Trump Illegit

[Billy_Kinetta]

only an idiot like you would post what you do, and call others ignorant

Yes vh I'm not the dummy who voted for a pussy grabbing no tax paying billionaire a man known for cheating those smaller than him with limited funds to fight the thief off a man buying and selling wives like you buy burgers Good for you Hope you get just what you wished for

Neither did I, stupid.

I voted against both of them.

Neither have the qualifications to be in the Oval office.

But, you've admitted to voting for the Teflon Queen, and in about a month, she will be at the top of Obamas last pardon list.

That makes you far more stupid than most on the Right here

I don't think so vh
U.S. intelligence officials now believe with "a high level of confidence" that Russian President Vladimir Putin became personally involved in the covert Russian campaign to interfere in the U.S. presidential election, senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News.

Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used. The intelligence came from diplomatic sources and spies working for U.S. allies, the officials said.

Putin's objectives were multifaceted, a high-level intelligence source told NBC News. What began as a "vendetta" against Hillary Clinton morphed into an effort to show corruption in American politics and to "split off key American allies by creating the image that [other countries] couldn't depend on the U.S. to be a credible global leader anymore," the official said.

U.S. intelligence officials now believe

senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News

Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used.

the officials said.

a high-level intelligence source told NBC News.

the official said.

a high-level intelligence source told NBC News.

the official said.

You want them to name names Put their safety at risk ?

There is no reason to grant anonymous sources any credibility whatsoever, particularly when the other side of the industry disagrees with the findings of the anonymous source(s).

 

[eddiew37]

Yes vh I'm not the dummy who voted for a pussy grabbing no tax paying billionaire a man known for cheating those smaller than him with limited funds to fight the thief off a man buying and selling wives like you buy burgers Good for you Hope you get just what you wished for

Neither did I, stupid.

I voted against both of them.

Neither have the qualifications to be in the Oval office.

But, you've admitted to voting for the Teflon Queen, and in about a month, she will be at the top of Obamas last pardon list.

That makes you far more stupid than most on the Right here

I don't think so vh
U.S. intelligence officials now believe with "a high level of confidence" that Russian President Vladimir Putin became personally involved in the covert Russian campaign to interfere in the U.S. presidential election, senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News.

Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used. The intelligence came from diplomatic sources and spies working for U.S. allies, the officials said.

Putin's objectives were multifaceted, a high-level intelligence source told NBC News. What began as a "vendetta" against Hillary Clinton morphed into an effort to show corruption in American politics and to "split off key American allies by creating the image that [other countries] couldn't depend on the U.S. to be a credible global leader anymore," the official said.

U.S. intelligence officials now believe

senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News

Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used.

the officials said.

a high-level intelligence source told NBC News.

the official said.

a high-level intelligence source told NBC News.

the official said.

You want them to name names Put their safety at risk ?

There is no reason to grant anonymous sources any credibility whatsoever, particularly when the other side of the industry disagrees with the findings of the anonymous source(s).

but what does this other side base their disagreement on? just because the other side believes it and knows that russia along with china are the top hackers in the world? ...even though you're a right leaner you have to know there is still a strong possibility of hacking our election

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Neither did I, stupid.

I voted against both of them.

Neither have the qualifications to be in the Oval office.

But, you've admitted to voting for the Teflon Queen, and in about a month, she will be at the top of Obamas last pardon list.

That makes you far more stupid than most on the Right here

I don't think so vh
U.S. intelligence officials now believe with "a high level of confidence" that Russian President Vladimir Putin became personally involved in the covert Russian campaign to interfere in the U.S. presidential election, senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News.

Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used. The intelligence came from diplomatic sources and spies working for U.S. allies, the officials said.

Putin's objectives were multifaceted, a high-level intelligence source told NBC News. What began as a "vendetta" against Hillary Clinton morphed into an effort to show corruption in American politics and to "split off key American allies by creating the image that [other countries] couldn't depend on the U.S. to be a credible global leader anymore," the official said.

U.S. intelligence officials now believe

senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News

Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used.

the officials said.

a high-level intelligence source told NBC News.

the official said.

a high-level intelligence source told NBC News.

the official said.

You want them to name names Put their safety at risk ?

There is no reason to grant anonymous sources any credibility whatsoever, particularly when the other side of the industry disagrees with the findings of the anonymous source(s).

but what does this other side base their disagreement on?

Lack of evidence, which the refusal of the accusing agencies to prove their claim clearly indicates.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Democrats have one avenue left. Cull the military for democrat loyalists and declare war on Russia.

