- Banned
- #1
As a "Boomer" it pains me to see where we are in this Country. I don't recall this type behavior ever being discussed in school, even in the abstract. Is it now days? Or even a generation ago? I don't remember my kids (35 and soon to be 40) talking about it and I'm pretty sure they would have.
So, what is it, exactly, are these people (the acolytes) hoping to get- or prove? Does the msm really believe they'll gain any credibility promoting what is going on? I mean, really? Do the posters here actually they will be better off? Or worse, if Trump wins, for that matter-
What *specifically* is to be gained?
The Transition Integrity Project (TIP) is a shadowy group of government, military and media elites who have concocted a plan to spread mayhem and disinformation following the November 3 presidential elections. The strategy takes advantage of the presumed delay in determining the winner of the upcoming election. (due to the deluge of mail-in votes.) The interim period is expected to intensify partisan warfare creating the perfect environment for disseminating propaganda and inciting street violence. The leaders of TIP believe that a mass mobilization will help them to achieve what Russiagate could not, that is, the removal Donald Trump via an illicit coup conjured up by behind-the-scenes powerbrokers and their Democrat allies. Here’s a little more background from an article by Chris Farrell at the Gatestone Institute:
There are some links in the article the author uses for validation of his thoughts.
www.gatestoneinstitute.org
From the second link- copy and pasted so the spelling errors are the software- FYI
Preventing a Disrupted Presidential Election andTransitionAugust 3, 2020Executive SummaryIn June 2020 the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) convened a bipartisan group of over 100 current and former senior government and campaign leaders and other experts in a series of 2020 election crisis sce-nario planning exercises. The results of all four table-top exercises were alarming. We assess with a high degree of likelihood that November’s elections will be marked by a chaotic legal and political landscape.We also assess that the President Trump is likely to contest the result by both legal and extra-legal means, in an attempt to hold onto power. Recent events, including the President’s own unwillingness to commit to abiding by theresults of theelection, the Attorney General’s embrace ofthe President’sgroundless electoral fraud claims,and the unprecedented deployment of federal agents to put down leftwing protests, underscore the extremelengths to which President Trump may be willing to go in order to stay in office.In this report, TIP explains the basis for our assessment. Our findings are bolstered by the historical expe-rience of Bush v. Gore(2000) and other U.S. electoral dysfunctions. The closest analogy may be the elec-tion of 1876, a time of extreme partisanship and rampant disenfranchisement, where multiple states prof-fered competing slates of electors, and the election was only resolved through a grand political bargain days before Inauguration—one that tradedan end toReconstruction for electoral peace and resulted in a century of Jim Crow, leaving deep wounds that are far from healed today. Among the findings we highlight in the report:•The concept of “election night,” is no longer accurate and indeed is dangerous.We face a pe-riod of contestation stretching from the first day a ballot is cast in mid-September until January 20. The winner may not, and we assess likely will not, be known on “election night” as officials count mail-in ballots. This period of uncertainty provides opportunities for an unscrupulous can-didate to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the process and to set up an unprecedented assault on the outcome. Campaigns, parties, the press and the public must be educated to adjust expectationsstarting immediately.
So, what is it, exactly, are these people (the acolytes) hoping to get- or prove? Does the msm really believe they'll gain any credibility promoting what is going on? I mean, really? Do the posters here actually they will be better off? Or worse, if Trump wins, for that matter-
What *specifically* is to be gained?
The Transition Integrity Project (TIP) is a shadowy group of government, military and media elites who have concocted a plan to spread mayhem and disinformation following the November 3 presidential elections. The strategy takes advantage of the presumed delay in determining the winner of the upcoming election. (due to the deluge of mail-in votes.) The interim period is expected to intensify partisan warfare creating the perfect environment for disseminating propaganda and inciting street violence. The leaders of TIP believe that a mass mobilization will help them to achieve what Russiagate could not, that is, the removal Donald Trump via an illicit coup conjured up by behind-the-scenes powerbrokers and their Democrat allies. Here’s a little more background from an article by Chris Farrell at the Gatestone Institute:
There are some links in the article the author uses for validation of his thoughts.
How to Steal an Election
In one of the greatest public disinformation campaigns in American history, the "Transition Integrity Project" (TIP) released a 22-page report in August 2020 "war gaming" (their term) four election crisis scenarios.... The outcome of each TIP scenario
From the second link- copy and pasted so the spelling errors are the software- FYI
Preventing a Disrupted Presidential Election andTransitionAugust 3, 2020Executive SummaryIn June 2020 the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) convened a bipartisan group of over 100 current and former senior government and campaign leaders and other experts in a series of 2020 election crisis sce-nario planning exercises. The results of all four table-top exercises were alarming. We assess with a high degree of likelihood that November’s elections will be marked by a chaotic legal and political landscape.We also assess that the President Trump is likely to contest the result by both legal and extra-legal means, in an attempt to hold onto power. Recent events, including the President’s own unwillingness to commit to abiding by theresults of theelection, the Attorney General’s embrace ofthe President’sgroundless electoral fraud claims,and the unprecedented deployment of federal agents to put down leftwing protests, underscore the extremelengths to which President Trump may be willing to go in order to stay in office.In this report, TIP explains the basis for our assessment. Our findings are bolstered by the historical expe-rience of Bush v. Gore(2000) and other U.S. electoral dysfunctions. The closest analogy may be the elec-tion of 1876, a time of extreme partisanship and rampant disenfranchisement, where multiple states prof-fered competing slates of electors, and the election was only resolved through a grand political bargain days before Inauguration—one that tradedan end toReconstruction for electoral peace and resulted in a century of Jim Crow, leaving deep wounds that are far from healed today. Among the findings we highlight in the report:•The concept of “election night,” is no longer accurate and indeed is dangerous.We face a pe-riod of contestation stretching from the first day a ballot is cast in mid-September until January 20. The winner may not, and we assess likely will not, be known on “election night” as officials count mail-in ballots. This period of uncertainty provides opportunities for an unscrupulous can-didate to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the process and to set up an unprecedented assault on the outcome. Campaigns, parties, the press and the public must be educated to adjust expectationsstarting immediately.
