Trump and Melania test positive for COVID-19

[EL Rich]

To all of the "neither candidate is good and you are all being duped by the deep state" crowd,

The problem with your POV is that facts exist. Look to the facts and the path reveals itself.

Yeah, really doesn’t matter who you are supporting, the idea that you know the facts and anyone who disagrees with you is lost, is some of the most ignorant nonsense our society is dealing with right now. While I wouldn’t vote for President Trump to be my village dog catcher, I know plenty of caring, thoughtful people who see him as needed to stem the tide of over reaching government. When I talk to these folks and try to change their minds, I don’t start by calling “******* idiots”, I reserve that distinction for folks who display their idiocy in what they have to say.

Are you suggesting there's not a right thing to do, and that people aren't personally responsible if they cannot understand what a fact is?

No I am not, I am suggesting that you alone are not the arbiter of what is or is not factual and what conclusions can be drawn.

That's trivial - nobody is the arbiter of what a fact is besides reality. Just because someone recognizes what the facts are, doesnt mean theyre the ones deciding its a fact...glad I could clear up that distinction, though...because it seems to me that in the interest of some magical fairness you're suggesting that everyone is entitled to their own facts.

No, what I am saying, is that raw data is factual, but what we all do is use our reason to extrapolate truth out of those facts. I am not defending those who willfully stick their heads in the sand and deny reality. I am simply suggesting that reasonable people can have reasonable disagreements about what the facts “mean”. This is not me saying, Alternative Facts are anything but lies, but I am suggesting like an statistician will tell you, numbers can be manipulated to derive meaning almost any meaning, yet they are factual.

What you are saying is completely trivial. If you think the only way to conclude that Trump is and has been bad for the Country is by arbitrary opinion, and the facts cannot support that - then it's not by some colloquial interpretation of the facts to say that you are wrong, and perhaps stupid. Universal you, in the hypothetical...not you you. You knew that.

Which you?

The letter. The letter u.

Or two of them, or the letter that says two of them. Double you. Or W.

Great, insults.
All I am saying is that a reasonable person can completely disagree with you while looking at the same data. Maybe they believe that immigration and people of color are destroying our culture. I disagree with them, but the second you say they have no right to express that opinion at all, you are betraying democratic norms. There is a reason the ACLU fought for the rights of Nazis to hold a march. Freedom belongs to everyone or no one. By the way, all I have advocated for is not dismissing people before you hear why they think what they think. I fear that you do not see how your unwillingness to accept the ability of others to disagree With you, without being wrong, exists whether you wish to accept it or not. And you are exposing the most legitimate criticism of the modern left, you are intolerant of any type of digression from the doctrines of critical theory.
If your curious where that leads check out China under Mao and that is not hyperbol.

We're not against immigration, we're against ILLEGAL immigration. And we aren't against "people of color" coming here, we only want whites to come here LEGALLY too. **** the shit out of you.

To say you're open to hearing things you disagree with then you denigrate and demagogue people who disagree with you and intentionally misrepresent our views as racist and xenophobic really is no better than anything any other anti-free speech leftist does

It was over-simplification for the sake of expediency, your criticism is fair. Mea Culpa.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Were they wearing defective masks by any chance?

Will Pence be sworn in?

He should be...Amendment XXV should come into play given Trump is incapacitated and quarantined. But he just claimed, via his entourage, he will be working from the WH residence. Who the **** really knows what that Idiot will do though!

Nope... He is not incapacitated...

XXV does not apply..

And how do YOU know he's not?
Because Captain Clorox sez so?
LOL
He wouldn't LIE about something like this, oh no, he NEVER lies.

WOW...

IF you think the Presidents physician is not informing those in succession and the Cabinet you would be mistaken... His duties are clearly defined in the law.

 

[G.T.]

To all of the "neither candidate is good and you are all being duped by the deep state" crowd,

The problem with your POV is that facts exist. Look to the facts and the path reveals itself.

Yeah, really doesn’t matter who you are supporting, the idea that you know the facts and anyone who disagrees with you is lost, is some of the most ignorant nonsense our society is dealing with right now. While I wouldn’t vote for President Trump to be my village dog catcher, I know plenty of caring, thoughtful people who see him as needed to stem the tide of over reaching government. When I talk to these folks and try to change their minds, I don’t start by calling “******* idiots”, I reserve that distinction for folks who display their idiocy in what they have to say.

Are you suggesting there's not a right thing to do, and that people aren't personally responsible if they cannot understand what a fact is?

No I am not, I am suggesting that you alone are not the arbiter of what is or is not factual and what conclusions can be drawn.

