Trump deleted message pressuring Bondi to prosecute his enemies

Trump seems to know that he seriously hurt any chances of cases against his enemies by admitting he's doing so because he wants revenge.
Otherwise he wouldn't have deleted his message. Here's an article from our favorite conservative outlet stating that he deleted the message and replaced it with nicer ones.
The Cowardly Liar is up to his old tricks
 
Trump seems to know that he seriously hurt any chances of cases against his enemies by admitting he's doing so because he wants revenge.
Otherwise he wouldn't have deleted his message. Here's an article from our favorite conservative outlet stating that he deleted the message and replaced it with nicer ones.
Trump can’t run anymore, what he does now is for us not for him your ******* retarded *****
 
Lefties weren't concerned when Trump was indicted on frivolous charges, impeached on "evidence" that relied on faked documents or set up for two assassination attempts. Payback is a *****. Live with it.
 
Lefties weren't concerned when Trump was indicted on frivolous charges, impeached on "evidence" that relied on faked documents or set up for two assassination attempts. Payback is a *****. Live with it.
If Teumpowere frivolous charges what are the charges against Letitia James
 
Trump seems to know that he seriously hurt any chances of cases against his enemies by admitting he's doing so because he wants revenge.
Otherwise he wouldn't have deleted his message. Here's an article from our favorite conservative outlet stating that he deleted the message and replaced it with nicer ones.

Yeah, and he thinks if he deletes it, nobody will be able to see it any more. How childish is that?
 
Trump seems to know that he seriously hurt any chances of cases against his enemies by admitting he's doing so because he wants revenge.
Otherwise he wouldn't have deleted his message. Here's an article from our favorite conservative outlet stating that he deleted the message and replaced it with nicer ones.
He’s right you know, the evidence is overwhelming
 
He’s right you know, the evidence is overwhelming
A. It’s not

B. We always knew it was not about the law but rather about politics

Trump just confirmed that
 
In legal terms deleting the post is called "consciousness of guilt."
 
Comey needs to be indicted for lying to Congress.

Trump did not need to call out Bondi on social media.

She is his employee, just have a meeting with her.
 
Trump seems to know that he seriously hurt any chances of cases against his enemies by admitting he's doing so because he wants revenge.
Otherwise he wouldn't have deleted his message. Here's an article from our favorite conservative outlet stating that he deleted the message and replaced it with nicer ones.
If these enemies of the state broke the law, they should be prosecuted. Trump's opinion of them is irrelevant. Nobody is above the law, right?
 
If these enemies of the state broke the law, they should be prosecuted. Trump's opinion of them is irrelevant. Nobody is above the law, right?
They aren't enemies of the state. They are people the orange piece of shit doesn't like. His opinion of them is why they are being investigated, so of course it matters. BTW, Erik Seibert, the US Attorney who trump forced out because he did not find sufficient legal predicate to charge James with a crime, was also against charging Comey for the same reason.
 
So James, Willis, Comey, Wray should be above the law....

Nice...
Nope... But it is not the job of the US President to target his political enemies using the DOJ...

Trump broke the law and a Grand Jury found that he should face trail... He then lost in that case and became a felon...

What the rest of the world is trying to figure out is, why were the other cases dropped...
It seems that if elected President you suddenly aren't a criminal any more... That isn't the way it works in other countries like EU... You still have to go to court and defend your actions..
Being elected by voters doesn't make your criminal acts go away...


So we are trying to figure out why Trump isn't standing trail for the Classified Documents and Interfering in the election...

Can someone explain that?

I am saying that because it seems that we could find the US President a mass murderer and nothing can be done... That is daft... Impeachment is not a criminal process, it is a political one...
 
15th post
They aren't enemies of the state. They are people the orange piece of shit doesn't like. His opinion of them is why they are being investigated, so of course it matters. BTW, Erik Seibert, the US Attorney who trump forced out because he did not find sufficient legal predicate to charge James with a crime, was also against charging Comey for the same reason.
Their lawlessness will be determined by a grand jury. Just like everyone else. Nobody is above the law.
 
Former FBI Director James Comey indicted on criminal charges

Former FBI Director James Comey, a longtime target of President Donald Trump’s ire, was indicted Thursday on criminal charges of false statement and obstruction.

The charges came days after Trump publicly complained to Attorney General Pam Bondi that “nothing is being done” about Comey and other of the president’s perceived enemies, who he claimed were “all guilty as hell.”

A senior Justice Department official told NBC News that Comey was charged in a two-count indictment.

Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared to reference Comey’s indictment, without mentioning him by name, as news of the charges broke.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/25/james-comey-indicted-fbi-trump.html

What a crazy coincidence. A few days after Dotard demanded the sock puppet known as Pam do something about his enemies list........she did. Even though Erik Seibert, the US Attorney trump canned because he wouldn't indict L. James without sufficient evidence, was of the opinion there was no criminal predicate to charge Comey.

But I guess the insurance attorney trump hired to replace Seibert, the woman with zero prosecutorial experience but some hotness, was convinced of Comey's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Kinda funny how it all worked out, right? Unless your not a fan of authoritarian governance.
 

Pressed on Justice Department polarization, Bondi goes on the attack.

Attorney General Pam Bondi’s approach on Tuesday to fielding hostile questions posed by Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee about the perceived political weaponization of the Justice Department was simple and brutal: Don’t answer, just attack.

Ms. Bondi attempted to cast more than four hours of stonewalling senatorial queries about decisions on her watch as an aggrieved defense of President Trump, herself and other administration appointees.

Ms. Bondi’s calculated bombast at the oversight hearing reflected an effort across the Trump administration to flip potentially damaging — or revealing — moments of public accountability into opportunities to savage political opponents.

Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the top Democrat on the committee, opened the questioning by asking if the White House had consulted Ms. Bondi on the deployment of federal troops to Chicago. She ignored the question and instead raised her voice to accuse Mr. Durbin, a 28-year veteran of the Senate who has delivered billions of dollars in criminal justice funding to his state, of disloyalty to his constituents.


It's often said of members of the regime, both trump regimes, that they are speaking to an audience of one. Namely, the orange piece of shit. He had to be thrilled with the blonde sock puppet's performance today giving dishonor to herself and the office she represents.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom