Trump And Israel: Carrots And Peas

1. Once again Trump has proven to be the diametric opposite of Hussein Obama....As much as Hussein abhorred the Jewish state, Trump seems to embrace same.

Short story....the Obama cult with it's allies in the UN and the Muslim world, did everything to put Israel in a bad light, claim illegality about its cities, Trump has erase the biased attempts.



2. "Pompeo Breaks With Years of Error On Israel Settlements

3. ...a turning point in Middle East history. Secretary of State Pompeo’s statement that Israeli settlements are not illegal per se is the most significant shift in America’s Middle East policy in the past generation.

4. ...the issue of the legality of Israeli settlements has been the defining issue of much of the international discourse on Israel for a generation.

5.In the vast majority of cases, the discourse has revolved around the widely held allegation – with no basis in actual law – that Israeli communities in Judea and Samaria are illegal. This allegation has served as the justification for a continuous barrage of condemnations of Israel in international arenas and for anti-Israel legal verdicts in international courts, including the International Court of Justice at the Hague in 2004 and the European Court of Justice last week."
Pompeo Breaks With Years of Error On Israel Settlements




For clarity.....the term 'settlement' is misleading.


170201163116-settlement-view-exlarge-169.jpg


Israeli settlements: What you need to know - CNN



That city is what the western media refers to as 'a settlement.'

That's like calling Manhattan a settlement.

But they want to pollute the reality, and pretend that the cities that they demand turning over to the Palestinians is merely a temporary jerry-built refugee camp of Israelis.
It is not. It is a vibrant, thriving community rising up from the desert.
And it is permanent.
So much blood spilled over millenia over that desert wasteland
 
nd
A question no Democrat/Obama supporter has ever been able to answer:
What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?




10. "...Robert Malley, the former senior White House official who served as point man for President Barack Obama’s realignment strategy, published an essay in Foreign Affairs titled “The Unwanted Wars: Why the Middle East Is More Combustible Than Ever,” in which he laid out what he sees as the future of Obama’s foreign policy legacy.

Obama’s core vision for the region. The goal of achieving “balance” in America’s posture in the Middle East is how Obama presented his strategy of realigning American interests with Iran. For Obama, it was not in America’s interest to lead a regional alliance system which stands in opposition to Iran, and which therefore threatens to move the U.S. closer to war. Rebalancing away from traditional allies means moving closer to Iran, and away from the security architecture in which America had formerly been invested.

What America should, and must, do when confronted with such a tinderbox is obvious: backpedal away, fast, while kicking our former allies in the region to the curb, hard."
Malley in Wonderland





Iran??? A military power with the political views of Nazi Germany?

This was Obama's plan: provide 7th century barbarians with nuclear weapons????

After promising that Iran would never get nuclear weapons, Obama guaranteed them nukes.

October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table"





There are only two possible explanations:
a. a visceral hatred of America and Western Civilization

b. his admission that he never abandoned the Muslim faith of his childhood.


Liar.
Iran has every legal right in the world to have a nuclear deterrent after the US illegally invaded the innocent country of Iraq and caused the sovereign leader to be murdered.

And Ombama did not at all advance any Iranian project to gain nuclear weapons, but instead froze them, with adequate inspections to ensure no progress would be made.



No they don't, you moron.

1. Hussein Obama:
March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.



2. The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-ProliferationTreaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of ...
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia


3.war criminal - an offender who violates international law during timesof war
offender, wrongdoer - a person who transgresses moral or civillaw
war criminal

Liar.

1. Clearly what Obama said is that he negotiated a freeze on weapons development by Iran.

2. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is entirely VOLUNTARY!
Anyone attempting to force non-proliferation on any sovereign nation is a criminal.

3. The US clearly is a war criminal for illegally invading Iraq when they threatened no one.
Israel is a war criminal for not allowing the right of return to refugees, collective retribution, illegally blockading civilian commerce, etc.



There was never any 'freeze,' and never any inspections.


Only a fool like you imagines there were.



1. Anyone who maintains that Iran is living up to the agreement is a bald-faced liar!!!


No one knows, no one can tell…..because the deal prevents actual inspections.



2. "The deal's provisions for inspections of military facilities, or "undeclared sites," involve a complex process with plenty of opportunities for Iran to stall. Tehran can propose alternatives to on-site inspections, or reject the request, which would trigger a 24-day process for the Joint Commission countries to override the rejection.

