And this is why Rust Belt democrats voted for Trump. I wonder what message they were telling the world about the far-left's statistics showing "a majority of Americans support...." ?
Apparently if you tell a lie over and over it doesn't always become truth. Learn something new every day.
Here's a chart from the link in the OP:
I was just wondering whether it was a conservative or liberal position to interpret the Constitution to let just some sexually deviant behaviors dismantle marriage...where it proximally harms children's ancient enjoyment of "one mother, one father" while at the same time banishing other behaviors, like polygamy for example, from accessing marriage licenses? Is that even legal within the requirements of the 14th Amendment's demand for equal privileges and immunities?
Is it conservative to only let some enjoy the 14th's immunities? Or is that a liberal stance? What was magical, special and immutable about the number "two" again? I didn't see anything about that in Obergefell/14th Amendment's Opinions.. I mean, if mother & father aren't special, magical or immutable I don't see how the number 2 is suddenly untouchable? Anyone remember the arguments about that point? I don't. Not a peep.
When it is time for the next one to go, which will be very soon,
when making a prediction for his next appointment, look at the
possibilities by age. He's not going to appoint anyone over 55.
(His current trend)
/--------/ Oh here we go again, one magical night every slave owning democrat was turned into a Republican, and the Republicans who ended slavery became democRATS.
