Trump is right to call it "treason"...

[occupied]

Treason, Trump keeps saying that word but it does not mean what he thinks it means. Informing the nation of corruption at great personal risk is patriotism. The president is merely the top public servant in America. When the president starts to think he is America that dictator wannabe has to go.

So you oppose any investigation into the affairs of Joe and Hunter Biden or any other Democrat for any reason, correct? Trump was just investigated two years on absolutely NOTHING. You are a hypocrite.

Trump didn't want an investigation, that has already been done, Trump wanted confirmation of a debunked conspiracy theory.

You're on acid. You are a moron.

It's not like no one tried to tell you that electing a known con man and system rigger might be a bad idea.

 

[K9Buck]

Those that actively engage to unjustly remove the president should be targeted for elimination. So, no, that's not the average Democrat or journalist.

Michael Schiff comes to mind.

The dude’s name is Adam. You don’t even know the name of the people you want to murder.

Was it "murder" when the patriots shot the British?

I misspoke on Schiff, obviously.

You think Schiff is falsely accusing Trump of a crime and you want to kill him. Is that correct?

I believe Schiff is a corrupt liar.

Anyone who commits treason should be executed.

Would you have supported death for someone if they had assassinated Obama?

The standard you have created is death for falsely accusing someone of a crime. Why are you now trying to talk about punishment for assassination?

And no. I don’t support the death penalty for any crime.

You are misstating what I said because, like all leftist fascists, you're a ******* liar.

 

[K9Buck]

Treason, Trump keeps saying that word but it does not mean what he thinks it means. Informing the nation of corruption at great personal risk is patriotism. The president is merely the top public servant in America. When the president starts to think he is America that dictator wannabe has to go.

So you oppose any investigation into the affairs of Joe and Hunter Biden or any other Democrat for any reason, correct? Trump was just investigated two years on absolutely NOTHING. You are a hypocrite.

Trump didn't want an investigation, that has already been done, Trump wanted confirmation of a debunked conspiracy theory.

You're on acid. You are a moron.

It's not like no one tried to tell you that electing a known con man and system rigger might be a bad idea.

Obama, Hillary, Pelosi, etc. are the most corrupt people in the history of our government and you worship the ground on which they walk. And then you get butthurt when someone speaks of exposing their corruption. Yea, you're a ******* idiot.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

What is non democratic about using the steps laid out in the constitution?

High crimes and misdemeanors say hello remember us? Yeah, no you don't.

The process being utilized is an abortion of it's intended purpose.

If the Democrats knew their shit wasn't fake they would bring it to the floor of the house for a vote. THEN the left would have to let the right do their part. But we both know that wont happen because the left are lying cowards

You think the jury should render a verdict before the prosecution questions witnesses and presents it's case? I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way.

I'm pretty sure that has **** all to do with the NORMAL procedure for impeachment

 

[occupied]

Treason, Trump keeps saying that word but it does not mean what he thinks it means. Informing the nation of corruption at great personal risk is patriotism. The president is merely the top public servant in America. When the president starts to think he is America that dictator wannabe has to go.

So you oppose any investigation into the affairs of Joe and Hunter Biden or any other Democrat for any reason, correct? Trump was just investigated two years on absolutely NOTHING. You are a hypocrite.

Trump didn't want an investigation, that has already been done, Trump wanted confirmation of a debunked conspiracy theory.

You're on acid. You are a moron.

It's not like no one tried to tell you that electing a known con man and system rigger might be a bad idea.

Obama, Hillary, Pelosi, etc. are the most corrupt people in the history of our government and you worship the ground on which they walk. And then you get butthurt when someone speaks of exposing their corruption. Yea, you're a ******* idiot.

Exposing corruption is a good thing but just saying people are corrupt is mere politics. In this case the complaint came from a whistle blower. They tend to be believed far more than your pundits because it very often involves tremendous risk to the whistle blower. You think democrats are corrupt, they very well may be, but at some point you have to prove it.

 

[K9Buck]

So you oppose any investigation into the affairs of Joe and Hunter Biden or any other Democrat for any reason, correct? Trump was just investigated two years on absolutely NOTHING. You are a hypocrite.

Trump didn't want an investigation, that has already been done, Trump wanted confirmation of a debunked conspiracy theory.

You're on acid. You are a moron.

It's not like no one tried to tell you that electing a known con man and system rigger might be a bad idea.

Obama, Hillary, Pelosi, etc. are the most corrupt people in the history of our government and you worship the ground on which they walk. And then you get butthurt when someone speaks of exposing their corruption. Yea, you're a ******* idiot.

