Interesting article. I found it to be lacking in objectivity, the language it used was extremely slanted, and many of the, "facts," it told, were plainly wrong. But, that should be expected from globalists trying to reshape American history.
". . He declined to comment for this report.. . "
<snip>
". . A spokesperson for Trump did not respond to requests for comment. . . "
<snip>
“You need to make sure that those ballots are maintained under strict chain of custody at all times,” said David Becker, executive director of the nonpartisan Center for Election Innovation and Research. “It's destroying voter confidence in the United States.. . ”
(chain of custody, sure. . . like Brenda Snipes cares about? The very fact that the writers are writing this piece, and that there was a riot at the Capitol? Um, I think that ship has sailed. )
<snip>
". . The secret ballot “is a fundamental right in American elections,” said Pamela Smith, president of Verified Voting, a nonpartisan group that advocates for secure elections.. . "
(See? This is what I am talking about? You have a paper run by oligarchs? They will not hesitate to push lies. So why should we trust them on any of this propaganda sparse on provable facts, long on STATE declarations of what is the FIAT paradigm of reality?
". . .The other way of voting, still employed by seven states in the mid-nineteenth century, was by voice – viva voce. Voting in a viva voce state required you to go to the polling place and read out, or recite if you couldn’t read, the names of the candidates you wished to support. . ..... . And it made sense: in those times political choices were understood to be communal, not private, matters. Voting to advance private individual interests calls for secrecy – but public voting made perfect sense when politics was understood to be about group or communal interests. . . ")
sociallogic.iath.virginia.edu
<snip>
". .. The Federal Bureau of Investigation declined to comment. . . . "
<snip>
". . .Reuters was unable to determine what data, if any, was stolen. .. "
<snip>
". . . Senter and Frank did not respond to requests for comment for this report.. . "
<snip>
". . . Hiatt, a Republican, did not respond to requests for comment.. . "
<snip>
". . . Huff, a registered independent, said she was dismayed by the threats and spread of disinformation. She said her office must now prepare for voters who may refuse to insert their ballot into the tabulator in the false belief the device will switch their vote.
"I'm very concerned for the voters," Huff told Reuters. "Democracy starts here. It starts here in our office."
To date, only one of the incidents has resulted in serious criminal charges over the voting data breaches: the case of Peters, the Mesa County clerk in Colorado. Peters, a Republican, was indicted in March on seven felony charges, including attempted influence of a public servant, criminal impersonation and identity theft, and three misdemeanors. The charges could carry a sentence of more than 25 years.
She has not yet entered a plea; her arraignment is scheduled for May 24. Peters declined to comment. She has previously said she is a victim of a partisan attack. . . "
<snip>
". . .Jackson did not respond to requests for comment.. . "
<snip>
". . . Sweet did not respond to requests for comment.. . "
<snip>
". . . Emmet County Prosecuting Attorney James Linderman did not respond to requests for comment for this story.. . "
<snip>
". . . Lambert did not respond to requests for comment.. . ."
<snip>
". . .Scott declined to comment for this story.. . "
<snip>
". . Cook did not respond to requests for comment. Smith declined to comment.. . ."
<snip>
“. . The heat is more on Republican clerks,” said Crane, a Republican who served as Arapahoe County clerk until 2018. “They really look at us like traitors.”
In legal filings, Schroeder said he believed he had a “statutory duty” to preserve the 2020 voting records and the information he copied should be legally public information, without detailing what the files contained.
In court filings, Schroeder said that he was careful to “preserve chain of custody” with the data he gave the attorneys, asserting on Feb. 3 that the copied hard drives remained in “sealed containers.” He said the lawyers who took possession of the data – including the attorney representing him, Case – told him no one had accessed it.
Case declined to comment. . . ."
This article and globalist gas-lighting is long on hyperbole, and gaslighting, but really short on any attempts to seriously empathize or tell an honest portrayal of the other sides POV.
No thinking person could ever really consider this "journalism," anymore. I have listed all the relevant facts of this very, VERY long article that a person needs.
Oh. . here's a last quote from that piece, superimposed . . . on a different image, to put things into perspective.