That's trivial - nobody is the arbiter of what a fact is besides reality. Just because someone recognizes what the facts are, doesnt mean theyre the ones deciding its a fact...glad I could clear up that distinction, though...because it seems to me that in the interest of some magical fairness you're suggesting that everyone is entitled to their own facts.

No, what I am saying, is that raw data is factual, but what we all do is use our reason to extrapolate truth out of those facts. I am not defending those who willfully stick their heads in the sand and deny reality. I am simply suggesting that reasonable people can have reasonable disagreements about what the facts “mean”. This is not me saying, Alternative Facts are anything but lies, but I am suggesting like an statistician will tell you, numbers can be manipulated to derive meaning almost any meaning, yet they are factual.

What you are saying is completely trivial. If you think the only way to conclude that Trump is and has been bad for the Country is by arbitrary opinion, and the facts cannot support that - then it's not by some colloquial interpretation of the facts to say that you are wrong, and perhaps stupid. Universal you, in the hypothetical...not you you. You knew that.

Which you?

The letter. The letter u.

Or two of them, or the letter that says two of them. Double you. Or W.

Great, insults.
All I am saying is that a reasonable person can completely disagree with you while looking at the same data. Maybe they believe that immigration and people of color are destroying our culture. I disagree with them, but the second you say they have no right to express that opinion at all, you are betraying democratic norms. There is a reason the ACLU fought for the rights of Nazis to hold a march. Freedom belongs to everyone or no one. By the way, all I have advocated for is not dismissing people before you hear why they think what they think. I fear that you do not see how your unwillingness to accept the ability of others to disagree With you, without being wrong, exists whether you wish to accept it or not. And you are exposing the most legitimate criticism of the modern left, you are intolerant of any type of digression from the doctrines of critical theory.
If your curious where that leads check out China under Mao and that is not hyperbol.

Everyone doesn't get their own set of facts, and it doesn't matter how emotional or unfair that makes you feel, or anyone else either.

Also, it's really ******* weird you're accusing me of wanting anyone to have no right to express their opinion. What the ****? Nobody said that. <-- see, that's a fact, and you don't get to interpret it any other way except to say, 'oh, haha, yeah I guess you're not saying that anyone isn't entitled to their opinions...I'm just saying that you GT are NOT entitled to YOURS, that they're stupid.'

Wow, you didn’t read what I wrote or I failed to make it clear enough. I get you.

I read it just fine - you implied that someone is trying to take someone's rights.. (you: I disagree with them, but the second you say they have no right to express that opinion at all, you are betraying democratic norms.)... away, by calling them stupid....and then went on a diatribe about why taking their rights away is bad.

Since I did none of that and didnt even imply anyone should have their rights taken away, it was just dumb of you to say all of that. You are saying trivial shit over and over again because of your antipathy for calling a spade a spade, a dumb opinion, a lack of a grasp of the facts...stupid. Reality can suck sometimes, and some people are pretty ******* stupid. Hence: Trump.

When you say, I know the facts so I am the authority for truth, you are attempting to curtail someone else’s speech. Why is this idea so hard for you to understand? Democratic norms dictate that reasonable people can have reasonable discussions. When you present the idea that the only explanation for someone to support Trump is that they are stupid, you not only dismiss the foundation of open discussion but you also make it hard for them to care about anything else you have to say. What I mean by that is, if you want others to respect what you have to say, start by respecting their right to have an opinion you think is wrong.
How in the world you continue to take issue with that is difficult for me to understand.

When you say, I know the facts so I am the authority for truth, you are attempting to curtail someone else’s speech. Why is this idea so hard for you to understand?

Because it's a false premise, and I didn't say it. You just have a hard time grasping that, that's not on me.

start by respecting their right

Respecting their right? I respect their right by my support of the 1st amendment. Respecting their right is not the same as respecting their content. ******* DUH. That outlines your confusion, perfectly. Hopefully you get it now.

 

[Godboy]

WTF

I thought the virus didn’t affect anyone?!

Like the flu, old or unhealthy people are more affected, Einstein.

Lol actually it affects everyone who has it. I’m glad I could clear this up for you lol

Lol it doesnt effect everyone the same. Im glad i could clear this up for you lol

 

[DrLove]

I wonder who infected Hope Hicks?

Probably not the first time Trump caught something from a woman.

Howard Stern: "I even went as far to say that you're braver than any Vietnam vet because you're out there screwing a lot of women."

"Getting the Congressional Medal of Honor, in actuality," said Trump.

Later in the interview Trump and Stern again compared avoiding STDs to Vietnam.