That could drag on for months. And under ambiguities built into the deal, it's unclear whether Iran must allow IAEA inspectors into military sites, or whether the Iranians can take their own environmental samples and send them to the IAEA for testing, as was allowed under a 2015 side agreement that let Iran use its own experts to inspect the Parchin military site."
U.S. seeks to test Iran deal with more inspections



3. Obama's Iran Nuclear Deal Allows the Regime to Develop a Weapon ...
"Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon"
Read more at:
Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon



4. § The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was not allowed to inspect or monitor Iran's military sites where nuclear activities were most likely being carried out. Among the many concessions that the Obama administration gave the Iranian government, one was accepting the Iranian leaders' demand that these military sites would be out of the IAEA's reach.

§ Due to this surrender, various high-profile Iranian sites such as the Parchin military complex, located southeast of Tehran, were free to engage in nuclear activities without the risk of inspection.

§ Once the authoritarian, anti-Semitic and anti-American government of Iran possess a nuclear bomb, no amount of actions will be able reverse the catastrophe.

§
Stop Iran From Going Nuclear




5. In 2015, President Obama promised when he tried to sell the deal to a skeptical American public that the Iranians agreed to the "
most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime, ever negotiated for any nuclear program in history," based on "unprecedented verification." Moreover, Obama adviser Ben Rhodes reassured the public repeatedly that the deal included "anywhere, anytime" inspections and 24-7 access to Iran's key nuclear facilities.

But in reality, the administration repeatedly lied to the American public by misrepresenting the deal and the nature of the inspections Iran agreed to. The robust inspections referred only to Iran's declared nuclear sites. Other sites that the IAEA has suspicions about, including all military sites and undeclared nuclear sites, fell under a separate cheating-friendly procedure.

One of the most controversial issues in the 2015 negotiations was whether the U.N.'s IAEA would be able to visit military sites if they had questions about suspected nuclear activities or facilities within them. In the end, Iranian leader Ayatollah Khamenei on June 23, 2015 stated that granting access to Iran's military sites was a red line, and the U.S. and its partners gave in and agreed on language with Iran avoiding a direct mention of the military sites issue.

Instead, the deal stated that in order to allay IAEA concerns, Iran would give access within a 24-day time frame, after the IAEA made a request to visit a suspected site. Furthermore, the deal stated that if Iran refused the access, the Islamist state and the IAEA would have additional 14 days to resolve the agreement among themselves. If they failed to agree, a joint commission comprising the six member-nations who are parties to the agreement would consider the matter for an additional week.

In conclusion, according to the agreement, Iran can continue its uranium enrichment program and continue developing its weapon program at its many military sites, and every time the IAEA suspects anything, the Iranians can have 24 days at a minimum and 45 days maximum to delay the access, sanitize the sites, or transfer the unauthorized nuclear work to another unauthorized military site.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/05/obama_and_irans_nuclear_lies.html#ixzz5nH0Ua9im




Bet you feel pretty stooooooopid right now, huh?


Liar.
The International Atomic Energy Association has conducted dozens of nuclear freeze inspection successfully for decades, and not once have they failed.
They use instrumentation, seals, etc., and can not be evaded or sanitized as you claim.
Who do are we to beleive, the IAEA and the UN, or your ridiculous lies?



I never lie and I'm never wrong.


Watch this:



"IAEA not authorized to inspect Iran’s military sites: Russia
A senior Russian diplomat has criticized certain countries’ calls for the expansion of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s inspections to include Iranian military sites, saying the IAEA has no authority to carry out such inspection. “I would like to say absolutely clear and directly that acquiring some false topicality [about] the theme of the IAEA work […"
IAEA not authorized to inspect Iran’s military sites: Russia - iran news daily iran news now | iran news daily iran news now




How ya' like dat...booooooyyyyyeeeeeeee!!!!


Another custard pie in your ugly kisser!
 
So much blood spilled over millenia over that desert wasteland


We really need to just deport everyone like Political Chic to Israel... that would solve a lot of our problems in the US right away....



Actually....I've been to Israel.....but you haven't.

Hence, you're just one more anti-Semitic windbag.


True?
 
Past or current the hate exists. I never said there wasn't good reason for the hatred. BUT, it will not solve a damn thing! I don't know how to say that any clearer.

