I try to provide what I think are likely outcomes based on the evidence.
Judge Cannon, if she presides over the case, could do some real damage to the prosecution. I don't like it. I think its corrupt as ****. But what is, is.
She'd be the one allowing the removal of jurors. She'd the one that gives instructions, allows or disallows evidence, allows or disallows witnesses.
And she's already demonstrated an eager willingness to offer Trump special protections, rewrite rules in his favor, violate bedrock separations of powers and radically reorder caselaw. And appeals courts, especially in jury trials, are loathe to overturn the juries judgment. Double jeopardy would essentially disallow overturning a jury verdict if she threw the case in Trump's favor.
Here's hoping she's not on the case.