"I'm having a good time, but Howard, you know the one negative: It's very, very dangerous out there," said Trump.

"Yes it is, it's your Vietnam," added Stern.

"It's Vietnam," added Trump. "It is very dangerous. So I'm very, very careful."

Trump is ,was, and will always be a swine Any women voting for him must be without a brain

Well since he's had some great looking wives I think you are full of shit.

Not much other than mail order brides. Anyone who inherited half billion from Daddy can score with hot babes.

I doubt any of them were mail order and you are right. Money draws but none of his ex's have a bad thing to say about him.

He was a prick with all of them They talk it'll cost them

Being a butthole is expensive!

The New York Times reported in 1991 that Ivana's divorce settlement included $14 million, a 45-room Connecticut mansion, an apartment in the Trump Plaza, and the use of Mar-a-Lago for one month a year. The divorce was finalized in 1992.

Being a billionaire he can afford to be a butthole. Can you??

1. It's obvious that he ain't no billionaire 2. I have no aspirations to be either a billionaire OR a butthole.

Well he's worth 2.5 billion. So he's a billionaire. You aren't and never will be.

Trump is no more a billionaire then a guy who owns a $250k house but owes $200 k on it, is worth the full price of the house.

Yep, the NYT's blockbuster tax revelations indicate that Donald owes 400 million that will come due in next couple of years. Russia and Saudi Arabia are most likely lenders as no bank in the US would give him a loan.

I think Mark Cuban probably had it about right when he guessed Don the Con to be worth about 350 million after debt.

I think it's Deutsche Bank, they've been busted many times for allowing their customers to launder money.

Yes, Deutsche is in big trouble most likely. But there are ties to Russia and Saudi billionaires. The loans may have been from laundered money for sure. Deutsche was real good at that, probably covering their tracks at present.

But there are only two possibilities. Either Donald owes Putin a butt-ton of money, or Putin has dirt on Donald. I'm guessing both. We'll find out before long!

 

[Billy000]

WTF

I thought the virus didn’t affect anyone?!

Like the flu, old or unhealthy people are more affected, Einstein.

Lol actually it affects everyone who has it. I’m glad I could clear this up for you lol

Lol it doesnt effect everyone the same. Im glad i could clear this up for you lol

Perhaps you need to tell Trump that. He says it doesn’t affect anyone lol

 

[DrLove]

I wonder who infected Hope Hicks?

Probably not the first time Trump caught something from a woman.

Howard Stern: "I even went as far to say that you're braver than any Vietnam vet because you're out there screwing a lot of women."

"Getting the Congressional Medal of Honor, in actuality," said Trump.

Later in the interview Trump and Stern again compared avoiding STDs to Vietnam.

"I'm having a good time, but Howard, you know the one negative: It's very, very dangerous out there," said Trump.

"Yes it is, it's your Vietnam," added Stern.

"It's Vietnam," added Trump. "It is very dangerous. So I'm very, very careful."

Trump is ,was, and will always be a swine Any women voting for him must be without a brain

Well since he's had some great looking wives I think you are full of shit.

Cheated on them all and needed to pay prostitutes What a guy What a great repub president Pure scum

Got a link for him cheating and paying prostitutes?? I didn't think so. You're so full of shit you should be a sewer worker.

He laid pipe to a porn queen while Mel was home alone with a newborn and had to pay 135 grand in hush money just before the election to keep her quiet. Please catch up.

No he didn't. You should read the story before you open your mouth and sound like the imbecile you are.

Oh it was hush money all right. Money he paid to shut her up during the election.

He never had an affair with Stormy. Just a good business deal to shut her up and she signed NDE which she broke. She tried to sue Trump and her case got thrown out.

Must you remain ignorant for the rest of your life? I mean SERIOUSLY.

 

[EL Rich]

To all of the "neither candidate is good and you are all being duped by the deep state" crowd,

The problem with your POV is that facts exist. Look to the facts and the path reveals itself.

Yeah, really doesn’t matter who you are supporting, the idea that you know the facts and anyone who disagrees with you is lost, is some of the most ignorant nonsense our society is dealing with right now. While I wouldn’t vote for President Trump to be my village dog catcher, I know plenty of caring, thoughtful people who see him as needed to stem the tide of over reaching government. When I talk to these folks and try to change their minds, I don’t start by calling “******* idiots”, I reserve that distinction for folks who display their idiocy in what they have to say.

Are you suggesting there's not a right thing to do, and that people aren't personally responsible if they cannot understand what a fact is?

No I am not, I am suggesting that you alone are not the arbiter of what is or is not factual and what conclusions can be drawn.

