Trump And Israel: Carrots And Peas

[Rigby5]

nd

Liar.

1. Clearly what Obama said is that he negotiated a freeze on weapons development by Iran.

2. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is entirely VOLUNTARY!
Anyone attempting to force non-proliferation on any sovereign nation is a criminal.

3. The US clearly is a war criminal for illegally invading Iraq when they threatened no one.
Israel is a war criminal for not allowing the right of return to refugees, collective retribution, illegally blockading civilian commerce, etc.

There was never any 'freeze,' and never any inspections.


Only a fool like you imagines there were.



1. Anyone who maintains that Iran is living up to the agreement is a bald-faced liar!!!


No one knows, no one can tell…..because the deal prevents actual inspections.



2. "The deal's provisions for inspections of military facilities, or "undeclared sites," involve a complex process with plenty of opportunities for Iran to stall. Tehran can propose alternatives to on-site inspections, or reject the request, which would trigger a 24-day process for the Joint Commission countries to override the rejection.

That could drag on for months. And under ambiguities built into the deal, it's unclear whether Iran must allow IAEA inspectors into military sites, or whether the Iranians can take their own environmental samples and send them to the IAEA for testing, as was allowed under a 2015 side agreement that let Iran use its own experts to inspect the Parchin military site."
U.S. seeks to test Iran deal with more inspections



3. Obama's Iran Nuclear Deal Allows the Regime to Develop a Weapon ...
"Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon"
Read more at: Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon



4. § The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was not allowed to inspect or monitor Iran's military sites where nuclear activities were most likely being carried out. Among the many concessions that the Obama administration gave the Iranian government, one was accepting the Iranian leaders' demand that these military sites would be out of the IAEA's reach.

§ Due to this surrender, various high-profile Iranian sites such as the Parchin military complex, located southeast of Tehran, were free to engage in nuclear activities without the risk of inspection.

§ Once the authoritarian, anti-Semitic and anti-American government of Iran possess a nuclear bomb, no amount of actions will be able reverse the catastrophe.

§ Stop Iran From Going Nuclear




5. In 2015, President Obama promised when he tried to sell the deal to a skeptical American public that the Iranians agreed to the "most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime, ever negotiated for any nuclear program in history," based on "unprecedented verification." Moreover, Obama adviser Ben Rhodes reassured the public repeatedly that the deal included "anywhere, anytime" inspections and 24-7 access to Iran's key nuclear facilities.

But in reality, the administration repeatedly lied to the American public by misrepresenting the deal and the nature of the inspections Iran agreed to. The robust inspections referred only to Iran's declared nuclear sites. Other sites that the IAEA has suspicions about, including all military sites and undeclared nuclear sites, fell under a separate cheating-friendly procedure.

One of the most controversial issues in the 2015 negotiations was whether the U.N.'s IAEA would be able to visit military sites if they had questions about suspected nuclear activities or facilities within them. In the end, Iranian leader Ayatollah Khamenei on June 23, 2015 stated that granting access to Iran's military sites was a red line, and the U.S. and its partners gave in and agreed on language with Iran avoiding a direct mention of the military sites issue.

Instead, the deal stated that in order to allay IAEA concerns, Iran would give access within a 24-day time frame, after the IAEA made a request to visit a suspected site. Furthermore, the deal stated that if Iran refused the access, the Islamist state and the IAEA would have additional 14 days to resolve the agreement among themselves. If they failed to agree, a joint commission comprising the six member-nations who are parties to the agreement would consider the matter for an additional week.

In conclusion, according to the agreement, Iran can continue its uranium enrichment program and continue developing its weapon program at its many military sites, and every time the IAEA suspects anything, the Iranians can have 24 days at a minimum and 45 days maximum to delay the access, sanitize the sites, or transfer the unauthorized nuclear work to another unauthorized military site.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/05/obama_and_irans_nuclear_lies.html#ixzz5nH0Ua9im




Bet you feel pretty stooooooopid right now, huh?