Exposing corruption is a good thing but just saying people are corrupt is mere politics. In this case the complaint came from a whistle blower. They tend to be believed far more than your pundits because it very often involves tremendous risk to the whistle blower. You think democrats are corrupt, they very well may be, but at some point you have to prove it.

It's been proven. Hillary committed well over 100 felonies with her server and then obstructed justice by destroying evidence and she skated because Comey, Lynch and Obama were equally corrupt.

 

[Seawytch]

The donnie deplorables are getting shriller and shriller as they panic over the impending fall of their orange god.

You're a fascist ****. If that happens, Democrats are going to pay with their lives.

You are a psychopath that doesn't belong in civil society. Seek help.

 

[Dragonlady]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

This is most definitely not "treason". They are attempting to remove a criminal President, using the impeachment provisions of the Constitution. This is the Constitutional removal of a criminal President who should never have been allowed to run for President because of his history and temperment.

"Treason" is defined as aiding and abetting the enemy in the time of war declared by Congress. Unless Democrats are aiding and abetting the Talaban in Afghanistan, they are not committing treason.

 

[Lesh]

The donnie deplorables are getting shriller and shriller as they panic over the impending fall of their orange god.

You're a fascist ****. If that happens, Democrats are going to pay with their lives.

Trumpers are getting violent...again

 

[Seawytch]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

What is non democratic about using the steps laid out in the constitution?

High crimes and misdemeanors say hello remember us? Yeah, no you don't.

The process being utilized is an abortion of it's intended purpose.

If the Democrats knew their shit wasn't fake they would bring it to the floor of the house for a vote. THEN the left would have to let the right do their part. But we both know that wont happen because the left are lying cowards

You think the jury should render a verdict before the prosecution questions witnesses and presents it's case? I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way.

I'm pretty sure that has **** all to do with the NORMAL procedure for impeachment

Fortunately for our country, impeachment isn't normal procedure for anything. There is no "normal" procedure. I know you can't describe anything the House is doing as being outside what the constitution prescribes for impeachment proceedings.

They will investigate. If they uncover facts they believe rise to an impeachable level, articles will be drafted and voted on then it moves to the Senate where there is a trial.

 

[Dragonlady]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

What is non democratic about using the steps laid out in the constitution?

High crimes and misdemeanors say hello remember us? Yeah, no you don't.

The process being utilized is an abortion of it's intended purpose.

If the Democrats knew their shit wasn't fake they would bring it to the floor of the house for a vote. THEN the left would have to let the right do their part. But we both know that wont happen because the left are lying cowards

Given the Founders concerns with foreign meddling in American politics, I would said that this is EXACTLY what the Founders had in mind.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

What is non democratic about using the steps laid out in the constitution?

High crimes and misdemeanors say hello remember us? Yeah, no you don't.

The process being utilized is an abortion of it's intended purpose.

If the Democrats knew their shit wasn't fake they would bring it to the floor of the house for a vote. THEN the left would have to let the right do their part. But we both know that wont happen because the left are lying cowards

You think the jury should render a verdict before the prosecution questions witnesses and presents it's case? I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way.

I'm pretty sure that has **** all to do with the NORMAL procedure for impeachment

Hillaryoconnor1680@gmail.com
Fortunately for our country, impeachment isn't normal procedure for anything. There is no "normal" procedure. I know you can't describe anything the House is doing as being outside what the constitution prescribes for impeachment proceedings.

They will investigate. If they uncover facts they believe rise to an impeachable level, articles will be drafted and voted on then it moves to the Senate where there is a trial.

The United States Constitution provides that the House of Representatives "shall have the sole Power of Impeachment" (Article I, section 2)

Aka THE HOUSE

Not the democrats
Not Nancy Pelosi
THE HOUSE, as in the entirity of the house.

What we have now is a partisan shit show of political gamesmanship

 

[Seawytch]

What is non democratic about using the steps laid out in the constitution?

High crimes and misdemeanors say hello remember us? Yeah, no you don't.

The process being utilized is an abortion of it's intended purpose.

If the Democrats knew their shit wasn't fake they would bring it to the floor of the house for a vote. THEN the left would have to let the right do their part. But we both know that wont happen because the left are lying cowards

You think the jury should render a verdict before the prosecution questions witnesses and presents it's case? I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way.

I'm pretty sure that has **** all to do with the NORMAL procedure for impeachment

Hillaryoconnor1680@gmail.com
Fortunately for our country, impeachment isn't normal procedure for anything. There is no "normal" procedure. I know you can't describe anything the House is doing as being outside what the constitution prescribes for impeachment proceedings.