That's trivial - nobody is the arbiter of what a fact is besides reality. Just because someone recognizes what the facts are, doesnt mean theyre the ones deciding its a fact...glad I could clear up that distinction, though...because it seems to me that in the interest of some magical fairness you're suggesting that everyone is entitled to their own facts.

No, what I am saying, is that raw data is factual, but what we all do is use our reason to extrapolate truth out of those facts. I am not defending those who willfully stick their heads in the sand and deny reality. I am simply suggesting that reasonable people can have reasonable disagreements about what the facts “mean”. This is not me saying, Alternative Facts are anything but lies, but I am suggesting like an statistician will tell you, numbers can be manipulated to derive meaning almost any meaning, yet they are factual.

What you are saying is completely trivial. If you think the only way to conclude that Trump is and has been bad for the Country is by arbitrary opinion, and the facts cannot support that - then it's not by some colloquial interpretation of the facts to say that you are wrong, and perhaps stupid. Universal you, in the hypothetical...not you you. You knew that.

Which you?

The letter. The letter u.

Or two of them, or the letter that says two of them. Double you. Or W.

Great, insults.
All I am saying is that a reasonable person can completely disagree with you while looking at the same data. Maybe they believe that immigration and people of color are destroying our culture. I disagree with them, but the second you say they have no right to express that opinion at all, you are betraying democratic norms. There is a reason the ACLU fought for the rights of Nazis to hold a march. Freedom belongs to everyone or no one. By the way, all I have advocated for is not dismissing people before you hear why they think what they think. I fear that you do not see how your unwillingness to accept the ability of others to disagree With you, without being wrong, exists whether you wish to accept it or not. And you are exposing the most legitimate criticism of the modern left, you are intolerant of any type of digression from the doctrines of critical theory.
If your curious where that leads check out China under Mao and that is not hyperbol.

Everyone doesn't get their own set of facts, and it doesn't matter how emotional or unfair that makes you feel, or anyone else either.

Also, it's really ******* weird you're accusing me of wanting anyone to have no right to express their opinion. What the ****? Nobody said that. <-- see, that's a fact, and you don't get to interpret it any other way except to say, 'oh, haha, yeah I guess you're not saying that anyone isn't entitled to their opinions...I'm just saying that you GT are NOT entitled to YOURS, that they're stupid.'

Wow, you didn’t read what I wrote or I failed to make it clear enough. I get you.

I read it just fine - you implied that someone is trying to take someone's rights.. (you: I disagree with them, but the second you say they have no right to express that opinion at all, you are betraying democratic norms.)... away, by calling them stupid....and then went on a diatribe about why taking their rights away is bad.

Since I did none of that and didnt even imply anyone should have their rights taken away, it was just dumb of you to say all of that. You are saying trivial shit over and over again because of your antipathy for calling a spade a spade, a dumb opinion, a lack of a grasp of the facts...stupid. Reality can suck sometimes, and some people are pretty ******* stupid. Hence: Trump.

When you say, I know the facts so I am the authority for truth, you are attempting to curtail someone else’s speech. Why is this idea so hard for you to understand? Democratic norms dictate that reasonable people can have reasonable discussions. When you present the idea that the only explanation for someone to support Trump is that they are stupid, you not only dismiss the foundation of open discussion but you also make it hard for them to care about anything else you have to say. What I mean by that is, if you want others to respect what you have to say, start by respecting their right to have an opinion you think is wrong.
How in the world you continue to take issue with that is difficult for me to understand.

When you say, I know the facts so I am the authority for truth, you are attempting to curtail someone else’s speech. Why is this idea so hard for you to understand?

Because it's a false premise, and I didn't say it. You just have a hard time grasping that, that's not on me.

start by respecting their right

Respecting their right? I respect their right by my support of the 1st amendment. Respecting their right is not the same as respecting their content. ******* DUH. That outlines your confusion, perfectly. Hopefully you get it now.

Ok, you are still talking past me and not to me. No worries.
But understand you are attacking me because I don’t think it is fair or productive for you to dismiss support for Trump as “some people are pretty ******* stupid“. You are going down the same road that allowed Trump to beat Hillary in 2016. Not sure how you feel about that, but I’d guess if you could you’d go back in time and stop Hillary from calling almost 45% of the people who vote, deplorable, you would.

 

[Care4all]

Convenient timing after that side show they called a debate the other night. Guess they really really really didn't want to debate again. Ha. I'm sure Biden is just as pleased.

Biden was in close proximity for 90 minuets.... He gets a test too...

God will see to it that biden gets it.

