Trump needs to come off more professional, but Chris Wallace was a disgrace.

Yeah, "we" did use HCL. By "we" I mean the vast majority of doctors around the country who prescribed it for themselves, especially those on the front lines.

LOL...I don't think you understand the article, which is full of holes by the way.

Hydroxychloroquine was overall chosen as the most effective therapy amongst COVID-19 treaters from a list of 15 options (37% of COVID-19 treaters).

Doctors were able to choose more than one option when selecting which treatment was most effective, meaning that the 37% who selected hydroxychloroquine may have also selected another treatment as well. Other treatment options in the survey included zinc tablets, analgesics, anti-HIV medications and "nothing."

The answer U.S. doctors selected most often was actually "nothing," with 51% of doctors choosing this option.


So about 1/2 of the doctors chose "nothing" as to which treatment was most effective. "Nothing" isn't really an answer at all unless they had tried all other 15 treatments. It would stand to reason that many, if not most of these had not tried HCL as a treatment. 37% chose HCL, which is quite a high number as probably no more than 37% could even get their hands on the stuff as prescriptions were not being filled in the US. Who knows just how accessible it was in the other 29 countries. The questionnaire didn't ask them if they had even tried HCL as a treatment but simply which treatment is best(out of 15). A combination of HCL and azithromycin is effective. To much money in big pharma and too much political crap at play to say this out loud.

Leave it up to you idiot TDS monkeys not to even understand what the crap you post.
 
Yeah, "we" did use HCL. By "we" I mean the vast majority of doctors around the country who prescribed it for themselves, especially those on the front lines.

LOL...I don't think you understand the article, which is full of holes by the way.

Hydroxychloroquine was overall chosen as the most effective therapy amongst COVID-19 treaters from a list of 15 options (37% of COVID-19 treaters).

Doctors were able to choose more than one option when selecting which treatment was most effective, meaning that the 37% who selected hydroxychloroquine may have also selected another treatment as well. Other treatment options in the survey included zinc tablets, analgesics, anti-HIV medications and "nothing."

The answer U.S. doctors selected most often was actually "nothing," with 51% of doctors choosing this option.


So about 1/2 of the doctors chose "nothing" as to which treatment was most effective. "Nothing" isn't really an answer at all unless they had tried all other 15 treatments. It would stand to reason that many, if not most of these had not tried HCL as a treatment. 37% chose HCL, which is quite a high number as probably no more than 37% could even get their hands on the stuff as prescriptions were not being filled in the US. Who knows just how accessible it was in the other 29 countries. The questionnaire didn't ask them if they had even tried HCL as a treatment but simply which treatment is best(out of 15). A combination of HCL and azithromycin is effective. To much money in big pharma and too much political crap at play to say this out loud.

Leave it up to you idiot TDS monkeys not to even understand what the crap you post.

All you have done is skew your opinion onto the data available. You haven't refuted it with evidence of your own. You state that in your opinion the 51% stands to reason they haven't tried it. Really? Where is your evidence? In my world view they might have tried it and found it not to work. They might not have tried it because they think it is a sham. You say I don't understand. Maybe, maybe not. I tell you what I don't do. I don't make shit up on the fly without it to back it up like the Trumptard Deplorable loser you are.
 
Yeah, "we" did use HCL. By "we" I mean the vast majority of doctors around the country who prescribed it for themselves, especially those on the front lines.

LOL...I don't think you understand the article, which is full of holes by the way.

Hydroxychloroquine was overall chosen as the most effective therapy amongst COVID-19 treaters from a list of 15 options (37% of COVID-19 treaters).

Doctors were able to choose more than one option when selecting which treatment was most effective, meaning that the 37% who selected hydroxychloroquine may have also selected another treatment as well. Other treatment options in the survey included zinc tablets, analgesics, anti-HIV medications and "nothing."

The answer U.S. doctors selected most often was actually "nothing," with 51% of doctors choosing this option.


