Trump Is Hitler, Trump’s Destroying America, Yada Yada

[anynameyouwish]

So what’s the big deal about keeping people from illegally immigrating here? Who’d want people to immigrate to 1938 Germany? Only a sick evil SOB would want that.

BUILD THE WALL AND SAVE THEM FROM A LIFE LIVING UNDER HITLER!

trump can't be hitler....

Obama was hitler....and Hillary was HITLARY.....

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

How can they do that after Trump grants them their wish of banning guns?

Huh ?

How can a gun free society overthrow a tyrant dictator?

Whereas Trump is doing all he can do disarm Americans, you should get the answer to that question shortly.

How so?

The people who revere the wall as if it were a religious cult keep chanting the mantra "illegal" immigration. The reality is, there is NO such thing. Immigration is when people come here for the purpose of PERMANENT residence. Generally speaking, that means citizenship.

We are a free market country. People ought to be able to engage in the free market without becoming citizens. Wallists do not acknowledge the fact that we are a free market country.

#1) They can come here legally we have a process or on a Visa

#2) They may do business here but apply accordingly.

#3) Just like I would not allow strangers into my house, we should not allow strangers into the US.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

So what’s the big deal about keeping people from illegally immigrating here? Who’d want people to immigrate to 1938 Germany? Only a sick evil SOB would want that.

BUILD THE WALL AND SAVE THEM FROM A LIFE LIVING UNDER HITLER!

In politics things are rarely what they seem.

Immigration - The entrance into a country of foreigners for purposes of permanent residence. The correlative term emigration denotes the act of such persons in leaving their former country.

immigration

Here is what I don't get:

The wallists and their wall worship only see immigration (aka PERMANENT RESIDENCE) as the only method of coming here... Why in the Hell do you guys lobby for that? So they can come in "legally" as you erroneously call it only to become citizens and outvote you???

My parents came here legally and vote Red. Used to vote Blue.

What you are talking about was the past.

Your post was in the past too. LOL. How subjective.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

The Demon-crats want them in order to over throw your alledged Hitler, along with his white henchmen they hate sorely. They want to take the spoils for themselves, and live on them until they implode because they could care less about what it took to create and/or to build it all.

How can they do that after Trump grants them their wish of banning guns?

Huh ?

How can a gun free society overthrow a tyrant dictator?

Whereas Trump is doing all he can do disarm Americans, you should get the answer to that question shortly.

Like what is Trump doing?

Trump is a gun control advocate. Let's look at what he said in his 2000 book, The America We Deserve:

"I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun."

The bump stock ban violated the Constitution on THREE grounds:

1) It was a direct assault on the Second Amendment

2) Since people were ordered to destroy or turn in their bump stocks, that violated the prohibition against ex post facto laws

3) When the government takes your personal property, they are required to give you just compensation for it. ALL of this is in the Constitution

In addition, Trump does not believe in Due Process:

"President Trump said Wednesday he favors taking guns away from people who might commit violence before going through legal due process in the courts..."

Trump says take guns first and worry about 'due process second' in White House gun meeting

Trump's support for Red Flag Laws and his support for insane gun control laws is startling:

Trump Calls Heller a ‘Champion,’ Slams Opponent ‘Wacky Jacky’ Rosen

The fact is, the Heller decision reversed at least the first 100 years of pro- gun rulings in local, state, federal and United States Supreme Court rulings starting at the time of the ratification of the Constitution. Checks out the exact ruling in Heller:

"Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited."

WTH??? Now courts go after features of firearms starting with bump stocks and high capacity magazines. Then it will be flash suppressors, pistol grips, bayonet lugs, etc., etc.

Trump is not pro - gun. The fact that he has not repealed a single, solitary Executive Order that infringes on your Second Amendment Right ought to to tell you something.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

Huh ?

How can a gun free society overthrow a tyrant dictator?

Whereas Trump is doing all he can do disarm Americans, you should get the answer to that question shortly.

How so?

The people who revere the wall as if it were a religious cult keep chanting the mantra "illegal" immigration. The reality is, there is NO such thing. Immigration is when people come here for the purpose of PERMANENT residence. Generally speaking, that means citizenship.

We are a free market country. People ought to be able to engage in the free market without becoming citizens. Wallists do not acknowledge the fact that we are a free market country.

#1) They can come here legally we have a process or on a Visa

#2) They may do business here but apply accordingly.

#3) Just like I would not allow strangers into my house, we should not allow strangers into the US.