All Biden needs to do is touch the surface where the virus is and then touch his face by putting on or taking off his mask and he has got it... Shit happens... and there isn't anything anyone can do about it unless you live in a sterile bubble..

Yup. These lefty meatheads think you can control a virus.

You can't. No matter who runs the show, no matter what they have to say, no matter what they do a pandemic kills. It can't be controlled.

It will get into any country no matter the safeguards that country institutes. Its a killer and can't be controlled.

Of course it can be controlled and reduced in spread.

It can't be eliminated entirely, until at 80 or 90% herd immunity, via vaccination. The small pox virus was killed, eliminated, is one example

 

[Claudette]

Convenient timing after that side show they called a debate the other night. Guess they really really really didn't want to debate again. Ha. I'm sure Biden is just as pleased.

Biden was in close proximity for 90 minuets.... He gets a test too...

God will see to it that biden gets it.

All Biden needs to do is touch the surface where the virus is and then touch his face by putting on or taking off his mask and he has got it... Shit happens... and there isn't anything anyone can do about it unless you live in a sterile bubble..

Yup. These lefty meatheads think you can control a virus.

You can't. No matter who runs the show, no matter what they have to say, no matter what they do a pandemic kills. It can't be controlled.

It will get into any country no matter the safeguards that country institutes. Its a killer and can't be controlled.

Of course it can be controlled and reduced in spread.

It can't be eliminated entirely, until at 80 or 90% herd immunity, via vaccination. The small pox virus was killed, eliminated, is one example

I agree but it takes years to develop a vaccine.

You know that. They have to develop it and the FDA has to test it. You and I know how long that takes. It won't happen overnight. It will take years.

 

[DrLove]

I wonder who infected Hope Hicks?

Probably not the first time Trump caught something from a woman.

Howard Stern: "I even went as far to say that you're braver than any Vietnam vet because you're out there screwing a lot of women."

"Getting the Congressional Medal of Honor, in actuality," said Trump.

Later in the interview Trump and Stern again compared avoiding STDs to Vietnam.

"I'm having a good time, but Howard, you know the one negative: It's very, very dangerous out there," said Trump.

"Yes it is, it's your Vietnam," added Stern.

"It's Vietnam," added Trump. "It is very dangerous. So I'm very, very careful."

Trump is ,was, and will always be a swine Any women voting for him must be without a brain

Well since he's had some great looking wives I think you are full of shit.

Not much other than mail order brides. Anyone who inherited half billion from Daddy can score with hot babes.

I doubt any of them were mail order and you are right. Money draws but none of his ex's have a bad thing to say about him.

He was a prick with all of them They talk it'll cost them

Being a butthole is expensive!

The New York Times reported in 1991 that Ivana's divorce settlement included $14 million, a 45-room Connecticut mansion, an apartment in the Trump Plaza, and the use of Mar-a-Lago for one month a year. The divorce was finalized in 1992.

Being a billionaire he can afford to be a butthole. Can you??

1. It's obvious that he ain't no billionaire 2. I have no aspirations to be either a billionaire OR a butthole.

Well he's worth 2.5 billion. So he's a billionaire. You aren't and never will be.

His tax returns obtained legally by the NYT's say otherwise. I have even money that after paying off the 400 million he'll owe shortly, the 71 million he probably owes the IRS along with fines, and the rest of his mountain of debt, he's worth less than a billion. Probably Mitt Romney rich - in the half billion range.

The difference is - Mitt may be out of touch, but he's not a butthole and he won't be going to prison soon.

 

[martybegan]

Convenient timing after that side show they called a debate the other night. Guess they really really really didn't want to debate again. Ha. I'm sure Biden is just as pleased.

Biden was in close proximity for 90 minuets.... He gets a test too...

God will see to it that biden gets it.

All Biden needs to do is touch the surface where the virus is and then touch his face by putting on or taking off his mask and he has got it... Shit happens... and there isn't anything anyone can do about it unless you live in a sterile bubble..

Yup. These lefty meatheads think you can control a virus.

You can't. No matter who runs the show, no matter what they have to say, no matter what they do a pandemic kills. It can't be controlled.

It will get into any country no matter the safeguards that country institutes. Its a killer and can't be controlled.

Of course it can be controlled and reduced in spread.

It can't be eliminated entirely, until at 80 or 90% herd immunity, via vaccination. The small pox virus was killed, eliminated, is one example

because smallpox only infects humans and has no other reservoir or infection source. It also didn't mutate into differing forms like some other viruses do.

 

[San Souci]

Looks like Hope Hicks is Typhoid Mary

She intermingled with members of the Trump Administration while she “wasn’t feeling well”

There may be more infections

I hope Kamala Harris catches a bad case.

