Trump approval plummets to levels seen in midterm wipeout

[Clipper]

MAGAs don't care.

They are living on fantasies that Trump is a 4D chess player who's policies will defy their obvious economic effects.

They don't belive prices will go up when imports are taxed 25% more, they don't belive there will be any recession, they think that everything is going great. They will happily wistle past the grave yard all the way to the political dead end of MAGA in just a few years.

It's a cult.

They'll never, never admit that they bet all their chips on a madman. A corrupt deranged jerkoff with the IQ of a fence post.

 

[Clipper]

I don't. If Biden was doing this same crazy shit I would make these same predictions.

My dislike for Trump has nothing to do with considering economic effects of his policies, just like my dislike for Trump would not interfere with me being able to add 2 plus 2.

MAGAs on the other hand are happy to delude themselves with half-thoughts about how Trump can make 2 plus 2 equal to 6 because he is such a genius.

They're glued to Fox drooling as mega millionaires such as Hannity tell them not to sweat too much as their 401k's crater & their retirement plans turn into just wishful thinking.

"Don't worry, money isn't everything"!

 

[jc456]

They'll never, never admit that they bet all their chips on a madman. A corrupt deranged jerkoff with the IQ of a fence post.

Thank god Trump knocked that fker out

 

[AntonToo]

Who cares?

The graph shows recovered drops far worse than we are seeing now, 2022-2024 in particular.

The lowest datapoint on my graph is at the start of it.

Your graph ended at 40,600+ and now it's 3000 lower...what fn "start"?

There has been nothing worse during 2022-2024 and the big difference was that it was caused by well understood market disruption and contraction of Fed balances to counter the resulting infaltion.

Today the markets are being sunk by the volatily caused by just one wreckless man in the White House introducing huge distortions into global trade on fly. No one knows wtf this bafoon is going to be up to tommrow.

You obviously don't understand how markets work, and you obviously have trouble with even most basic data analysis, so why are you posting on this? Just admit that you like Trump and will support just about anything he does.

 

[jc456]

Your graph ended at 40,600+ and now it's 3000 lower...what fn "start"?

There has been nothing worse during 2022-2024 and the big difference was that it was caused by well understood market disruption, contraction of Fed balances to increase interest rates.

Today the markets are being sunk by the volatily caused by just one wreckless man in the White House introducing huge distortions into global trade on fly. No one knows wtf this idiot is going to be up to tommrow.

You obviously don't understand how markets work, you obviously have trouble with even most basic data analysis, so why are you posting on this?

So what

 

[martybegan]

Your graph ended at 40,600+ and now it's 3000 lower...what fn "start"?

There has been nothing worse during 2022-2024 and the big difference was that it was caused by well understood market disruption and contraction of Fed balances to counter the resulting infaltion.

Today the markets are being sunk by the volatily caused by just one wreckless man in the White House introducing huge distortions into global trade on fly. No one knows wtf this bafoon is going to be up to tommrow.

You obviously don't understand how markets work, and you obviously have trouble with even most basic data analysis, so why are you posting on this? Just admit that you like Trump and will support just about anything he does.

A Man trying to fix a trade imbalance that has been getting worse for decades.

Any you suddenly care about the Market only because of your TDS.

 

[citygator]

A Man trying to fix a trade imbalance that has been getting worse for decades.

Any you suddenly care about the Market only because of your TDS.

We are the most prosperous nation on earth. Trade imbalances arent a bad thing. They mean you are getting cheaper stuff somewhere. We are at full employment. We are at record profits. Its all a ruse. The problem is that wealth is not getting to the working class... not that they arent working. That is because companies are keeping the record profits. Need unions and wage support laws.

 

[martybegan]

We are the most prosperous nation on earth. Trade imbalances arent a bad thing. They mean you are getting cheaper stuff somewhere. We are at full employment. We are at record profits. Its all a ruse. The problem is that wealth is not getting to the working class... not that they arent working. That is because companies are keeping the record profits. Need unions and wage support laws.

We are hurtling towards a debt crisis at both the Federal and (some) State levels.

