Trump bombs Iran

To not do anything would be stupid.

You were doing something. The Trump Administration and the Iranian government were going to sit down to discuss a negotiated settlement last Monday, but then Bibi bombed them on Friday Night to stop the peace talks.

So instead of doing the smart thing, and condemning the attack, Trump has piled on for no reason.

Iran was prepared to negotiate. Now they are not. Hard to see how this makes things better, and your pathetic attempts to spin WWIII into something that is both necessary and wise, is never going to work.
 
We will see how Iran will respond.
What do you predict?

I was not one who was hoping for the U.S. to enter the war between Israel and Iran, but now that it has happened, Trump was pretty decisive in accomplishing the goal of no nuclear weapons for Iran. Iran has been killing and otherwise terrorizing Americans for over fifty years, and it is long past time for us to be patient.

What can they do?

Will Iran send planes to bomb the U.S., increase its sponsorship of anti-U.S. terrorism, with specific orders for which of our locations to target, or simply take it out on Israel with more seemingly unaimed missiles?

Or what? What decisive action can they take to defeat the U.S.?

Or . . . will they ask for peace and sit down to negotiate? Trump took their nuclear weapons program off the table, and that was the big sticking point.
 
When did they say that, Lisa????? All they said was they were going to continue to enrich uranium. You're really not very bright are, you?

It's a long, long, long way from enriching uranium to building a bomb, and then you have to build a missile. There was absolutely no danger in NOT bombing Iran.

Where do you get your bullshit from?
 
Gabbard told congress that Iran didn't have plans to pursue a bomb. They were pursuing enrichment beyond civilian use but not quite at weapons-grade. They wanted options. Given how they were sucker-punched by what they thought was a president serious about striking a deal to stick to civilian-use enrichment and pivoting away from the ME and toward China, I think we can see why Iran wanted options.

Short of completely annihilating Iran, there is no way we can stop Iran from building nukes. We can slow them down, but that's it, and now they have zero reason to trust us, so we very likely hastened the very development we were trying to avoid.
Iran will now kick out IAEA inspectors, and take their program underground, and will now get expert technical assistance from China, their biggest oil customer, as well as Russia, and Pakistan.
 

Screen Shot 2025-06-22 at 10.58.50 AM.webp

"I wasn't part of the brawl, but after she was down,
I stuck my foot in and gave her a couple of good kicks."
 
YO DINGLE BERRY -

I PROVIDED MY SOURCE

A NICE WHITE JEWISH INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER WHO PROVIDED ALL THE DOCUMENTATION


YOU ARE THE ONE WHO VOLUNTARILY CHOOSES IGNORANCE
:laughing0301: Oh, yelling now eh?

I simply pointed out that your source was funded by known leftist donations....That calls their credibility into question....

Bottom line, Iran can't ever be allowed to have a nuke, and thank God, we have a president that understands that.
 
What do you predict?

I was not one who was hoping for the U.S. to enter the war between Israel and Iran, but now that it has happened, Trump was pretty decisive in accomplishing the goal of no nuclear weapons for Iran. Iran has been killing and otherwise terrorizing Americans for over fifty years, and it is long past time for us to be patient.

What can they do?

Will Iran send planes to bomb the U.S., increase its sponsorship of anti-U.S. terrorism, with specific orders for which of our locations to target, or simply take it out on Israel with more seemingly unaimed missiles?

Or what? What decisive action can they take to defeat the U.S.?

Or . . . will they ask for peace and sit down to negotiate? Trump took their nuclear weapons program off the table, and that was the big sticking point.
PURE UNADULTERATED BULLSHIT

THE ATTACK AGAINST IRAN WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND >>>>>>>UNNECESSARY<<<<<<<<<
 
Florida's Republican Chairman came out has he said ''he is trusting the Presidents decision'' but also said he had reservations about it. Alot of Republicans seem to be feeling the same.

Good discussions on the subject on Meet The Press and other Sunday news shows. May all go well for all and there is no escalation.
Personal opinion, I have a suspicion the President got suckered into doing this by those with a larger agenda. I hope I am wrong.
 
You were doing something. The Trump Administration and the Iranian government were going to sit down to discuss a negotiated settlement last Monday, but then Bibi bombed them on Friday Night to stop the peace talks.

So instead of doing the smart thing, and condemning the attack, Trump has piled on for no reason.

Iran was prepared to negotiate. Now they are not. Hard to see how this makes things better, and your pathetic attempts to spin WWIII into something that is both necessary and wise, is never going to work.
And you trust Iran to live up to their word? Why?
 
Gabbard told congress that Iran didn't have plans to pursue a bomb. They were pursuing enrichment beyond civilian use but not quite at weapons-grade. They wanted options. Given how they were sucker-punched by what they thought was a president serious about striking a deal to stick to civilian-use enrichment and pivoting away from the ME and toward China, I think we can see why Iran wanted options.

Short of completely annihilating Iran, there is no way we can stop Iran from building nukes. We can slow them down, but that's it, and now they have zero reason to trust us, so we very likely hastened the very development we were trying to avoid.
You do know that Gabbard came out and said she was taken out of context.
 
15th post

Strikes Caused ‘Severe Damage’ to Iranian Nuclear Sites, U.S. Officials Say​

The Pentagon’s top leaders echoed President Trump’s claims of success but said it was too soon to say whether Iran still retains some nuclear capability. Iran condemned the strikes and has vowed to defend itself.
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/06/22/world/israel-iran-us-trump

Don, in typically hyperbolic fashion, said the sites were “completely and totally obliterated.” Sounds like it's too early to know the extent of the damage.
Sounds like you want Iran to have a nuclear weapon.
 
HU
I simply pointed out that your source was funded by known leftist donations....That calls their credibility into question...
HUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

But the fact that the IAEA was using Palantir Software - one that is controlled by the CIA and Mossad doesn't call the alleged IAEA Report into question ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!!?
 
Well, if you thought bombing N Koreas nuke program would have prevented it and they wouldn't have nukes today, what would you say?

Look, there are no good options. No easy decisions.

Trump won't be invading Iran, that's the key. If China armed Iran to attack America, it will only make the tariffs applied to China that much more easier for Trump to defend.

Iran suggested the obvious “good option”.

A return to the JCPOA.

They had dialed their program back per the agreement, and were in compliance with the inspections when the Fool unilaterally tore up the agreement.

Facing an untrustworthy and agressive foe, Iran began enriching again.

Now that Trump attacked Iran, there is no question that Tehran will not stop until they get their bomb.

Trump guaranteed that.

Indeed, I expect them to detonate one while Trump is still President, so the repurcussions of Trump’s recklessness come home to roost.
 
Back
Top Bottom