Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 26,530
- 12,488
- 973
Of course. Please tell us when the grand jury subpoenaed Clinton and what she did to thwart this subpoena.Yes, do you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Of course. Please tell us when the grand jury subpoenaed Clinton and what she did to thwart this subpoena.Yes, do you?
Maybe if you could explain what exactly you are reading into a butler being asked to move boxes, without his employer explaining in detail what was in the boxes?Note the MAGAs are defending the account, just strawmanning, smokescreening and whataboutism.
Oh, you're stuck on "grand jury?"Of course. Please tell us when the grand jury subpoenaed Clinton and what she did to thwart this subpoena.
That’s the subpoena that Trump decided to ignore. I thought you said Clinton did that?Oh, you're stuck on "grand jury?"
No thanks.Research it yourself. Sorry, not starting history all over beginning this morning. That's a left M.O.
He is a witness and part of the indictment of Dear Leader.No, dipshit. We're trying to inject some reality into this non-story.
He is part of the chain. The other guys knows what they are, asked him to move them. Now the other witness ties to Trump saying Trump told him to do so, conviction for Felonies occurs.Maybe if you could explain what exactly you are reading into a butler being asked to move boxes, without his employer explaining in detail what was in the boxes?
She did ignore subpoenas, yes.That’s the subpoena that Trump decided to ignore. I thought you said Clinton did that?
Not remotely the same!Nope, Trump's personal papers/records, same as Clinton in the Clinton sock drawer tapes case. Wherein the DOJ fought for Clinton's claim that the tapes were his personal records from his administration, and the court in DC agreed.
And that is why, in spite of having a grand jury in DC originally hear this matter, Jack Smith moved it to Florida, because someone realized they had controlling case law. But since the DOJ argued on behalf of Clinton over the same issue, the DC court is solid to use in Florida as well.
Wrong.No thanks.
If you can't back your statements then you probably shouldn't bring them up, right?
Are you saying that what I said is not true?Otherwise we could all just post anything we wanted and pretend it's true.
Clinton is irrelevant. Biden is irrelevant. This is about the felonies Trump did.She did ignore subpoenas, yes.
You didn't know that?
You are an alien from Saturn in human form here to infiltrate the earth for your spacy brethren.Wrong.
Of course I should bring up facts that are widely known, and I don't have to "prove" them every time.
Are you saying that what I said is not true?
Post your evidence for that.
Grand jury subpoenas?She did ignore subpoenas, yes.
You didn't know that?
Sorry. This fat-fuck said he had no idea what was in the boxes.He is a witness and part of the indictment of Dear Leader.
He is part of the chain. The other guys knows what they are, asked him to move them. Now the other witness ties to Trump saying Trump told him to do so, conviction for Felonies occurs.
Only to someone who is completely ignorant of what Trump did, here.The sheer hypocrisy of this thread just shows you how brain dead people can be
View attachment 915803
He does now. And remember, these are the people hanpicked by your orange God to serve him.Sorry. This fat-fuck said he had no idea what was in the boxes.
We can never learn from the past?Clinton is irrelevant. Biden is irrelevant. This is about the felonies Trump did.
I didn't say that it was not true. I neither confirm nor deny it.You are an alien from Saturn in human form here to infiltrate the earth for your spacy brethren.
Post your evidence this isn't true.
You also said:No she didn't.
So, can you back your statement, "no she didn't," or are you just posting anything you want and pretending it's true?If you can't back your statements then you probably shouldn't bring them up, right?
Otherwise we could all just post anything we wanted and pretend it's true.
Please stop giving this sealion and his lies so much attention. This thread isn't about cult fantasies about Hillary.We can never learn from the past?
I didn't say that it was not true. I neither confirm nor deny it.
You said:
You also said:
So, can you back your statement, "no she didn't," or are you just posting anything you want and pretending it's true?
We can never learn from the past?
I didn't say that it was not true. I neither confirm nor deny it.
You said:
You also said:
So, can you back your statement, "no she didn't," or are you just posting anything you want and pretending it's true?
If you say so.Exactly. You also can't prove it isn't true.
Based on your logic it therefore must be true.
It doesn't, your lack of a link does.If you say so.
What does my immigration status have to do with whether H. Clinton ignored subpoenas?