 

[G.T.]

To all of the "neither candidate is good and you are all being duped by the deep state" crowd,

The problem with your POV is that facts exist. Look to the facts and the path reveals itself.

Yeah, really doesn’t matter who you are supporting, the idea that you know the facts and anyone who disagrees with you is lost, is some of the most ignorant nonsense our society is dealing with right now. While I wouldn’t vote for President Trump to be my village dog catcher, I know plenty of caring, thoughtful people who see him as needed to stem the tide of over reaching government. When I talk to these folks and try to change their minds, I don’t start by calling “******* idiots”, I reserve that distinction for folks who display their idiocy in what they have to say.

Are you suggesting there's not a right thing to do, and that people aren't personally responsible if they cannot understand what a fact is?

No I am not, I am suggesting that you alone are not the arbiter of what is or is not factual and what conclusions can be drawn.

That's trivial - nobody is the arbiter of what a fact is besides reality. Just because someone recognizes what the facts are, doesnt mean theyre the ones deciding its a fact...glad I could clear up that distinction, though...because it seems to me that in the interest of some magical fairness you're suggesting that everyone is entitled to their own facts.

No, what I am saying, is that raw data is factual, but what we all do is use our reason to extrapolate truth out of those facts. I am not defending those who willfully stick their heads in the sand and deny reality. I am simply suggesting that reasonable people can have reasonable disagreements about what the facts “mean”. This is not me saying, Alternative Facts are anything but lies, but I am suggesting like an statistician will tell you, numbers can be manipulated to derive meaning almost any meaning, yet they are factual.

What you are saying is completely trivial. If you think the only way to conclude that Trump is and has been bad for the Country is by arbitrary opinion, and the facts cannot support that - then it's not by some colloquial interpretation of the facts to say that you are wrong, and perhaps stupid. Universal you, in the hypothetical...not you you. You knew that.

Which you?

The letter. The letter u.

Or two of them, or the letter that says two of them. Double you. Or W.

Great, insults.
All I am saying is that a reasonable person can completely disagree with you while looking at the same data. Maybe they believe that immigration and people of color are destroying our culture. I disagree with them, but the second you say they have no right to express that opinion at all, you are betraying democratic norms. There is a reason the ACLU fought for the rights of Nazis to hold a march. Freedom belongs to everyone or no one. By the way, all I have advocated for is not dismissing people before you hear why they think what they think. I fear that you do not see how your unwillingness to accept the ability of others to disagree With you, without being wrong, exists whether you wish to accept it or not. And you are exposing the most legitimate criticism of the modern left, you are intolerant of any type of digression from the doctrines of critical theory.
If your curious where that leads check out China under Mao and that is not hyperbol.

Everyone doesn't get their own set of facts, and it doesn't matter how emotional or unfair that makes you feel, or anyone else either.

Also, it's really ******* weird you're accusing me of wanting anyone to have no right to express their opinion. What the ****? Nobody said that. <-- see, that's a fact, and you don't get to interpret it any other way except to say, 'oh, haha, yeah I guess you're not saying that anyone isn't entitled to their opinions...I'm just saying that you GT are NOT entitled to YOURS, that they're stupid.'

Wow, you didn’t read what I wrote or I failed to make it clear enough. I get you.

I read it just fine - you implied that someone is trying to take someone's rights.. (you: I disagree with them, but the second you say they have no right to express that opinion at all, you are betraying democratic norms.)... away, by calling them stupid....and then went on a diatribe about why taking their rights away is bad.

Since I did none of that and didnt even imply anyone should have their rights taken away, it was just dumb of you to say all of that. You are saying trivial shit over and over again because of your antipathy for calling a spade a spade, a dumb opinion, a lack of a grasp of the facts...stupid. Reality can suck sometimes, and some people are pretty ******* stupid. Hence: Trump.

When you say, I know the facts so I am the authority for truth, you are attempting to curtail someone else’s speech. Why is this idea so hard for you to understand? Democratic norms dictate that reasonable people can have reasonable discussions. When you present the idea that the only explanation for someone to support Trump is that they are stupid, you not only dismiss the foundation of open discussion but you also make it hard for them to care about anything else you have to say. What I mean by that is, if you want others to respect what you have to say, start by respecting their right to have an opinion you think is wrong.
How in the world you continue to take issue with that is difficult for me to understand.

When you say, I know the facts so I am the authority for truth, you are attempting to curtail someone else’s speech. Why is this idea so hard for you to understand?