War crimes fall under the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (World Court) at The Hague is responsible for investigating and prosecuting war crimes. Remember where I said the United Nations created this problem and the United Nations should fix this problem. Let the ICJ charge and try those who they have evidence to show are war criminals.


"Past or current the hate exists."


Link or lie.

Oh FFS. Okay, let me change my word to dissension, or discord, or dissent, or conflict. Take your pick.



Your education continues:

Let's paint a picture of the side you'd like to equate with Israel:

1. “We should by now have become used to the death cult that is thriving at the fringes of the Muslim world. This is the cult of people who are proud to declare, "You love life, but we love death." This is the cult that sent waves of defenseless children to be mowed down on the battlefields of the Iran-Iraq war, that trains kindergartners to become bombs, that fetishizes death, that sends people off joyfully to commit mass murder. Because the death cult is not really about the cause it purports to serve. It's about the sheer pleasure of killing and dying.” Opinion | Cult of Death

a. It is the blood that informs the act. In the 1971 assassination of Jordan’s prime minister, Wasfi l-Tell, by PLO terrorists. “As he lay there, one of his killers bent over and lapped the blood that poured from his wounds.” Michael Ledeen | National Review

b. Leading Muslim clerics often refer to the love of death. Chief Palestinian Authority cleric Mufti Sheikh Ikrimeh Sabri stated, "We tell them, in as much as you love life, the Muslim loves death and martyrdom.” http://old.nationalreview.com/comment/stalinsky200405240846.asp

c. And so, the ideals and idea of America, and the iconic message of the Declaration of Independence, ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,’ is anathema to Islamism, just as it was to fascism and communism, and every totalitarian philosophy.


Liar.
Quotes and links from fascist garbage like the "National Review" only proves you are a liar.
a. The "Black Hand of September" that killed Wasfi Tell was NOT at all member of the PLO, and your lie about someone licking up blood is not only false, but disgusting.
The reality is the gunmen instantly fled and never approached the body.
The security guards defending Wasfi kissed the body out of respect.
{...
The Bedouin guard asked, "Is there anything?"

"No, there is nothing," the doctor replied.

The Beduoin officer began to cry and bent down to kiss Tell.
...}
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/flash/articles/nov96/jordan71.htm

Every bit of bizarre propaganda you vomit is a deliberate lie.
 
I never lie and I'm never wrong


LOL!!!!

I mean, this is the same poster who, when confronted with that she cannot refute or debate, then starts claiming her adversary is mentally ill.

There is a pattern.

Those who chicken out from debate and start "tossing cards," THEY ARE MENTALLY ILL AND INFERIOR.
 
1. Once again Trump has proven to be the diametric opposite of Hussein Obama....As much as Hussein abhorred the Jewish state, Trump seems to embrace same.

Short story....the Obama cult with it's allies in the UN and the Muslim world, did everything to put Israel in a bad light, claim illegality about its cities, Trump has erase the biased attempts.



2. "Pompeo Breaks With Years of Error On Israel Settlements

3. ...a turning point in Middle East history. Secretary of State Pompeo’s statement that Israeli settlements are not illegal per se is the most significant shift in America’s Middle East policy in the past generation.

4. ...the issue of the legality of Israeli settlements has been the defining issue of much of the international discourse on Israel for a generation.

5.In the vast majority of cases, the discourse has revolved around the widely held allegation – with no basis in actual law – that Israeli communities in Judea and Samaria are illegal. This allegation has served as the justification for a continuous barrage of condemnations of Israel in international arenas and for anti-Israel legal verdicts in international courts, including the International Court of Justice at the Hague in 2004 and the European Court of Justice last week."
Pompeo Breaks With Years of Error On Israel Settlements




For clarity.....the term 'settlement' is misleading.


170201163116-settlement-view-exlarge-169.jpg


Israeli settlements: What you need to know - CNN



That city is what the western media refers to as 'a settlement.'

That's like calling Manhattan a settlement.

But they want to pollute the reality, and pretend that the cities that they demand turning over to the Palestinians is merely a temporary jerry-built refugee camp of Israelis.
It is not. It is a vibrant, thriving community rising up from the desert.
And it is permanent.
So much blood spilled over millenia over that desert wasteland




And that has what to do with the post you linked to?
 
