True information about USA illegal attack against Syria

[Eugene]

MisterBeale
I used phrase "true info" referring to my own feelings about information got from our Defense Ministry.
I never faced their lies. They often do not inform about some actions but never lie.

I do realize that for people living in another...in opposite media space my point of view is impossible but I suggest you to get this information into account when making own conclusions. That's exactly what I do when reading western main stream media.

And I also invoke to look for logic in everything going on.
For example if Pentagon says 22 missiles got to a target, each bearing more than 250kg of explosives why we cannot see huge damage? There should be moon landscape at that place.
Or if Asad is suspected in chemical attacks what was the reason for it if he was day or two from clearing Douma by usual weapon?

You don't know shit about cruise missiles do you?

There is no carpet bombing "moonscape" like from a B-52 carpet bombing.

I am not a specialist, right. But I do realize what 4-5 tons of explosives achieved one target would do.

 

[Eugene]

That attack did not aim to make some damage but to express political will and determination.
It's obvious.
And Pentagon succeeded.
But I don't understand why they lie about the real result.
None of 4 targeted airbases were damaged, 2 empty warehouses exploded and 1 centre of oncological curing...empty as well. Is that normal result of more than hundred rockets?

And one sentence more.. USA is very anxious about Syrians suffering from chemical attacks but shoots to chemical weapon warehouses? If there was that weapon it might cause thousands of dead.

Don't know anything about chemical weapons either, do you?

Chemical weapon is dangerous even without proper detonation. So bombing warehouses of chemical weapon is very very dangerous, tho not as dangerous as if they were blown up properly.

So we have 2 lies of Pentagon:
- far not all of their rockets achieved the targets;
- they do not anxious about Syrians and their being poisoned.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

MisterBeale
I used phrase "true info" referring to my own feelings about information got from our Defense Ministry.
I never faced their lies. They often do not inform about some actions but never lie.

I do realize that for people living in another...in opposite media space my point of view is impossible but I suggest you to get this information into account when making own conclusions. That's exactly what I do when reading western main stream media.

And I also invoke to look for logic in everything going on.
For example if Pentagon says 22 missiles got to a target, each bearing more than 250kg of explosives why we cannot see huge damage? There should be moon landscape at that place.
Or if Asad is suspected in chemical attacks what was the reason for it if he was day or two from clearing Douma by usual weapon?

You don't know shit about cruise missiles do you?

There is no carpet bombing "moonscape" like from a B-52 carpet bombing.

I am not a specialist, right. But I do realize what 4-5 tons of explosives achieved one target would do.

Where do you get 4-5 tons? A Tomahawk warhead is about 1000 pounds.

Keep talking. You are proving how little you know.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

That attack did not aim to make some damage but to express political will and determination.
It's obvious.
And Pentagon succeeded.
But I don't understand why they lie about the real result.
None of 4 targeted airbases were damaged, 2 empty warehouses exploded and 1 centre of oncological curing...empty as well. Is that normal result of more than hundred rockets?

And one sentence more.. USA is very anxious about Syrians suffering from chemical attacks but shoots to chemical weapon warehouses? If there was that weapon it might cause thousands of dead.

Don't know anything about chemical weapons either, do you?

Chemical weapon is dangerous even without proper detonation. So bombing warehouses of chemical weapon is very very dangerous, tho not as dangerous as if they were blown up properly.

So we have 2 lies of Pentagon:
- far not all of their rockets achieved the targets;
- they do not anxious about Syrians and their being poisoned.

Chemical weapons are usually mixed before use as they are often binary agents. The storage facility is in the middle of f-ing nowhere for a reason, dumbass!

A Tomahawk is not a rocket. Why not just shut up while you are behind?

 

[Marion Morrison]

Idk but, I think they should have waited for confirmation, and I should have put every extra dollar I have into Raytheon stock for a day or two.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Idk but, I think they should have waited for confirmation, and I should have put every extra dollar I have into Raytheon stock for a day or two.

Who were we getting confirmation from? The Russians and Syrians wouldn't let anyone anywhere near the scene of the attack.

 

[Eugene]

Idk but, I think they should have waited for confirmation, and I should have put every extra dollar I have into Raytheon stock for a day or two.

Who were we getting confirmation from? The Russians and Syrians wouldn't let anyone anywhere near the scene of the attack.

Commission visited the place and has already agreed to Russian and Syrian statement it was a stage in Douma.
All your tries to show Russians unreliable look idiotic for me. Who cannot be trusted at all is the USA.


Witnesses are in Hague now. While USA tries to boycott that briefing.
And of course that information will not be widely spread in your media.

 

[Eugene]

And here is something more about strange smart smerican rockets...

 

[Eugene]

MisterBeale
I used phrase "true info" referring to my own feelings about information got from our Defense Ministry.
I never faced their lies. They often do not inform about some actions but never lie.

I do realize that for people living in another...in opposite media space my point of view is impossible but I suggest you to get this information into account when making own conclusions. That's exactly what I do when reading western main stream media.

And I also invoke to look for logic in everything going on.
For example if Pentagon says 22 missiles got to a target, each bearing more than 250kg of explosives why we cannot see huge damage? There should be moon landscape at that place.
Or if Asad is suspected in chemical attacks what was the reason for it if he was day or two from clearing Douma by usual weapon?

You don't know shit about cruise missiles do you?

There is no carpet bombing "moonscape" like from a B-52 carpet bombing.