It is not your decision who any state allows to come into their "house" to do business. That is not in the Constitution. The Constitution limits the federal government's authority over the issue and it covers naturalization... not dictating who may come into a state and engage in legal activities. Again, you are jockeying for citizenship.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

So what’s the big deal about keeping people from illegally immigrating here? Who’d want people to immigrate to 1938 Germany? Only a sick evil SOB would want that.

BUILD THE WALL AND SAVE THEM FROM A LIFE LIVING UNDER HITLER!

In politics things are rarely what they seem.

Immigration - The entrance into a country of foreigners for purposes of permanent residence. The correlative term emigration denotes the act of such persons in leaving their former country.

immigration

Here is what I don't get:

The wallists and their wall worship only see immigration (aka PERMANENT RESIDENCE) as the only method of coming here... Why in the Hell do you guys lobby for that? So they can come in "legally" as you erroneously call it only to become citizens and outvote you???

My parents came here legally and vote Red. Used to vote Blue.

What you are talking about was the past.

Your post was in the past too. LOL. How subjective.

My post is current. It is the here and now.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

How can a gun free society overthrow a tyrant dictator?

Whereas Trump is doing all he can do disarm Americans, you should get the answer to that question shortly.

How so?

The people who revere the wall as if it were a religious cult keep chanting the mantra "illegal" immigration. The reality is, there is NO such thing. Immigration is when people come here for the purpose of PERMANENT residence. Generally speaking, that means citizenship.

We are a free market country. People ought to be able to engage in the free market without becoming citizens. Wallists do not acknowledge the fact that we are a free market country.

#1) They can come here legally we have a process or on a Visa

#2) They may do business here but apply accordingly.

#3) Just like I would not allow strangers into my house, we should not allow strangers into the US.

It is not your decision who any state allows to come into their "house" to do business. That is not in the Constitution. The Constitution limits the federal government's authority over the issue and it covers naturalization... not dictating who may come into a state and engage in legal activities. Again, you are jockeying for citizenship.

I disagree 100%. Every country has the right to defend its borders. It is MY decision as a voter and an American.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

So what’s the big deal about keeping people from illegally immigrating here? Who’d want people to immigrate to 1938 Germany? Only a sick evil SOB would want that.

BUILD THE WALL AND SAVE THEM FROM A LIFE LIVING UNDER HITLER!

In politics things are rarely what they seem.

Immigration - The entrance into a country of foreigners for purposes of permanent residence. The correlative term emigration denotes the act of such persons in leaving their former country.

immigration

Here is what I don't get:

The wallists and their wall worship only see immigration (aka PERMANENT RESIDENCE) as the only method of coming here... Why in the Hell do you guys lobby for that? So they can come in "legally" as you erroneously call it only to become citizens and outvote you???

My parents came here legally and vote Red. Used to vote Blue.

What you are talking about was the past.

Your post was in the past too. LOL. How subjective.

My post is current. It is the here and now.

Nope its in the past. All your posts sucks to be honest.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

Whereas Trump is doing all he can do disarm Americans, you should get the answer to that question shortly.

How so?

The people who revere the wall as if it were a religious cult keep chanting the mantra "illegal" immigration. The reality is, there is NO such thing. Immigration is when people come here for the purpose of PERMANENT residence. Generally speaking, that means citizenship.

We are a free market country. People ought to be able to engage in the free market without becoming citizens. Wallists do not acknowledge the fact that we are a free market country.

#1) They can come here legally we have a process or on a Visa

#2) They may do business here but apply accordingly.

#3) Just like I would not allow strangers into my house, we should not allow strangers into the US.

It is not your decision who any state allows to come into their "house" to do business. That is not in the Constitution. The Constitution limits the federal government's authority over the issue and it covers naturalization... not dictating who may come into a state and engage in legal activities. Again, you are jockeying for citizenship.

I disagree 100%. Every country has the right to defend its borders. It is MY decision as a voter and an American.

What are you disagreeing with? Every country has a right to defend its borders. The federal government, however, does NOT have any right whatsoever to interfere with the free market and dictate to the states how they can and cannot do business.

If you can't find something that pertains to your strawman arguments, always refer to the Tenth Amendment.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

In politics things are rarely what they seem.

Immigration - The entrance into a country of foreigners for purposes of permanent residence. The correlative term emigration denotes the act of such persons in leaving their former country.

immigration

Here is what I don't get:

The wallists and their wall worship only see immigration (aka PERMANENT RESIDENCE) as the only method of coming here... Why in the Hell do you guys lobby for that? So they can come in "legally" as you erroneously call it only to become citizens and outvote you???

