Trump and dangerous precedent

[American_Jihad]

Muslims are coming here to get welfare. Trump goes to the UK to give investment.

Muslims come here to commit murder. Trump goes to the UK to give parties.

Does that help your understanding?

Trump is using hate speech. Most Muslims don't go to the US to commit murder.

But then trying to tell some right wingers that all Muslims aren't the same is a waste of time, because no one cares to listen.

You pegged the meter out ya silly bastard...

 

[frigidweirdo]

Muslims are coming here to get welfare. Trump goes to the UK to give investment.

Muslims come here to commit murder. Trump goes to the UK to give parties.

Does that help your understanding?

Trump is using hate speech. Most Muslims don't go to the US to commit murder.

But then trying to tell some right wingers that all Muslims aren't the same is a waste of time, because no one cares to listen.

You pegged the meter out ya silly bastard...

You could have actually discussed things, but in true right wing style, you decided to go bullshit instead.

 

[Tilly]

Trump Threatens To Pull £700m Scots Investment

Trump believes that banning him from the UK would set dangerous precedent.

However he doesn't think banning Muslims from the US would set dangerous precedent.

Doesn't this guy know what hypocrisy is?

If it's wrong to ban Muslim immigration here, you should be condemning Britain for considering banning him there.

Talk about hypocrisy.

Actually no. Trump would ban people who have done nothing wrong. Trump has proven with his words why he should be banned from the UK. A pity he can't be banned from the US.

how very liberal.

 

[Tilly]

Trump Threatens To Pull £700m Scots Investment

Trump believes that banning him from the UK would set dangerous precedent.

However he doesn't think banning Muslims from the US would set dangerous precedent.

Doesn't this guy know what hypocrisy is?

If it's wrong to ban Muslim immigration here, you should be condemning Britain for considering banning him there.

Talk about hypocrisy.

Actually no. Trump would ban people who have done nothing wrong. Trump has proven with his words why he should be banned from the UK. A pity he can't be banned from the US.

Yes!

Let us ban all the things!!!

How childish. All of it.

Trump has done nothing wrong in Britain either, so what basis would they have to ban him from entering?

Nice double standard. I'm impressed.

Actually many countries will ban people from entering their country because of what they have said or done in another country.

The UK has banned certain Americans from entering the UK before.

List of people banned from entering the United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stephen "Don" Black, racist, white supremacist, runs Stormfront. The UK doesn't want this sort of person in. The BNP wanted this sort of person in, the govt didn't allow him.

Preston Wigginton doesn't appear on this list, but he got banned for the same reason.

Erich Gliebe, white supremacist.

Mike Guzovsky, Israeli militant.

Plenty of people the UK govt deems inappropriate to come into the UK.

So the reality is it wouldn't set any precedent at all, the UK govt has done it before and will do it again. Even Mike Tyson's on this list.

Trump is making remarks that are not to the liking of a lot of British people. If the British people choose to ban him for what he has said, then this is consistent with the law.

Banning a whole religion based on the actions of other people in the religion is, however, not consistent with much, certainly not with the constitution.

A lot of British people like what he says too. The debate will be held, there will be no vote, and absolutely nothing, other than the usual Muslims and their dhimmis whining, will happen. Absolutely nothing. Cameron has already made that clear and nothing has changed.

 

[Liminal]

Typical Trump followers......nothing but a violent mob of dummies.

 

[Mad Scientist]

American Politicians have been OWNED by Special Interests for so long that when one comes along that cant be bought some people don't know WHAT to think.

 

[Stephanie]

the danger to us all was put in as president by you left/liberal/democrats when you put in some nobody thug named Obama. so if you think Trump could be any worse than that, you're sadly mistaken. at least trump BUILDS us and our country up. not this constant of running us down like we had to endure with the stinking Community agitating thug

 

[frigidweirdo]

Trump Threatens To Pull £700m Scots Investment

Trump believes that banning him from the UK would set dangerous precedent.

However he doesn't think banning Muslims from the US would set dangerous precedent.

Doesn't this guy know what hypocrisy is?

If it's wrong to ban Muslim immigration here, you should be condemning Britain for considering banning him there.

Talk about hypocrisy.

Actually no. Trump would ban people who have done nothing wrong. Trump has proven with his words why he should be banned from the UK. A pity he can't be banned from the US.

how very liberal.

How very nothing.....

 

[frigidweirdo]

Trump Threatens To Pull £700m Scots Investment

Trump believes that banning him from the UK would set dangerous precedent.

However he doesn't think banning Muslims from the US would set dangerous precedent.