They will investigate. If they uncover facts they believe rise to an impeachable level, articles will be drafted and voted on then it moves to the Senate where there is a trial.

The United States Constitution provides that the House of Representatives "shall have the sole Power of Impeachment" (Article I, section 2)

Aka THE HOUSE

Not the democrats
Not Nancy Pelosi
THE HOUSE, as in the entirity of the house.

What we have now is a partisan shit show of political gamesmanship

How many Democrats were involved in the Clinton impeachment?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

High crimes and misdemeanors say hello remember us? Yeah, no you don't.

The process being utilized is an abortion of it's intended purpose.

If the Democrats knew their shit wasn't fake they would bring it to the floor of the house for a vote. THEN the left would have to let the right do their part. But we both know that wont happen because the left are lying cowards

You think the jury should render a verdict before the prosecution questions witnesses and presents it's case? I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way.

I'm pretty sure that has **** all to do with the NORMAL procedure for impeachment

Hillaryoconnor1680@gmail.com
Fortunately for our country, impeachment isn't normal procedure for anything. There is no "normal" procedure. I know you can't describe anything the House is doing as being outside what the constitution prescribes for impeachment proceedings.

They will investigate. If they uncover facts they believe rise to an impeachable level, articles will be drafted and voted on then it moves to the Senate where there is a trial.

The United States Constitution provides that the House of Representatives "shall have the sole Power of Impeachment" (Article I, section 2)

Aka THE HOUSE

Not the democrats
Not Nancy Pelosi
THE HOUSE, as in the entirity of the house.

What we have now is a partisan shit show of political gamesmanship

How many Democrats were involved in the Clinton impeachment?

All of them. It was voted on by the house and they thereby had the opportunity to call in any witnesses via subpoena.

 

[Seawytch]

You think the jury should render a verdict before the prosecution questions witnesses and presents it's case? I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way.

I'm pretty sure that has **** all to do with the NORMAL procedure for impeachment

Hillaryoconnor1680@gmail.com
Fortunately for our country, impeachment isn't normal procedure for anything. There is no "normal" procedure. I know you can't describe anything the House is doing as being outside what the constitution prescribes for impeachment proceedings.

They will investigate. If they uncover facts they believe rise to an impeachable level, articles will be drafted and voted on then it moves to the Senate where there is a trial.

The United States Constitution provides that the House of Representatives "shall have the sole Power of Impeachment" (Article I, section 2)

Aka THE HOUSE

Not the democrats
Not Nancy Pelosi
THE HOUSE, as in the entirity of the house.

What we have now is a partisan shit show of political gamesmanship

How many Democrats were involved in the Clinton impeachment?

All of them. It was voted on by the house and they thereby had the opportunity to call in any witnesses via subpoena.

That's because, due to the Starr report, the judiciary had no vote and no investigation. It was Republicans that "skipped a step".

 

[K9Buck]

The donnie deplorables are getting shriller and shriller as they panic over the impending fall of their orange god.

You're a fascist ****. If that happens, Democrats are going to pay with their lives.

Trumpers are getting violent...again

I'm the least violent person there is, but I draw the line against a coup directed at our nation's democratic system.

 

[Cellblock2429]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

/——/ Adam Shyt-face stacks the deck. GOP demands 'equal playing field' ahead of former Ukraine envoy Volker's scheduled testimony

 

[K9Buck]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

This is most definitely not "treason". They are attempting to remove a criminal President, using the impeachment provisions of the Constitution. This is the Constitutional removal of a criminal President who should never have been allowed to run for President because of his history and temperment.

"Treason" is defined as aiding and abetting the enemy in the time of war declared by Congress. Unless Democrats are aiding and abetting the Talaban in Afghanistan, they are not committing treason.

treason
noun
trea·son | \ ˈtrē-zᵊn \
Definition of treason


1: the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family
2: the betrayal of a trust : TREACHERY

 

[K9Buck]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

What is non democratic about using the steps laid out in the constitution?

High crimes and misdemeanors say hello remember us? Yeah, no you don't.

The process being utilized is an abortion of it's intended purpose.

If the Democrats knew their shit wasn't fake they would bring it to the floor of the house for a vote. THEN the left would have to let the right do their part. But we both know that wont happen because the left are lying cowards

Given the Founders concerns with foreign meddling in American politics, I would said that this is EXACTLY what the Founders had in mind.

It appears that all of the "meddling" in our nation's elections was orchestrated by the Obama Administration and their faithful Gestapo at the FBI.

 

[K9Buck]

George Papadopoulos on Twitter