Trump not a convicted felon.

[Godboy]

I get that when it comes to debates (maybe), but there's no way Trump isn't crushing the campaign trail all the way to November.

Youll see less of them. He WILL be going into blue states though.

 

[Delldude]

Trump Lawyer Argues Fake Electors Were “Official” Presidential Act

Donald Trump is already using the Supreme Court immunity ruling exactly how you’d expect.

newrepublic.com

Will Scharf

You just did it again......................stick with the facts instead of distorting them:

The Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity means that the president can attempt to overturn elections, according to one of Trump’s lawyers.

Get back to me after the ruling.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Youll see less of them. He WILL be going into blue states though.

I won't be seeing any less of him, of that I can assure you.

And yes.

Yes he will.

In fact?

Already has?

 

[Rogue AI]

Convicted by a jury of his peers

Convicted felon

Juries don't convict, they determine innocence or guilt. The power to convict lies with the state. How else would plea bargains work? I get it though, you folks have hit a rough patch, you must cling to something as your dreams of a 2024 victory circle the drain.

 

[Delldude]

You do get it's a LONG way to November, right??
Just like 2020.

Good point.................Biden's donor's, 25 plus democrats (and Growing) calling for Biden to pull the E handle, and you're crowing................

 

[ThisIsMe]

Really?

hilarious

Sure…is it not accurate?

 

[JoeB131]

Jack Smith was never confirmed by the Senate.
All of his indictments are illegitimate.

Special prosecutors don't have to be confirmed by the Senate.

 

[Delldude]

Special prosecutors don't have to be confirmed by the Senate.

Not according to several very well researched challenges before SCOTUS.

 

[JoeB131]

Not according to several very well researched challenges before SCOTUS.

Okay, and when they make a ruling, let me know, but no Special Prosecutor has ever been appointed by Congress before.

The problem here is that you will just leave prosecution of high officials to a partisan DOJ. Frankly, I would have been fine with that, rather than appointing a Special Prosecutor, just hand the prosecution of Trump to DOJ prosecutors, he had no immunity at that point not being president anymore.

 

[Delldude]

Okay, and when they make a ruling, let me know, but no Special Prosecutor has ever been appointed by Congress before.

Are you admitting these appointments haven't been done 'by the book'?

The problem here is that you will just leave prosecution of high officials to a partisan DOJ.

Partisan DOJ? It is my understanding that DOJ personnel put their politics in their back pockets, so to speak. God forbid anything different.

Any comment on, say , DOJ created policy regarding prosecuting a sitting president, for example, and the recent Chevron ruling?

I can't find anything in COTUS supporting that, for instance.

 

[Lesh]

Juries don't convict, they determine innocence or guilt. The power to convict lies with the state. How else would plea bargains work? I get it though, you folks have hit a rough patch, you must cling to something as your dreams of a 2024 victory circle the drain.

So he’s guilty. Does that make you feel better?

 

[Rogue AI]

So he’s guilty. Does that make you feel better?

Being factually makes me feel better. One should not wallow in ignorance.

 

[Delldude]

So he’s guilty. Does that make you feel better?

Due to a recent SCOTUS ruling, He may get a new trial, or, for the left, worse, totally get off, then that would put your 'theory' out the window.

 

[Delldude]

So he’s guilty.

The judge has to accept that verdict.

 

[JoeB131]

Are you admitting these appointments haven't been done 'by the book'?

Nope, they've been done exactly by the book. We've been doing it this way since Watergate, and it has mostly worked out okay. Some of these guys get a little silly, like Ken Starr, but for the most part, they work. Certainly better than the alternative.

Partisan DOJ? It is my understanding that DOJ personnel put their politics in their back pockets, so to speak. God forbid anything different.

The point of special prosecutors was to have someone who was separate from the DOJ. Imagine if a DOJ hack declared Biden did nothing wrong with the handling of documents or had given Hunter a sweetheart deal on his gun charge.

Any comment on, say , DOJ created policy regarding prosecuting a sitting president, for example, and the recent Chevron ruling?

I can't find anything in COTUS supporting that, for instance.

The recent Chevron ruling was crap... pretty much giving big business a right to pollute your water.

 

[Delldude]

Nope, they've been done exactly by the book. We've been doing it this way since Watergate, and it has mostly worked out okay.

Looking more and more like a violation of the SP&P manual.

The recent Chevron ruling was crap... pretty much giving big business a right to pollute your water.

Crap?

Kicked the administrative right in the balls for creating and enforcing all types of 'law'.

or had given Hunter a sweetheart deal on his gun charge.

Well that happened already and little Hunter was thrown under the bus...........didn't get the memo?

 

[Delldude]

trump has been convicted by a jury of his peers, he is a convicted felon.

Juries don't convict............only find guilt..........a judge has to accept or reject their verdict.

Try again.

 

[JoeB131]

Kicked the administrative right in the balls for creating and enforcing all types of 'law'.

Not sure why you are so keen to drink polluted water!

"Dun, der, Cleetus, I don't want no administrative state telling me that I can't drink polluted water!!!"

 

[Delldude]

"Dun, der, Cleetus, I don't want no administrative state telling me that I can't drink polluted water!!!"

There's no issue with that, the issue is them creating and enforcing law. Last I checked, that was congresses job.

 

[Dante]

Okay, and when they make a ruling, let me know, but no Special Prosecutor has ever been appointed by Congress before.

The problem here is that you will just leave prosecution of high officials to a partisan DOJ. Frankly, I would have been fine with that, rather than appointing a Special Prosecutor, just hand the prosecution of Trump to DOJ prosecutors, he had no immunity at that point not being president anymore.

Challenges? Tell that dope, most go where this one is going -- nowhere.