My parents came here legally and vote Red. Used to vote Blue.

What you are talking about was the past.

Your post was in the past too. LOL. How subjective.

My post is current. It is the here and now.

Nope its in the past. All your posts sucks to be honest.

If you really felt the way you do, you would put me on ignore. You don't and you can't refrain from commenting. Do you know why?

You have been programmed, Pavlovian style, to respond to certain stimuli. You hear terminology like "illegals" or something related thereto and right away you feel compelled to tell us about some mythical invasion of foreigners and we can't afford them, protect our borders, people are stealing jobs, etc., etc. ad infinitum.

Since you cannot sustain a civil argument, you're already prodding for weakness; hoping for a fight. The problem is, your arguments don't help you. Let's start with this "legal" argument. It's a bogus argument that the globalists want you to be able to make, but it cannot be done.

For example: In wallists theology people are going to come here the "right way" and become citizens. Then you have to face reality.

In the federal legislature, 13 percent of federal legislators are immigrants or the children of immigrants. There are a FEW children of immigrants that identify as Republicans, but ALL the current immigrants in the federal legislature are Democrats.

In 116th Congress, at least 13% of lawmakers are immigrants or the children of immigrants

Since the number of Democrats grows with each election cycle, at some point, you will be voted out of office "legally" as you like to call it. They win, displace you, and in a couple of generations this discussion becomes moot. What is amazing is that you participate in your own genocide, too ignorant to figure out how you got played by the globalists.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

How so?

The people who revere the wall as if it were a religious cult keep chanting the mantra "illegal" immigration. The reality is, there is NO such thing. Immigration is when people come here for the purpose of PERMANENT residence. Generally speaking, that means citizenship.

We are a free market country. People ought to be able to engage in the free market without becoming citizens. Wallists do not acknowledge the fact that we are a free market country.

#1) They can come here legally we have a process or on a Visa

#2) They may do business here but apply accordingly.

#3) Just like I would not allow strangers into my house, we should not allow strangers into the US.

It is not your decision who any state allows to come into their "house" to do business. That is not in the Constitution. The Constitution limits the federal government's authority over the issue and it covers naturalization... not dictating who may come into a state and engage in legal activities. Again, you are jockeying for citizenship.

I disagree 100%. Every country has the right to defend its borders. It is MY decision as a voter and an American.

What are you disagreeing with? Every country has a right to defend its borders. The federal government, however, does NOT have any right whatsoever to interfere with the free market and dictate to the states how they can and cannot do business.

If you can't find something that pertains to your strawman arguments, always refer to the Tenth Amendment.

You're talking in circles. If ABC company in TX allows people to come in unverified that creates a huge security threat.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

My parents came here legally and vote Red. Used to vote Blue.

What you are talking about was the past.

Your post was in the past too. LOL. How subjective.

My post is current. It is the here and now.

Nope its in the past. All your posts sucks to be honest.

If you really felt the way you do, you would put me on ignore. You don't and you can't refrain from commenting. Do you know why?

You have been programmed, Pavlovian style, to respond to certain stimuli. You hear terminology like "illegals" or something related thereto and right away you feel compelled to tell us about some mythical invasion of foreigners and we can't afford them, protect our borders, people are stealing jobs, etc., etc. ad infinitum.

Since you cannot sustain a civil argument, you're already prodding for weakness; hoping for a fight. The problem is, your arguments don't help you. Let's start with this "legal" argument. It's a bogus argument that the globalists want you to be able to make, but it cannot be done.

For example: In wallists theology people are going to come here the "right way" and become citizens. Then you have to face reality.

In the federal legislature, 13 percent of federal legislators are immigrants or the children of immigrants. There are a FEW children of immigrants that identify as Republicans, but ALL the current immigrants in the federal legislature are Democrats.

In 116th Congress, at least 13% of lawmakers are immigrants or the children of immigrants

Since the number of Democrats grows with each election cycle, at some point, you will be voted out of office "legally" as you like to call it. They win, displace you, and in a couple of generations this discussion becomes moot. What is amazing is that you participate in your own genocide, too ignorant to figure out how you got played by the globalists.

I am a son of immigrants. Democrats have betrayed me. Stats are just that.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

The people who revere the wall as if it were a religious cult keep chanting the mantra "illegal" immigration. The reality is, there is NO such thing. Immigration is when people come here for the purpose of PERMANENT residence. Generally speaking, that means citizenship.