Doesn't this guy know what hypocrisy is?

If it's wrong to ban Muslim immigration here, you should be condemning Britain for considering banning him there.

Talk about hypocrisy.

Actually no. Trump would ban people who have done nothing wrong. Trump has proven with his words why he should be banned from the UK. A pity he can't be banned from the US.

Yes!

Let us ban all the things!!!

How childish. All of it.

Trump has done nothing wrong in Britain either, so what basis would they have to ban him from entering?

Nice double standard. I'm impressed.

Actually many countries will ban people from entering their country because of what they have said or done in another country.

The UK has banned certain Americans from entering the UK before.

List of people banned from entering the United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stephen "Don" Black, racist, white supremacist, runs Stormfront. The UK doesn't want this sort of person in. The BNP wanted this sort of person in, the govt didn't allow him.

Preston Wigginton doesn't appear on this list, but he got banned for the same reason.

Erich Gliebe, white supremacist.

Mike Guzovsky, Israeli militant.

Plenty of people the UK govt deems inappropriate to come into the UK.

So the reality is it wouldn't set any precedent at all, the UK govt has done it before and will do it again. Even Mike Tyson's on this list.

Trump is making remarks that are not to the liking of a lot of British people. If the British people choose to ban him for what he has said, then this is consistent with the law.

Banning a whole religion based on the actions of other people in the religion is, however, not consistent with much, certainly not with the constitution.

A lot of British people like what he says too. The debate will be held, there will be no vote, and absolutely nothing, other than the usual Muslims and their dhimmis whining, will happen. Absolutely nothing. Cameron has already made that clear and nothing has changed.

A lot. What is a lot? 50 people? 1,000 people?

Sure, some people like what he has to say, there are idiots in the UK too you know.

And Cameron has made it clear that money is more important than people's health, and people's lives. So yeah, nothing will happen. Money rules in the Tory Party as it does in the Republican Party.

 

[Tilly]

If it's wrong to ban Muslim immigration here, you should be condemning Britain for considering banning him there.

Talk about hypocrisy.

Actually no. Trump would ban people who have done nothing wrong. Trump has proven with his words why he should be banned from the UK. A pity he can't be banned from the US.

Yes!

Let us ban all the things!!!

How childish. All of it.

Trump has done nothing wrong in Britain either, so what basis would they have to ban him from entering?

Nice double standard. I'm impressed.

Actually many countries will ban people from entering their country because of what they have said or done in another country.

The UK has banned certain Americans from entering the UK before.

List of people banned from entering the United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stephen "Don" Black, racist, white supremacist, runs Stormfront. The UK doesn't want this sort of person in. The BNP wanted this sort of person in, the govt didn't allow him.

Preston Wigginton doesn't appear on this list, but he got banned for the same reason.

Erich Gliebe, white supremacist.

Mike Guzovsky, Israeli militant.

Plenty of people the UK govt deems inappropriate to come into the UK.

So the reality is it wouldn't set any precedent at all, the UK govt has done it before and will do it again. Even Mike Tyson's on this list.

Trump is making remarks that are not to the liking of a lot of British people. If the British people choose to ban him for what he has said, then this is consistent with the law.

Banning a whole religion based on the actions of other people in the religion is, however, not consistent with much, certainly not with the constitution.

A lot of British people like what he says too. The debate will be held, there will be no vote, and absolutely nothing, other than the usual Muslims and their dhimmis whining, will happen. Absolutely nothing. Cameron has already made that clear and nothing has changed.

A lot. What is a lot? 50 people? 1,000 people?

Sure, some people like what he has to say, there are idiots in the UK too you know.

And Cameron has made it clear that money is more important than people's health, and people's lives. So yeah, nothing will happen. Money rules in the Tory Party as it does in the Republican Party.

Trump won't be banned because he hasn't done anything deserving of a ban. I'm so pleased he isn't going to be banned, that would be intolerable and the U.K. Would look utterly ridiculous, or more ridiculous than usual.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Actually no. Trump would ban people who have done nothing wrong. Trump has proven with his words why he should be banned from the UK. A pity he can't be banned from the US.

Yes!

Let us ban all the things!!!

How childish. All of it.

Trump has done nothing wrong in Britain either, so what basis would they have to ban him from entering?

Nice double standard. I'm impressed.

Actually many countries will ban people from entering their country because of what they have said or done in another country.

The UK has banned certain Americans from entering the UK before.