So about 1/2 of the doctors chose "nothing" as to which treatment was most effective. "Nothing" isn't really an answer at all unless they had tried all other 15 treatments. It would stand to reason that many, if not most of these had not tried HCL as a treatment. 37% chose HCL, which is quite a high number as probably no more than 37% could even get their hands on the stuff as prescriptions were not being filled in the US. Who knows just how accessible it was in the other 29 countries. The questionnaire didn't ask them if they had even tried HCL as a treatment but simply which treatment is best(out of 15). A combination of HCL and azithromycin is effective. To much money in big pharma and too much political crap at play to say this out loud.

Leave it up to you idiot TDS monkeys not to even understand what the crap you post.

All you have done is skew your opinion onto the data available. You haven't refuted it with evidence of your own. You state that in your opinion the 51% stands to reason they haven't tried it. Really? Where is your evidence? In my world view they might have tried it and found it not to work. They might not have tried it because they think it is a sham. You say I don't understand. Maybe, maybe not. I tell you what I don't do. I don't make shit up on the fly without it to back it up like the Trumptard Deplorable loser you are.

Only an idiot would think that all 51% had tried all 15 drugs listed....but then again, you are a Biden supporter so that explains quite a bit. 37% is actually a very good number in support of HCL. If moron Democrats wouldn't have thrown such a tantrum when Trump mentioned it several months ago, more lives could have been saved. We all know it isn't about saving lives to Democrats, it is about winning the election and getting their way.
 
Only an idiot would think that all 51% had tried all 15 drugs listed....but then again, you are a Biden supporter so that explains quite a bit. 37% is actually a very good number in support of HCL. If moron Democrats wouldn't have thrown such a tantrum when Trump mentioned it several months ago, more lives could have been saved. We all know it isn't about saving lives to Democrats, it is about winning the election and getting their way.

I don't support either of them. I think they are both underwhelming. However, Biden is a lot better than Trump just by virtue of Trump being such a piece of shit. And no, this isn't a recent opinion by me, I have thought Trump was a piece of shit long before he became a politician. Things are that bad, that somebody like Biden is better than Trump. Unbelievable.

I have no idea if the 51 per cent have tried all the 15 drugs listed. Maybe they tried 7 including Hydro and found it wanting. Maybe it was 5. I don't know. Thing is, neither do you. It wasn't so much that Trump mentioned it, it was how he mentioned it - ie, he didn't have a clue (yet again). He is such a dumbfuck, as is anybody who would vote for the fat piece of shit.
 
Hey, at least he asked Americans to watch the polls.
The same kind of Americans Rudy asked to watch the polls in 1993?

https://www.democracynow.org/2020/9/30/trump_biden_debate_white_supremacists

"I recall, clearly, back in 1993 in a mayoral election in New York City, when Rudy Giuliani was attempting to unseat David Dinkins, who was then the first African American mayor in the city, and there were literally hundreds of off-duty police officers and off-duty correction officers who Giuliani mobilized to go into the Black and Latino neighborhoods of New York to intimidate the voters.

"And I remember, the night of the election, asking the campaign manager of David Dinkins, Bill Lynch — I said, 'Bill, why aren’t you protesting this? We’re getting all these reports.'

"And it was a very close election, but Lynch and the Democratic machinery at that time basically accepted the result, even though they knew that there was massive intimidation occurring."

What actions would these "poll watchers" take in order to preserve the integrity of the vote?
 
EjLfT8nXgAAB95r
 
Hey, at least he asked Americans to watch the polls.
The same kind of Americans Rudy asked to watch the polls in 1993?

https://www.democracynow.org/2020/9/30/trump_biden_debate_white_supremacists

"I recall, clearly, back in 1993 in a mayoral election in New York City, when Rudy Giuliani was attempting to unseat David Dinkins, who was then the first African American mayor in the city, and there were literally hundreds of off-duty police officers and off-duty correction officers who Giuliani mobilized to go into the Black and Latino neighborhoods of New York to intimidate the voters.

"And I remember, the night of the election, asking the campaign manager of David Dinkins, Bill Lynch — I said, 'Bill, why aren’t you protesting this? We’re getting all these reports.'

"And it was a very close election, but Lynch and the Democratic machinery at that time basically accepted the result, even though they knew that there was massive intimidation occurring."

What actions would these "poll watchers" take in order to preserve the integrity of the vote?

