Trump Favorables 20-34% V. Clinton Favorables 44-55% Also Not Close

[mascale]

Trump On-Message is so far likely worse than the off-message Trump. The Answer to world terrorism is proposed the confiscation of all the international assets, not world-trade. The Answer to U. S. National Poverty, in the West Bend, "Sleep Tight Address," is more police. Putting Trump on-message are new people, far more near-sighted than that. So polls look like ABC/Washington Post, Trump favorable rating under 30% on a possible new trend that his own support base is crumbing. That would take a trend, to actually show.

Trump's Unfavorables Spike, but Clinton's Challenged Too

Wall Street Journal types think the message will work, remembering the Republican Failed Presidency as usual, Richard Nixon. The appeal was white, when diversity could have been said, "Stay Home."

Now there are Third Party Candidates, even. Anyone has to guess that White may now mean, "Stay Home."

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Why do International Trade, When anyone could simply White Eyes back to where they came from?!)

 

[Dekster]

.....so your article says clinton has a 55% unfavorable rating and you interpret that as a 55% favorable rating.....you must come from Planet 110%

 

[mascale]

The actual interpretation across various polls is that Clinton has a 45-55% favorable rating, like expected from arithmetic. The showing in the cited poll is that anyone knows that Trump only appeals to a tiny minority of White Male people, and maybe really small. There is no basis appeal to a diversity base, viewing him favorably. So the particular poll is noted since the Favorable rating for Trump--presumably his base--is tiny, and and may be declining, even there. That declining base, however, even Wall Street Journal calls a basis for a solid Richard Nixon type of turnout(?). They also think they make a lot of economic sense(?)--and actually they do when reporting economic data.

The "White Power" problem aside, then there is the "Nasty" problem of Donald Trump. Even one of his new campaign appointees doesn't want to discuss it. There is a "Mommy" problem with it.

Unfavorable ratings should actually be expected for the Clinton polls. The Democrats appeal to a diversity base, not always liking even one another. For example, there were no polls in now famous Benghazi. Likely the embassy was not well-regarded, after all, in various different barrios, of the population. A videotape may have helped set the now famous attack in motion. In contrast, there are polls in the current election campaign. There are people with doubts about Clinton. There are high ratings about the capability, and her likely November election. There may continue to be unhappiness with an aggressive White woman winning, and privileged with all the college degrees.

Trump can't even appeal to a lot of White people with Trump University degrees(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred."
(White Eyes get up early in morning, and prepare for workday! Then many White Eyes, find sleeping in makes better sense, and right away!)