Trump Changes To History At National Parks Must Be Undone Judge Rules

skews13

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
12,046
Reaction score
16,328
Points
2,415
President Trump's effort to rewrite the past at the country's museums, parks and landmarks was struck down on Friday, with a federal judge calling for the administration to restore changes already made at locations nationwide.

The preliminary injunction issued by U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley in Massachusetts also orders a pause on any additional changes, writing that the plaintiffs have shown these efforts are meant "to rewrite the Nation's history with a white-out pen."


MAGA is really going to like all of the new additions coming in 2029.

1781394703949.webp
 
President Trump's effort to rewrite the past at the country's museums, parks and landmarks was struck down on Friday, with a federal judge calling for the administration to restore changes already made at locations nationwide.

The preliminary injunction issued by U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley in Massachusetts also orders a pause on any additional changes, writing that the plaintiffs have shown these efforts are meant "to rewrite the Nation's history with a white-out pen."


MAGA is really going to like all of the new additions coming in 2029.

View attachment 1268894
Also read about his signs in the White House describing other presidents.

Trump's is like "He has the large penis, and is known for licking nipples the fastest, and having the most blow jobs from 13 year olds of any president in US hisotry"

Whereas Obama is "He go elected because of DEI"

Biden "He lost the election in 2020" (this one is actually true).

Reagan "He loved Trump" (this one is actually true).
 
President Trump's effort to rewrite the past at the country's museums, parks and landmarks was struck down on Friday, with a federal judge calling for the administration to restore changes already made at locations nationwide.

The preliminary injunction issued by U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley in Massachusetts also orders a pause on any additional changes, writing that the plaintiffs have shown these efforts are meant "to rewrite the Nation's history with a white-out pen."


MAGA is really going to like all of the new additions coming in 2029.

View attachment 1268894
America is ruled by Judges. How many presidents do we now have?
 
I think that one thing the blob's "administrations" have shown us is that we need to have a whole separate court system set up to simply undo over-reaches by the Executive if Congress isn't going to do their duty and be the people's branch.

Periodic changes to the White House (notice I didn't say improvements) can be done by the President requesting them through Congress and as long as it's within reason...they almost always get approved. Putting greens, basketball courts, the UFC cockfighting cage or whatever it is.

But I think even those on the right would agree that there is no calculus in the world that approves an entire wing of the building being bulldozed to the ground before the legal questions have been asked and answered, before the funding has been appropriated and voted on, etc...

So yeah, the part of our constitution that has been historically silent needs to be given a voice. And since Congress has revealed itself to be largely either a massive roadblock or a rubber stamp of approval for the executive, the courts need a rapid reaction docket that can answer the legal challenges in a week or less lets say.
 
President Trump's effort to rewrite the past at the country's museums, parks and landmarks was struck down on Friday, with a federal judge calling for the administration to restore changes already made at locations nationwide.

The preliminary injunction issued by U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley in Massachusetts also orders a pause on any additional changes, writing that the plaintiffs have shown these efforts are meant "to rewrite the Nation's history with a white-out pen."


MAGA is really going to like all of the new additions coming in 2029.

View attachment 1268894
love that pic..

Did you see the Times article on Mango Mussolini's name coming off of the Kennedy center?

Here are some excerpts.



1781396008127.webp



1781396147657.webp


1781396189228.webp


I think the next Democratic president will have an office established in the DOI to return everything back to normal. Hopefully Congress will act on it as well in concert with the new administration to make sure this sort of nonsense doesn't happen again without going through proper channels.
 
Also read about his signs in the White House describing other presidents.

Trump's is like "He has the large penis, and is known for licking nipples the fastest, and having the most blow jobs from 13 year olds of any president in US hisotry"

Whereas Obama is "He go elected because of DEI"

Biden "He lost the election in 2020" (this one is actually true).

Reagan "He loved Trump" (this one is actually true).
You people are weird.
 
President Trump's effort to rewrite the past at the country's museums, parks and landmarks was struck down on Friday, with a federal judge calling for the administration to restore changes already made at locations nationwide.

The preliminary injunction issued by U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley in Massachusetts also orders a pause on any additional changes, writing that the plaintiffs have shown these efforts are meant "to rewrite the Nation's history with a white-out pen."


MAGA is really going to like all of the new additions coming in 2029.

View attachment 1268894
Do you want a nation ruled by the Bench as per Sotomayor’s vision?
 
President Trump's effort to rewrite the past at the country's museums, parks and landmarks was struck down on Friday, with a federal judge calling for the administration to restore changes already made at locations nationwide.

The preliminary injunction issued by U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley in Massachusetts also orders a pause on any additional changes, writing that the plaintiffs have shown these efforts are meant "to rewrite the Nation's history with a white-out pen."


MAGA is really going to like all of the new additions coming in 2029.

View attachment 1268894
And when they return to power, they will reverse what you do. Trump is really giving you a lot of things to erase though. Of course, you most likely have the lists all drawn up now and will add everything he adds also.
 
I think that one thing the blob's "administrations" have shown us is that we need to have a whole separate court system set up to simply undo over-reaches by the Executive if Congress isn't going to do their duty and be the people's branch.

Periodic changes to the White House (notice I didn't say improvements) can be done by the President requesting them through Congress and as long as it's within reason...they almost always get approved. Putting greens, basketball courts, the UFC cockfighting cage or whatever it is.

But I think even those on the right would agree that there is no calculus in the world that approves an entire wing of the building being bulldozed to the ground before the legal questions have been asked and answered, before the funding has been appropriated and voted on, etc...

So yeah, the part of our constitution that has been historically silent needs to be given a voice. And since Congress has revealed itself to be largely either a massive roadblock or a rubber stamp of approval for the executive, the courts need a rapid reaction docket that can answer the legal challenges in a week or less lets say.
Why do you want a nation ruled by left wing judges?
 
15th post
Do you want a nation ruled by the Bench as per Sotomayor’s vision?
Actually you're too late. It was Chief Justice Roberts vision, when they threw out the Chevron Doctrine.

The majority opinion, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, stated that the previous Chevron framework was "fundamentally misguided" and violated the federal Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The Court determined that it is the judiciary’s fundamental duty to interpret the law, not the agencies'.

The U.S. Supreme Court officially overturned the Chevron doctrine on June 28, 2024, in the landmark case Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. By a 6-3 vote, the Court ended the 40-year precedent that required federal judges to defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous laws
 
Why can't you respond to what I actually write? It would be a nice change.
You opened the door to rebuttal in your post #4 touting a 'separate judicial system.' Your separate judicial system seems to often be overruled by the highest court in the land when they make it that far.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom