LOSER!What are you even talking about? It's a very interesting question of law that remains unanswered. The people of PA need an answer..I suppose if it happens again, they know to file at the moment it's done.MAGA is MAGA is MAGA....STUPID is STUPID is STUPID....He didn't bring this lawsuit...did you not read your own link?The Liar in Chief needs to give it up...YOU Lour OST DONNIE!.Five months after the presidential election, the Supreme Court said on Monday that it won't take up a case from several Republicans challenging changes to election rules in the battleground state of Pennsylvania.
The unsigned ruling sends yet another message that the court's majority has no interest in relitigating the last election.
Before Monday, the justices had already declined several requests to dive into one of the most litigious elections in history, denying petitions from then-President Donald Trump and other Republicans seeking to overturn election result in multiple states President Joe Biden won.
There were no noted dissents.
Supreme Court tosses out another Republican 2020 election challenge
Five months after the presidential election, the Supreme Court said on Monday that it won't take up a case from several Republicans challenging changes to election rules in the battleground state of Pennsylvania.www.cnn.com
Maybe they will appeal it to the Knesset, and he will become President of Israel?
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Trump And Republicans Suffer Another Humiliating Defeat In The Supreme Court
- Thread starter skews13
- Start date
LOSERWhat are you even talking about? It's a very interesting question of law that remains unanswered. The people of PA need an answer..I suppose if it happens again, they know to file at the moment it's done.MAGA is MAGA is MAGA....STUPID is STUPID is STUPID....He didn't bring this lawsuit...did you not read your own link?The Liar in Chief needs to give it up...YOU Lour OST DONNIE!.Five months after the presidential election, the Supreme Court said on Monday that it won't take up a case from several Republicans challenging changes to election rules in the battleground state of Pennsylvania.
The unsigned ruling sends yet another message that the court's majority has no interest in relitigating the last election.
Before Monday, the justices had already declined several requests to dive into one of the most litigious elections in history, denying petitions from then-President Donald Trump and other Republicans seeking to overturn election result in multiple states President Joe Biden won.
There were no noted dissents.
Maybe they will appeal it to the Knesset, and he will become President of Israel?Supreme Court tosses out another Republican 2020 election challenge
Five months after the presidential election, the Supreme Court said on Monday that it won't take up a case from several Republicans challenging changes to election rules in the battleground state of Pennsylvania.
MAGA Loves to Lose....over and over and over....The should change their stupid red hats to MALA.....Make America Lose AgainI've got to admit that I didn't expect Coney barrett and Barr O'kavenaugh to do so.Fortunately a vast majority of adults are able to rise to the occasion and respect and dignify a high office.The judges are not fools like the voters.Pretty crazy that this stuff is so far out in left field that even tRump's hand picked justices can't justify it.
Unlike, obviously, orange buffoons.
toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
Five months after the presidential election, the Supreme Court said on Monday that it won't take up a case from several Republicans challenging changes to election rules in the battleground state of Pennsylvania. The unsigned ruling sends yet another message that the court's majority has no interest in relitigating the last election.
IDIOT. If you only read your own linked articles, you'd know that Trump's name isn't even on the case and the court's action wouldn't have any impact on the last election. The rule changes made by PA are clearly ILLEGAL and should have been challenged a year ago when they were made, or challenged at the PA Court level.
It is not clearly illegal. You are clueless.
Moron, the election rule changes DIRECTLY CONFLICT with established state law. The people who made the changes don't even have the authority to do so!
That's illegal.
Biden was elected illegally.
They said it was moot...which is a legal term, meaning nothing they could decide on the case would change anything. Moot.The court said they didn't want to waste time on such a goofy claim. I'm not sure you can take much more from that.The Court didn't say there was no voter fraud...did you not read the links in the OP?The courts would seem to disagree with you.Democrats have made it obvious that they favor voter fraud simply based on the ferocity which they fight against everything that promotes fairness and integrity in our elections. Actually, they're beyond wanting voter fraud. They need voter fraud.
" Because Federal Courts only have constitutional authority to resolve actual disputes (see Case or Controversy) legal actions cannot be brought or continued after the matter at issue has been resolved, leaving no live dispute for a court to resolve. In such a case, the matter is said to be "moot".
They can't hear the case even if they wanted to.
They are loyal to the Constitution and the Rule of Law, NOT Trump. Do you have a JD?
