Trump continues to lie about ‘election interference.’

[Independentthinker]

The Defendant had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-determinative fraud during the election and that he had won. He was also entitled to formally challenge the results of the election through lawful and appropriate means, such as by seeking recounts or audits of the popular vote in states or filing lawsuits challenging ballots and procedures. Indeed, in many cases, the Defendant did pursue these methods of contesting the election results. His efforts to change the outcome in any state through recounts, audits, or legal challenges were uniformly unsuccessful.

https://www.justice.gov/storage/US_v_Trump_23_cr_257.pdf

So? I don't know what you are trying to say. Many of the dems in my video were claiming the election was stolen or whatever years afterward.

 

[BlindBoo]

So? I don't know what you are trying to say. Many of the dems in my video were claiming the election was stolen or whatever years afterward.

So what? Free speech allow them to. Perhaps you don't understand how free speech works in our country. None of those cases involved trying to overturn any of those elections after all legal means were exhausted.

 

[beautress]

The Defendant had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-determinative fraud during the election and that he had won. He was also entitled to formally challenge the results of the election through lawful and appropriate means, such as by seeking recounts or audits of the popular vote in states or filing lawsuits challenging ballots and procedures. Indeed, in many cases, the Defendant did pursue these methods of contesting the election results. His efforts to change the outcome in any state through recounts, audits, or legal challenges were uniformly unsuccessful.

https://www.justice.gov/storage/US_v_Trump_23_cr_257.pdf

I hate to tell you this, but some of us have had the internet experience of accidentally running into leftist precinct chairmen from all states chatting and bragging about their multiple votes being greater than anyone else's before the turn of the century. YOUR LEFTIST LEADERS BROUGHT THE TRUTH ON THEMSELVES ABOUT LEFTIST GRANDOISE GRABS FOR POWER BY DUPING THE POLLS FROM THE PACIFIC TO THE ATLANTIC 20 years ago using famous websites to tattle their own brags as if hoisting votes en mass was an appropriate thing to do from sea to shining sea.

Now they're going to tell a new generation they're not at it again. The judges can buy it except for anyone who saw them brag at the Time Magazine website in the late 1990s, or was it the NY Times? I was sick for a week after I saw that bragging hehaw crap about who voted the most times in the presidential election, and I will never forget having a sick stomach after learning that an unfair election in this nation was going on, and it was done by cheaters from coast to coast who didn't want Republicans to win Presidential, House, or Senate seats. You can't make me forget what toadies were doing in national elections that affect all of us. It still makes me sick to think about their pride in destroying the real vote count. I still vote, but having the deep state choice winning an election is for the birds.

 

[kyzr]

Your link provides an opinion not a legal basis for appeal

So you'll just have to wait and see what the Trump legal team files, and they will, after the trial.
I showed you a Law professors opinion that the Bragg case is DOA on appeal.

 

[rightwinger]

So you'll just have to wait and see what the Trump legal team files, and they will, after the trial.
I showed you a Law professors opinion that the Bragg case is DOA on appeal.

Trump appeals EVERY decision he loses whether he has grounds or not

 

[surada]

Not a big fan of innocent until proven guilty huh?

He's not on the jury. He's entitled to an opinion.

 

[rightwinger]

DJTrump does not lie about proven issues.

Like elections?

 

[Cougarbear]

And who did they identify as "ultra left outlets"?

And yet, these so-called readers of ultra-left news......got seated, despite the voir dire of competent defense counsel. Seems those attorneys ain't hyperventilating over the reading habits as much as the poster CB is.
--------------------------------------------



Ummm, you are letting your histrionics cloud your better judgement. Let's give you a bit of a primer:
1. This has been a long incubating case within DA's office. Signficantly accelerated when Michael Cohen, Trump's former bagman, became a witness against Trump.
2. It has dragged on and on and on due to the blizzard of motions and appeals by Trump to delay the proceedings. He finally ran out of rope, or the court out of patience. And here we are.
3. Your personal beef against "Banana Republics" is your cross to bear. It is not applicable here......the case was thoroughly investigated (a couple of years); grand juries determined there was cause for indictment; it was thoroughly vetted, combed-through, and resisted by expensive and competent counsel for the defense. And the court has been amazingly tolerant of social media threats by the defendant against a whole array of players, including the judge's family.
4. So-called 'Banana Republics' do none of that.