 

[eddiew37]

I don't think so vh
U.S. intelligence officials now believe with "a high level of confidence" that Russian President Vladimir Putin became personally involved in the covert Russian campaign to interfere in the U.S. presidential election, senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News.

Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used. The intelligence came from diplomatic sources and spies working for U.S. allies, the officials said.

Putin's objectives were multifaceted, a high-level intelligence source told NBC News. What began as a "vendetta" against Hillary Clinton morphed into an effort to show corruption in American politics and to "split off key American allies by creating the image that [other countries] couldn't depend on the U.S. to be a credible global leader anymore," the official said.

U.S. intelligence officials now believe

senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News

Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used.

the officials said.

a high-level intelligence source told NBC News.

the official said.

a high-level intelligence source told NBC News.

the official said.

You want them to name names Put their safety at risk ?

There is no reason to grant anonymous sources any credibility whatsoever, particularly when the other side of the industry disagrees with the findings of the anonymous source(s).

but what does this other side base their disagreement on?

Lack of evidence, which the refusal of the accusing agencies to prove their claim clearly indicates.

You're being played Billy ,,,,,,,Thought you were smarter than that Now you're in VH's class

 

[Auld Phart]

U.S. intelligence officials now believe

senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News

Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used.

the officials said.

a high-level intelligence source told NBC News.

the official said.

a high-level intelligence source told NBC News.

the official said.

You want them to name names Put their safety at risk ?

There is no reason to grant anonymous sources any credibility whatsoever, particularly when the other side of the industry disagrees with the findings of the anonymous source(s).

but what does this other side base their disagreement on?

Lack of evidence, which the refusal of the accusing agencies to prove their claim clearly indicates.

You're being played Billy ,,,,,,,Thought you were smarter than that Now you're in VH's class

Trying to determine facts instead of believing the bullshit you put out?

you should find a ladder and raise your standards to do the same

 

[blackhawk]

Hillary lost because of the second gunman on the grassy knoll in 1963 the left has tried every other conspiracy theory so might as well throw this one out there.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

He didn't win the election, has no mandate and so qualifications. And now he's filling his own personal swamp with Goldman Sachs, K Street lobbyists, lots of billionaire cronies, has beens, wannabes, never was - its a disaster and no, we should not let it go.

He won by lying, cheating and stealing on the part of the Rs. They were very open about stopping people from voting, hiding ballots, stealing votes.

Our democracy is dead and trump is gearing up to bury it while Putin gets comfy in the Lincoln bedroom.

Dude, you sound like a loon. As looney as the fucktards that were freaking out over Obama in '08.

Christ Almighty... let it go. On 1/21 you will wake up, the sun will be shining and the Earth will continue spinning.

 

[eddiew37]

You want them to name names Put their safety at risk ?

There is no reason to grant anonymous sources any credibility whatsoever, particularly when the other side of the industry disagrees with the findings of the anonymous source(s).

but what does this other side base their disagreement on?

Lack of evidence, which the refusal of the accusing agencies to prove their claim clearly indicates.

You're being played Billy ,,,,,,,Thought you were smarter than that Now you're in VH's class

Trying to determine facts instead of believing the bullshit you put out?

you should find a ladder and raise your standards to do the same

Hillary lost because of the second gunman on the grassy knoll in 1963 the left has tried every other conspiracy theory so might as well throw this one out there.

Blackhawk that's bullshit She lost because many believed the bs about her spouted out by the liar trump Face it He's a con man and you got played

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

There is no reason to grant anonymous sources any credibility whatsoever, particularly when the other side of the industry disagrees with the findings of the anonymous source(s).

but what does this other side base their disagreement on?

Lack of evidence, which the refusal of the accusing agencies to prove their claim clearly indicates.

You're being played Billy ,,,,,,,Thought you were smarter than that Now you're in VH's class

Trying to determine facts instead of believing the bullshit you put out?

you should find a ladder and raise your standards to do the same

Hillary lost because of the second gunman on the grassy knoll in 1963 the left has tried every other conspiracy theory so might as well throw this one out there.

Blackhawk that's bullshit She lost because many believed the bs about her spouted out by the liar trump Face it He's a con man and you got played

Yeah.. that's the ticket.

 

[eddiew37]

but what does this other side base their disagreement on?

Lack of evidence, which the refusal of the accusing agencies to prove their claim clearly indicates.

You're being played Billy ,,,,,,,Thought you were smarter than that Now you're in VH's class

Trying to determine facts instead of believing the bullshit you put out?

you should find a ladder and raise your standards to do the same

Hillary lost because of the second gunman on the grassy knoll in 1963 the left has tried every other conspiracy theory so might as well throw this one out there.