List of people banned from entering the United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stephen "Don" Black, racist, white supremacist, runs Stormfront. The UK doesn't want this sort of person in. The BNP wanted this sort of person in, the govt didn't allow him.

Preston Wigginton doesn't appear on this list, but he got banned for the same reason.

Erich Gliebe, white supremacist.

Mike Guzovsky, Israeli militant.

Plenty of people the UK govt deems inappropriate to come into the UK.

So the reality is it wouldn't set any precedent at all, the UK govt has done it before and will do it again. Even Mike Tyson's on this list.

Trump is making remarks that are not to the liking of a lot of British people. If the British people choose to ban him for what he has said, then this is consistent with the law.

Banning a whole religion based on the actions of other people in the religion is, however, not consistent with much, certainly not with the constitution.

A lot of British people like what he says too. The debate will be held, there will be no vote, and absolutely nothing, other than the usual Muslims and their dhimmis whining, will happen. Absolutely nothing. Cameron has already made that clear and nothing has changed.

A lot. What is a lot? 50 people? 1,000 people?

Sure, some people like what he has to say, there are idiots in the UK too you know.

And Cameron has made it clear that money is more important than people's health, and people's lives. So yeah, nothing will happen. Money rules in the Tory Party as it does in the Republican Party.

Trump won't be banned because he hasn't done anything deserving of a ban. I'm so pleased he isn't going to be banned, that would be intolerable and the U.K. Would look utterly ridiculous, or more ridiculous than usual.

Only a fool thinks Britain is going to ban Trump. Left loons live in some alternate universe

 

[Stephanie]

Actually no. Trump would ban people who have done nothing wrong. Trump has proven with his words why he should be banned from the UK. A pity he can't be banned from the US.

Yes!

Let us ban all the things!!!

How childish. All of it.

Trump has done nothing wrong in Britain either, so what basis would they have to ban him from entering?

Nice double standard. I'm impressed.

Actually many countries will ban people from entering their country because of what they have said or done in another country.

The UK has banned certain Americans from entering the UK before.

List of people banned from entering the United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stephen "Don" Black, racist, white supremacist, runs Stormfront. The UK doesn't want this sort of person in. The BNP wanted this sort of person in, the govt didn't allow him.

Preston Wigginton doesn't appear on this list, but he got banned for the same reason.

Erich Gliebe, white supremacist.

Mike Guzovsky, Israeli militant.

Plenty of people the UK govt deems inappropriate to come into the UK.

So the reality is it wouldn't set any precedent at all, the UK govt has done it before and will do it again. Even Mike Tyson's on this list.

Trump is making remarks that are not to the liking of a lot of British people. If the British people choose to ban him for what he has said, then this is consistent with the law.

Banning a whole religion based on the actions of other people in the religion is, however, not consistent with much, certainly not with the constitution.

A lot of British people like what he says too. The debate will be held, there will be no vote, and absolutely nothing, other than the usual Muslims and their dhimmis whining, will happen. Absolutely nothing. Cameron has already made that clear and nothing has changed.

A lot. What is a lot? 50 people? 1,000 people?

Sure, some people like what he has to say, there are idiots in the UK too you know.

And Cameron has made it clear that money is more important than people's health, and people's lives. So yeah, nothing will happen. Money rules in the Tory Party as it does in the Republican Party.

Trump won't be banned because he hasn't done anything deserving of a ban. I'm so pleased he isn't going to be banned, that would be intolerable and the U.K. Would look utterly ridiculous, or more ridiculous than usual.

can you imagine having to live under a Government who has nothing better to do but sit around wondering if they should ban an American citizen who has done NOTHING against them to warrant such a thing. and then having the citizens here cheering them on over it. that's just sad and shows how much THEY hate a person is all

 

[Tilly]

Yes!

Let us ban all the things!!!

How childish. All of it.

Trump has done nothing wrong in Britain either, so what basis would they have to ban him from entering?

Nice double standard. I'm impressed.

Actually many countries will ban people from entering their country because of what they have said or done in another country.

The UK has banned certain Americans from entering the UK before.

List of people banned from entering the United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stephen "Don" Black, racist, white supremacist, runs Stormfront. The UK doesn't want this sort of person in. The BNP wanted this sort of person in, the govt didn't allow him.

Preston Wigginton doesn't appear on this list, but he got banned for the same reason.

Erich Gliebe, white supremacist.

Mike Guzovsky, Israeli militant.

Plenty of people the UK govt deems inappropriate to come into the UK.

So the reality is it wouldn't set any precedent at all, the UK govt has done it before and will do it again. Even Mike Tyson's on this list.