I am not a specialist, right. But I do realize what 4-5 tons of explosives achieved one target would do.

Where do you get 4-5 tons? A Tomahawk warhead is about 1000 pounds.

Keep talking. You are proving how little you know.

I don't understand your strange pounds.
As far as I know tomahawk (in Russian it is a rocket, not ballistic but winged one or cruise) bears from 250 to 400kg of explosives.
If Pentagon claims 26 rockets got to the target so we have a place where 26 x 250kg = 6500kg = 6.5 tons of explosives had been blown up.
Right you are, I am not a specialist but even for me it is obvious how such a place should look like.

Keep lying. The more you do it the less people believe you.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Idk but, I think they should have waited for confirmation, and I should have put every extra dollar I have into Raytheon stock for a day or two.

Who were we getting confirmation from? The Russians and Syrians wouldn't let anyone anywhere near the scene of the attack.

Commission visited the place and has already agreed to Russian and Syrian statement it was a stage in Douma.
All your tries to show Russians unreliable look idiotic for me. Who cannot be trusted at all is the USA.


Witnesses are in Hague now. While USA tries to boycott that briefing.
And of course that information will not be widely spread in your media.

Nice source! Russian TV? Do you honestly think we are that stupid?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

MisterBeale
I used phrase "true info" referring to my own feelings about information got from our Defense Ministry.
I never faced their lies. They often do not inform about some actions but never lie.

I do realize that for people living in another...in opposite media space my point of view is impossible but I suggest you to get this information into account when making own conclusions. That's exactly what I do when reading western main stream media.

And I also invoke to look for logic in everything going on.
For example if Pentagon says 22 missiles got to a target, each bearing more than 250kg of explosives why we cannot see huge damage? There should be moon landscape at that place.
Or if Asad is suspected in chemical attacks what was the reason for it if he was day or two from clearing Douma by usual weapon?

You don't know shit about cruise missiles do you?

There is no carpet bombing "moonscape" like from a B-52 carpet bombing.

I am not a specialist, right. But I do realize what 4-5 tons of explosives achieved one target would do.

Where do you get 4-5 tons? A Tomahawk warhead is about 1000 pounds.

Keep talking. You are proving how little you know.

I don't understand your strange pounds.
As far as I know tomahawk (in Russian it is a rocket, not ballistic but winged one or cruise) bears from 250 to 400kg of explosives.
If Pentagon claims 26 rockets got to the target so we have a place where 26 x 250kg = 6500kg = 6.5 tons of explosives had been blown up.
Right you are, I am not a specialist but even for me it is obvious how such a place should look like.

Keep lying. The more you do it the less people believe you.

I am a specialist. I was a naval officer trained in these weapons systems and nuclear, biological and chemical warfare.

Exactly what am I lying about?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

And here is something more about strange smart smerican rockets...

Why do you think those parts of missiles indicate they did not hit their targets?

 

[Eugene]

Exactly what am I lying about?

In your recent posts
- when said about Tomahawks and quantity of explosives in them
- when calling RT or Russian Defense Ministry unreliable - they do not lie but say what your authority doesn't want to be heard and what in mainstream media is not said.

But which is most important you support lying propaganda and lying government.

 

[Eugene]

And here is something more about strange smart smerican rockets...

Why do you think those parts of missiles indicate they did not hit their targets?

I didn't say that.
But those parts are available for any specialist who can understand if that missile was intercepted or hit the target

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Exactly what am I lying about?

In your recent posts
- when said about Tomahawks and quantity of explosives in them
- when calling RT or Russian Defense Ministry unreliable - they do not lie but say what your authority doesn't want to be heard and what in mainstream media is not said.

But which is most important you support lying propaganda and lying government.

There are no lies in my statement. Have a nice day, comrade!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

And here is something more about strange smart smerican rockets...

Why do you think those parts of missiles indicate they did not hit their targets?

I didn't say that.
But those parts are available for any specialist who can understand if that missile was intercepted or hit the target

Ever seen an airplane crash site? That's what those parts look like after the missile warhead blows up!

 

[Eugene]

And here is something more about strange smart smerican rockets...

Why do you think those parts of missiles indicate they did not hit their targets?

I didn't say that.
But those parts are available for any specialist who can understand if that missile was intercepted or hit the target

Ever seen an airplane crash site? That's what those parts look like after the missile warhead blows up!

After warhead blowing up tail almost remains. When intercepted damage of the missile is another.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

And here is something more about strange smart smerican rockets...

Why do you think those parts of missiles indicate they did not hit their targets?

I didn't say that.
But those parts are available for any specialist who can understand if that missile was intercepted or hit the target

Ever seen an airplane crash site? That's what those parts look like after the missile warhead blows up!

After warhead blowing up tail almost remains. When intercepted damage of the missile is another.

Why are you wasting your time with this? You should be practicing your English skills, which suck ass!

 

[Eugene]

And here is something more about strange smart smerican rockets...

Why do you think those parts of missiles indicate they did not hit their targets?

I didn't say that.
But those parts are available for any specialist who can understand if that missile was intercepted or hit the target

Ever seen an airplane crash site? That's what those parts look like after the missile warhead blows up!

After warhead blowing up tail almost remains. When intercepted damage of the missile is another.

Why are you wasting your time with this? You should be practicing your English skills, which suck ass!

It's not your concern.
Besides, твой русский вообще нулевой!