I am sorry...what did I say that suggest they weren't and what does any of this have to do with TruThey said it was moot...which is a legal term, meaning nothing they could decide on the case would change anything. Moot.The court said they didn't want to waste time on such a goofy claim. I'm not sure you can take much more from that.The Court didn't say there was no voter fraud...did you not read the links in the OP?The courts would seem to disagree with you.Democrats have made it obvious that they favor voter fraud simply based on the ferocity which they fight against everything that promotes fairness and integrity in our elections. Actually, they're beyond wanting voter fraud. They need voter fraud.
" Because Federal Courts only have constitutional authority to resolve actual disputes (see Case or Controversy) legal actions cannot be brought or continued after the matter at issue has been resolved, leaving no live dispute for a court to resolve. In such a case, the matter is said to be "moot".
They can't hear the case even if they wanted to.
They are loyal to the Constitution and the Rule of Law, NOT Trump. Do you have a JD?
Not much use arguing with mindless MAGA trash. Their minds have been warped by watching the Liar in Chief repeat over and over..."Massive Voter Fraud." Which of course was a Big Lie.They said it was moot...which is a legal term, meaning nothing they could decide on the case would change anything. Moot.The court said they didn't want to waste time on such a goofy claim. I'm not sure you can take much more from that.The Court didn't say there was no voter fraud...did you not read the links in the OP?The courts would seem to disagree with you.Democrats have made it obvious that they favor voter fraud simply based on the ferocity which they fight against everything that promotes fairness and integrity in our elections. Actually, they're beyond wanting voter fraud. They need voter fraud.
" Because Federal Courts only have constitutional authority to resolve actual disputes (see Case or Controversy) legal actions cannot be brought or continued after the matter at issue has been resolved, leaving no live dispute for a court to resolve. In such a case, the matter is said to be "moot".
They can't hear the case even if they wanted to.
They are loyal to the Constitution and the Rule of Law, NOT Trump. Do you have a JD?
- Aug 8, 2016
- 26,074
- 25,130
- 2,445
Not much use arguing with mindless MAGA trash. Their minds have been warped by watching the Liar in Chief repeat over and over..."Massive Voter Fraud." Which of course was a Big Lie.
Secretaries of state can't just go arbitrarily changing the election laws without the consent of the legislatures. It's unconstitutional. Patently. Blatantly.
If you believe that you're intellectually capable of making a valid case that they can, well, make it.
We'll wait.
Heck, if anyone on the board believes they can make a valid case that Secretaries of state can just go arbitrarily changing the election laws without the consent of the legislatures, let's hear it.
Show us all how smart you are.
- Aug 8, 2016
- 26,074
- 25,130
- 2,445
In the mean time, it should be expected that the SCOTUS is going to back off with the threat of stacking the court.
Reason being is that what Biden and company are doing by threatening to stack the court for political gain is actually undermining the historic respect for the court and the authority of the current justices themselves.
That's a bit of a deeper, more intellectual discussion, however. And would require an actual primary foundation for moral code, one consistent with that which serves as the nation's own primary foundation. Which is clearly lacking from some of you Mickey Mouse mothertruckers.
Reason being is that what Biden and company are doing by threatening to stack the court for political gain is actually undermining the historic respect for the court and the authority of the current justices themselves.
That's a bit of a deeper, more intellectual discussion, however. And would require an actual primary foundation for moral code, one consistent with that which serves as the nation's own primary foundation. Which is clearly lacking from some of you Mickey Mouse mothertruckers.
Last edited:
Theft is not a loss even if the USSC and other courts ignore it.Five months after the presidential election, the Supreme Court said on Monday that it won't take up a case from several Republicans challenging changes to election rules in the battleground state of Pennsylvania.
The unsigned ruling sends yet another message that the court's majority has no interest in relitigating the last election.
Before Monday, the justices had already declined several requests to dive into one of the most litigious elections in history, denying petitions from then-President Donald Trump and other Republicans seeking to overturn election result in multiple states President Joe Biden won.
There were no noted dissents.
Supreme Court tosses out another Republican 2020 election challenge
Five months after the presidential election, the Supreme Court said on Monday that it won't take up a case from several Republicans challenging changes to election rules in the battleground state of Pennsylvania.
Maybe they will appeal it to the Knesset, and he will become President of Israel?
Five months after the presidential election, the Supreme Court said on Monday that it won't take up a case from several Republicans challenging changes to election rules in the battleground state of Pennsylvania.
The unsigned ruling sends yet another message that the court's majority has no interest in relitigating the last election.
