Did you know The snidey tactics of witholding and hiding stuff that Bragg did means the DA's office and judge(that knew this) are guilty of DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW
SUMMARY:
Section 242 of Title 1
8
Also under that law it would ESPECIALLY be violated if Bragg was the leak on the Grand Jury, which violated Trumps rights.
Also Bragg and his cohorts openly admitted a few things in public speeches in front of news corps that point to clear cut racial bias.
I found more proof of Bragg and associates Crimes besides the obvious timing obstruction and false charge false arrest to come tues, there's something openly in front of us during their present and past speeches in front of press.
You'll notice there is no racial diversity in Bragg's foot soldiers, and they all made the mistake of talking about race and his political affiliation in a case that does not warrant those defaming and racist comments and in premeditative years before the charges. So they exposed themselves as "radically" prejudiced.
This falls into Braggs act of false arrest as being a hate crime, which is a crime motivated by bias against race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity or disability(which they accused Trump of being many times), social status and even political affiliation-and political ideology (which the violators proved prejudiced against in their speeches).
Under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, people cannot be prosecuted simply for their beliefs. People may be offended or upset about beliefs (which they admited they were) but it can not be used for prejudiced cases, especially when those with your views are not treated equal upon the law.