Liar.
The International Atomic Energy Association has conducted dozens of nuclear freeze inspection successfully for decades, and not once have they failed.
They use instrumentation, seals, etc., and can not be evaded or sanitized as you claim.
Who do are we to beleive, the IAEA and the UN, or your ridiculous lies?

I never lie and I'm never wrong.


Watch this:



"IAEA not authorized to inspect Iran’s military sites: Russia
A senior Russian diplomat has criticized certain countries’ calls for the expansion of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s inspections to include Iranian military sites, saying the IAEA has no authority to carry out such inspection. “I would like to say absolutely clear and directly that acquiring some false topicality [about] the theme of the IAEA work […"
IAEA not authorized to inspect Iran’s military sites: Russia - iran news daily iran news now | iran news daily iran news now




How ya' like dat...booooooyyyyyeeeeeeee!!!!


Another custard pie in your ugly kisser!

You obvious are an idiot as well as a liar.
Of course the IAEA is not authorized to ever inspect anyone.
What allows the IAEA inspections is a voluntary agreement.
In this case, it was Obama offering to reduce economic sanctions if Iran would allow inspections.
Iran agreed.
Therefore the inspections occurred and would have until Trump stopped them.

Dolt.....the Obama deal never allowed any real inspections.


Once they were caught cheating, they had 45 days to allow the IAEA in.

Gads, you're a moron.

Bet you're tired of everyone telling you that.

Liar.
The standard IAEA procedure is to install instrumentation, including video cameras and seals.
No one has ever been able to defraud IAEA inspections yet.
They are the experts.
You are just a liar.

 

[PoliticalChic]

So much blood spilled over millenia over that desert wasteland

We really need to just deport everyone like Political Chic to Israel... that would solve a lot of our problems in the US right away....

Actually....I've been to Israel.....but you haven't.

Hence, you're just one more anti-Semitic windbag.


True?

Obviously you are not a US citizen but an Israeli bot.
You are so ignorant that you do not know that the word Semitic means of an Arab language group, and does not at all mean Jewish.
In fact, Ashkenazi Jews have the Germanic as their native language, so are not at all Semitic.

Me?


Just a lil' ol' southern gal....


Seoul, South Korea.....but an American citizen.

How 'bout you? Iran??????

 

[LaDairis]

Obviously you are not a US citizen but an Israeli bot.

Agreed, one masquerading as a "Christian." A total fraud. Too much "princess" in her, and too rich.

As the old Jewish saying goes....

Christians always end up with NOTHING (as the "original Christians" did)

 

[LaDairis]

Political Chic, why do you think Jews do not "believe in Jesus?"

Why do you imagine (I almost said 'think') that question belongs in this thread?


Did you run out of Jew-hatred stuff?

Why doesn't in belong here?

And why are you TOO COWARDLY to answer it???

LOL!!!!!


Once again, a legit question is met with a CARD TOSS.....

 

[PoliticalChic]

nd

There was never any 'freeze,' and never any inspections.


Only a fool like you imagines there were.



1. Anyone who maintains that Iran is living up to the agreement is a bald-faced liar!!!


No one knows, no one can tell…..because the deal prevents actual inspections.



2. "The deal's provisions for inspections of military facilities, or "undeclared sites," involve a complex process with plenty of opportunities for Iran to stall. Tehran can propose alternatives to on-site inspections, or reject the request, which would trigger a 24-day process for the Joint Commission countries to override the rejection.

That could drag on for months. And under ambiguities built into the deal, it's unclear whether Iran must allow IAEA inspectors into military sites, or whether the Iranians can take their own environmental samples and send them to the IAEA for testing, as was allowed under a 2015 side agreement that let Iran use its own experts to inspect the Parchin military site."
U.S. seeks to test Iran deal with more inspections



3. Obama's Iran Nuclear Deal Allows the Regime to Develop a Weapon ...
"Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon"
Read more at: Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon



4. § The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was not allowed to inspect or monitor Iran's military sites where nuclear activities were most likely being carried out. Among the many concessions that the Obama administration gave the Iranian government, one was accepting the Iranian leaders' demand that these military sites would be out of the IAEA's reach.

