Trump allies eye overhauling Medicaid, food stamps in tax legislation

It depends greatly on where the cuts are.

For example, if we just cut it to states that refuse to work with the Feds on illegal immigration detainers, we could save millions....CA, which by far gets the most in SNAP benefits, could be a massive cut
As usual you don't know what you are talking about.

The SNAP beneficiary rate, that is, the percentage of people receiving food stamps, was calculated by dividing the number of SNAP participants by state by the population estimates of the respective states, from the census data of 2023. After the analysis, these are the 15 states in which the most people receive SNAP:

Percentage of residents receiving food stamps:​

  • New Mexico: 19.48%
  • Louisiana: 18.58%
  • Oregon: 17.67%
  • Oklahoma: 16.73%
  • Nevada: 15.72%
  • Nevada: 15.72%
  • West Virginia: 15.54%
  • Illinois: 15.32%
  • Pennsylvania: 15.31%
  • Michigan: 14.98%
  • New York: 14.80%
  • Alabama: 14.62%
  • California: 13.69%
  • Mississippi: 13.24%
  • Kentucky: 12.98%
 
As usual you don't know what you are talking about.

The SNAP beneficiary rate, that is, the percentage of people receiving food stamps, was calculated by dividing the number of SNAP participants by state by the population estimates of the respective states, from the census data of 2023. After the analysis, these are the 15 states in which the most people receive SNAP:

Percentage of residents receiving food stamps:​

  • New Mexico: 19.48%
  • Louisiana: 18.58%
  • Oregon: 17.67%
  • Oklahoma: 16.73%
  • Nevada: 15.72%
  • Nevada: 15.72%
  • West Virginia: 15.54%
  • Illinois: 15.32%
  • Pennsylvania: 15.31%
  • Michigan: 14.98%
  • New York: 14.80%
  • Alabama: 14.62%
  • California: 13.69%
  • Mississippi: 13.24%
  • Kentucky: 12.98%
I was not talking about the rate. I said pure numbers
 
For the millionth time, tax cuts generate more revenue to the federal government. Ask JFK.

And for the millionth time, tax cut may bring in more revenue. But less than they would have.

Trump’s trillion dollar borrowing hardly oved the economic needle at all. Wall Street and corporate America just took the freebies and stuffed them in their pockets in the form of stock buybacks.

You’ve only been waiting for it to trickle down for 50 years!
 
Last edited:
Paid in and well paid back
Suck it jealous and angry moochers
 
However, concern is high among some Republicans about the political downsides of such cuts, which would affect programs that provide support for at least 70 million low-income Americans, and some people familiar with the talks stressed that discussions are preliminary.
However ‘preliminary,’ such considerations are reckless and irresponsible, harmful mostly to working families and children.

Republicans have contempt for sound, responsible governance.
 
And for the millionth time, tax cut may bring in more revenue. But less than they would have.

Trump’s trillion dollar borrowing hardly oved the economic needle at all. Wall Street and corporate America just took the freebies and stuffed them in their pockets in the form of stock buybacks.

You’ve only been waiting for it to trickle down for 50 years!

Trickle down was never a thing.
Rube.
 
Interesting. Do you have anything on that?
On social programs there is fat and corruption that supposedly can be cut. We all know the elderly are not going to take a slashing after paying into social security their working lives. Of course, Progs always put the apocalyptic dogma into their demonic agendas.
 
Initial discussions about funding Trump tax cuts via cuts in Medicaid, food stamps, and other safety net programs. I wonder how this will impact the legacy Confederate states that voted heavily for Republicans and make up most of the bottom ten states in the Union. What are its chances of passing?


Trump allies eye overhauling Medicaid, food stamps in tax legislation​

Republican leaders, looking for ways to offset the cost of lower taxes, are considering changes to safety net programs for the poor.


President-elect Donald Trump’s economic advisers and congressional Republicans have begun preliminary discussions about making significant changes to Medicaid, food stamps and other federal safety net programs to offset the enormous cost of extending Trump’s 2017 tax cuts next year.

Among the options under discussion by GOP lawmakers and aides are new work requirements and spending caps for the programs, according to seven people familiar with the talks, many of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. Those conversations have included some economic officials on Trump’s transition team, the people said.

However, concern is high among some Republicans about the political downsides of such cuts, which would affect programs that provide support for at least 70 million low-income Americans, and some people familiar with the talks stressed that discussions are preliminary.


“I don’t think that passing just an extension of tax cuts that shows on paper an increase in the deficit [is] going to be challenging,” said one GOP tax adviser. “But the other side of the coin is, you start to add things to reduce the deficit, and that gets politically more challenging.”

The discussions center on Trump’s 2017 tax bill, which lowered taxes for the vast majority of Americans. Major portions of that law are set to expire at the end of next year, and extending those provisions — as Trump has proposed — would add more than $4 trillion to the already soaring national debt over the next decade, according to congressional bookkeepers. The debt exceeds $36 trillion now. Trump also campaigned on a bevy of new tax cuts — such as ending taxes on tips and overtime — which tack trillions more onto the overall price tag.
Work requirements and spending caps sound reasonable.
 
However ‘preliminary,’ such considerations are reckless and irresponsible, harmful mostly to working families and children.

Republicans have contempt for sound, responsible governance.
How can a work requirement be "harmful mostly to working families and children?"
 
Government Welfare programs of all kinds are bankrupting our nation... we have to bring back the Clinton policy that says you must work... you can't just sit on your butt and collect goodies from the rest of us... Welfare programs must be a leg up not a lifestyle...
Or at least have to show you're actively seeking employment. Say, showing you have applied for X number of jobs in a given week. If you refuse a job offer, cut off the benefits. It used to be that people having to go on welfare, food stamps, etc. wanted to get off the dole ASAP as a matter of pride. Now it's seemingly the exact opposite in far too many cases.
 
However ‘preliminary,’ such considerations are reckless and irresponsible, harmful mostly to working families and children.

Republicans have contempt for sound, responsible governance.
So actually working is irresponsible and harmful? This is why you idiots got totally rejected. Your contempt for work is telling...
 
When are minority left wing Americans going to understand that they were duped with disinformation by WAPO for the last four years and longer? WAPO ain't your friend, the media outlet is wrong and dishonest and out of touch with the majority of Americans.
 
Or at least have to show you're actively seeking employment. Say, showing you have applied for X number of jobs in a given week. If you refuse a job offer, cut off the benefits. It used to be that people having to go on welfare, food stamps, etc. wanted to get off the dole ASAP as a matter of pride. Now it's seemingly the exact opposite in far too many cases.
yep absolutely correct...
 
Trickle down was never a thing.
Rube.

You have been told that we can tax cut our way to prosperity for fifty years.

“Trickle down was never a thing”?

Maybe you were born yesterday. The GOP has been peddling trickle down as a benefit of tax cuts for the rich since Ronald Reagan.
 
15th post
This seems like an attempt to keep people working longer which will only hurt the nation. We need people retiring much earlier, not later.
 
Work requirements and spending caps sound reasonable.

As long as you don’t know much about it, or don’t care because it will happen to the “other”.
 
You have been told that we can tax cut our way to prosperity for fifty years.

“Trickle down was never a thing”?

Maybe you were born yesterday. The GOP has been peddling trickle down as a benefit of tax cuts for the rich since Ronald Reagan.
Nope. You’ve been lied to again. Reagan’s philosophy was “A rising tide lifts all boats” .
Rube.
 
Back
Top Bottom