Yeah, I'm sure that's what Rudy did. Recall is not having evidence. Remember too that Biden basically said the same thing, that they will be watching the polls.
 
And he never once asked Biden of his past remarks like poor kids can be just as bright as white kids. Or the Republican's want to put y'all back in chains. Or of Obama when he referred to him as clean.

Because all those issues were litigated. LIke it or not, any dumb thing he said 40 years ago is offset by 40 years of good work.

Good work at what? Besides using his VP position to make his family rich, he hasn't accomplished a thing in over 45 years. And his "put y'all back in chains" comment was made eight years ago. His comment about Obama was made when he won the primaries.
 
In spite of his pre-debate claims that Biden would be drugged for the debate, it appeared that Trump was the one who was unable to control himself.

Like a child who was off ADD drugs, Trump repeatedly spewed a stream of consciousness and invectives.
Nice attempt to float a conspiracy theory.
what of Trump's conspiracy theory of biden using imaginary drugs. Did that bother you? Not. LOL

I don't buy that either. Initially, when it started I thought he was looking for medication reactions/side effects, etc. and so on. But, no. Of course not.
 
I am voting for Trump. However, this may surprise you, I think Joe Biden did better than expected and he probably came off better. Trump had some great moments, one that touched me was forest management in California, because it is true. I give props to Biden, he did good. Trump had his good moments. What was disgraceful was I am trying to figure out who President Trump was debating - Chris Wallace or Joe Biden. It is clear that Chris spent a great deal of time on his knees in front of Joe Biden's zipper. Biden was able to interrupt, but the problem is, Biden's dick was too far down Wallace's throat for him to be fair and down the middle.

What I find interesting is, at first Wallace tried to establish himself as objective, and non-partisan, but as the debate progressed, Wallace was debating Trump as much as Biden was debating him, and it turned into a 2 on 1 debacle. In SPITE of that, I feel Trump could have conducted himself in a manner to overcome not only Biden, but that democrat operative with a press pass, Chris Wallace, and that is where Trump failed.

Trump had some great moments, but seriously, in the next debate he needs to be more substantive. I don't think Biden did any better as far as substance, I mean really, he's talking up the green new deal, then he says he doesn't endorse it? WTF. In conclusion, if you like the bar room brawler, Trump won. Unfortunately, Biden came off as more personable.


I mostly agree, however, Donald Trump must be Donald Trump at all times. Trump is an apex predator—an alpha of alpha wolves—and that is exactly what I and millions of other Americans respect most about him. If DT changes his personality artificially at the last moment . . . in the final hours . . . he will pay dearly. Wallace, however, was one hundred percent anti-Trump—stunningly so in fact. The way I see it EVERYONE is against our President or rather everyone who matters. They say no man is an island. I disagree. Donald John Trump is the island of man.

Anyone who stands up to Trump's bullying and asks tough questions of Trump is anti-Trump. Wallace was a professional newsman. That is why you don't like him.
They are whining because Wallace refused to give Trump soft-ball questions...waaa..
Do you mean like he gave to Biden? Wallace let Biden get away without answering questions asked by the President He interrupted, saying "moving on". Wallace wouldn't take up the issue of the 2nd Amendment.
 
I am voting for Trump. However, this may surprise you, I think Joe Biden did better than expected and he probably came off better. Trump had some great moments, one that touched me was forest management in California, because it is true. I give props to Biden, he did good. Trump had his good moments. What was disgraceful was I am trying to figure out who President Trump was debating - Chris Wallace or Joe Biden. It is clear that Chris spent a great deal of time on his knees in front of Joe Biden's zipper. Biden was able to interrupt, but the problem is, Biden's dick was too far down Wallace's throat for him to be fair and down the middle.

What I find interesting is, at first Wallace tried to establish himself as objective, and non-partisan, but as the debate progressed, Wallace was debating Trump as much as Biden was debating him, and it turned into a 2 on 1 debacle. In SPITE of that, I feel Trump could have conducted himself in a manner to overcome not only Biden, but that democrat operative with a press pass, Chris Wallace, and that is where Trump failed.

