessary items.

https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...od-keep-federal-funding-if-it-halts-abortions

So, uh, all that stuff about contraceptives and family planning and women's health *arent* that important to them. At least not if it slows the abortion train.
Planned Parenthood is exclusively about abortions. McAbortions would be a better name. The rest is window dressing to cover that fact.

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

Trump offers Planned Parenthood funds if it halts abortions

Sounds good to me!

That's not a compromise. That's arm twisting, which PP will not succumb to.

Then lose the money. It's the taxpayers money not PPs. Elections have consequences and this is one of them. PP will fold - it's always about the money.

Abortion is a legal medical procedure. Tax payers don't have any business deciding which legal medical procedures they will fund and which they won't. Your side will not get away with this.

Tax payers have every right to decide how tax dollars are spent. Your days of telling Americans what they will and must do are over.

It is your side trying to tell American women what they will and must do with their bodies and their lives. It's not going to go over well. Just warning ya.

You are incorrect. WE are not telling women what to do with their bodies. They are free to do as they please and accept the consequences for their decisions. WE ARE no longer going to pay for those consequences, however.

 

[2aguy]

There is no place or circumstance where tax payers pay for abortions.

No one is killing "babies".

No one has the right to force women to reproduce.

MYOB

No one is forcing women to reproduce....not allowing them to kill their baby is not forcing them to reproduce, it is preventing them from killing their baby....

 

[Weatherman2020]

“Planned Parenthood says it rejected the informal offer, noting that federal funds cannot be used for abortions anyway.”

Which is like saying people on Federal assistance do not spend their money on booze or drugs instead of food.

No, it enables them to splurge on unnecessary items.

https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...od-keep-federal-funding-if-it-halts-abortions

Fascist.

MYOB

^ If public tax money is used
it IS Weatherman2020's equal business if he pays taxes ^

Are you going to play the Fascist and decide
who gets to decide where "other peoples" taxes go?
Luddly Neddite

Love and hugs from Emily
Can we be friends yet?

PP is a private company. Dufus thinks taxpayers owe them money.

 

[Weatherman2020]

“Planned Parenthood says it rejected the informal offer, noting that federal funds cannot be used for abortions anyway.”

Which is like saying people on Federal assistance do not spend their money on booze or drugs instead of food.

No, it enables them to splurge on unnecessary items.

https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...od-keep-federal-funding-if-it-halts-abortions

So, uh, all that stuff about contraceptives and family planning and women's health *arent* that important to them. At least not if it slows the abortion train.
Planned Parenthood is exclusively about abortions. McAbortions would be a better name. The rest is window dressing to cover that fact.

Yep. They will provide things like breast exams - with not one mammography machine owned.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Trump offers Planned Parenthood funds if it halts abortions

Sounds good to me!

That's not a compromise. That's arm twisting, which PP will not succumb to.

Then lose the money. It's the taxpayers money not PPs. Elections have consequences and this is one of them. PP will fold - it's always about the money.

Abortion is a legal medical procedure. Tax payers don't have any business deciding which legal medical procedures they will fund and which they won't. Your side will not get away with this.

Tax payers have every right to decide how tax dollars are spent. Your days of telling Americans what they will and must do are over.

We live in a republic, which we the people elect to do the people's business. We also have a Constitution, one which provides on checks and balances on the POTUS and The Congress. A process umpired by a Judiciary which is supposed to be impartial:

Sadly, it too has become more and more political.

It is past time for the Supreme Court to promulgate a Code of Ethics, as have all other judges and justices who preside in the lesser courts of our nation. Too often justices of the Supreme Court have Conflicts of Interests, which though denied impact their judgment and decisions.

That's not a compromise. That's arm twisting, which PP will not succumb to.

Then lose the money. It's the taxpayers money not PPs. Elections have consequences and this is one of them. PP will fold - it's always about the money.

Abortion is a legal medical procedure. Tax payers don't have any business deciding which legal medical procedures they will fund and which they won't. Your side will not get away with this.

Tax payers have every right to decide how tax dollars are spent. Your days of telling Americans what they will and must do are over.

It is your side trying to tell American women what they will and must do with their bodies and their lives. It's not going to go over well. Just warning ya.

You are incorrect. WE are not telling women what to do with their bodies. They are free to do as they please and accept the consequences for their decisions. WE ARE no longer going to pay for those consequences, however.

That's not a compromise. That's arm twisting, which PP will not succumb to.

Then lose the money. It's the taxpayers money not PPs. Elections have consequences and this is one of them. PP will fold - it's always about the money.

Abortion is a legal medical procedure. Tax payers don't have any business deciding which legal medical procedures they will fund and which they won't. Your side will not get away with this.

Tax payers have every right to decide how tax dollars are spent. Your days of telling Americans what they will and must do are over.

It is your side trying to tell American women what they will and must do with their bodies and their lives. It's not going to go over well. Just warning ya.

You are incorrect. WE are not telling women what to do with their bodies. They are free to do as they please and accept the consequences for their decisions. WE ARE no longer going to pay for those consequences, however.

 

[Rob37]

Such bullshit. To the extent that federal funding allows PP to pay their rent and light bills it is funding abortion.