Ummm, earnest poster Cougarbear, my avatar, nor me, has "a side".
We are long-standing 'Independents'. Fiercely so.
Although, with that said, we will admit that we are not TDS'rs.
Trump's Duped & Snookered. Nor are we Trump Sycophants. Or Trump Groupies. Nor followers of the Trump Cult. Nor MAGA. Nor Q-Anon.

We are none of those.....except "Independent".

So rest easy, I am not a partisan. Nor is my avatar.

You people think the tyrannists will leave you alone. They won’t. So, rest uneasy. What I posted is 100% true.

 

[Cougarbear]

Only when you consider everything outside of Fox News to be “ultra left”

It is. Not only that, they are pro socialists that think they will be immune to the tyranny within the Democrats. If you believe otherwise you are the problem

 

[rightwinger]

It is. Not only that, they are pro socialists that think they will be immune to the tyranny within the Democrats. If you believe otherwise you are the problem

Can you define what a socialist is?
I didn’t think so

 

[Rawley]

He's not on the jury. He's entitled to an opinion.

You are entitled to an opinion, not entitled to immunity from being called out as an asshole when you spew lies.

 

[Cougarbear]

Can you define what a socialist is?
I didn’t think so

 

[Hollie]

Trump’s criminal prosecution is perfectly lawful and warranted – in no matter ‘election interference.’

Trump alone is responsible for the crimes he committed; Trump alone is responsible for time taken from campaigning; Trump has only himself to blame.

In fact, it’s Trump who is guilty of election interference.

‘Merchan understands that the core issue in the trial is not the payments made in October 2016 to an adult film star to conceal their alleged sexual relationship, but why Trump made them.

"Paying hush money by itself is not a crime," Eisen wrote. "The crime alleged in this case is felony document falsification, as the judge detailed. That requires intent to conceal, aid or commit another crime. Here, the prosecution alleges that the intent was to violate federal campaign finance laws and also the state statute prohibiting the 'unlawful influence' of an election — i.e., election interference."’

MSN

The criminal prosecution is another fraud perpetrated by the reprehensible Dem / Socialist, Soros funded DIE hires.

The Dem / Socialist loon and cheerleader, Joy Reid has shared her enthusiasm for black DA's waging their Jihad against the white devil.

What a bunch of reprehensible lowlifes.

 

[MagicMike]

No it's not. It's 8 years old, a state case, a misdemeanor. And Bragg is trying to try this as a federal felony. Why is a state judge allowing this? It's too old to try because statute of limitation has run out. It should not be tried in a state court. It's a waste of taxpayer's money and will be thrown out if convicted. Why do you Democrats keep ignoring the laws of this nation and the Constitution??? You all have mental illness called Trump Derangement Syndrome. Get some help, please!

Fake news

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

If Trump wanted to campaign, he shouldn't have violated the law.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The criminal prosecution is another fraud perpetrated by the reprehensible Dem / Socialist, Soros funded DIE hires.

The Dem / Socialist loon and cheerleader, Joy Reid has shared her enthusiasm for black DA's waging their Jihad against the white devil.

What a bunch of reprehensible lowlifes.

It's Trump who actually committed election interference.

 

[Independentthinker]

If Trump wanted to campaign, he shouldn't have violated the law.

What law?

 

[Hollie]

It's Trump who actually committed election interference.

Joy Reid gave you an autographed pair of pom poms, right?

 

[Aldo Raine]

The Trump prosecutions are setting a bad example that all Republican candidates for President will be treated this way in the future.

No tRump is THE bad example!
MAGA

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

Trump’s criminal prosecution is perfectly lawful and warranted – in no matter ‘election interference.’

Trump alone is responsible for the crimes he committed; Trump alone is responsible for time taken from campaigning; Trump has only himself to blame.

In fact, it’s Trump who is guilty of election interference.

‘Merchan understands that the core issue in the trial is not the payments made in October 2016 to an adult film star to conceal their alleged sexual relationship, but why Trump made them.

"Paying hush money by itself is not a crime," Eisen wrote. "The crime alleged in this case is felony document falsification, as the judge detailed. That requires intent to conceal, aid or commit another crime. Here, the prosecution alleges that the intent was to violate federal campaign finance laws and also the state statute prohibiting the 'unlawful influence' of an election — i.e., election interference."’

MSN

That's what it's all about. Been about . The fear of a President that is for America and Americans. They will stop at nothing to keep him out of the Whitehouse. Nothing is off limits. Political witch hunt .