Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If that is the right interpretation then your privacy is not protected on the internet, phones teletypes or any other modern device. And only the printing press is allowed to be used by news organizations. See how that works?Yes, all militia members have a right to a single-shot muzzleloader.
Again RETARD not required. as stated by the 2nd Amendment and the Supreme Court.Yes, all militia members have a right to a single-shot muzzleloader.
Would you allow yourself to be shot with a revolutionary war era flintlock at close range to test your assanine theory that these guns are usually survivable at close range?
PS. There were no antibiotics in the revolution dude, no surgery to fix internal organs either which added to death rates dramatically. But u keep up posting nunsense, it's quite amusing.
Yeah, sparky, but you got the point of what was in use at the time the thoroughly fucked up 2nd Amendment was written. Oh, and are you in a "militia"...?
If that is the right interpretation then your privacy is not protected on the internet, phones teletypes or any other modern device. And only the printing press is allowed to be used by news organizations. See how that works?Yes, all militia members have a right to a single-shot muzzleloader.
Again RETARD not required. as stated by the 2nd Amendment and the Supreme Court.Yes, all militia members have a right to a single-shot muzzleloader.
Would you allow yourself to be shot with a revolutionary war era flintlock at close range to test your assanine theory that these guns are usually survivable at close range?
PS. There were no antibiotics in the revolution dude, no surgery to fix internal organs either which added to death rates dramatically. But u keep up posting nunsense, it's quite amusing.
Yeah, sparky, but you got the point of what was in use at the time the thoroughly fucked up 2nd Amendment was written. Oh, and are you in a "militia"...?
Look another retard that lies as a means of comment.Of course it's a right. But Republicans want felons, the mentally ill and outright crazies to carry as many loaded weapons as they can.Clinton was just interviewed by Stephanopoulos. She is dishonest and the questions are dishonest. But it is clear Clinton supports government confiscation of guns from private citizens.
Watch: Hillary Refuses Say Right to Bear Arms Is a 'Constitutional Right' - Breitbart
That's where we disagree.
You forgot "the people" part. Militias are armed by definition.Yeah, sparky, but you got the point of what was in use at the time the thoroughly fucked up 2nd Amendment was written. Oh, and are you in a "militia"...?
English please.Again RETARD not required. as stated by the 2nd Amendment and the Supreme Court.Yes, all militia members have a right to a single-shot muzzleloader.
Would you allow yourself to be shot with a revolutionary war era flintlock at close range to test your assanine theory that these guns are usually survivable at close range?
PS. There were no antibiotics in the revolution dude, no surgery to fix internal organs either which added to death rates dramatically. But u keep up posting nunsense, it's quite amusing.
Yeah, sparky, but you got the point of what was in use at the time the thoroughly fucked up 2nd Amendment was written. Oh, and are you in a "militia"...?
Thank you for mentioning the Supreme Court - because the 2nd Amendment means whatever they say it means at any point in time.
Yes, all militia members have a right to a single-shot muzzleloader.
Yes, all militia members have a right to a single-shot muzzleloader.
I guess that means the following agencies are all unconstitutional
FAA - no aircraft
DOT - no trucks, cars, whatever
FCC - no radio or television
Dept Energy - no electricity
Air Force - no planes
Amtrak - no railroads
FDA - no drugs
NASA - no planes, rockets
Just what do you mean the 2nd Amendment is thoroughly fucked up? Do you know if we didnt have the 2nd Amendment, the Japs could have invaded the US as far in as Chicago according to Admiral Yamamoto. They feared our civilians with a gun behind every blade of grass. And what the hell is wrong with having a " militia"? You are just pissed our 2nd amendmend never applied to your Indian ancestors back in the good ole days.Yes, all militia members have a right to a single-shot muzzleloader.
Would you allow yourself to be shot with a revolutionary war era flintlock at close range to test your assanine theory that these guns are usually survivable at close range?
PS. There were no antibiotics in the revolution dude, no surgery to fix internal organs either which added to death rates dramatically. But u keep up posting nunsense, it's quite amusing.
Yeah, sparky, but you got the point of what was in use at the time the thoroughly fucked up 2nd Amendment was written. Oh, and are you in a "militia"...?
No that is NOT what she said. She is saying honest people have a right to expect that guns will not be sold to criminals and terrorists, only to responsible Americans. The gun lobby wants to sell guns to as many criminals and terrorists as possible in order to force everybody else to buy guns to protect themselves from the well armed criminals and terrorists. The gun lobby wants to sell guns to both sides of all conflicts.No, that isn't what a right is. That's like saying you have the right to free speech as long as you don't upset somebody. Rights are not dependent on your comfort level. We have reasonable laws now so she does want to restrict our 2nd A rights.Why am I not surprised that you and BigotBarf are lying???Clinton was just interviewed by Stephanopoulos. She is dishonest and the questions are dishonest. But it is clear Clinton supports government confiscation of guns from private citizens.
Watch: Hillary Refuses Say Right to Bear Arms Is a 'Constitutional Right' - Breitbart
She did say it is a right!
