Trump dismisses Gabbard's testimony on Iran nukes: "I don't care what she said"

[struth]

Ask all those who's countries and societies have been destroyed by America.

Yes, like Nazi Germany, Pol Pot's Killing Fields, Japanese Empire, Saddam's Iraq, yes, these regimes of death.....not surprised Demafascist miss them

 

[struth]

I. Saw. Her. Say. It. With. My. Own. Two. Eyes. And. Ears.

No you didn't. All she said in her testimony when asked, was that they don't have intel that suggest the Supreme Leader ordered the restart of their nuclear weapons program.

That in no way is at odds of what Trump said....in fact it appears the reporter asking the question had it wrong.

 

[citygator]

No you didn't. All she said in her testimony when asked, was that they don't have intel that suggest the Supreme Leader ordered the restart of their nuclear weapons program.

That in no way is at odds of what Trump said....in fact it appears the reporter asking the question had it wrong.

Again. You will say anything, even if it isnt accurate. The reporter didnt ask the question, congress did.

Tulsi Gabbard, U.S. Director of National Intelligence, said: "The I.C. continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003."

Tulsi had many many many opportunities to weigh in and say that her organization is full of shit. The IC is run by republicans and has been for many years.

 

[citygator]

The intelligence committee:

 

[struth]

Again. You will say anything, even if it isnt accurate. The reporter didnt ask the question, congress did.

Tulsi Gabbard, U.S. Director of National Intelligence, said: "The I.C. continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003."

Tulsi had many many many opportunities to weigh in and say that her organization is full of shit. The IC is run by republicans and has been for many years.

Correct, they had no intel in March.
She has weighted in on it since then, and so as the UN.

Tulsi Gabbard now says Iran could produce nuclear weapon 'within weeks'

This comes after US President Donald Trump said she was "wrong" for saying Iran was not building nuclear weapons.

www.bbc.com

In her post on social media, Gabbard said US intelligence showed Iran is "at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months".

"President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree," she added.

Gabbard shared a video of her full testimony before Congress in March, where she said US intelligence agencies had concluded Iran was not building nuclear weapons.

Experts also determined Iran had not resumed its suspended 2003 nuclear weapons programme, she added in the clip, even as the nation's stockpile of enriched uranium - a component of such weapons - was at an all-time high.

In her testimony, she said Iran's stock was "unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons".

Global watchdog finds Iran failing to meet nuclear obligations​

12 June 2025

Watchdog finds Iran failing to meet nuclear obligations

Iran condemns the resolution passed by the IAEA's board of governors as "political" and says it will open a new uranium enrichment facility.

www.bbc.com

 

[citygator]

Correct, they had no intel in March.
She has weighted in on it since then, and so as the UN.

Tulsi Gabbard now says Iran could produce nuclear weapon 'within weeks'

This comes after US President Donald Trump said she was "wrong" for saying Iran was not building nuclear weapons.

www.bbc.com

In her post on social media, Gabbard said US intelligence showed Iran is "at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months".

"President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree," she added.

Gabbard shared a video of her full testimony before Congress in March, where she said US intelligence agencies had concluded Iran was not building nuclear weapons.

Experts also determined Iran had not resumed its suspended 2003 nuclear weapons programme, she added in the clip, even as the nation's stockpile of enriched uranium - a component of such weapons - was at an all-time high.

In her testimony, she said Iran's stock was "unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons".

Global watchdog finds Iran failing to meet nuclear obligations​

12 June 2025

Watchdog finds Iran failing to meet nuclear obligations

Iran condemns the resolution passed by the IAEA's board of governors as "political" and says it will open a new uranium enrichment facility.

www.bbc.com

You are hopeless. First you say "she didnt say that". Now you are saying "she said it but it was wrong".

 

[struth]

You are hopeless. First you say "she didnt say that". Now you are saying "she said it but it was wrong".

I don't disagree with what she said back in March, I have no reason to believe she was wrong in March.

Again. You will say anything, even if it isnt accurate. The reporter didnt ask the question, congress did.

Tulsi Gabbard, U.S. Director of National Intelligence, said: "The I.C. continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003."

Tulsi had many many many opportunities to weigh in and say that her organization is full of shit. The IC is run by republicans and has been for many years.

A reporter ASKED Trump.....geez man.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

I'm asking you. Or can't you think any deeper than your canned, weak responses?