 

[Weatherman2020]

For years, Planned Parenthood has claimed that abortions only account for 3 percent of their services. That means 97 percent of their services would continue to receive federal funding.

 

[Wry Catcher]

That's not a compromise. That's arm twisting, which PP will not succumb to.

Then lose the money. It's the taxpayers money not PPs. Elections have consequences and this is one of them. PP will fold - it's always about the money.

Abortion is a legal medical procedure. Tax payers don't have any business deciding which legal medical procedures they will fund and which they won't. Your side will not get away with this.

Tax payers have every right to decide how tax dollars are spent. Your days of telling Americans what they will and must do are over.

It is your side trying to tell American women what they will and must do with their bodies and their lives. It's not going to go over well. Just warning ya.

You are incorrect. WE are not telling women what to do with their bodies. They are free to do as they please and accept the consequences for their decisions. WE ARE no longer going to pay for those consequences, however.

Are you aware of the Hyde Amendment?

"In U.S. politics, the Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision barring the use of certain federal funds to pay for abortion except to save the life of the woman, or if the pregnancy arises from incest or rape.

Do you believe a women raped should be required to go full term, delivery a baby and provide for its support until it reaches maturity?

 

[DOTR]

Planned Parenthood exists to (1) abort babies and sell the parts and (2) suck up federal funding.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Such bullshit. To the extent that federal funding allows PP to pay their rent and light bills it is funding abortion.

It's like having the government paying your mortgage and car payments but not the vacations you take with that extra cash in your pocket.

 

[DOTR]

Trump exceeds all expectations. Instead of attacking the abortionists as the Republican losers did for decades he exposes their real agenda with one beautiful offer. The man will be the greatest President since Reagan.

 

[2aguy]

Trump offers Planned Parenthood funds if it halts abortions

Sounds good to me!

That's not a compromise. That's arm twisting, which PP will not succumb to.

Then lose the money. It's the taxpayers money not PPs. Elections have consequences and this is one of them. PP will fold - it's always about the money.

Abortion is a legal medical procedure. Tax payers don't have any business deciding which legal medical procedures they will fund and which they won't. Your side will not get away with this.

Tax payers have every right to decide how tax dollars are spent. Your days of telling Americans what they will and must do are over.

We live in a republic, which we the people elect to do the people's business. We also have a Constitution, one which provides on checks and balances on the POTUS and The Congress. A process umpired by a Judiciary which is supposed to be impartial:

Sadly, it too has become more and more political.

It is past time for the Supreme Court to promulgate a Code of Ethics, as have all other judges and justices who preside in the lesser courts of our nation. Too often justices of the Supreme Court have Conflicts of Interests, which though denied impact their judgment and decisions.

Then lose the money. It's the taxpayers money not PPs. Elections have consequences and this is one of them. PP will fold - it's always about the money.

Abortion is a legal medical procedure. Tax payers don't have any business deciding which legal medical procedures they will fund and which they won't. Your side will not get away with this.

Tax payers have every right to decide how tax dollars are spent. Your days of telling Americans what they will and must do are over.

It is your side trying to tell American women what they will and must do with their bodies and their lives. It's not going to go over well. Just warning ya.

You are incorrect. WE are not telling women what to do with their bodies. They are free to do as they please and accept the consequences for their decisions. WE ARE no longer going to pay for those consequences, however.

Then lose the money. It's the taxpayers money not PPs. Elections have consequences and this is one of them. PP will fold - it's always about the money.

Abortion is a legal medical procedure. Tax payers don't have any business deciding which legal medical procedures they will fund and which they won't. Your side will not get away with this.

Tax payers have every right to decide how tax dollars are spent. Your days of telling Americans what they will and must do are over.

It is your side trying to tell American women what they will and must do with their bodies and their lives. It's not going to go over well. Just warning ya.

You are incorrect. WE are not telling women what to do with their bodies. They are free to do as they please and accept the consequences for their decisions. WE ARE no longer going to pay for those consequences, however.

And that is why left wingers should not be judges.....I agree with you.....

 

[2aguy]

Then lose the money. It's the taxpayers money not PPs. Elections have consequences and this is one of them. PP will fold - it's always about the money.

Abortion is a legal medical procedure. Tax payers don't have any business deciding which legal medical procedures they will fund and which they won't. Your side will not get away with this.

Tax payers have every right to decide how tax dollars are spent. Your days of telling Americans what they will and must do are over.

It is your side trying to tell American women what they will and must do with their bodies and their lives. It's not going to go over well. Just warning ya.

You are incorrect. WE are not telling women what to do with their bodies. They are free to do as they please and accept the consequences for their decisions. WE ARE no longer going to pay for those consequences, however.

Are you aware of the Hyde Amendment?

"In U.S. politics, the Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision barring the use of certain federal funds to pay for abortion except to save the life of the woman, or if the pregnancy arises from incest or rape.

Do you believe a women raped should be required to go full term, delivery a baby and provide for its support until it reaches maturity?

Yes.......since most of you left wingers are against the death penalty for actual murderers...it is always funny when you justify the death penalty for a baby who committed no crime......while you won't give the death penalty to the actual rapist.