Because it's a false premise, and I didn't say it. You just have a hard time grasping that, that's not on me.

start by respecting their right

Respecting their right? I respect their right by my support of the 1st amendment. Respecting their right is not the same as respecting their content. ******* DUH. That outlines your confusion, perfectly. Hopefully you get it now.

Ok, you are still talking past me and not to me. No worries.
But understand you are attacking me because I don’t think it is fair or productive for you to dismiss support for Trump as “some people are pretty ******* stupid“. You are going down the same road that allowed Trump to beat Hillary in 2016. Not sure how you feel about that, but I’d guess if you could you’d go back in time and stop Hillary from calling almost 45% of the people who vote, deplorable, you would.

I don't apologize for my take, if that's what you're trying to get me to say. I offer no excuse for someone's support of a guy who brags about being in the locker rooms of teenaged girls, has been a known perv. since the 90s, has had back and forth fights with Magazines over the years for not acknowledging he is as rich as he says he is...can be found on video after video after video after video lying...and not only out of context, but literally pairs of videos where he says one thing on one, and something contradictory on another...

No excuse, and no excuse for supporting the most divisive President we've ever had.

Sorry not sorry - support of him is ******* stupid, sorry that hurts your or anyone's feelings but the facts are in: he's a liar, he's a womanizer, he says nefarious things about underaged girls, those are clearly disqualifying all by themselves without getting into the 6, 000 other things wrong with the fuckin' guy.

I've no problem supporting that, and you can't say @oh but biden@ because I'm not a Biden supporter and offer no excuses there, either. So...

And you can quit accusing me of trying to take anyone's rights away. That's just stupid, you're not hearing that from me. Just tough love. Trump support is stupid.

 

[Claudette]

I wonder who infected Hope Hicks?

Probably not the first time Trump caught something from a woman.

Howard Stern: "I even went as far to say that you're braver than any Vietnam vet because you're out there screwing a lot of women."

"Getting the Congressional Medal of Honor, in actuality," said Trump.

Later in the interview Trump and Stern again compared avoiding STDs to Vietnam.

"I'm having a good time, but Howard, you know the one negative: It's very, very dangerous out there," said Trump.

"Yes it is, it's your Vietnam," added Stern.

"It's Vietnam," added Trump. "It is very dangerous. So I'm very, very careful."

Trump is ,was, and will always be a swine Any women voting for him must be without a brain

Well since he's had some great looking wives I think you are full of shit.

Not much other than mail order brides. Anyone who inherited half billion from Daddy can score with hot babes.

I doubt any of them were mail order and you are right. Money draws but none of his ex's have a bad thing to say about him.

He was a prick with all of them They talk it'll cost them

Being a butthole is expensive!

The New York Times reported in 1991 that Ivana's divorce settlement included $14 million, a 45-room Connecticut mansion, an apartment in the Trump Plaza, and the use of Mar-a-Lago for one month a year. The divorce was finalized in 1992.

Being a billionaire he can afford to be a butthole. Can you??

1. It's obvious that he ain't no billionaire 2. I have no aspirations to be either a billionaire OR a butthole.

Well he's worth 2.5 billion. So he's a billionaire. You aren't and never will be.

His tax returns obtained legally by the NYT's say otherwise. I have even money that after paying off the 400 million he'll owe shortly along with the rest of his mountain of debt, he's worth less than a billion. Probably Mitt Romney rich - in the half billion range.

The difference is, Mitt may be out of touch, but he's not a butthole.

Oh so you think the State auditors wouldn't have caught that a long time ago.

I think you are full of shit.

 

[kaz]

President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump tested positive for the coronavirus, he announced on Twitter early Friday.

"Tonight, @FLOTUS and I tested positive for COVID-19. We will begin our quarantine and recovery process immediately. We will get through this TOGETHER!" he tweeted.

Trump, first lady Melania Trump test positive for Covid-19

I wonder how many others are also infected? MSNBC listed 20 people earlier who had been in close proximity to Hope Hicks. Trump and Melania are among the lucky ones who actually have a full-time doctor and state-of-the-art medical facilities in the White House - plus Walter Reed Army Medical Center if needed.

When Trump's 'personal assistant'..wink..wink.. tested positive you knew there was a good chance Trump would not dodge it anymore. Then he goes and passes it on to Melania. Melania should slap the hell out of Hicks for that.

You need a mental health checkup. I'd recommend you get the full test

 

[Care4all]

Poor Left tard.... Cant or wont debate the facts I posted?

Hmmm....should I listen to the director of the CDC or the anonymous Trump supporter with no medical degrees and can't make his argument without calling me a "tard"? Such an eloquent response from someone who clearly knows what they're talking about.

