Trump Changes To History At National Parks Must Be Undone Judge Rules

[Thinker101]

Well, that's my point.... Nobody (TTBOMK) gave the blob the ok to destroy a 1/3 of the white house in October 2025. He just did it. And here we are nine months later in limbo.

Seems to me that whomever the President is can just demolish/build whatever they want in DC.

I think there should be some guardrails.

I've said it a few times here. I get lumped in with liberals and I guess I am pretty liberal about some things but at my heart I'm an institutionalist....if there isn't a sincerely pressing need for something to be done by the feds that involves national security or safety of the American people...it should be a group project.

No kidding, who gave you asswipes the ok to tear down statues a few years back?

 

[Robert W]

View attachment 1268938
A win for the good guys.

Kennedy was not a good student. His death to this day is questioned. His name on the auditorium is fine but were he alive today, he might welcome the Trump name on it as well. It was a mess until Trump fixed it.

 

[candycorn]

Actually the case of Trump Vs United States, where the supreme court gave the president immunity for all presidential acts, and acts related to the presidency.
When Trump bulldozed the east wing, he did it as the president, and as such has presidential immunity from prosecution (per the supreme court)
So the usual guardrails no longer apply.
And even if a new court is created to rule on the legality of the act. The president can't be held liable.
And anyone who assisted, who can b e held liable to the law. Can be given a presidential pardon. Which is an absolute constitutional power.

I wasn't speaking about prosecution I suppose...just someone to "pump the brakes" whenever there is a executive over-reach. Not to imprison or punish but make the executive prove there is a compelling national emergency that forces action without congressional oversight more or less.

Sort of.

 

[candycorn]

I have been to the Arlington national Cemetery and also in Arlington VA.
It in my opinion is a magnificent tribute to the United States of America

And it's my opinion its an unnecessary eyesore.

I have stood on the ground where Lincoln invaded VA with no permission of Congress, so I know presidents can lash out and create wars. Why do you object to the arch?

I recall when Democrats were so busy ripping down monuments. They seem so upset over this monument.

Yeah, a lot of people have brains--not you of course--and don't think we should be honoring insurrectionists who attacked this nation.

 

[Concerned American]

And here we are nine months later in limbo.

And why is that? Can you say democrat obstruction like we've witnessed with every move Trump has made for the last ten years? Of course you can't.

 

[candycorn]

One wonders when Teddy Roosevelt had the East wing built and later added to by Franklin Roosevelt if there was this gnashing of teeth and dog witted protests?

Is the job of the president to be helpless?

1. Including results for Who had the estwing build white house.
   Do you want results only for Who had the east wing built whitehouse?
2. https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=c64e...YnVpbHQrd2hpdGVob3VzZSZmb3JtPUNTQlJBTkQ&ntb=1
   
   Like
   Dislike
   

   The East Wing was originally built in 1902 under President Theodore Roosevelt, designed by architect Charles Follen McKim, and later expanded in 1942 under President Franklin D. Roosevelt, designed by White House architect Lorenzo Winslow.​

   Original Construction (1902)​

   The first East Wing was constructed during Theodore Roosevelt’s renovation of the White House in 1902. Its purpose was primarily to serve as a formal entrance for visitors and guests attending large social events, providing a circular driveway, a porte-cochère, and a coatroom known as “the hatbox” for guests’ coats and hats. The wing was designed by Charles Follen McKim, a prominent architect of the era, as part of Roosevelt’s broader effort to modernize and expand the White House complex while restoring elements of Thomas Jefferson’s original vision for the east entrance Wikipedia+2.
   
   

   Expansion and Remodeling (1942)​

   In 1942, during Franklin D. Roosevelt’s presidency, the East Wing underwent a significant expansion and remodeling. This project was commissioned to provide additional office space for the growing staff, including the First Lady’s offices, and to conceal the construction of the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC), an underground bunker for national security purposes. The two-story expansion was designed by White House architect Lorenzo Winslow, integrating Roosevelt’s coatroom into the new structure and creating the White House Family Theater Wikipedia+1.
   
   

   Purpose and Legacy​

   Over time, the East Wing became the administrative hub for the First Lady and her staff, including the Social Secretary, correspondence staff, and other offices. Its design was deliberately modest and sympathetic to the Neoclassical style of the Executive Residence, balancing the West Wing and maintaining the overall composition of the White House complex factually.co+1. The East Wing remained a key functional and ceremonial space until its partial demolition in 2025 to make way for a new privately funded ballroom project Wikipedia+1.
   In summary, the original East Wing was built by Charles Follen McKim under Theodore Roosevelt in 1902, and the major 1942 expansion was designed by Lorenzo Winslow under Franklin D. Roosevelt, reflecting both practical needs and national security considerations.

actually nobody wonders that.

 

[candycorn]

No kidding, who gave you asswipes the ok to tear down statues a few years back?

Which statue are you talking about?

 

[candycorn]

His name on the auditorium is fine but were he alive today, he might welcome the Trump name on it as well. It was a mess until Trump fixed it.

Yeah, nobody believes that; including you.

 

[Thinker101]

Which statue are you talking about?

Which statue? There were at least 100. Is your amnesia kicking in?

 

[otto105]

Do you want a nation ruled by the Bench as per Sotomayor’s vision?

Is the judicial branch of government it a co-equal branch?

 

[otto105]

Actually you're too late. It was Chief Justice Roberts vision, when they threw out the Chevron Doctrine.

The majority opinion, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, stated that the previous Chevron framework was "fundamentally misguided" and violated the federal Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The Court determined that it is the judiciary’s fundamental duty to interpret the law, not the agencies'.

The U.S. Supreme Court officially overturned the Chevron doctrine on June 28, 2024, in the landmark case Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. By a 6-3 vote, the Court ended the 40-year precedent that required federal judges to defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous laws

You mean subject matter experts for industry sycophants.

 

[candycorn]

Which statue? There were at least 100. Is your amnesia kicking in?

I was asking which one you were talking about....

 

[meaner gene]

You mean subject matter experts for industry sycophants.

Actually subject matter experts for the government.

 

[egp320i]

I wasn't speaking about prosecution I suppose...just someone to "pump the brakes" whenever there is a executive over-reach. Not to imprison or punish but make the executive prove there is a compelling national emergency that forces action without congressional oversight more or less.

Sort of.

show me proof of who the good guys are?

watching too much guardians of the galaxy?

this is congress......

 

[candycorn]

show me proof of who the good guys are?

watching too much guardians of the galaxy?

this is congress......

Good guys don't elect a convicted felon...much less a 34X convicted felon.

 

[egp320i]

Good guys don't elect a convicted felon...much less a 34X convicted felon.

wow 100x over, never convicted........34x conviction felon........NO charges

wow, innocent until proven guilty............this is NOT the UK

grow a brain........if that were true he's not president but in jail for life

 

[candycorn]

wow 100x over, never convicted........34x conviction felon........NO charges

wow, innocent until proven guilty............this is NOT the UK

grow a brain........if that were true he's not president but in jail for life

Are you having an episode? Try some punctuation and capitalization.

 

[egp320i]

Are you having an episode? Try some punctuation and capitalization.

late, don't care........point is allegations don't get you in prison

not enough evidence........simple rule of law

cry all you like

dems pulled out every trick in their dirty book and still lost

your butt must still be burning......get some tucks wipes

 

[candycorn]

late, don't care........point is allegations don't get you in prison

Convictions usually do. They didn't in the blob's case but he's still a convicted felon 34 times over. A win for the good guys.

 

[otto105]

Actually subject matter experts for the government.

Hilarious