§ Due to this surrender, various high-profile Iranian sites such as the Parchin military complex, located southeast of Tehran, were free to engage in nuclear activities without the risk of inspection.

§ Once the authoritarian, anti-Semitic and anti-American government of Iran possess a nuclear bomb, no amount of actions will be able reverse the catastrophe.

§ Stop Iran From Going Nuclear




5. In 2015, President Obama promised when he tried to sell the deal to a skeptical American public that the Iranians agreed to the "most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime, ever negotiated for any nuclear program in history," based on "unprecedented verification." Moreover, Obama adviser Ben Rhodes reassured the public repeatedly that the deal included "anywhere, anytime" inspections and 24-7 access to Iran's key nuclear facilities.

But in reality, the administration repeatedly lied to the American public by misrepresenting the deal and the nature of the inspections Iran agreed to. The robust inspections referred only to Iran's declared nuclear sites. Other sites that the IAEA has suspicions about, including all military sites and undeclared nuclear sites, fell under a separate cheating-friendly procedure.

One of the most controversial issues in the 2015 negotiations was whether the U.N.'s IAEA would be able to visit military sites if they had questions about suspected nuclear activities or facilities within them. In the end, Iranian leader Ayatollah Khamenei on June 23, 2015 stated that granting access to Iran's military sites was a red line, and the U.S. and its partners gave in and agreed on language with Iran avoiding a direct mention of the military sites issue.

Instead, the deal stated that in order to allay IAEA concerns, Iran would give access within a 24-day time frame, after the IAEA made a request to visit a suspected site. Furthermore, the deal stated that if Iran refused the access, the Islamist state and the IAEA would have additional 14 days to resolve the agreement among themselves. If they failed to agree, a joint commission comprising the six member-nations who are parties to the agreement would consider the matter for an additional week.

In conclusion, according to the agreement, Iran can continue its uranium enrichment program and continue developing its weapon program at its many military sites, and every time the IAEA suspects anything, the Iranians can have 24 days at a minimum and 45 days maximum to delay the access, sanitize the sites, or transfer the unauthorized nuclear work to another unauthorized military site.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/05/obama_and_irans_nuclear_lies.html#ixzz5nH0Ua9im




Bet you feel pretty stooooooopid right now, huh?

Liar.
The International Atomic Energy Association has conducted dozens of nuclear freeze inspection successfully for decades, and not once have they failed.
They use instrumentation, seals, etc., and can not be evaded or sanitized as you claim.
Who do are we to beleive, the IAEA and the UN, or your ridiculous lies?

I never lie and I'm never wrong.


Watch this:



"IAEA not authorized to inspect Iran’s military sites: Russia
A senior Russian diplomat has criticized certain countries’ calls for the expansion of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s inspections to include Iranian military sites, saying the IAEA has no authority to carry out such inspection. “I would like to say absolutely clear and directly that acquiring some false topicality [about] the theme of the IAEA work […"
IAEA not authorized to inspect Iran’s military sites: Russia - iran news daily iran news now | iran news daily iran news now




How ya' like dat...booooooyyyyyeeeeeeee!!!!


Another custard pie in your ugly kisser!

You obvious are an idiot as well as a liar.
Of course the IAEA is not authorized to ever inspect anyone.
What allows the IAEA inspections is a voluntary agreement.
In this case, it was Obama offering to reduce economic sanctions if Iran would allow inspections.
Iran agreed.
Therefore the inspections occurred and would have until Trump stopped them.

Dolt.....the Obama deal never allowed any real inspections.


Once they were caught cheating, they had 45 days to allow the IAEA in.