Decisions...

Maybe try throwing in a few "commie" insults and a "cuck" or two. Oh, and don't forget to sprinkle in some "TDS". I think that will really drive your point home.

Such difficult decisions...

How about you apply commonsense to your thought process...

Explain to me how a virus that is 0.1 microns in size is stopped by a filter that only filters down to 1.5 microns... I'll wait...

And how is that screen door on your submarine working out?

Before we get into the physics of it all can I ask a simpler question.... How do you think doctors and nurses that are treating COVID positive patients every day are not all sick by now? We know this is a highly contagious virus... how do you explain that?

Its simple... Proper mask dawning and removal.. Proper eye shields.. Positive pressure face masks, and having the appropriate mask filtration.

They also wear gloves and change them frequently all while washing their hands before and after removing or dawning a mask.

Its process and the negative pressure environments that hospitals use to protect staff.

Masks do nothing.

Where is your proof?

 

[Billy_Bob]

Of course it can be controlled and reduced in spread.

Only in your dreams... This is a VIRUS, a micro organism that lives in the air and in water vapor.. Tell me how you think your going to stop it and control it... I'll wait..

 

[DrLove]

I wonder who infected Hope Hicks?

Probably not the first time Trump caught something from a woman.

Howard Stern: "I even went as far to say that you're braver than any Vietnam vet because you're out there screwing a lot of women."

"Getting the Congressional Medal of Honor, in actuality," said Trump.

Later in the interview Trump and Stern again compared avoiding STDs to Vietnam.

"I'm having a good time, but Howard, you know the one negative: It's very, very dangerous out there," said Trump.

"Yes it is, it's your Vietnam," added Stern.

"It's Vietnam," added Trump. "It is very dangerous. So I'm very, very careful."

Trump is ,was, and will always be a swine Any women voting for him must be without a brain

Well since he's had some great looking wives I think you are full of shit.

Not much other than mail order brides. Anyone who inherited half billion from Daddy can score with hot babes.

I doubt any of them were mail order and you are right. Money draws but none of his ex's have a bad thing to say about him.

He was a prick with all of them They talk it'll cost them

Being a butthole is expensive!

The New York Times reported in 1991 that Ivana's divorce settlement included $14 million, a 45-room Connecticut mansion, an apartment in the Trump Plaza, and the use of Mar-a-Lago for one month a year. The divorce was finalized in 1992.

Being a billionaire he can afford to be a butthole. Can you??

1. It's obvious that he ain't no billionaire 2. I have no aspirations to be either a billionaire OR a butthole.

Well he's worth 2.5 billion. So he's a billionaire. You aren't and never will be.

His tax returns obtained legally by the NYT's say otherwise. I have even money that after paying off the 400 million he'll owe shortly along with the rest of his mountain of debt, he's worth less than a billion. Probably Mitt Romney rich - in the half billion range.

The difference is, Mitt may be out of touch, but he's not a butthole.

Oh so you think the State auditors wouldn't have caught that a long time ago.

I think you are full of shit.

Hardly anyone gets audited anymore. You should know why, but then again you should also know that Donald indeed screwed Stormy.

How the IRS Was Gutted

An eight-year campaign to slash the agency’s budget has left it understaffed, hamstrung and operating with archaic equipment. The result: billions less to fund the government. That’s good news for corporations and the wealthy.

www.propublica.org

 

[miketx]

Poor Left tard.... Cant or wont debate the facts I posted?

Hmmm....should I listen to the director of the CDC or the anonymous Trump supporter with no medical degrees and can't make his argument without calling me a "tard"? Such an eloquent response from someone who clearly knows what they're talking about.

Decisions...

Maybe try throwing in a few "commie" insults and a "cuck" or two. Oh, and don't forget to sprinkle in some "TDS". I think that will really drive your point home.

Such difficult decisions...

How about you apply commonsense to your thought process...

Explain to me how a virus that is 0.1 microns in size is stopped by a filter that only filters down to 1.5 microns... I'll wait...

And how is that screen door on your submarine working out?

Before we get into the physics of it all can I ask a simpler question.... How do you think doctors and nurses that are treating COVID positive patients every day are not all sick by now? We know this is a highly contagious virus... how do you explain that?

Its simple... Proper mask dawning and removal.. Proper eye shields.. Positive pressure face masks, and having the appropriate mask filtration.

They also wear gloves and change them frequently all while washing their hands before and after removing or dawning a mask.

Its process and the negative pressure environments that hospitals use to protect staff.

Masks do nothing.

Where is your proof?

You fowl vermin don't accept proof.