Before Monday, the justices had already declined several requests to dive into one of the most litigious elections in history, denying petitions from then-President Donald Trump and other Republicans seeking to overturn election result in multiple states President Joe Biden won.
There were no noted dissents.
Supreme Court tosses out another Republican 2020 election challenge
Five months after the presidential election, the Supreme Court said on Monday that it won't take up a case from several Republicans challenging changes to election rules in the battleground state of Pennsylvania.
Maybe they will appeal it to the Knesset, and he will become President of Israel?
MSN
www.msn.com
The Arizona Senate has found a place to audit Maricopa County's 2.1 million ballots
The contract is just the latest step in the Arizona Senate’s monthslong effort to conduct its own unprecedented review of the Maricopa County ballots
www.azcentral.com
Arizona Senate to Start Major Audit of 2.1 Million 2020 Presidential Election Ballots
www.theepochtimes.com
Dana7360
Diamond Member
- Aug 6, 2014
- 15,147
- 13,596
- 2,405
This means the communists don't have an argument that the court made a finding that the election was legal.
You think all the judges Trump appointed are Communists? Are you quite insane?
The person you replied to doesn't know the honest meaning of the word communist.
Yeah.. much education is pretty slap dash and the kids don't really want it. The don't keep learning after school.. Not much for curiosity or critical thinking. You see it here a lot.. Trump inspires them to be their worst selves.
Yes I can't agree with you more.
Which is the reason why I don't waste my time with such people.
After the GOPQ stole a USSC pick from Obama....the GOPQ deserves whatever they get...In the mean time, it should be expected that the SCOTUS is going to back off with the threat of stacking the court.
Reason being is that what Biden and company are doing by threatening to stack the court for political gain is actually undermining the historic respect for the court and the authority of the current justices themselves.
That's a bit of a deeper, more intellectual discussion, however. And would require an actual primary foundation for moral code, one consistent with that which serves as the nation's own primary foundation. Which is clearly lacking from some of you Mickey Mouse mothertruckers.
trump humpers will be whining about fabricated "massive election fraud" until they expire....there is no convincing them of anything else. They are waiting until protection at the US Capitol is relaxed and they will try again to overthrow the government. When trump told the rabid crowd to "fight like Hell"....that their country was being stolen from them....he incited the insurrection. No Independent voters are going to vote for a repeat of January 6th.
It stands to reason if the GOPQ nominates him again in 2024 and he loses, which he in all likelihood he will, we will see a repeat of January 6th....but more people will die next time. No one other than true trump humpers are going to vote for that.
It stands to reason if the GOPQ nominates him again in 2024 and he loses, which he in all likelihood he will, we will see a repeat of January 6th....but more people will die next time. No one other than true trump humpers are going to vote for that.
- Aug 8, 2016
- 26,074
- 25,130
- 2,445
After the GOPQ stole a USSC pick from Obama....the GOPQ deserves whatever they get...
You forgot to make a valid constitutional case that Secretaries of State can just go arbitrarily changing the election laws without the consent of the state legislatures.
HelloOoo.
- Aug 8, 2016
- 26,074
- 25,130
- 2,445
We won't hold our breath. 
Please do....We won't hold our breath.
Five months after the presidential election, the Supreme Court said on Monday that it won't take up a case from several Republicans challenging changes to election rules in the battleground state of Pennsylvania. The unsigned ruling sends yet another message that the court's majority has no interest in relitigating the last election.
IDIOT. If you only read your own linked articles, you'd know that Trump's name isn't even on the case and the court's action wouldn't have any impact on the last election. The rule changes made by PA are clearly ILLEGAL and should have been challenged a year ago when they were made, or challenged at the PA Court level.
It is not clearly illegal. You are clueless.
Moron, the election rule changes DIRECTLY CONFLICT with established state law. The people who made the changes don't even have the authority to do so!
That's illegal.
Biden was elected illegally.
Biden was not elected illegally. No state laws were violated.
toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
Biden was not elected illegally. No state laws were violated.
BLOW IT OUT YOUR STUPID LYING ASS. PA has already long ago plainly admitted that their legislative process and laws wasn't followed.
Biden is as legit as a $3 dollar bill.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 40
- Views
- 600
- Replies
- 371
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 59
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 22
- Views
- 728
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 307
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 71
- Views
- 162
- Replies
- 241
- Views
- 982
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 6
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8039
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 468
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-