Trump Celebrates Fourth Of July By Deporting Veterans And Their Families

Veterans across the country are watching as their parents, spouses, and children are swept up in raids.
You're not wrong on the facts. Jermaine Thomas getting deported despite being born on a U.S. base, and Sayed Noori—an Afghan ally—getting hauled off mid-asylum case? That’s not just bad optics, that’s a moral faceplant.

But man, you really wrapped valid outrage in a layer of snark thicker than VA paperwork. “Squirmy little turds” and “Not a good look Donny” might win claps in your echo chamber, but they risk making real injustice sound like just another episode of Political Theater: Special Victims Unit.
 
The problem is that your cognitive bias filters what you read.
Oh? That's news to me. I filter any factual assertions I encounter through AI like Grok. I cross-reference them manually to corroborate what the AI finds. I don't sit here making blind assertions; I actually filter the facts with diligent research, believe it or not.
 
Trump supports numerous positions that are aligned with the globalists / WEF.
Hey Buttercup, I appreciate the passion and depth in your post—seriously, you’ve clearly been keeping receipts. But I took some time to dig into the claims you made, and a lot of them seem to be running more on internet fumes than hard policy facts.

--Trump’s record does include early support for mRNA vaccines via Operation Warp Speed, sure—but there’s no evidence he dropped a new mRNA shot on Day 2 of Term Two like it was a party favor. In fact, recent moves under his second term leaned more toward scaling back mRNA programs.

--As for the “trackable digital ID” and “Freedom Cities”? My Google-fu couldn’t find anything tying him to 15-minute cities, smart cities, or Klaus Schwab's vision board. That idea’s been floating around in conspiracy circles, but it doesn’t show up in any actual policy.

--He has put focus on AI development, which some folks interpret as “technocracy,” but calling that transhumanism might be like calling your Fitbit “the mark of the beast.” Let’s maybe not skip that many steps.

If Trump is a secret globalist, he’s doing a pretty poor job playing nice with the globalist club. No love for the WEF, no moves toward world governance, and no George Soros high-fives on record.

So yeah, fair to be skeptical, but I think some of this needs a fact-check before it turns into a Netflix doc. Appreciate your voice in the conversation though—seriously.
 
Hey Buttercup, I appreciate the passion and depth in your post—seriously, you’ve clearly been keeping receipts. But I took some time to dig into the claims you made, and a lot of them seem to be running more on internet fumes than hard policy facts.

--Trump’s record does include early support for mRNA vaccines via Operation Warp Speed, sure—but there’s no evidence he dropped a new mRNA shot on Day 2 of Term Two like it was a party favor. In fact, recent moves under his second term leaned more toward scaling back mRNA programs.

--As for the “trackable digital ID” and “Freedom Cities”? My Google-fu couldn’t find anything tying him to 15-minute cities, smart cities, or Klaus Schwab's vision board. That idea’s been floating around in conspiracy circles, but it doesn’t show up in any actual policy.

--He has put focus on AI development, which some folks interpret as “technocracy,” but calling that transhumanism might be like calling your Fitbit “the mark of the beast.” Let’s maybe not skip that many steps.

If Trump is a secret globalist, he’s doing a pretty poor job playing nice with the globalist club. No love for the WEF, no moves toward world governance, and no George Soros high-fives on record.

So yeah, fair to be skeptical, but I think some of this needs a fact-check before it turns into a Netflix doc. Appreciate your voice in the conversation though—seriously.


I just wanted to say I'll get back to this post later to respond to all the points you posted. I'm cooking right now and I'm going to sign off of here for a while. If I don't get back here soon, it will be late tonight. Thanks and btw welcome to USMB!
 
I just wanted to say I'll get back to this post later to respond to all the points you posted. I'm cooking right now and I'm going to sign off of here for a while. If I don't get back here soon, it will be late tonight. Thanks and btw welcome to USMB!
Happy 4th mate!
 
Read post #14 again. And reread it, should you need to assail me with more garbage.

As for someone who attacks people for having mental health issues, you have an interesting definition of cruelty.

Not at all. As much as I think you are a waste of skin, I wouldn't want the government to do terrible things to you.
 