We are a free market country. People ought to be able to engage in the free market without becoming citizens. Wallists do not acknowledge the fact that we are a free market country.

#1) They can come here legally we have a process or on a Visa

#2) They may do business here but apply accordingly.

#3) Just like I would not allow strangers into my house, we should not allow strangers into the US.

It is not your decision who any state allows to come into their "house" to do business. That is not in the Constitution. The Constitution limits the federal government's authority over the issue and it covers naturalization... not dictating who may come into a state and engage in legal activities. Again, you are jockeying for citizenship.

I disagree 100%. Every country has the right to defend its borders. It is MY decision as a voter and an American.

What are you disagreeing with? Every country has a right to defend its borders. The federal government, however, does NOT have any right whatsoever to interfere with the free market and dictate to the states how they can and cannot do business.

If you can't find something that pertains to your strawman arguments, always refer to the Tenth Amendment.

You're talking in circles. If ABC company in TX allows people to come in unverified that creates a huge security threat.

No it does not. That's absolute bullshit.

Mexico prints comic books teaching their citizenry how to avoid the immigration authorities. How on God's earth are you going to "verify" people from foreign countries? I'm not talking in circles; I talk in one straight line. And, here is where YOUR straight line goes:

Whereas ALL PERSONS (as differentiated from citizens) are guaranteed the equal protection of the laws, then the government wants to "verify" you too. You like that pee test, criminal background check, credit check, blood test, drug test, MVR check, insurance verification, National ID Card, Socialist Surveillance Number ... oops "Social Security Number" check, occupation license check, etc. etc. just to look for a job or exercise a constitutional Right (like buy a firearm or a bottle of booze.)

Maybe you support the POLICE STATE on some idiotic notion due to the simple fact you cannot tell us WHY (the truth) about why the Republicans are helping flood this country with people from south of the border. Maybe you are a modern day Winston Smith. But, a REAL AMERICAN rejects tyranny and the false promise of temporary Safety in exchange for Liberty.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

What you are talking about was the past.

Your post was in the past too. LOL. How subjective.

My post is current. It is the here and now.

Nope its in the past. All your posts sucks to be honest.

If you really felt the way you do, you would put me on ignore. You don't and you can't refrain from commenting. Do you know why?

You have been programmed, Pavlovian style, to respond to certain stimuli. You hear terminology like "illegals" or something related thereto and right away you feel compelled to tell us about some mythical invasion of foreigners and we can't afford them, protect our borders, people are stealing jobs, etc., etc. ad infinitum.

Since you cannot sustain a civil argument, you're already prodding for weakness; hoping for a fight. The problem is, your arguments don't help you. Let's start with this "legal" argument. It's a bogus argument that the globalists want you to be able to make, but it cannot be done.

For example: In wallists theology people are going to come here the "right way" and become citizens. Then you have to face reality.

In the federal legislature, 13 percent of federal legislators are immigrants or the children of immigrants. There are a FEW children of immigrants that identify as Republicans, but ALL the current immigrants in the federal legislature are Democrats.

In 116th Congress, at least 13% of lawmakers are immigrants or the children of immigrants

Since the number of Democrats grows with each election cycle, at some point, you will be voted out of office "legally" as you like to call it. They win, displace you, and in a couple of generations this discussion becomes moot. What is amazing is that you participate in your own genocide, too ignorant to figure out how you got played by the globalists.

I am a son of immigrants. Democrats have betrayed me. Stats are just that.

You realize what all wallists have in common? If they find even the most spurious reference on the Internet that verifies their cause, it is manna from Heaven. Any fact that disproves their position is fake news, just a statistic, etc. Really dude? That was the best you could do?

 

[francoHFW]

How can they do that after Trump grants them their wish of banning guns?

Huh ?

How can a gun free society overthrow a tyrant dictator?

Whereas Trump is doing all he can do disarm Americans, you should get the answer to that question shortly.

Like what is Trump doing?

Trump is a gun control advocate. Let's look at what he said in his 2000 book, The America We Deserve:

"I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun."

The bump stock ban violated the Constitution on THREE grounds:

1) It was a direct assault on the Second Amendment

2) Since people were ordered to destroy or turn in their bump stocks, that violated the prohibition against ex post facto laws

3) When the government takes your personal property, they are required to give you just compensation for it. ALL of this is in the Constitution

In addition, Trump does not believe in Due Process:

"President Trump said Wednesday he favors taking guns away from people who might commit violence before going through legal due process in the courts..."