Gee, thanks </sarcasm>

I'm in absolutely not in need of any of your "education" from your strict inability to view both sides of the issue.


"I'm in absolutely not in need of any of your "education"


Actually....you are.

In dire need.

Notice that everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.


And you've not been able to do so with your 'side.'


Let me know if you are in need of a list of books to read.....

Liar.
Not a single thing you have posted has any sort of validation at all, and is all obvious lies.
Echoing false propaganda in a quote does not make is any less of a lie.
 
I never lie and I'm never wrong


LOL!!!!

I mean, this is the same poster who, when confronted with that she cannot refute or debate, then starts claiming her adversary is mentally ill.

There is a pattern.

Those who chicken out from debate and start "tossing cards," THEY ARE MENTALLY ILL AND INFERIOR.



Are you saying your mental illness is of a pattern???

Genetic????


Then....please,.....have no children.
 
1. Once again Trump has proven to be the diametric opposite of Hussein Obama....As much as Hussein abhorred the Jewish state, Trump seems to embrace same.

Short story....the Obama cult with it's allies in the UN and the Muslim world, did everything to put Israel in a bad light, claim illegality about its cities, Trump has erase the biased attempts.



2. "Pompeo Breaks With Years of Error On Israel Settlements

3. ...a turning point in Middle East history. Secretary of State Pompeo’s statement that Israeli settlements are not illegal per se is the most significant shift in America’s Middle East policy in the past generation.

4. ...the issue of the legality of Israeli settlements has been the defining issue of much of the international discourse on Israel for a generation.

5.In the vast majority of cases, the discourse has revolved around the widely held allegation – with no basis in actual law – that Israeli communities in Judea and Samaria are illegal. This allegation has served as the justification for a continuous barrage of condemnations of Israel in international arenas and for anti-Israel legal verdicts in international courts, including the International Court of Justice at the Hague in 2004 and the European Court of Justice last week."
Pompeo Breaks With Years of Error On Israel Settlements




For clarity.....the term 'settlement' is misleading.


170201163116-settlement-view-exlarge-169.jpg


Israeli settlements: What you need to know - CNN



That city is what the western media refers to as 'a settlement.'

That's like calling Manhattan a settlement.

But they want to pollute the reality, and pretend that the cities that they demand turning over to the Palestinians is merely a temporary jerry-built refugee camp of Israelis.
It is not. It is a vibrant, thriving community rising up from the desert.
And it is permanent.
So much blood spilled over millenia over that desert wasteland




And that has what to do with the post you linked to?
Your photo. People are dying and killing over some shitty high rises. I guess it's a better reason than most of the killing religious nutters have done there over the millenia.
 
nd
Liar.
Iran has every legal right in the world to have a nuclear deterrent after the US illegally invaded the innocent country of Iraq and caused the sovereign leader to be murdered.

And Ombama did not at all advance any Iranian project to gain nuclear weapons, but instead froze them, with adequate inspections to ensure no progress would be made.



No they don't, you moron.

1. Hussein Obama:
March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.



2. The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-ProliferationTreaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of ...
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia


3.war criminal - an offender who violates international law during timesof war
offender, wrongdoer - a person who transgresses moral or civillaw
war criminal

Liar.

1. Clearly what Obama said is that he negotiated a freeze on weapons development by Iran.

2. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is entirely VOLUNTARY!
Anyone attempting to force non-proliferation on any sovereign nation is a criminal.

3. The US clearly is a war criminal for illegally invading Iraq when they threatened no one.
Israel is a war criminal for not allowing the right of return to refugees, collective retribution, illegally blockading civilian commerce, etc.



There was never any 'freeze,' and never any inspections.


Only a fool like you imagines there were.



1. Anyone who maintains that Iran is living up to the agreement is a bald-faced liar!!!


No one knows, no one can tell…..because the deal prevents actual inspections.



2. "The deal's provisions for inspections of military facilities, or "undeclared sites," involve a complex process with plenty of opportunities for Iran to stall. Tehran can propose alternatives to on-site inspections, or reject the request, which would trigger a 24-day process for the Joint Commission countries to override the rejection.

