RedrickTheCoat
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2025
- 275
- 156
- 143
Europe has only sent the people it sent recently as an indication to the US that they should not proceed with trying to forcibly annex Greenland. If Trump continues in his manner, it's possible that Europe sends a lot more troops to Greenland as a deterrant to any potential action by Trump.You don't understand how valuable Greenland truly is to the United States. Greenland is rapidly becoming the most geostrategically important landmass on the planet due to the fading of Arctic Ice and opening up new pathways for international trade and military. My point is at the current pace, the U.S. is in a better position to defend Greenland than any of the countries currently involved, they are moving too slowly. If by June, there are still only a miniscule amount of NATO military presence in Greenland, then we need to move in. We're running out of time.
Europe as a whole, can easily supply enough forces to defend it in conjunction with the US. If the US said, they either want it or they won't help defend it, then that wouldn't make sense for the US, but Europe would ultimately be able to put enough forces on it. Like I said, Europe is a nuclear power, any attack on Greenland could result in a nuclear response from Europe. It's the nuclear deterrant. Europe can also scale up their militaries reasonably quickly (over the next 5-10 years). And I imagine they will, as the US has now shown to be an unreliable ally. In our recent history, they have been fine letting US take the lead as a superpower, and supporting that superpower status because the US has been a reliable and trusted ally. Trump seems to think this is some negative, but I don't think it is.
I understand that it is valuable. But it isn't so valuable that the US should forcibly take it. And they don't need to own it to be able to benefit from the shipping routes etc.
We're running out of time.
We are not running out of time because of the nuclear deterrant and the fact that any attack on Greenland would be a declaration of war against all of Europe and the US LOL. There is no indiction that Russia or China is looking to invade Greenland.
If Trump were take it for strategic reasons, what precedent does that set for other countries doing the same thing elsewhere?
It would be so terrible for the entire world if the US were to take Greenland by force.
Nothing is stopping from the US putting more military bases on Greenland...If by June, there are still only a miniscule amount of NATO military presence in Greenland, then we need to move in.
I also find it funny that Republicans are so anti the fact of anthropogenic climate change, but melting ice is opening up trade routes. Do you know how long that usually takes for an area of ice like this to melt, unless there is some cause for it? Most of the natural changes occur over very long timescale. And if there were to happen over shorter timescales, there is usually some observable reason for it.