Trump says take guns first and worry about 'due process second' in White House gun meeting

Trump's support for Red Flag Laws and his support for insane gun control laws is startling:

Trump Calls Heller a ‘Champion,’ Slams Opponent ‘Wacky Jacky’ Rosen

The fact is, the Heller decision reversed at least the first 100 years of pro- gun rulings in local, state, federal and United States Supreme Court rulings starting at the time of the ratification of the Constitution. Checks out the exact ruling in Heller:

"Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited."

WTH??? Now courts go after features of firearms starting with bump stocks and high capacity magazines. Then it will be flash suppressors, pistol grips, bayonet lugs, etc., etc.

Trump is not pro - gun. The fact that he has not repealed a single, solitary Executive Order that infringes on your Second Amendment Right ought to to tell you something.

Good for him, it appears he is not totally insane after all...

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

#1) They can come here legally we have a process or on a Visa

#2) They may do business here but apply accordingly.

#3) Just like I would not allow strangers into my house, we should not allow strangers into the US.

It is not your decision who any state allows to come into their "house" to do business. That is not in the Constitution. The Constitution limits the federal government's authority over the issue and it covers naturalization... not dictating who may come into a state and engage in legal activities. Again, you are jockeying for citizenship.

I disagree 100%. Every country has the right to defend its borders. It is MY decision as a voter and an American.

What are you disagreeing with? Every country has a right to defend its borders. The federal government, however, does NOT have any right whatsoever to interfere with the free market and dictate to the states how they can and cannot do business.

If you can't find something that pertains to your strawman arguments, always refer to the Tenth Amendment.

You're talking in circles. If ABC company in TX allows people to come in unverified that creates a huge security threat.

No it does not. That's absolute bullshit.

Mexico prints comic books teaching their citizenry how to avoid the immigration authorities. How on God's earth are you going to "verify" people from foreign countries? I'm not talking in circles; I talk in one straight line. And, here is where YOUR straight line goes:

Whereas ALL PERSONS (as differentiated from citizens) are guaranteed the equal protection of the laws, then the government wants to "verify" you too. You like that pee test, criminal background check, credit check, blood test, drug test, MVR check, insurance verification, National ID Card, Socialist Surveillance Number ... oops "Social Security Number" check, occupation license check, etc. etc. just to look for a job or exercise a constitutional Right (like buy a firearm or a bottle of booze.)

Maybe you support the POLICE STATE on some idiotic notion due to the simple fact you cannot tell us WHY (the truth) about why the Republicans are helping flood this country with people from south of the border. Maybe you are a modern day Winston Smith. But, a REAL AMERICAN rejects tyranny and the false promise of temporary Safety in exchange for Liberty.

Your posts are nonsensical. Maybe I support logic. Open borders is a disaster

 

[Porter Rockwell]

Huh ?

How can a gun free society overthrow a tyrant dictator?

Whereas Trump is doing all he can do disarm Americans, you should get the answer to that question shortly.

Like what is Trump doing?

Trump is a gun control advocate. Let's look at what he said in his 2000 book, The America We Deserve:

"I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun."

The bump stock ban violated the Constitution on THREE grounds:

1) It was a direct assault on the Second Amendment

2) Since people were ordered to destroy or turn in their bump stocks, that violated the prohibition against ex post facto laws

3) When the government takes your personal property, they are required to give you just compensation for it. ALL of this is in the Constitution

In addition, Trump does not believe in Due Process:

"President Trump said Wednesday he favors taking guns away from people who might commit violence before going through legal due process in the courts..."

Trump says take guns first and worry about 'due process second' in White House gun meeting

Trump's support for Red Flag Laws and his support for insane gun control laws is startling:

Trump Calls Heller a ‘Champion,’ Slams Opponent ‘Wacky Jacky’ Rosen

The fact is, the Heller decision reversed at least the first 100 years of pro- gun rulings in local, state, federal and United States Supreme Court rulings starting at the time of the ratification of the Constitution. Checks out the exact ruling in Heller:

"Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited."

WTH??? Now courts go after features of firearms starting with bump stocks and high capacity magazines. Then it will be flash suppressors, pistol grips, bayonet lugs, etc., etc.

Trump is not pro - gun. The fact that he has not repealed a single, solitary Executive Order that infringes on your Second Amendment Right ought to to tell you something.

Good for him, it appears he is not totally insane after all...