Gads, you're a moron.

Bet you're tired of everyone telling you that.

Liar.
The standard IAEA procedure is to install instrumentation, including video cameras and seals.
No one has ever been able to defraud IAEA inspections yet.
They are the experts.
You are just a liar.

I never lie....and I'm never wrong.


But I do like these verbal vivisections of dopes like you....


Watch this:


In conclusion, according to the agreement, Iran can continue its uranium enrichment program and continue developing its weapon program at its many military sites, and every time the IAEA suspects anything, the Iranians can have 24 days at a minimum and 45 days maximum to delay the access, sanitize the sites, or transfer the unauthorized nuclear work to another unauthorized military site.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/05/obama_and_irans_nuclear_lies.html#ixzz5nH0Ua9im




Want some more, dunce????

“Iran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close

Iran can easily stretch out the inspection of suspect nuclear sites for three months or more.”
Iran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close

 

[Old Man Grumbles]

PoliticalChic

From Haaretz: Givati Brigade commander: 'Studying Torah is best protection’

From The Guardian: The Israel-Palestine conflict is not just about land. It’s a bitter religious war | Anshel Pfeffer (actually an interesting piece looking at both sides)

From The Atlantic: The Real Dispute Driving the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (also an interesting piece on the attitudes of both Israelis and Palestinians)

Is this enough or do you require more (which won't happen today since it is time to start preparing supper)?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Obviously you are not a US citizen but an Israeli bot.

Agreed, one masquerading as a "Christian." A total fraud. Too much "princess" in her, and too rich.

As the old Jewish saying goes....

Christians always end up with NOTHING (as the "original Christians" did)

You can refer to me as 'princess.'


Don't you want to comment on my amazing grasp of the subject?
My understated wit?
My cygnian grace?
Please don't mention my spectacular good looks (just kidding- go ahead and mention them.)

 

[LaDairis]

Better yet, for even more "protection," set up fraudulent Muslim "leaders" to spur Muslim on Muslim conflict.....


Edward Snowden: Simon Elliot, aka Al-Baghdadi, Mossad agent | ERMISNEWS

 

[PoliticalChic]

PoliticalChic

From Haaretz: Givati Brigade commander: 'Studying Torah is best protection’

From The Guardian: The Israel-Palestine conflict is not just about land. It’s a bitter religious war | Anshel Pfeffer (actually an interesting piece looking at both sides)

From The Atlantic: The Real Dispute Driving the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (also an interesting piece on the attitudes of both Israelis and Palestinians)

Is this enough or do you require more (which won't happen today since it is time to start preparing supper)?

Enough of what????


You're objecting to Jewish folks suggesting study of their religious documents?????



You don't recognize how Leftist the two other sources are?



Now, focus like a laser: what is the hatred of Muslims that you are claiming about Israel???


Can you name several of the books that have informed your geopolitical outlook?


Just kiddin'....bet you are a government school grad and never read a book not assigned therein.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Better yet, for even more "protection," set up fraudulent Muslim "leaders" to spur Muslim on Muslim conflict.....


Edward Snowden: Simon Elliot, aka Al-Baghdadi, Mossad agent | ERMISNEWS

And?

 

[Old Man Grumbles]

lmao - you're never satisfied. You seem to see only black & white - no intuitive understanding.

Call Trump, tell him you want the Secy of State position so you can impose your will on the Palestinians.

I give up trying to get you, even a little bit, to see more than your own POV.

ADDED: And no, it doesn't mean you're always right.

 

[PoliticalChic]

lmao - you're never satisfied. You seem to see only black & white - no intuitive understanding.

Call Trump, tell him you want the Secy of State position so you can impose your will on the Palestinians.

I give up trying to get you, even a little bit, to see more than your own POV.

ADDED: And no, it doesn't mean you're always right.

