.....but you have a rather simplistic view of intelligence reports in general. Yes, agendas shape each government's tone or what they reveal and withhold, but the significance of Mossad's intelligence concerning Iran is that Israel has more of a reason to be wary of Iran than most other nations. It's much easier for EU nations, for example, to turn a blind eye to Iran's nuclear ambitions.
You don't seem to fully understand "intelligence reports" - which is divided into two mains streams:
1. gathering of "factual" information
2. "construing" information
Countries like N-Korea, Singapore or e.g. China are not in need of "construing" intelligence since they already control their population and therefore are not in need of "construing fake information" in order to get their populations approval or support !!!
The point is that Acosta tried to undermine any of Trump's efforts at normalizing relations with North Korea by injecting himself into the situation.
The point is, a "responsible" government (towards its own population/nation) doesn't "normalize" relations with an oppressive and mindless dictator.
Ukraine hasn't been "sovereign" since its supposed independence. Every regime that has taken power there has either been a pawn of the West or a pawn of Russia. It is true that Russia has been involved in supporting separatists in Donbas since 2014, but they didn't actually enter that region with their own troops until 2022.
Ukraine has been a fully accepted sovereign nation by ALL UN members since 1991, incl. the Russian Federation.
Internal destabilizing issues - (pertaining to almost all countries on the planet) have no legal say in regards to ignoring/defying the "right" and international acknowledgement of a respective countries sovereignty.
The USA has been in almost full control of e.g. Germany since 1949 - however that doesn't make it "right" nor does the USA have a given right, to impose it's political aspirations onto a "sovereign" Germany.
Tariffs certainly work better than nationalization, unless your goal is to run industry into the ground.
Tariffs are solely the result of a misguided economy. Or to self-implement an advantage to ones respective own nation. As for the latter e.g. the US steel tariffs.
So, again, I ask. What is your solution? Just let China continue to steal tech with no repercussions?
Who told you that China "stole" technology???
One is espionage - which every country conducts, foremost by the dear good old USA
The far greater one was/is Western corporate greed - that "enabled" Chinese companies to "learn" from it's foreign suppliers. However extremely effective due to a centralized approach, overseen by the Chinese government.
It's not bullshit. Even many European officials are reluctantly admitting that Europe has allowed itself to be too dependent on American military might when it comes to NATO.
Only and solely in regards to the US commitment, of it's "nuclear umbrella" since 1990 - and absolutely NOT towards a conventional military support. If the USA is willing to give conventional support (
as agreed - in exchange for e.g. Germany to pay for the maintenance of US bases&training grounds and "allow" for their existence) - okay, why should the European NATO members refuse???
As a matter of fact the USA has been exceedingly reliant onto European military&financial NATO support for it's political/military adventures since 1990. You simply ignore the fact that whilst Russia has been spending around US$ 25-30 billion annually since 1990 till today - the European NATO members by themselves, have spend around US$200 billion annually, since 1990.
The US's high spending on the military has been one of the main reasons most of the EU could instead spend on infrastructure and entitlements so much during the Cold War.
Nonsense - the US military expenditure was in view of all these wars that the USA conducted worldwide on their own behalf since 1945.
Germany's % in e.g. 1963 was 5% - in 1980 it was 3% and upon the dissolution of the USSR it was at 2.5%.
Since there was no more viable threat from Russia, as of 1990 it went down to 1.2% - and Germany had to cough up US$2 TRILLION - solely on it's own, to finance the German reunification from 1990 to 2020.
Furthermore 5% of Germany's 1963 GDP adds up to US$ 5 billion - whilst 1.4% of Germany's GDP in 2022 adds up to US$ 50 billion and 2% in 2024 would add up to US$ 75 billion - which is more (factually double of what Russia spends in total). !!!
I'll give you one thing: nationalism is definitely better than the globalism that the West has embraced. However, the form of nationalism that China has embraced is oppressive as hell. Also, the investment China has been engaging in is more like the modern form of colonialism. They're doing it to strip various areas of raw materials. Much of the investment has not and will not be beneficial to the affected nations in the long run.
You are totally misinformed - and take it from one who is working and living in China since 20 years, 70-80% of China's population are in favor of their government policies - despite the "unhappiness" about a "global recession" that naturally also effects China. (Thanks to the irresponsible US crash in 2008, Trumps idiotic trade war starting in 2017 and then Covid from 2020 onward)
Guns aren't about stimulating the economy.
The industry continues to have a positive economic impact, creating jobs and tax revenue, and is proud to be one of the bright spots in this economy.
www.nssf.org
United States companies that manufacture, distribute, and sell sporting firearms, ammunition, and supplies are an important part of the country’s economy.
Economic Impact of the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Industry in the United States
| Direct | Supplier | Induced | Total |
---|
Jobs (FTE) | 172,697 | 97,823 | 123,176 | 393,696 |
---|
Wages | $9,372,350,400 | $8,188,510,300 | $8,026,286,800 | $25,587,147,500 |
---|
Economic Impact | $32,110,233,100 | $24,468,955,600 | $24,151,650,400 | $80,730,839,100 |
---|
The Firearm & Ammunition Industry is an Important Part of America’s Economy
Companies in the United States that manufacture, distribute, and sell firearms, ammunition, and hunting equipment employ as many as 172,697 people in the country and generate an additional 220,999 jobs in supplier and ancillary industries. These include jobs in supplying goods and services to manufacturers, distributors, and retailers, and those that depend on sales to workers in the firearm and ammunition industry.
In 2022 the firearm and ammunition industry was responsible for as much as $80.73 billion in total economic activity in the country.
As such the gun industry in the USA adds up to around US$ 80 billion in 2022
They simply serve as a way for people to hunt and defend themselves.
Americans don't need 400 million guns to "hunt" rabbits.
Total number of paid license hunters in the USA in 2023 was - 16 million, thus flushing US$ 1.1 billion license fees into the US tax coffers.
You feel a need to be defended?? call onto your military (US $ 1 TRILLION budget) or your local police force.
If you can't get your daily "law and order" under control - make use of your democratic means and given "rights", and not via instigating an insurrection, or living the dream of guns in the hands of retarded and radicalized people, supposedly providing for safety.