That's my answer, if you ask the victims of US foreign policy about how their lives might be had the US not bombed them, their families and their infrastructure then you'll have your answer, why is it so hard to ask the victims or are their opinions not relevant in your deranged world?

You are no better than Hitler, not one jot better, eager to "justify" mass slaughter in the name of some fake fantasy about how noble it is to kill and bomb people. Hitler claimed that the USSR and Communism was a huge threat to Europe and Germany and so did the "right thing" in attacking the country and killing millions to "save" Europe.

This is the exact same justification the US gave for bombing Indochina in the 60s and 70s, killing millions and leaving devastation that lingers to this day (chemical weapons and unexploded cluster munitions).

You are no better, any perceived nobility or grandiose self congratulation for acting as the savior of humanity is bullshit, utter bullshit, as I said you and your sick ilk love war and death so long as American people are not victims.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Yes, like Nazi Germany

Defending a reluctant weak Europe from the imminent threat of Soviet domination.

Pol Pot's Killing Fields

Which arose after the US illegally bombed the country and destroyed civil society enabling the dictator to get a political foothold.

Japanese Empire

After Japan seized territory from the occupying colonial French to which the US responded with sanctions on Japan.

Saddam's Iraq, yes, these regimes of death.....not surprised Demafascist miss them

Yes, the Saddam that the US supported financially and militarily for years and even supplied chemicals needed to make chemical weapons.

Let me know if I'm going to fast for you.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

I don't disagree with what she said back in March, I have no reason to believe she was wrong in March.

A reporter ASKED Trump.....geez man.

No intelligent person pays any attention to what Gabbard, Hegseth or the other reprobates say, they are all only there because they're weak and say what King Donny wants them to say.

 

[Concerned American]

You are no better, any perceived nobility or grandiose self congratulation for acting as the savior of humanity is bullshit, utter bullshit, as I said you and your sick ilk love war and death so long as American people are not victims.

Yet here you are enjoying the peace and security that this country affords you. SMFH, don't talk with your mouth full ingrate.

 

[struth]

No intelligent person pays any attention to what Gabbard, Hegseth or the other reprobates say, they are all only there because they're weak and say what King Donny wants them to say.

Then why is everyone making a big deal out of it?

 

[struth]

Defending a reluctant weak Europe from the imminent threat of Soviet domination.

Which arose after the US illegally bombed the country and destroyed civil society enabling the dictator to get a political foothold.

After Japan seized territory from the occupying colonial French to which the US responded with sanctions on Japan.

Yes, the Saddam that the US supported financially and militarily for years and even supplied chemicals needed to make chemical weapons.

Let me know if I'm going to fast for you.

Yes I get your upset the tyrantical regimes you admire were overthrown

This is why the demafasict are so upset with trump hitting your allies in the Iranian regime

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Yet here you are enjoying the peace and security that this country affords you. SMFH, don't talk with your mouth full ingrate.

Like the freedom to publicly condemn genocide without fear of deportation? or question those in power?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Then why is everyone making a big deal out of it?

They're not, they're making a big deal out of the hypocrisy and the weakness of congress.

 

[struth]

They're not, they're making a big deal out of the hypocrisy and the weakness of congress.

The poster I responded to was certainly

No mention of Congress. What weakness of Congress are you referring to?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Yes I get your upset the tyrantical regimes you admire were overthrown

This is why the demafasict are so upset with trump hitting your allies in the Iranian regime

 

[Concerned American]

Like the freedom to publicly condemn genocide without fear of deportation? or question those in power?

View attachment 1127934

Again don't talk with your mouth full. If you're a guest in another's house, you don't bad mouth the host. If you don't like the gov't of this nation, haul your butt back where you came from. In any case STFU.

 

[Dorian Mode]

What do you think the world would look like today with an isolationist America?

Why is it all or nothing with everyone? America does not have to be isolationist and it doesn't have to be always at war, and that includes proxy wars. All wars are very expensive and accomplish very little. So far, in the last few decades, how much money has America invested in Iraq and Afghanistan and what was the ROI? I think the ROI was about 10 trillion in national debt. A war with Iran is going to accomplish little. The cost of being the world's police force is too much for the little to no benefit it returns. Why not let Europe take over being the world's cop for awhile while rebuilding infrastructure in America?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

The poster I responded to was certainly

No mention of Congress. What weakness of Congress are you referring to?

Too many examples to list, here's one though.