Trump is acting insane on Greenland

Quasar44

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
34,570
Reaction score
18,233
Points
1,788
Location
Phoenix, AZ


Somebody needs to tell him he is 100 percent wrong to threaten nato allies over this ?? wtf

He is also becoming the president of the military industrial complex!!!!

He wants to increase military to 1.5 T

Utterly insane !!

We need Vance or Rubio to take over
 


Somebody needs to tell him he is 100 percent wrong to threaten nato allies over this ?? wtf

He is also becoming the president of the military industrial complex!!!!

He wants to increase military to 1.5 T

Utterly insane !!

We need Vance or Rubio to take over

scott.gif


Vance and Rubio are both Zionist shits.
 


Somebody needs to tell him he is 100 percent wrong to threaten nato allies over this ?? wtf

He is also becoming the president of the military industrial complex!!!!

He wants to increase military to 1.5 T

Utterly insane !!

We need Vance or Rubio to take over
I support Trump 100%.
 
Yet nobody is talking about the threat to US national security these arctic exercises pose. Literally if Russia overruns the Europeans tomorrow and takes over Greenland that is a direct threat to the American homeland.
 
It's one of those proud of my country, ashamed of my government kind of things.
Not for me.

I also dispute the OP.

While some of President Trump’s comments do strike me as off-putting, he remains largely correct about our need for Greenland.

I’d say we don’t need to take it over. And I don’t believe for a second that we’d ever simply “march in”’ to seize that land.

But it is very foresightful of President Trump to make the moves, now, to seize the initiative. In terms of geopolitics and military security for the free world, we clearly need to secure Greenland from the grasp of any other nations (like red China or Russia).
 


Somebody needs to tell him he is 100 percent wrong to threaten nato allies over this ?? wtf

He is also becoming the president of the military industrial complex!!!!

He wants to increase military to 1.5 T

Utterly insane !!

We need Vance or Rubio to take over
You voted for Him.
 
Yet nobody is talking about the threat to US national security these arctic exercises pose. Literally if Russia overruns the Europeans tomorrow and takes over Greenland that is a direct threat to the American homeland.
Overruns the Europeans? France and the UK are both nuclear powers. Many other European countries host US nuclear weapons.

Russia can't even take Ukraine, and Europe have been involved in many wars in their history and have shown to be extremely capable. There is also the biggest thing, which is the nuclear deterrent.

There is no realistic threat from either Russia or China taking Greenland. If they did, it would basically be a declaration of war against Europe and the US, and the outcome of that would be terrible for everyone.

And the US can put military bases on Greenland, so it makes no sense that the US needs to control Greenland itself. Europe can also put military bases on Greenland if that is the issue that Trump has. Trump is doing what he is doing because it would financially benefit the US. The problem is, you can't just annex a country because you would want to control their resources.

It hasn't even been a full year, and Trump has already destroyed relationships with Europe. You guys can pretend that you are so superior that you don't need a relationship with Europe, but the long term negatives of Trump actions will have an effect on the US.
 


Somebody needs to tell him he is 100 percent wrong to threaten nato allies over this ?? wtf

He is also becoming the president of the military industrial complex!!!!

He wants to increase military to 1.5 T

Utterly insane !!

We need Vance or Rubio to take over
1.5 T is a sure sign of WWIII
 
This is obvious, indefensible idiocy. There is no argument for such a thing. Trump's manner of making great noise around an issue in order to obtain something, or hide something else, is often laughable. This time it is plain, out of the question, absurd, or, as Senator Kennedy said, "weapons grade stupid".
 
Overruns the Europeans? France and the UK are both nuclear powers.
There are approximately 35-50 troops from Europe in Greenland. Do you really think 35 ******* troops will defend Greenland from Russia better than the United States of ******* America? Serious question.
 
There are approximately 35-50 troops from Europe in Greenland. Do you really think 35 ******* troops will defend Greenland from Russia better than the United States of ******* America? Serious question.
Sorry, when I originally read it, I took it as meaning overrun the Europeans, as in, they would take out the Europeans first. But, I see now it means taking Greenland. But 'overruning the Europeans' in this scenario, would also mean overrunning the US. I think that's why I got confused, because the statement doesn't make sense in it's intended state.

As I said further down in my comment, any invasion by Russia or China in Greenland would result in WW3. It's just not a realistic thing that they would do...It would be a potential nuclear war.

But going back to the 35-50 troops thing, as I also said further down my comment, if Trump's problem is that the US would have to build all the Military bases, then I'm sure Europe would be happy to put some military bases in Greenland too. What ultimately doesn't make sense is why the US would want to force Greenland to submit and join them. Violating Greenland's sovereignty would be hugely terrible.
 
15th post
Overruns the Europeans? France and the UK are both nuclear powers. Many other European countries host US nuclear weapons.

Russia can't even take Ukraine, and Europe have been involved in many wars in their history and have shown to be extremely capable. There is also the biggest thing, which is the nuclear deterrent.

There is no realistic threat from either Russia or China taking Greenland. If they did, it would basically be a declaration of war against Europe and the US, and the outcome of that would be terrible for everyone.

And the US can put military bases on Greenland, so it makes no sense that the US needs to control Greenland itself. Europe can also put military bases on Greenland if that is the issue that Trump has. Trump is doing what he is doing because it would financially benefit the US. The problem is, you can't just annex a country because you would want to control their resources.

It hasn't even been a full year, and Trump has already destroyed relationships with Europe. You guys can pretend that you are so superior that you don't need a relationship with Europe, but the long term negatives of Trump actions will have an effect on the US.

All the trillions in revenue only will go to Trumps super rich white friends and won’t benefit anyone
 
But going back to the 35-50 troops thing, as I also said further down my comment, if Trump's problem that the US would have to build on the Military bases, then I'm sure Europe would be happy to put some military bases in Greenland too. What ultimately doesn't make sense is why the US would want to force Greenland to submit and join them. Violating Greenland's sovereignty would be hugely terrible.
You don't understand how valuable Greenland truly is to the United States. Greenland is rapidly becoming the most geostrategically important landmass on the planet due to the fading of Arctic Ice and opening up new pathways for international trade and military. My point is at the current pace, the U.S. is in a better position to defend Greenland than any of the countries currently involved, they are moving too slowly. If by June, there are still only a miniscule amount of NATO military presence in Greenland, then we need to move in. We're running out of time.
 
Back
Top Bottom