Blackhawk that's bullshit She lost because many believed the bs about her spouted out by the liar trump Face it He's a con man and you got played

Yeah.. that's the ticket.

The dream team for Putin .........Chumps cabinet

 

[blackhawk]

There is no reason to grant anonymous sources any credibility whatsoever, particularly when the other side of the industry disagrees with the findings of the anonymous source(s).

but what does this other side base their disagreement on?

Lack of evidence, which the refusal of the accusing agencies to prove their claim clearly indicates.

You're being played Billy ,,,,,,,Thought you were smarter than that Now you're in VH's class

Trying to determine facts instead of believing the bullshit you put out?

you should find a ladder and raise your standards to do the same

Hillary lost because of the second gunman on the grassy knoll in 1963 the left has tried every other conspiracy theory so might as well throw this one out there.

Blackhawk that's bullshit She lost because many believed the bs about her spouted out by the liar trump Face it He's a con man and you got played

She lost becasue she was a lousy candidate who ran a terrible campaign and arrogantly assumed she was destined to be President just like she did in 2008 when she lost the nomination to Obama. The only ones who got conned were you and the others who couldn't see this and it seems still can't and that is very sad and I truly feel sorry for all of you who are still stuck in denial over this. You can continue to rant about Trump I have Christmas presents to wrap.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

U.S. intelligence officials now believe

senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News

Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used.

the officials said.

a high-level intelligence source told NBC News.

the official said.

a high-level intelligence source told NBC News.

the official said.

You want them to name names Put their safety at risk ?

There is no reason to grant anonymous sources any credibility whatsoever, particularly when the other side of the industry disagrees with the findings of the anonymous source(s).

but what does this other side base their disagreement on?

Lack of evidence, which the refusal of the accusing agencies to prove their claim clearly indicates.

You're being played Billy ,,,,,,,Thought you were smarter than that Now you're in VH's class

Nah, no tickee no washee, ed.

If you can't prove your accusations, bounce yer arse back downstairs.

 

[Mac1958]

No doubt Trump will resign post haste as a direct result of Reich's objective and comprehensive analysis.

 

[eddiew37]

You want them to name names Put their safety at risk ?

There is no reason to grant anonymous sources any credibility whatsoever, particularly when the other side of the industry disagrees with the findings of the anonymous source(s).

but what does this other side base their disagreement on?

Lack of evidence, which the refusal of the accusing agencies to prove their claim clearly indicates.

You're being played Billy ,,,,,,,Thought you were smarter than that Now you're in VH's class

Nah, no tickee no washee, ed.

If you can't prove your accusations, bounce yer arse back downstairs.

What did your guys PROVE with all the hillary before congress bs ?? She was guilty without a trial and when she was interrogated you came up with nothing but you kept it up 9 times your lice called her before congress Now it's dems turn

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Neither did I, stupid.

I voted against both of them.

Neither have the qualifications to be in the Oval office.

But, you've admitted to voting for the Teflon Queen, and in about a month, she will be at the top of Obamas last pardon list.

That makes you far more stupid than most on the Right here

I don't think so vh
U.S. intelligence officials now believe with "a high level of confidence" that Russian President Vladimir Putin became personally involved in the covert Russian campaign to interfere in the U.S. presidential election, senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News.

Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used. The intelligence came from diplomatic sources and spies working for U.S. allies, the officials said.

Putin's objectives were multifaceted, a high-level intelligence source told NBC News. What began as a "vendetta" against Hillary Clinton morphed into an effort to show corruption in American politics and to "split off key American allies by creating the image that [other countries] couldn't depend on the U.S. to be a credible global leader anymore," the official said.

U.S. intelligence officials now believe

senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News

Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used.

the officials said.

a high-level intelligence source told NBC News.

the official said.

a high-level intelligence source told NBC News.

the official said.

You want them to name names Put their safety at risk ?

There is no reason to grant anonymous sources any credibility whatsoever, particularly when the other side of the industry disagrees with the findings of the anonymous source(s).

but what does this other side base their disagreement on? just because the other side believes it and knows that russia along with china are the top hackers in the world? ...even though you're a right leaner you have to know there is still a strong possibility of hacking our election

And when you have proof, then discuss it. Until then, "could have, should have, might have" is bringing a knife to a gun fight.

Craig Murray says source of Hillary Clinton campaign WikiLeaks emails a ‘disgusted’ Democrat

 

[eddiew37]

I don't think so vh
U.S. intelligence officials now believe with "a high level of confidence" that Russian President Vladimir Putin became personally involved in the covert Russian campaign to interfere in the U.S. presidential election, senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News.

Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used. The intelligence came from diplomatic sources and spies working for U.S. allies, the officials said.

Putin's objectives were multifaceted, a high-level intelligence source told NBC News. What began as a "vendetta" against Hillary Clinton morphed into an effort to show corruption in American politics and to "split off key American allies by creating the image that [other countries] couldn't depend on the U.S. to be a credible global leader anymore," the official said.

U.S. intelligence officials now believe

senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News

Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used.

the officials said.

a high-level intelligence source told NBC News.

the official said.

a high-level intelligence source told NBC News.

the official said.

You want them to name names Put their safety at risk ?

There is no reason to grant anonymous sources any credibility whatsoever, particularly when the other side of the industry disagrees with the findings of the anonymous source(s).

but what does this other side base their disagreement on? just because the other side believes it and knows that russia along with china are the top hackers in the world? ...even though you're a right leaner you have to know there is still a strong possibility of hacking our election

And when you have proof, then discuss it. Until then, "could have, should have, might have" is bringing a knife to a gun fight.

Craig Murray says source of Hillary Clinton campaign WikiLeaks emails a ‘disgusted’ Democrat

17 agencies saying so is good enough for me ......you'd like pictures??

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

U.S. intelligence officials now believe

senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News

Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used.

the officials said.

a high-level intelligence source told NBC News.

the official said.

a high-level intelligence source told NBC News.

the official said.

You want them to name names Put their safety at risk ?

There is no reason to grant anonymous sources any credibility whatsoever, particularly when the other side of the industry disagrees with the findings of the anonymous source(s).

but what does this other side base their disagreement on? just because the other side believes it and knows that russia along with china are the top hackers in the world? ...even though you're a right leaner you have to know there is still a strong possibility of hacking our election

And when you have proof, then discuss it. Until then, "could have, should have, might have" is bringing a knife to a gun fight.

Craig Murray says source of Hillary Clinton campaign WikiLeaks emails a ‘disgusted’ Democrat

17 agencies saying so is good enough for me ......you'd like pictures??

Pictures? You don't even have any evidence yet alone pictures. Oh! Obama's agencies that he's in charge of said so. Yeah, I believe that. Let's see their evidence and then discuss it. We've seen what Obama's FBI did. We seen what Obama's Justice Department did. We seen what Obama's IRS department did.

 

[jasonnfree]

He didn't win the election, has no mandate and so qualifications. And now he's filling his own personal swamp with Goldman Sachs, K Street lobbyists, lots of billionaire cronies, has beens, wannabes, never was - its a disaster and no, we should not let it go.

He won by lying, cheating and stealing on the part of the Rs. They were very open about stopping people from voting, hiding ballots, stealing votes.

Our democracy is dead and trump is gearing up to bury it while Putin gets comfy in the Lincoln bedroom.

Wow! How do you sleep at night anyway?

He won the election. The qualifications to be a President in the United States is listed in something you never read before---the US Constitution. His mandate is to try and bring jobs back to America, create a fair trading environment, get rid of these illegals, and begin to work on preventing more from coming here.

Next please?

I'm amazed at how dems are complaining how our electoral system works. They're always bragging about how many of them are college grads. Looks like they slept through history and politics. They were probably smoking pot with their professors instead.

 

[jasonnfree]

It was close VH
Donald Trump lost the popular vote in last month’s US presidential election by a bigger margin than any other US president in history.

The Republican is currently trailing Democrat rival Hillary Clinton by 2.8 million votes as the last remaining postal ballots are counted – despite him winning the November 8 election because of the Electoral College system.

That deficit is more than five times bigger than the 544,000 by which George W. Bush lost to Al Gore in 2000 - the second biggest popular vote deficit in history for a candidate who has still gone on to become President.






0:00
/
1:24




Electoral college members demand information on Russian relations before voting for Donald Trump

• READ MORE

Donald Trump could violate US Constitution on first day of presidency

Only five US presidents in history have been elected despite losing the popular vote: John Quincy Adams in 1824, Rutherford Hayes in 1876, Benjamin Harrison in 1888, George W. Bush in 2000 and Donald Trump this November.

Mr Trump has previously responded angrily to people pointing out his defeat in the popular vote.

Last month he tweeted: “In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally.

"Serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire and California - so why isn't the media reporting on this? Serious bias - big problem!”

The President-elect did not provide any evidence that illegal voting had taken place and has been criticised for making the unsubstantiated allegation.

We need voter i.d. so we won't have any doubts about whether illegals vote or not. Or who voted multiple times.