Trump is trying to get working class jobs back here, your concept is a handout from the government that makes the working class dependent on the government, making them Democratic Party Serfs.

 

[struth]

Rightwing organization, Newsweek, is reporting that Trump's approval has plummeted to the levels that saw the republicans wiped out in 2018. Cites the vastly unpopular tariffs and sky high recession fears.

Looks like Trump will only have another year and a half to totally trash this place.

Donald Trump's strong disapproval rating surges

Trump's approval rating has taken a notable hit, with disapproval numbers now mirroring levels seen during the 2018 midterm elections.

www.newsweek.com

According to pollster Harry Enten, Trump's disapproval rating is currently at a similar level to November 2018, when the Republicans lost the House in the midterms and the Democrats gained 41 seats. At the time, 42 percent disapproved of Trump's job performance, according to Enten's analysis.

Now, that number stands at 43 percent. According to Enten, that could be a bad sign for Trump, who is still more than a year away from the next round of midterm elections.

43 percent is better then the historical lows of your demafacsit party.

With that said RCP avg approval rating still has him at 47.5 percent, again way ahead of the Demafacsit party: https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/approval/donald-trump/approval-rating

 

[Zincwarrior]

Trump was handed a stock market at 44k, dipshit.

More than $11 trillion has been wiped out since he was sworn in.

Dow futures $37,112.

 

[Zincwarrior]

We are hurtling towards a debt crisis at both the Federal and (some) State levels.

Which is why he wants to raise the debt levels and pass a massive tax cut...

 

[martybegan]

Which is why he wants to raise the debt levels and pass a massive tax cut...

Cutting spending reduces the deficit. Tarriff income could reduce the deficit.

The only thing progs can think of is "RAISE TAXES"

 

[Marener]

Cutting spending reduces the deficit. Tarriff income could reduce the deficit.

The only thing progs can think of is "RAISE TAXES"

Tariffs are taxes and Trump has instituted the greatest tax increase we’ve ever seen.

That’s got to be unconstitutional.

 

[martybegan]

Tariffs are taxes and Trump has instituted the greatest tax increase we’ve ever seen.

That’s got to be unconstitutional.

Nope. Trump is using existing Tariff laws, and tariffs are defined distinctly in the Constitution as a power of the federal government.

Maybe he will lower income taxes to compensate, which will drive progs mad.

 

[Marener]

Nope. Trump is using existing Tariff laws, and tariffs are defined distinctly in the Constitution as a power of the federal government.

Maybe he will lower income taxes to compensate, which will drive progs mad.

Those laws were never intended to be used like this.

It runs afoul of the major questions doctrine.

 

[martybegan]

Those laws were never intended to be used like this.

It runs afoul of the major questions doctrine.

They were intended to be used exactly like this.

The Constitution gave Congress the power to pass laws on tariffs, Congress then passed laws giving the executive the ability to set the rates.

Congress wants that power back? change the laws.

 

[Marener]

In

They were intended to be used exactly like this.

The Constitution gave Congress the power to pass laws on tariffs, Congress then passed laws giving the executive the ability to set the rates.

Congress wants that power back? change the laws.

Nope. The law wasn’t intended for a single president to cause an economic catastrophe and throw tariffs on every nation and very high rates because he feels like it and no other reason.

This is exactly the kind of thing that major questions doctrine doesn’t allow.

 

[martybegan]

In

Nope. The law wasn’t intended for a single president to cause an economic catastrophe and throw tariffs on every nation and very high rates because he feels like it and no other reason.

This is exactly the kind of thing that major questions doctrine doesn’t allow.

The law didn't go into reasoning, it said the President sets the rates.

If Congress wants to change that, they can pass a law changing that.

 

[Marener]

The law didn't go into reasoning, it said the President sets the rates.

You sure about that or are you just saying shit again?

 

[Lesh]

Newsweek is so far left they're about to fall off the planet

That’s your entire take on this?

Newsflash, Trump approval is taking a nosedive.

People get nervous when the President intentionally tanks the stock market

People don’t like it when their retirement savings are threatened.

Can you blame them?