That could drag on for months. And under ambiguities built into the deal, it's unclear whether Iran must allow IAEA inspectors into military sites, or whether the Iranians can take their own environmental samples and send them to the IAEA for testing, as was allowed under a 2015 side agreement that let Iran use its own experts to inspect the Parchin military site."
U.S. seeks to test Iran deal with more inspections



3. Obama's Iran Nuclear Deal Allows the Regime to Develop a Weapon ...
"Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon"
Read more at:
Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon



4. § The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was not allowed to inspect or monitor Iran's military sites where nuclear activities were most likely being carried out. Among the many concessions that the Obama administration gave the Iranian government, one was accepting the Iranian leaders' demand that these military sites would be out of the IAEA's reach.

§ Due to this surrender, various high-profile Iranian sites such as the Parchin military complex, located southeast of Tehran, were free to engage in nuclear activities without the risk of inspection.

§ Once the authoritarian, anti-Semitic and anti-American government of Iran possess a nuclear bomb, no amount of actions will be able reverse the catastrophe.

§
Stop Iran From Going Nuclear




5. In 2015, President Obama promised when he tried to sell the deal to a skeptical American public that the Iranians agreed to the "
most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime, ever negotiated for any nuclear program in history," based on "unprecedented verification." Moreover, Obama adviser Ben Rhodes reassured the public repeatedly that the deal included "anywhere, anytime" inspections and 24-7 access to Iran's key nuclear facilities.

But in reality, the administration repeatedly lied to the American public by misrepresenting the deal and the nature of the inspections Iran agreed to. The robust inspections referred only to Iran's declared nuclear sites. Other sites that the IAEA has suspicions about, including all military sites and undeclared nuclear sites, fell under a separate cheating-friendly procedure.

One of the most controversial issues in the 2015 negotiations was whether the U.N.'s IAEA would be able to visit military sites if they had questions about suspected nuclear activities or facilities within them. In the end, Iranian leader Ayatollah Khamenei on June 23, 2015 stated that granting access to Iran's military sites was a red line, and the U.S. and its partners gave in and agreed on language with Iran avoiding a direct mention of the military sites issue.

Instead, the deal stated that in order to allay IAEA concerns, Iran would give access within a 24-day time frame, after the IAEA made a request to visit a suspected site. Furthermore, the deal stated that if Iran refused the access, the Islamist state and the IAEA would have additional 14 days to resolve the agreement among themselves. If they failed to agree, a joint commission comprising the six member-nations who are parties to the agreement would consider the matter for an additional week.

In conclusion, according to the agreement, Iran can continue its uranium enrichment program and continue developing its weapon program at its many military sites, and every time the IAEA suspects anything, the Iranians can have 24 days at a minimum and 45 days maximum to delay the access, sanitize the sites, or transfer the unauthorized nuclear work to another unauthorized military site.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/05/obama_and_irans_nuclear_lies.html#ixzz5nH0Ua9im




Bet you feel pretty stooooooopid right now, huh?


Liar.
The International Atomic Energy Association has conducted dozens of nuclear freeze inspection successfully for decades, and not once have they failed.
They use instrumentation, seals, etc., and can not be evaded or sanitized as you claim.
Who do are we to beleive, the IAEA and the UN, or your ridiculous lies?



I never lie and I'm never wrong.


Watch this:



"IAEA not authorized to inspect Iran’s military sites: Russia
A senior Russian diplomat has criticized certain countries’ calls for the expansion of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s inspections to include Iranian military sites, saying the IAEA has no authority to carry out such inspection. “I would like to say absolutely clear and directly that acquiring some false topicality [about] the theme of the IAEA work […"
IAEA not authorized to inspect Iran’s military sites: Russia - iran news daily iran news now | iran news daily iran news now




How ya' like dat...booooooyyyyyeeeeeeee!!!!


Another custard pie in your ugly kisser!

You obvious are an idiot as well as a liar.
Of course the IAEA is not authorized to ever inspect anyone.
What allows the IAEA inspections is a voluntary agreement.
In this case, it was Obama offering to reduce economic sanctions if Iran would allow inspections.
Iran agreed.
Therefore the inspections occurred and would have until Trump stopped them.
 
Actually....I've been to Israel


then why don't you just STAY THERE, since ISRAEL is THE ONLY COUNTRY YOU CARE ABOUT

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????


I kinda liked Italy too.....

...gonna send me there as well?

I like traveling.




Did you see my posts about my trip to Jordan?

It's da bomb......wait...let me rephrase that....