CLINTON: "So I think it's important to recognize that reasonable people can say, as I do, responsible gun owners have a right -- I have no objection to that. But the rest of the American public has a right to require certain kinds of regularity, responsible actions to protect everyone else."
Just what do you mean the 2nd Amendment is thoroughly fucked up? Do you know if we didnt have the 2nd Amendment, the Japs could have invaded the US as far in as Chicago according to Admiral Yamamoto. They feared our civilians with a gun behind every blade of grass. And what the hell is wrong with having a " militia"?Yes, all militia members have a right to a single-shot muzzleloader.
Would you allow yourself to be shot with a revolutionary war era flintlock at close range to test your assanine theory that these guns are usually survivable at close range?
PS. There were no antibiotics in the revolution dude, no surgery to fix internal organs either which added to death rates dramatically. But u keep up posting nunsense, it's quite amusing.
Yeah, sparky, but you got the point of what was in use at the time the thoroughly fucked up 2nd Amendment was written. Oh, and are you in a "militia"...?
No that is NOT what she said. She is saying honest people have a right to expect that guns will not be sold to criminals and terrorists, only to responsible Americans. The gun lobby wants to sell guns to as many criminals and terrorists as possible in order to force everybody else to buy guns to protect themselves from the well armed criminals and terrorists. The gun lobby wants to sell guns to both sides of all conflicts.No, that isn't what a right is. That's like saying you have the right to free speech as long as you don't upset somebody. Rights are not dependent on your comfort level. We have reasonable laws now so she does want to restrict our 2nd A rights.Why am I not surprised that you and BigotBarf are lying???Clinton was just interviewed by Stephanopoulos. She is dishonest and the questions are dishonest. But it is clear Clinton supports government confiscation of guns from private citizens.
Watch: Hillary Refuses Say Right to Bear Arms Is a 'Constitutional Right' - Breitbart
She did say it is a right!
CLINTON: "So I think it's important to recognize that reasonable people can say, as I do, responsible gun owners have a right -- I have no objection to that. But the rest of the American public has a right to require certain kinds of regularity, responsible actions to protect everyone else."
They are all up in arms, about it...>>> waiting to hear what bears feel about this issue
Shall not be infringed is all you need to know
I used the quote you provided. We have background checks now. It isn't possible to know if someone who hasn't got a criminal record is ever going to commit a crime.No that is NOT what she said. She is saying honest people have a right to expect that guns will not be sold to criminals and terrorists, only to responsible Americans. The gun lobby wants to sell guns to as many criminals and terrorists as possible in order to force everybody else to buy guns to protect themselves from the well armed criminals and terrorists. The gun lobby wants to sell guns to both sides of all conflicts.No, that isn't what a right is. That's like saying you have the right to free speech as long as you don't upset somebody. Rights are not dependent on your comfort level. We have reasonable laws now so she does want to restrict our 2nd A rights.Why am I not surprised that you and BigotBarf are lying???Clinton was just interviewed by Stephanopoulos. She is dishonest and the questions are dishonest. But it is clear Clinton supports government confiscation of guns from private citizens.
Watch: Hillary Refuses Say Right to Bear Arms Is a 'Constitutional Right' - Breitbart
She did say it is a right!
CLINTON: "So I think it's important to recognize that reasonable people can say, as I do, responsible gun owners have a right -- I have no objection to that. But the rest of the American public has a right to require certain kinds of regularity, responsible actions to protect everyone else."
National Guard. Look into it.Shall not be infringed is all you need to know
What about the "well regulated militia" part?
Yet someone on the no fly list, as a known terrorist, can legally buy weapons...I used the quote you provided. We have background checks now. It isn't possible to know if someone who hasn't got a criminal record is ever going to commit a crime.No that is NOT what she said. She is saying honest people have a right to expect that guns will not be sold to criminals and terrorists, only to responsible Americans. The gun lobby wants to sell guns to as many criminals and terrorists as possible in order to force everybody else to buy guns to protect themselves from the well armed criminals and terrorists. The gun lobby wants to sell guns to both sides of all conflicts.No, that isn't what a right is. That's like saying you have the right to free speech as long as you don't upset somebody. Rights are not dependent on your comfort level. We have reasonable laws now so she does want to restrict our 2nd A rights.Why am I not surprised that you and BigotBarf are lying???Clinton was just interviewed by Stephanopoulos. She is dishonest and the questions are dishonest. But it is clear Clinton supports government confiscation of guns from private citizens.
Watch: Hillary Refuses Say Right to Bear Arms Is a 'Constitutional Right' - Breitbart
She did say it is a right!
CLINTON: "So I think it's important to recognize that reasonable people can say, as I do, responsible gun owners have a right -- I have no objection to that. But the rest of the American public has a right to require certain kinds of regularity, responsible actions to protect everyone else."
No, the gun lobby (is there such a thing? Doubt it) doesn't want to arm terrorists and criminals. Quit being so stupid. They are law abiding people an you do a disservice to your cause to misrepresent them as such.
The NG is not a militia..National Guard. Look into it.Shall not be infringed is all you need to know
What about the "well regulated militia" part?