You're just shuckin' and jivin'


I've produced not just a persuasive, but an irrefutable polemic as to why Trump is correct in supporting an American ally surrounded by enemies.

And you have done nothing but '..oh yeah.....two sides....blah blah blah.'

No there aren't.

Educate yourself about the two sides, about the events leading up to today, about the inherent violence and hatred of the political doctrine called Islam, and you will see that....I am, as always, correct.




Start with these two for background....I'm sure some nice adult will help you obtain a library card...

Now go do your homework.
You'll feel a lot more secure knowing rather than feeling.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Pop Quiz

Which Democrat anti-Semite instituted the fake 'Israeli settlements are illegal' calling Israeli settlements in the West Bank "inconsistent with international law."

Was it Democrat Jimmy Carter...
or
was it Democrat Hussein Obama?

Time's up....



Both. It was both Democrats....Carter and Obama....

Seems anti-Semitism is a requirement to be in the party.

 

[Zorro!]

BUTBUTBUTBUT! ORANGE MAN BAD! The Trump Administration Is Right: Israeli Settlements Do Not Violate International Law.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"...Pompeo said international law is ambiguous on the question of whether settlements are illegal and added that "there will never be a judicial resolution to the conflict, and arguments about who is right and who is wrong as a matter of international law will not bring peace."

Liberal critics are condemning the announcement as unprecedented—but in fact the U.S. position that settlements are illegal under international law only dates to the final days of the Obama administration.

The Trump administration is bringing U.S. policy in line with the positions held by successive Republican and Democratic administrations dating back to 1967, when Israel acquired the West Bank in the Six Day War.

It was only in late December 2016, after President Trump won the presidential election and weeks before Inauguration Day that the Obama administration supported a U.N. Security Council resolution declaring settlements a violation of international law. ....a spiteful, abrupt, and illegitimate policy shift by an administration days before its departure from the White House."
Trump Endorses Controversial, Unprecedented Policy on Settlements Held by Previous Administrations

 

[PoliticalChic]

"...successive administrations, including those of Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton, refused to call settlements "illegal."

So the Trump administration's announcement broke no new ground,...

... adopting the Palestinian position as its own, the Obama administration preemptively designated all of the West Bank—including half of Jerusalem, the Western Wall, and settlement blocs that will never be part of a Palestinian state—as Palestinian territory illegally controlled by Israel and therefore beyond compromise. The endorsement also promoted one of the worst tendencies in Palestinian politics—the fantasy of an eventual total victory over Israel, without the need for negotiation or compromise."
Trump Endorses Controversial, Unprecedented Policy on Settlements Held by Previous Administrations




Now....why would Hussein....brought up as a Muslim, and who, in his formative years, studied in a madrassa.....

...do such a thing????


Any Democrats care to answer?

 

[LaDairis]

Better yet, for even more "protection," set up fraudulent Muslim "leaders" to spur Muslim on Muslim conflict.....


Edward Snowden: Simon Elliot, aka Al-Baghdadi, Mossad agent | ERMISNEWS

And?

Yeah, as if you didn't already know that ISIS is a MOSSAD SPONSORED ENTITY....

 

[LaDairis]

why would Hussein....brought up as a Muslim

This was "Hussein" in high school.... a GAY COKE WHORE, not exactly an "islamic lifestyle...."


Obama Was A Cocaine-Using Gay Hustler, Says Woman Who Claims To Have Been Hawaiian Classmate | HuffPost



"“He always portrayed himself as a foreign student,” Pope said. “Girls were never anything that he ever was interested in ... He would get with these older white gay men, and this is how we just pretty much had the impression that that’s how he was procuring his cocaine.”

She then notes, “In other words, he was having sex with these older white guys and that’s how he was getting this cocaine to be able to freebase.”"

 

[g5000]

Bibi's been indicted.

Carrots and peas for sure!

More like two peas in a pod.

 

[LaDairis]

Bibi's been indicted.

Bibi is the Hitler of our generation