- Jul 5, 2012
- 20,124
- 4,971
- 280
There are also those laughing at all the rest.So what we have on this thread is liberals playing the role of the grammar police. Liberals still can't prove that fraud did not happen.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There are also those laughing at all the rest.So what we have on this thread is liberals playing the role of the grammar police. Liberals still can't prove that fraud did not happen.
The eight year old acts out again.
The national embarrassment continues.
When are you knuckle dragging Neanderthals gonna realise it?
You're like kids fighting over candy.
Not only that the same exact people complained about Trump and his base never accepting the election results are the same exact people that did not accept the Electoral College results in 2016 and wanted the Constitution Amended so that the Popular Vote is the only way a President can win…
So ya know the left forget their temper tantrum during Trump four years while they attempt to mock the Trump base for acting just like them!
One of the many behaviors shared by both ends of the spectrum.I've clearly stated many times that both sides are full of crap when it comes to the elections. A bunch of babies on both sides that can't accept losing.
Only issues I have are when:I've clearly stated many times that both sides are full of crap when it comes to the elections. A bunch of babies on both sides that can't accept losing.
Only issues I have are when:
Five times a candidate has won the popular vote and lost the election. Andrew Jackson in 1824 (to John Quincy Adams); Samuel Tilden in 1876 (to Rutherford B. Hayes); Grover Cleveland in 1888 (to Benjamin Harrison); Al Gore in 2000 (to George W. Bush); Hillary Clinton in 2016 (to Donald J. Trump)
535 electors decide who will be president for 330 million people?
In the 2016 United States presidential election, ten members of the Electoral College voted or attempted to vote for a candidate different from the ones to whom they were pledged.Hillary won by 3 million votes. She won California by 4 million. So if you take California out of the equation, she lost the rest of the country. Looking at it that way doesn't make her popular vote win so impressive. Besides, they told the Sanders organization that they knew the rules going in. Ditto.
In the 2016 United States presidential election, ten members of the Electoral College voted or attempted to vote for a candidate different from the ones to whom they were pledged.
Three of these votes were invalidated under the faithless elector laws of their respective states, and the elector either subsequently voted for the pledged candidate or was replaced by someone who did.
Although there had been a combined total of 155 instances of individual electors voting faithlessly prior to 2016 in over two centuries of previous US presidential elections, 2016 was the first election in over a hundred years in which multiple electors worked to alter the result of the election.
I agree and it is sad how this damn country has gotten to the point where the tit suckers run the Country and the adults are stuck in the background!I've clearly stated many times that both sides are full of crap when it comes to the elections. A bunch of babies on both sides that can't accept losing.
Unfortunately, one cannot go on when infected with TDS.It's about time Trump admits anyone who believes there was election fraud is either very stupid or very corrupt.
So can we all move on now?
Haha,all you crybabies have is fantasy.And yet President Trump never shit his pants in public....
Your stuttering shit clown did....
Wait for it....
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2020No, that steaming turd was voted out November 3rd, 2021!!!!!
MAGA
So what we have on this thread is liberals playing the role of the grammar police. Liberals still can't prove that fraud did not happen.
The electoral college vote and faithless electors electing the president.LOL
I have no clue how this addresses my post.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Total | |
New England Patriots | 0 | 3 | 6 | 19 | 6 | 34 |
Atlanta Falcons | 0 | 21 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 28 |
The electoral college vote and faithless electors electing the president.
More directly.
'So if you take California out of the equation, she lost the rest of the country'.
Super Bowl LI
New England Patriots at Atlanta Falcons
February 5, 2017
NRG Stadium, Houston, TX
Attendance: 70,807
1 2 3 4 5 Total New England Patriots 0 3 6 19 6 34 Atlanta Falcons 0 21 7 0 0 28
Scoring Summary
If you took the 4th quarter out of the equation, Atlanta would have won the SB.
Sure it does, you put a variable in your comment 'California'.That's true but does nothing to address my point. Hillary lost because most of the country couldn't stand her.
Sure it does, you put a variable in your comment 'California'.
I put one in mine, '4th quarter'.
I wouldn't say most.
Of people that voted, anyway, Clinton won the majority, likely just hated Trump more.
That's the only reason I voted for Clinton and Biden.
65,853,514 vs 62,984,828.
It sure does.The duopoly is very efficient at offering divisive, inferior candidates.
Spot on.Voters accept having the difficult choice between incompetents
I 'feel' better when a democrat is in office, across the board.This devolves to an emotional resolution, picking the one that "feels" better. That is not the way a democratic republic functions unless the goal is an eventual authoritarian government.