Trump is making remarks that are not to the liking of a lot of British people. If the British people choose to ban him for what he has said, then this is consistent with the law.

Banning a whole religion based on the actions of other people in the religion is, however, not consistent with much, certainly not with the constitution.

A lot of British people like what he says too. The debate will be held, there will be no vote, and absolutely nothing, other than the usual Muslims and their dhimmis whining, will happen. Absolutely nothing. Cameron has already made that clear and nothing has changed.

A lot. What is a lot? 50 people? 1,000 people?

Sure, some people like what he has to say, there are idiots in the UK too you know.

And Cameron has made it clear that money is more important than people's health, and people's lives. So yeah, nothing will happen. Money rules in the Tory Party as it does in the Republican Party.

Trump won't be banned because he hasn't done anything deserving of a ban. I'm so pleased he isn't going to be banned, that would be intolerable and the U.K. Would look utterly ridiculous, or more ridiculous than usual.

Only a fool thinks Britain is going to ban Trump. Left loons live in some alternate universe

The gvmnt is having the debate only because of its loud mouthed Muslims and their dhimmi supporters getting together a petition. There isn't even going to be a vote in the debate, and nothing will happen as a result of it - apart from more whining. Trump will be free to come and go. I can't believe these people who want to trample over free speech in this manner!

 

[frigidweirdo]

Yes!

Let us ban all the things!!!

How childish. All of it.

Trump has done nothing wrong in Britain either, so what basis would they have to ban him from entering?

Nice double standard. I'm impressed.

Actually many countries will ban people from entering their country because of what they have said or done in another country.

The UK has banned certain Americans from entering the UK before.

List of people banned from entering the United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stephen "Don" Black, racist, white supremacist, runs Stormfront. The UK doesn't want this sort of person in. The BNP wanted this sort of person in, the govt didn't allow him.

Preston Wigginton doesn't appear on this list, but he got banned for the same reason.

Erich Gliebe, white supremacist.

Mike Guzovsky, Israeli militant.

Plenty of people the UK govt deems inappropriate to come into the UK.

So the reality is it wouldn't set any precedent at all, the UK govt has done it before and will do it again. Even Mike Tyson's on this list.

Trump is making remarks that are not to the liking of a lot of British people. If the British people choose to ban him for what he has said, then this is consistent with the law.

Banning a whole religion based on the actions of other people in the religion is, however, not consistent with much, certainly not with the constitution.

A lot of British people like what he says too. The debate will be held, there will be no vote, and absolutely nothing, other than the usual Muslims and their dhimmis whining, will happen. Absolutely nothing. Cameron has already made that clear and nothing has changed.

A lot. What is a lot? 50 people? 1,000 people?

Sure, some people like what he has to say, there are idiots in the UK too you know.

And Cameron has made it clear that money is more important than people's health, and people's lives. So yeah, nothing will happen. Money rules in the Tory Party as it does in the Republican Party.

Trump won't be banned because he hasn't done anything deserving of a ban. I'm so pleased he isn't going to be banned, that would be intolerable and the U.K. Would look utterly ridiculous, or more ridiculous than usual.

Only a fool thinks Britain is going to ban Trump. Left loons live in some alternate universe

Maybe people aren't actually doing the petition to get him banned. Ever thought about that?

 

[frigidweirdo]

Yes!

Let us ban all the things!!!

How childish. All of it.

Trump has done nothing wrong in Britain either, so what basis would they have to ban him from entering?

Nice double standard. I'm impressed.

Actually many countries will ban people from entering their country because of what they have said or done in another country.

The UK has banned certain Americans from entering the UK before.

List of people banned from entering the United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stephen "Don" Black, racist, white supremacist, runs Stormfront. The UK doesn't want this sort of person in. The BNP wanted this sort of person in, the govt didn't allow him.

Preston Wigginton doesn't appear on this list, but he got banned for the same reason.

Erich Gliebe, white supremacist.

Mike Guzovsky, Israeli militant.

Plenty of people the UK govt deems inappropriate to come into the UK.

So the reality is it wouldn't set any precedent at all, the UK govt has done it before and will do it again. Even Mike Tyson's on this list.

Trump is making remarks that are not to the liking of a lot of British people. If the British people choose to ban him for what he has said, then this is consistent with the law.

Banning a whole religion based on the actions of other people in the religion is, however, not consistent with much, certainly not with the constitution.

A lot of British people like what he says too. The debate will be held, there will be no vote, and absolutely nothing, other than the usual Muslims and their dhimmis whining, will happen. Absolutely nothing. Cameron has already made that clear and nothing has changed.

