Trump demands CBS be stripped of licence over edited Harris interview

Is there proof of that for the WHOLE interview as you claim?

Obviously the whole interview wasn’t, I’m just going off of what I heard that parts of it were chopped up and rearranged.
 
Are you kidding? Media outlets like CBS put out propaganda to deceive the public and they do so BLATANTLY!
Control of media is what takes place in authoritative regimes. At the moment the Democratic Party controls most of the media that the voting public gets to see. It's why people believed the Russia hoax. It's why they believed the bullshit narrative that Hunter's laptop was fake. It's why Kamala Harris can run for President without answering tough questions. Trump isn't against the 1st Amendment...he's against a Main Stream Media that doesn't care about the truth anymore and is willing to lie to keep progressives in power.
BS. It has been proven that CNN gives more real news than FOX, which has the highest viewership in the U.S. and is watched mainly by Republicans

Fox News isn't news

A new study suggests Fox News viewers aren’t just manipulated and misinformed — they are literally being made ignorant by their consumption habits.

The study, titled “The manifold effects of partisan media on viewers’ beliefs and attitudes: A field experiment with Fox News viewers,” was performed by a pair of political scientists: David Broockman, who teaches at UC-Berkeley, and Joshua Kalla, who teaches at Yale.

According to Broockman and Kalla, when these Fox viewers watched CNN, they heard about all sorts of things Fox wasn’t telling them. They processed that information. They took it in. They became more knowledgeable about what was really going on in the United States.

Mediabiascnnvsfox.webp
 
Well sure, this is what a fascist does. This isn't Trump being in a bad mood or saying something to get attention. It's who he is.
/----/ I remember Commie Harris calling for Trump to be taken off Twitter. But that's what Communists do,
HARRIS: What's important about it is this, Jake, and I say this as a former prosecutor. You have to take seriously witness intimidation. You have to take seriously an attempt to obstruct justice. You have to take seriously a threat to a witness and really to their safety and potentially their life.

And when you're talking about Donald Trump, he has 65 million Twitter followers. He has proven himself to be willing to obstruct justice. Just ask Bob Mueller. You can look at the manifesto from the shooter in El Paso to know that what Donald Trump says on Twitter impacts people's perceptions about what they should and should not do.

And we're talking about a private corporation, Twitter, that has terms of use, and as far as I'm concerned and I think most people would say, including members of Congress who he has threatened --

TAPPER: Mm-hmm.

HARRIS: -- that he has lost his privileges and it should be taken down. The bottom line is that you can't say that you have one rule for Facebook and you have a different rule for Twitter. The same rule has to apply, which is that there has to be a responsibility that is placed on these social media sites to understand their power. They are directly speaking to millions and millions of people without any level of oversight or regulation, and that has to stop.

TAPPER: He is the president of the United States, and I would -- you know, you might argue, first of all, he doesn't --
 
Are you implying FOX NEWS and OOAN and Newsmax and Breibart and Washington Examiner, and Wall Street Journal and the NEW YORK POST, etc etc etc don't edit their News stories or interviews to FAVOR Trump or put him in a better light?
The difference is, CBS didn't merely edit the interview. They totally replaced one answer with a clip from a different interview answering a totally different question.
 
/----/ Censoring your political opponents is no different.
Twitter deciding to remove a user from Twitter is quite different than imprisoning someone or deleting the existence of Twitter.

You sound insane even to pretend otherwise.

But what option do you have? You are once again tasked with defending the undefensible, from the orange rapist. And you have accepted this task.

It does harm to your intellect and ethics. As you are showing very clearly.
 
Twitter deciding to remove a user from Twitter is quite different than imprisoning someone or deleting the existence of Twitter.

You sound insane even to pretend otherwise.

But what option do you have? You are once again tasked with defending the undefensible, from the orange rapist. And you have accepted this task.

It does harm to your intellect and ethics. As you are showing very clearly.
/---/ I thought we were talking about Trump calling for the network to lose their license? Who said put someone in jail? Maybe I missed that part.
 


It seems like his jihad against the first amrndment knows no bounds. This is from a party that is cool with lying. Imdeed JD Jackass proudly announces that he makes up stories to push his hateful narrative.

His paymaster Putin must be giving him tips on stifling free speech. This is what retribution loohs like under fascist regimes. Opponents havent been falling off buildings yet but the Holocaust didnt start with ovens.

Its telling that he has made no comment aabout the lying Gateway Pundit. They have actually been convicted of lying.
CBS engaged in election interference.

That's a crime.
 
I thought we were talking about Trump calling for the network to lose their license?
Yes, and i dared to correctly lump this in with his past, similar behavior and to include that in the discussion.

Like a normal, honest person would do.

A dishonest person trying to turn down into up would attempt to shield Trump by talking about this in a vacuum.

I'm not your guy, for that.
 
Trump calls anything that reflects negatively on him, "Election Interference".

Then he says that anyone who interferes with the election will be going to jail.

When he shows you who and what he is, believe him.
 
BS. It has been proven that CNN gives more real news than FOX, which has the highest viewership in the U.S. and is watched mainly by Republicans

Fox News isn't news

A new study suggests Fox News viewers aren’t just manipulated and misinformed — they are literally being made ignorant by their consumption habits.

The study, titled “The manifold effects of partisan media on viewers’ beliefs and attitudes: A field experiment with Fox News viewers,” was performed by a pair of political scientists: David Broockman, who teaches at UC-Berkeley, and Joshua Kalla, who teaches at Yale.

According to Broockman and Kalla, when these Fox viewers watched CNN, they heard about all sorts of things Fox wasn’t telling them. They processed that information. They took it in. They became more knowledgeable about what was really going on in the United States.

View attachment 1025494
You think CNN is unbiased because two liberal college professors say so? Are you REALLY that stupid, Lucky?
 
You think CNN is unbiased because two liberal college professors say so? Are you REALLY that stupid, Lucky?
If you read my post (and the article enclosed) correctly, I/they did not say (or show) that they are unbiased. I/they stated that they are less biased and do more true reporting than FOX and many other stations.

If you can't read things correctly, then learn before you open your mouth and make a fool of yourself.
 
If you read my post (and the article enclosed) correctly, I/they did not say (or show) that they are unbiased. I/they stated that they are less biased and do more true reporting than FOX and many other stations.

If you can't read things correctly, then learn before you open your mouth and make a fool of yourself.
And they base that conclusion on what, Lucky? Their bias?
 


It seems like his jihad against the first amrndment knows no bounds. This is from a party that is cool with lying. Imdeed JD Jackass proudly announces that he makes up stories to push his hateful narrative.

His paymaster Putin must be giving him tips on stifling free speech. This is what retribution loohs like under fascist regimes. Opponents havent been falling off buildings yet but the Holocaust didnt start with ovens.

Its telling that he has made no comment aabout the lying Gateway Pundit. They have actually been convicted of lying.
That tells you that Trumpy is nuts.
 
Nobody likes a rigged edited interview asking what she ate for lunch... While not mentioning the failures she is connected to.
 
And they base that conclusion on what, Lucky? Their bias?
You are blind-by-choice. You believe no one and no studies, articles, facts, or statistics that are numerous and done by many different people and institutions. What is even more surprising is that such a skeptic as you are, believes everything that Trump says.............in spite of facts that show he is the one not to be believed. You are a true Trump cult member.
 
Back
Top Bottom