He's America's best closet liberal, but you forget liberalism is a mental disorder. Sorry, but he is insane.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

It is not your decision who any state allows to come into their "house" to do business. That is not in the Constitution. The Constitution limits the federal government's authority over the issue and it covers naturalization... not dictating who may come into a state and engage in legal activities. Again, you are jockeying for citizenship.

I disagree 100%. Every country has the right to defend its borders. It is MY decision as a voter and an American.

What are you disagreeing with? Every country has a right to defend its borders. The federal government, however, does NOT have any right whatsoever to interfere with the free market and dictate to the states how they can and cannot do business.

If you can't find something that pertains to your strawman arguments, always refer to the Tenth Amendment.

You're talking in circles. If ABC company in TX allows people to come in unverified that creates a huge security threat.

No it does not. That's absolute bullshit.

Mexico prints comic books teaching their citizenry how to avoid the immigration authorities. How on God's earth are you going to "verify" people from foreign countries? I'm not talking in circles; I talk in one straight line. And, here is where YOUR straight line goes:

Whereas ALL PERSONS (as differentiated from citizens) are guaranteed the equal protection of the laws, then the government wants to "verify" you too. You like that pee test, criminal background check, credit check, blood test, drug test, MVR check, insurance verification, National ID Card, Socialist Surveillance Number ... oops "Social Security Number" check, occupation license check, etc. etc. just to look for a job or exercise a constitutional Right (like buy a firearm or a bottle of booze.)

Maybe you support the POLICE STATE on some idiotic notion due to the simple fact you cannot tell us WHY (the truth) about why the Republicans are helping flood this country with people from south of the border. Maybe you are a modern day Winston Smith. But, a REAL AMERICAN rejects tyranny and the false promise of temporary Safety in exchange for Liberty.

Your posts are nonsensical. Maybe I support logic. Open borders is a disaster

Your lack of reading skills and dabbling in strawman arguments does no justice to your posts.

You are making the typical arguments of brainwashed wallists. One is not allowed to agree with you that a problem exists if an individual disagrees with the standard canard of proposed solutions.

What is nonsensical is that you cannot make a post relevant to what I am saying without making shit up to argue against. It's only nonsensical because you have no common sense.

 

[Weatherman2020]

How can they do that after Trump grants them their wish of banning guns?

Huh ?

How can a gun free society overthrow a tyrant dictator?

Whereas Trump is doing all he can do disarm Americans, you should get the answer to that question shortly.

How so?

The people who revere the wall as if it were a religious cult keep chanting the mantra "illegal" immigration. The reality is, there is NO such thing. Immigration is when people come here for the purpose of PERMANENT residence. Generally speaking, that means citizenship.

We are a free market country. People ought to be able to engage in the free market without becoming citizens. Wallists do not acknowledge the fact that we are a free market country.

You’re pretty sick to want anyone to move here and suffer under Trump.

 

[beagle9]

How can they do that after Trump grants them their wish of banning guns?

Huh ?

How can a gun free society overthrow a tyrant dictator?

Whereas Trump is doing all he can do disarm Americans, you should get the answer to that question shortly.

Like what is Trump doing?

Trump is a gun control advocate. Let's look at what he said in his 2000 book, The America We Deserve:

"I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun."

The bump stock ban violated the Constitution on THREE grounds:

1) It was a direct assault on the Second Amendment

2) Since people were ordered to destroy or turn in their bump stocks, that violated the prohibition against ex post facto laws

3) When the government takes your personal property, they are required to give you just compensation for it. ALL of this is in the Constitution

In addition, Trump does not believe in Due Process:

"President Trump said Wednesday he favors taking guns away from people who might commit violence before going through legal due process in the courts..."

Trump says take guns first and worry about 'due process second' in White House gun meeting

Trump's support for Red Flag Laws and his support for insane gun control laws is startling:

Trump Calls Heller a ‘Champion,’ Slams Opponent ‘Wacky Jacky’ Rosen

The fact is, the Heller decision reversed at least the first 100 years of pro- gun rulings in local, state, federal and United States Supreme Court rulings starting at the time of the ratification of the Constitution. Checks out the exact ruling in Heller:

"Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited."

WTH??? Now courts go after features of firearms starting with bump stocks and high capacity magazines. Then it will be flash suppressors, pistol grips, bayonet lugs, etc., etc.

Trump is not pro - gun. The fact that he has not repealed a single, solitary Executive Order that infringes on your Second Amendment Right ought to to tell you something.

This angle of attack won't work, so back to the idiot board for some more acme plans for you Wile E. Coyote.