Trump Is Going To Lose Most Of The Current Federal Court Cases....Then What?

[BackAgain]

Had you left out the insult, I would have flashed a FACT on it. Instead, you get nothing like you deserve.

You are obtuse.

He was right, regardless of also noting that fact.

 

[BackAgain]

BS. My notion of what the amendment means follows precedent set by SCOTUS in the 1800s

Not true. Stop lying.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Below is the current situation regarding all of Trump's Federal court cases. Trump is getting his ass handed to him right now by the Federal judges. --

Everything Trump is doing is blatantly unconstitutional. A 10 year old civics student can tell you that. Most of these court cases will just be laughed out of court.

What is Trump going to do when he ultimately loses most of these cases? Is he just going to ignore the rulings and become King Trump? That's my guess.

And his pathetic lackey JD Vance is already encouraging Trump to do just that.

View attachment 1077707

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/02/07/trump-lawsuits-executive-orders-actions-legal-challenges/

He can try, but his toadies don't get the same immunity from criminal liability that he does. He can't pull any of it off single handedly

 

[BackAgain]

PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT:

There is STILL no support for the idiotic thread headline.

That is all.

Carry on.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT:

There is STILL no support for the idiotic thread headline.

That is all.

Carry on.

Sure there is, for example, in the comments made by the judges so far. And the fact that the moves clearly run at odds with the law.

 

[BackAgain]

Sure there is, for example, in the comments made by the judges so far. And the fact that the moves clearly run at odds with the law.

Nope. No support for it whatsoever.

It’s just the moron OP bloviating his ignorant opinion.

The interpretation of the meaning of that Amendment is what’s at issue.

Plessy v. Ferguson was once “settled” precedent. Guess what? It was wrong. It belatedly got re-examined. It got overruled.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Nope. No support for it whatsoever.

Except for the support I just listed.

 

[BackAgain]

Except for the support I just listed.

No. No exceptions.

The force of this wave will soon wash over all who stand in the way.

Reality is knocking. You’ll find out.

 

[Slade3200]

Not true. Stop lying.

Yes true. I’m not lying. Here is a link to back it up.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark | Constitution Center

National Constitution Center Supreme Court Case Library: United States v. Wong Kim Ark

constitutioncenter.org

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No. No exceptions.

The force of this wave will soon wash over all who stand in the way.

Reality is knocking. You’ll find out.

Except for the reasons I just listed.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

No, these activist liberal judges will be overruled. The president should just defy them.

Unfortunately, it's come to this.
America has zero chance of recovery unless these far left, anti-American, activist judges are removed. I support arresting them all.

I am fairly certain that nearly all American citizens and those who value their nation would wholeheartedly agree.

 

[BackAgain]

Yes true. I’m not lying. Here is a link to back it up.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark | Constitution Center

National Constitution Center Supreme Court Case Library: United States v. Wong Kim Ark

constitutioncenter.org

I assumed you had that case in mind.

Aside from the obvious fact that it barely goes back as far as you incorrectly stated, it doesn’t address the question (outside of non precedential obiter dicta) of the matter under actual discussion.

Muddle on, though, Slack.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

No. No exceptions.

The force of this wave will soon wash over all who stand in the way.

Reality is knocking. You’ll find out.

As a wise member of this forum said LONG ago, no matter who we elect, it is ultimately the will of the American People to restore civility and justice to America or not.

If Americans are unwilling to personally step up, then the end is merely delayed a bit.

 

[BackAgain]

Except for the reasons I just listed.

Nope. No exceptions.

I would educate you, but you’re far too retarded.

Let’s just say it simply: what judges have said based on the misinterpretation of the meaning of (and consequences of) the 14th Amendment would be the matter BEING re-evaluated. It therefore doesn’t support the idiot OP claim of what WILL happen if we get that issue re-evaluated.

 

[WEATHER53]

It’s not like they don’t have a nationality. If this goes through, they will simply not become our nationality on that silly simplistic basis. They will merely have mom’s nationality. Or mom’s and dad’s.

That puts responsibility on the parents instead of US taxpayers and Dem lib loons dont understand that concept

 

[Slade3200]

I assumed you had that case in mind.

Aside from the obvious fact that it barely goes back as far as you incorrectly stated, it doesn’t address the question (outside of non precedential obiter dicta) of the matter under actual discussion.

Muddle on, though, Slack.

Listen to yourself…”it barely goes back” (meaning it does go back) “as far as you incorrectly stated”… well if it barely went back to the 1800s then it did go back making my statement correct.

You’re trying way too hard.

In that case a child of two illegal immigrants was deemed to be a US citizen via the 14th amendment. So yes, it is applicable to this situation and gives precedent to the meaning of the 14th which has been executed by law for over a century.

 

[22lcidw]

Listen to yourself…”it barely goes back” (meaning it does go back) “as far as you incorrectly stated”… well if it barely went back to the 1800s then it did go back making my statement correct.

You’re trying way too hard.

In that case a child of two illegal immigrants was deemed to be a US citizen via the 14th amendment. So yes, it is applicable to this situation and gives precedent to the meaning of the 14th which has been executed by law for over a century.

You stole our money. You stole it. And continue to do so. Amendments designed with personal responsibility as compared to an evolved prog approved total welfare state modern payout system called constitutional.

 

[BackAgain]

That puts responsibility on the parents instead of US taxpayers and Dem lib loons dont understand that concept

“Hey, Maria,” said Juan. “Let’s get the heck out of our rats’ nest nation and go to America!”

Maria, Juan’s beloved lawfully wedded wife thinks for a bit and then asks Juan, “How can we? They make you wait — sometimes for years — to immigrate into their land.”

Juan says, “that may be true, darling. But we can sneak in. America has a porous Border. We can sneak in!”

“I dunno honey. The re-elected US President is shutting that down. And even if we could all sneak in, how will we support ourselves and the children?”

“Easy,” replies Juan. “Public assistance, free travel, free medical care and free housing! We’ll be set!”

Maria cries. “No Juan. The re-elected American President is shitting that down, too.”

Juan, now feeling defeated, says, “I guess we will need to wait on the line for legal immigration into America.”

 

[BackAgain]

Listen to yourself…”it barely goes back” (meaning it does go back) “as far as you incorrectly stated”… well if it barely went back to the 1800s then it did go back making my statement correct.

As I correctly said, “barely.”

You’re trying way too hard.

Not at all. It’s easy to shit can your pathetic fail arguments. Maybe you should try harder. Or admit your error.

In that case a child of two illegal immigrants was deemed to be a US citizen via the 14th amendment.

Really? Are you sure that’s what the case involved?

Please establish that the Asian parents were “illegal aliens.”

I’ll wait.

So yes, it is applicable to this situation and gives precedent to the meaning of the 14th which has been executed by law for over a century.

So no. It doesn’t control the matter we’re discussing.

 

[Slade3200]

You stole our money. You stole it. And continue to do so. Amendments designed with personal responsibility as compared to an evolved prog approved total welfare state modern payout system called constitutional.

Enough of that nonesense. I didn’t steal shit. Grow up