A lot. What is a lot? 50 people? 1,000 people?

Sure, some people like what he has to say, there are idiots in the UK too you know.

And Cameron has made it clear that money is more important than people's health, and people's lives. So yeah, nothing will happen. Money rules in the Tory Party as it does in the Republican Party.

Trump won't be banned because he hasn't done anything deserving of a ban. I'm so pleased he isn't going to be banned, that would be intolerable and the U.K. Would look utterly ridiculous, or more ridiculous than usual.

can you imagine having to live under a Government who has nothing better to do but sit around wondering if they should ban an American citizen who has done NOTHING against them to warrant such a thing. and then having the citizens here cheering them on over it. that's just sad and shows how much THEY hate a person is all

Or a man who has nothing better to do than to ban a whole damn religion, when the religion hasn't done anything and most of the people haven't done anything to the US???? Oh, never thought of that one. I'm sure you'll be able to think up of some way of twisting it to make it feel good for you.

 

[Katzndogz]

Britain will have to ban the leaders of Hungary too.

News from The Associated Press

The way the European invasion is going, Finland and Sweden might have to be added to the British ban list. If things keep deteriorating in Germany add Merkle to the list. Britain might find it mighty lonely except for the muslims who want to kill them.

Trump is guilty of premature common sense.

 

[bripat9643]

Muslims are coming here to get welfare. Trump goes to the UK to give investment.

Muslims come here to commit murder. Trump goes to the UK to give parties.

Does that help your understanding?

Trump is using hate speech. Most Muslims don't go to the US to commit murder.

But then trying to tell some right wingers that all Muslims aren't the same is a waste of time, because no one cares to listen.

It doesn't matter if not ALL of them want to murder us. Until you can identify the ones who do want to murder us, we would have to be crazy to allow any of them to come in.

 

[9thIDdoc]

Trump Threatens To Pull £700m Scots Investment

Trump believes that banning him from the UK would set dangerous precedent.

However he doesn't think banning Muslims from the US would set dangerous precedent.

Doesn't this guy know what hypocrisy is?

Set a dangerous precedent? Don't be silly! Banning muzzies is the wisest thing we could possibly do.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Trump Threatens To Pull £700m Scots Investment

Trump believes that banning him from the UK would set dangerous precedent.

However he doesn't think banning Muslims from the US would set dangerous precedent.

Doesn't this guy know what hypocrisy is?

As much as I disagree with Trump the fact is England need to cool it heels on banning him because Trump is just speaking from his ass and nothing more when it come to banning Muslim's.

Also it is him not any other member of his family that is being threaten with being banned from the U.K. so his daughter could run the operation in Scotland for him until he get the ban lifted...

 

[Tilly]

Actually many countries will ban people from entering their country because of what they have said or done in another country.

The UK has banned certain Americans from entering the UK before.

List of people banned from entering the United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stephen "Don" Black, racist, white supremacist, runs Stormfront. The UK doesn't want this sort of person in. The BNP wanted this sort of person in, the govt didn't allow him.

Preston Wigginton doesn't appear on this list, but he got banned for the same reason.

Erich Gliebe, white supremacist.

Mike Guzovsky, Israeli militant.

Plenty of people the UK govt deems inappropriate to come into the UK.

So the reality is it wouldn't set any precedent at all, the UK govt has done it before and will do it again. Even Mike Tyson's on this list.

Trump is making remarks that are not to the liking of a lot of British people. If the British people choose to ban him for what he has said, then this is consistent with the law.

Banning a whole religion based on the actions of other people in the religion is, however, not consistent with much, certainly not with the constitution.

A lot of British people like what he says too. The debate will be held, there will be no vote, and absolutely nothing, other than the usual Muslims and their dhimmis whining, will happen. Absolutely nothing. Cameron has already made that clear and nothing has changed.

A lot. What is a lot? 50 people? 1,000 people?

Sure, some people like what he has to say, there are idiots in the UK too you know.

And Cameron has made it clear that money is more important than people's health, and people's lives. So yeah, nothing will happen. Money rules in the Tory Party as it does in the Republican Party.

Trump won't be banned because he hasn't done anything deserving of a ban. I'm so pleased he isn't going to be banned, that would be intolerable and the U.K. Would look utterly ridiculous, or more ridiculous than usual.

Only a fool thinks Britain is going to ban Trump. Left loons live in some alternate universe

Maybe people aren't actually doing the petition to get him banned. Ever thought about that?

The petition demands that he be banned.