One Of The Wonders of the Ancient World: Petra


This:

9480_treasury_petra_jordan.JPG




Oh.....did I interrupt your rant????

Proceed.
 
1. Once again Trump has proven to be the diametric opposite of Hussein Obama....As much as Hussein abhorred the Jewish state, Trump seems to embrace same.

Short story....the Obama cult with it's allies in the UN and the Muslim world, did everything to put Israel in a bad light, claim illegality about its cities, Trump has erase the biased attempts.



2. "Pompeo Breaks With Years of Error On Israel Settlements

3. ...a turning point in Middle East history. Secretary of State Pompeo’s statement that Israeli settlements are not illegal per se is the most significant shift in America’s Middle East policy in the past generation.

4. ...the issue of the legality of Israeli settlements has been the defining issue of much of the international discourse on Israel for a generation.

5.In the vast majority of cases, the discourse has revolved around the widely held allegation – with no basis in actual law – that Israeli communities in Judea and Samaria are illegal. This allegation has served as the justification for a continuous barrage of condemnations of Israel in international arenas and for anti-Israel legal verdicts in international courts, including the International Court of Justice at the Hague in 2004 and the European Court of Justice last week."
Pompeo Breaks With Years of Error On Israel Settlements




For clarity.....the term 'settlement' is misleading.


170201163116-settlement-view-exlarge-169.jpg


Israeli settlements: What you need to know - CNN



That city is what the western media refers to as 'a settlement.'

That's like calling Manhattan a settlement.

But they want to pollute the reality, and pretend that the cities that they demand turning over to the Palestinians is merely a temporary jerry-built refugee camp of Israelis.
It is not. It is a vibrant, thriving community rising up from the desert.
And it is permanent.
So much blood spilled over millenia over that desert wasteland




And that has what to do with the post you linked to?
Your photo. People are dying and killing over some shitty high rises. I guess it's a better reason than most of the killing religious nutters have done there over the millenia.



Your entire point is you don't like the picture?


Words aren't your thing, huh?

Government school grad?
 
nd
No they don't, you moron.

1. Hussein Obama:
March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.



2. The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-ProliferationTreaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of ...
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia


3.war criminal - an offender who violates international law during timesof war
offender, wrongdoer - a person who transgresses moral or civillaw
war criminal

Liar.

1. Clearly what Obama said is that he negotiated a freeze on weapons development by Iran.

2. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is entirely VOLUNTARY!
Anyone attempting to force non-proliferation on any sovereign nation is a criminal.

3. The US clearly is a war criminal for illegally invading Iraq when they threatened no one.
Israel is a war criminal for not allowing the right of return to refugees, collective retribution, illegally blockading civilian commerce, etc.



There was never any 'freeze,' and never any inspections.


Only a fool like you imagines there were.



1. Anyone who maintains that Iran is living up to the agreement is a bald-faced liar!!!


No one knows, no one can tell…..because the deal prevents actual inspections.



2. "The deal's provisions for inspections of military facilities, or "undeclared sites," involve a complex process with plenty of opportunities for Iran to stall. Tehran can propose alternatives to on-site inspections, or reject the request, which would trigger a 24-day process for the Joint Commission countries to override the rejection.

That could drag on for months. And under ambiguities built into the deal, it's unclear whether Iran must allow IAEA inspectors into military sites, or whether the Iranians can take their own environmental samples and send them to the IAEA for testing, as was allowed under a 2015 side agreement that let Iran use its own experts to inspect the Parchin military site."
U.S. seeks to test Iran deal with more inspections



3. Obama's Iran Nuclear Deal Allows the Regime to Develop a Weapon ...
"Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon"
Read more at:
Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon



4. § The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was not allowed to inspect or monitor Iran's military sites where nuclear activities were most likely being carried out. Among the many concessions that the Obama administration gave the Iranian government, one was accepting the Iranian leaders' demand that these military sites would be out of the IAEA's reach.

§ Due to this surrender, various high-profile Iranian sites such as the Parchin military complex, located southeast of Tehran, were free to engage in nuclear activities without the risk of inspection.

§ Once the authoritarian, anti-Semitic and anti-American government of Iran possess a nuclear bomb, no amount of actions will be able reverse the catastrophe.

§
Stop Iran From Going Nuclear




5. In 2015, President Obama promised when he tried to sell the deal to a skeptical American public that the Iranians agreed to the "
most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime, ever negotiated for any nuclear program in history," based on "unprecedented verification." Moreover, Obama adviser Ben Rhodes reassured the public repeatedly that the deal included "anywhere, anytime" inspections and 24-7 access to Iran's key nuclear facilities.

But in reality, the administration repeatedly lied to the American public by misrepresenting the deal and the nature of the inspections Iran agreed to. The robust inspections referred only to Iran's declared nuclear sites. Other sites that the IAEA has suspicions about, including all military sites and undeclared nuclear sites, fell under a separate cheating-friendly procedure.

One of the most controversial issues in the 2015 negotiations was whether the U.N.'s IAEA would be able to visit military sites if they had questions about suspected nuclear activities or facilities within them. In the end, Iranian leader Ayatollah Khamenei on June 23, 2015 stated that granting access to Iran's military sites was a red line, and the U.S. and its partners gave in and agreed on language with Iran avoiding a direct mention of the military sites issue.

Instead, the deal stated that in order to allay IAEA concerns, Iran would give access within a 24-day time frame, after the IAEA made a request to visit a suspected site. Furthermore, the deal stated that if Iran refused the access, the Islamist state and the IAEA would have additional 14 days to resolve the agreement among themselves. If they failed to agree, a joint commission comprising the six member-nations who are parties to the agreement would consider the matter for an additional week.

In conclusion, according to the agreement, Iran can continue its uranium enrichment program and continue developing its weapon program at its many military sites, and every time the IAEA suspects anything, the Iranians can have 24 days at a minimum and 45 days maximum to delay the access, sanitize the sites, or transfer the unauthorized nuclear work to another unauthorized military site.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/05/obama_and_irans_nuclear_lies.html#ixzz5nH0Ua9im




Bet you feel pretty stooooooopid right now, huh?


Liar.
The International Atomic Energy Association has conducted dozens of nuclear freeze inspection successfully for decades, and not once have they failed.
They use instrumentation, seals, etc., and can not be evaded or sanitized as you claim.
Who do are we to beleive, the IAEA and the UN, or your ridiculous lies?



I never lie and I'm never wrong.


Watch this:



"IAEA not authorized to inspect Iran’s military sites: Russia
A senior Russian diplomat has criticized certain countries’ calls for the expansion of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s inspections to include Iranian military sites, saying the IAEA has no authority to carry out such inspection. “I would like to say absolutely clear and directly that acquiring some false topicality [about] the theme of the IAEA work […"
IAEA not authorized to inspect Iran’s military sites: Russia - iran news daily iran news now | iran news daily iran news now




How ya' like dat...booooooyyyyyeeeeeeee!!!!


Another custard pie in your ugly kisser!

You obvious are an idiot as well as a liar.
Of course the IAEA is not authorized to ever inspect anyone.
What allows the IAEA inspections is a voluntary agreement.
In this case, it was Obama offering to reduce economic sanctions if Iran would allow inspections.
Iran agreed.
Therefore the inspections occurred and would have until Trump stopped them.



Dolt.....the Obama deal never allowed any real inspections.


Once they were caught cheating, they had 45 days to allow the IAEA in.

Gads, you're a moron.

Bet you're tired of everyone telling you that.
 
So much blood spilled over millenia over that desert wasteland


We really need to just deport everyone like Political Chic to Israel... that would solve a lot of our problems in the US right away....



Actually....I've been to Israel.....but you haven't.

Hence, you're just one more anti-Semitic windbag.


True?

Obviously you are not a US citizen but an Israeli bot.
You are so ignorant that you do not know that the word Semitic means of an Arab language group, and does not at all mean Jewish.
In fact, Ashkenazi Jews have the Germanic as their native language, so are not at all Semitic.
 
Gee, thanks </sarcasm>

I'm in absolutely not in need of any of your "education" from your strict inability to view both sides of the issue.


"I'm in absolutely not in need of any of your "education"


Actually....you are.

In dire need.

Notice that everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.


And you've not been able to do so with your 'side.'


Let me know if you are in need of a list of books to read.....

Liar.
Not a single thing you have posted has any sort of validation at all, and is all obvious lies.
Echoing false propaganda in a quote does not make is any less of a lie.



What’s that you’re muttering? “Must-defend-self…”
 

Forum List

Back
Top