Trump had some great moments, but seriously, in the next debate he needs to be more substantive. I don't think Biden did any better as far as substance, I mean really, he's talking up the green new deal, then he says he doesn't endorse it? WTF. In conclusion, if you like the bar room brawler, Trump won. Unfortunately, Biden came off as more personable.

You are wrong on Wallace His performance was solid. The reason Trump and Wallace were interacting was because Trump was trying to take over the debate. Wallace had a duty to push back and keep the debate on track. Wallace did the right thing. Wallace was not acting like a democrat operative. That is so much bullshit.


Yeah right....Wallace performance was "very solid".....:rolleyes-41:

We all knew exactly what side he was on. It was disgusting.


1601520886822.png
 
I don't agree that Trump needs to "come off more professional".

Trump is the way he is, and that's the way he is liked and admired by all! :thup:

He came off the way he needed to come off.

Best President ever!:clap:




Wallace, on the other hand was a total disgrace, I agree with that.
 
Only an idiot would think that all 51% had tried all 15 drugs listed....but then again, you are a Biden supporter so that explains quite a bit. 37% is actually a very good number in support of HCL. If moron Democrats wouldn't have thrown such a tantrum when Trump mentioned it several months ago, more lives could have been saved. We all know it isn't about saving lives to Democrats, it is about winning the election and getting their way.

I don't support either of them. I think they are both underwhelming. However, Biden is a lot better than Trump just by virtue of Trump being such a piece of shit. And no, this isn't a recent opinion by me, I have thought Trump was a piece of shit long before he became a politician. Things are that bad, that somebody like Biden is better than Trump. Unbelievable.

I have no idea if the 51 per cent have tried all the 15 drugs listed. Maybe they tried 7 including Hydro and found it wanting. Maybe it was 5. I don't know. Thing is, neither do you. It wasn't so much that Trump mentioned it, it was how he mentioned it - ie, he didn't have a clue (yet again). He is such a dumbfuck, as is anybody who would vote for the fat piece of shit.

Sounds like you don’t like Trump, the man. I don’t like many of his personality traits, but I agree with the vast majority of his policies and he has gotten quite a bit done in 4 years. I fear that some are willing to sell the country to the left-wing Socialists/Marxists simply because they don’t like Trump’s demeanor. To me, that is just plain childish.
 
Only an idiot would think that all 51% had tried all 15 drugs listed....but then again, you are a Biden supporter so that explains quite a bit. 37% is actually a very good number in support of HCL. If moron Democrats wouldn't have thrown such a tantrum when Trump mentioned it several months ago, more lives could have been saved. We all know it isn't about saving lives to Democrats, it is about winning the election and getting their way.

I don't support either of them. I think they are both underwhelming. However, Biden is a lot better than Trump just by virtue of Trump being such a piece of shit. And no, this isn't a recent opinion by me, I have thought Trump was a piece of shit long before he became a politician. Things are that bad, that somebody like Biden is better than Trump. Unbelievable.

I have no idea if the 51 per cent have tried all the 15 drugs listed. Maybe they tried 7 including Hydro and found it wanting. Maybe it was 5. I don't know. Thing is, neither do you. It wasn't so much that Trump mentioned it, it was how he mentioned it - ie, he didn't have a clue (yet again). He is such a dumbfuck, as is anybody who would vote for the fat piece of shit.

Sounds like you don’t like Trump, the man. I don’t like many of his personality traits, but I agree with the vast majority of his policies and he has gotten quite a bit done in 4 years. I fear that some are willing to sell the country to the left-wing Socialists/Marxists simply because they don’t like Trump’s demeanor. To me, that is just plain childish.

I agree and Trumps demeanor is why I like the guy so much. He says what he thinks and he doesn't give a rats ass if anyone like what he says or how he says it. Nothing phony about the guy.
 
It was glaringly apparent that Christine Wallace was flat out helping biden.

He interupted trump 75 times and Biden 15

Hes a disgrace and the worst debate moderator in history
 
It was glaringly apparent that Christine Wallace was flat out helping biden.

He interupted trump 75 times and Biden 15

Hes a disgrace and the worst debate moderator in history

As someone else mentioned above, Wallace wouldn’t have even considered brining up the 2nd Ammendment. That would have been far too damaging to Biden.
 

Forum List

Back
Top