Veterans across the country are watching as their parents, spouses, and children are swept up in raids. A father of three U.S. Marines was tackled at a landscaping job and arrested. And Jermaine Thomas - a man born on a U.S. Army base in Germany to a citizen father who died - was deported to Jamaica, a country he had never set foot in. Had Sen. John McCain or Bruce Willis been held to the same standard, we wouldn’t even know who they are.

It's not only veterans and their families getting the shaft for Independence Day. There's Sayed Naser Noori, an Afghan interpreter who spent a decade supporting U.S. troops. His brother was murdered by the Taliban because of that loyalty. He fled to the U.S. legally, through a port of entry, under humanitarian parole. But this month, at a routine court appearance, ICE agents arrested him. Now, Trump's administration is fast-tracking his deportation - even as his asylum case remains unresolved. A fine reward for someone who lost his own brother to protect our brothers and sisters in arms.


Not a good look donny. I'm sure Democrats will be holding a committee investigation, to make sure America watches your squirmy little turds testify on national television every day about it. I'm sure it will be as popular as those Healthcare cuts are.

But he is NOT WHITE, that is what is important to MAGA MAGGOTS.
 
‘Trump and his administration are carrying out the cruelest and most sweeping mass deportation program in modern U.S. history. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, acting at Trump's direction, have detained and deported veterans, their children, their spouses - even those who served alongside us on the battlefield. This is being done under the guise of "making America safe again," when statistically America has never been safer. In fact, the administration is destroying the families who actually do keep us safe.’ ibid

Exactly.

This is yet another manifestation of the fascist Trump regime.
Go Trump. You are full of shit.
 
Veterans across the country are watching as their parents, spouses, and children are swept up in raids. A father of three U.S. Marines was tackled at a landscaping job and arrested. And Jermaine Thomas - a man born on a U.S. Army base in Germany to a citizen father who died - was deported to Jamaica, a country he had never set foot in. Had Sen. John McCain or Bruce Willis been held to the same standard, we wouldn’t even know who they are.
None of the people you mentioned who were deported are U.S. military veterans.

Why start your post with a lie.

If there are military veterans who are being deported for not being legally allowed to be in the United States, why did the Democrats and The Autopen not pass a law that allows any U.S. military veteran to stay in the United States no matter what?
It's not only veterans and their families getting the shaft for Independence Day. There's Sayed Naser Noori, an Afghan interpreter who spent a decade supporting U.S. troops. His brother was murdered by the Taliban because of that loyalty. He fled to the U.S. legally, through a port of entry, under humanitarian parole. But this month, at a routine court appearance, ICE agents arrested him. Now, Trump's administration is fast-tracking his deportation - even as his asylum case remains unresolved. A fine reward for someone who lost his own brother to protect our brothers and sisters in arms.

I assume that story is as truthful as your OP?
Not a good look donny. I'm sure Democrats will be holding a committee investigation, to make sure America watches your squirmy little turds testify on national television every day about it. I'm sure it will be as popular as those Healthcare cuts are.
Democrats will have to win an election to do that.

What's the plan?
 
15th post
Trump is the ONLY ONE standing against the globalist Great Replacement. All real Americans should have spent the day THANKING GOD for this chance to stop the takeover of this country
 
Hey Buttercup, I appreciate the passion and depth in your post—seriously, you’ve clearly been keeping receipts. But I took some time to dig into the claims you made, and a lot of them seem to be running more on internet fumes than hard policy facts.

--Trump’s record does include early support for mRNA vaccines via Operation Warp Speed, sure—but there’s no evidence he dropped a new mRNA shot on Day 2 of Term Two like it was a party favor. In fact, recent moves under his second term leaned more toward scaling back mRNA programs.

I'll go through these points one by one and I'll include links for you.

The new mRNA vaccine was indeed introduced on his second day, it was announced at the same time as Project Stargate.

Larry Ellison was the one who talked about it, as you can see here:




There was a backlash from many people including his own base, so Trump has not spoken about it much since....But at the same time, he hasn't disavowed the mRNA cancer vaccine idea.


--As for the “trackable digital ID” and “Freedom Cities”? My Google-fu couldn’t find anything tying him to 15-minute cities, smart cities, or Klaus Schwab's vision board. That idea’s been floating around in conspiracy circles, but it doesn’t show up in any actual policy.

It does show up, on his own website. Do an in-page search "Freedom Cities" on this page.

Here's a clip of him talking about it:




And here's an article about it, from an opposing perspective:



As for a Digital ID, I didn't claim that he brought it about, I said that he is moving us in that direction. To be clear, the digital ID idea is not solely a Trump thing. Here's an article for you on how the "REAL ID" (which was in the works for a long time, but was recently mandated on Trump's watch) is moving us one step at a time closer to a mandatory digital ID.



--He has put focus on AI development, which some folks interpret as “technocracy,” but calling that transhumanism might be like calling your Fitbit “the mark of the beast.” Let’s maybe not skip that many steps.

I didn't say that AI development is technocracy, and I didn't say that technocracy is transhumanism. Technocracy and transhumanism are two different things, but they do tend to go hand in hand.

As for technocracy, his massive push for AI is part of it (and that is a WEF agenda) but that’s not the only reason why I believe we’re heading toward Technocracy. Like I said, Trump has partnered with technocrats or powerful people with technocratic leanings, even if not all of them are open about it. Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Sam Altman, Larry Ellison, to name a few.

Look at what Larry Ellison is promoting here in this clip. What he’s describing is part of technocratic surveillance state:



If Trump is a secret globalist, he’s doing a pretty poor job playing nice with the globalist club. No love for the WEF, no moves toward world governance, and no George Soros high-fives on record.

Let me ask you a question, and please answer honestly. If the global powers-that-shouldn't-be want to bring about the "Great Reset" aka the New World Order, but their biggest opponents are conservatives and liberty-minded people.... true patriots.... then which one of these two options would be a better way for them to bring about their agenda? A) Using an openly globalist left-wing Democrat president that conservatives and patriots would immediately and fiercely oppose? OR, B) a "controlled opposition" fake Republican who is charismatic, says the right things and is very good at gaining people's loyalty and trust, but in reality is a Pied Piper?

From a purely strategic standpoint, which one would make more sense for them... a politician who would bring about fierce opposition from the right, or a politician who would placate the very patriot movement that would normally have been most militant about opposing globalism and technocracy?

I've said this before but I'll say it again... Most of us don't think this way because we're regular people with good intentions. But you have to consider how the enemy thinks. Corrupt, evil people don't think the same way you and I do. They are strategic, and they use deceptive tactics.

As for what you said about him not having any love for the WEF..... I beg to differ. He has visited the WEF and engaged with them 2 or 3 times and he doesn't look like he's enemies with them to me. :dunno: Yes, of course presidents have to be diplomatic, but he could also not visit them at all, if he was truly against what they stand for.





That said, obviously he's not going to show agreement or love for them in front of his base. He does good a job of playing the role of a "nationalist" Republican.

So yeah, fair to be skeptical, but I think some of this needs a fact-check before it turns into a Netflix doc. Appreciate your voice in the conversation though—seriously.

Not only is there more than enough evidence that he's a fraud.... but I also have learned to trust my intuition... and discernment, which is a spiritual thing. But anyway, this is post is getting really long, so for now I'll leave it at that. Thanks for being civil.
 
Last edited:
I support the bbb. It ***** MAGA voters. **** those guys.
You're not wrong about the BBB hurting a lot of MAGA voters—especially the working-class folks who rely on Medicaid, SNAP, and other safety nets that just got gutted. That part’s true.

But cheering it on like it’s some kind of cosmic justice? That’s where it gets messy.

Because this bill doesn’t just hurt “those guys.” It hurts single moms, veterans, rural families, disabled folks, and everyday people who might’ve voted red once—or never voted at all. People who are already struggling now have less support, and it’s going to get worse.

So if the goal is to get even with MAGA voters, sure… mission halfway accomplished.
But if the goal is to build a country that treats people better, holds leaders accountable, and doesn’t trade cruelty for policy? This ain’t it.

We can call out hypocrisy and poor voting choices without celebrating when millions get thrown under the bus. Otherwise, we just become the thing we said we were fighting.
 
Back
Top Bottom