“Travis told police Arbery “squared up” like he was going to attack.” So he shot him in the chest.

[Jitss617]

God this is all funny! We have a video of the black attacking a man legally holding his weapon. Legally discharged his weapon after being attacked.. stop with your nonsense

We have the video plus this official explanation from the triggerman of what happened in front of the truck that cannot be seen in the video:

“That’s when Arbery ran around the passenger side of Travis’ truck, and the two men met in front of it. Dial said Travis told police Arbery “squared up” like he was going to attack. He said Travis then fired the first shot into Arbery’s chest.”

Are you calling your hero TravisM a liar?

Has your murderer hero been tortured by Obama deep state apparatchiks forcing a statement to police that he shot an unarmed man in the chest before he was attacked?

What did the eyewitness say

 

[whutTHEYsay]

We have a video of the black attacking a man legally holding his weapon. Legally discharged his weapon after being attacked..

But the shooter told police he shot the victim in the chest before the victim started to attack.,

You are contradicting what the shooter told the police. How in a right mind can you do that?

 

[playtime]

It's not legal for a civilian to use a shotgun to make someone stop running.

It is if some thug is running toward you trying to take it away.

according to TravisM, a first hand eyewitness, he shot a man in the chest when the two men met in the front of the truck. You say it’s legal to shoot an unarmed person if they run toward you. Do you think it matters if the armed person steps into the path of the person who has been trying to evade the gunmen for four minutes of being chased.

they were chasing him in their trucks & 'cornered' him. he had no choice.

fight or flight occurred, but his path to flee was taken away. arbery had no choice but to fight back. HE was self defending - not the hillbillies.

Huh? Video? Do you have a different video?

the hillbilly with the dorothy hamill haircut has CONfessed to what happened before he started taping.

New details: Ahmaud Arbery was hit by truck before fatal shooting
Preliminary hearing begins into killing of black jogger

PUBLISHED: June 4, 2020 at 9:26 a.m. | UPDATED: June 4, 2020 at 9:48 a.m.

By Eliott C. McLaughlin, CNN

(CNN) — New details of the final moments of Ahmaud Arbery’s life emerged Thursday during preliminary hearings — including the report that the Georgia man was struck by a pickup truck shortly before he was fatally shot.

Richard Dial, a Georgia Bureau of Investigation agent, outlined the events that led to Arbery’s death on February 23 and told the court that the three men charged in his murder engaged in an elaborate chase as the 25-year-old jogger repeatedly tried to avoid them.

Before William “Roddy” Bryan began recording the video of the fatal confrontation, he had struck Arbery with his truck, Dial said.

Investigators found a swipe from a palm print on the rear door of Bryan’s truck, cotton fibers near the truck bed that “we attribute to contact with Mr. Arbery” and a dent below the fibers, Dial said.
[...]
Bryan tried to block in Arbery as Travis McMichael drove around the block with his father in the bed of the truck.

Bryan “made several statements about trying to block him in and using his vehicle to try to stop him,” Dial said. “His statement was that Mr. Arbery kept jumping out of the way and moving around the bumper and actually running down into the ditch in an attempt to avoid his truck.”

At one point, Arbery was heading out of the Satilla Shores neighborhood where the defendants live, but the McMichaels forced him to turn back into the neighborhood and run past Bryan, the agent said. That is when he struck Arbery, Dial said.

Bryan turned around, and that is where the widely disseminated video of Arbery’s killing begins.

New details: Ahmaud Arbery was hit by truck before fatal shooting

yer welcome for the enlightenment.

 

[Jitss617]

We have a video of the black attacking a man legally holding his weapon. Legally discharged his weapon after being attacked..

But the shooter told police he shot the victim in the chest before the victim started to attack.,

You are contradicting what the shooter told the police. How in a right mind can you do that?

I think you should wait for the trial. Your grasping for air

 

[DGS49]

So, my first question is this: When confronted by three armed rednecks and two pickup trucks, which of the three options makes the most sense? (a) Run the other way (a truck can't follow you between houses), (b) Ignore the bastards and run around them, or (c) run up to them and confront them with your bare hands.

The one video that I saw showed the ultimate victim running - starting from about 150 yards away - directly to the armed rednecks.

Why?

 

[Jitss617]

So, my first question is this: When confronted by three armed rednecks and two pickup trucks, which of the three options makes the most sense? (a) Run the other way (a truck can't follow you between houses), (b) Ignore the bastards and run around them, or (c) run up to them and confront them with your bare hands.

The one video that I saw showed the ultimate victim running - starting from about 150 yards away - directly to the armed rednecks.

Why?

Stop the racist names

 

[whutTHEYsay]

God this is all funny! We have a video of the black attacking a man legally holding his weapon. Legally discharged his weapon after being attacked.. stop with your nonsense

We have the video plus this official explanation from the triggerman of what happened in front of the truck that cannot be seen in the video:

“That’s when Arbery ran around the passenger side of Travis’ truck, and the two men met in front of it. Dial said Travis told police Arbery “squared up” like he was going to attack. He said Travis then fired the first shot into Arbery’s chest.”

Are you calling your hero TravisM a liar?

Has your murderer hero been tortured by Obama deep state apparatchiks forcing a statement to police that he shot an unarmed man in the chest before he was attacked?

What did the eyewitness say

Travis told police Arbery “squared up” like he was going to attack.

He said Travis then fired the first shot into Arbery’s chest.”

 

[SavannahMann]

We have a video of the black attacking a man legally holding his weapon. Legally discharged his weapon after being attacked..

But the shooter told police he shot the victim in the chest before the victim started to attack.,

You are contradicting what the shooter told the police. How in a right mind can you do that?

It is easy. This poor deluded fool we are debating has created a narrative in his mind, and nothing will change it. The narrative of course, is based on fiction. Imagine him six hundred years ago, and you will see the worse of humanity. The Inquisition, Although they were better educated. He is the sort who would stand on the pier and scream that Christopher Columbus was going to fall off the edge of the world when they set sail. When they returned successful, he would stand and scream that they were lying because we can see with our own eyes the earth was flat.

 

[Jitss617]

God this is all funny! We have a video of the black attacking a man legally holding his weapon. Legally discharged his weapon after being attacked.. stop with your nonsense

We have the video plus this official explanation from the triggerman of what happened in front of the truck that cannot be seen in the video:

“That’s when Arbery ran around the passenger side of Travis’ truck, and the two men met in front of it. Dial said Travis told police Arbery “squared up” like he was going to attack. He said Travis then fired the first shot into Arbery’s chest.”

Are you calling your hero TravisM a liar?

Has your murderer hero been tortured by Obama deep state apparatchiks forcing a statement to police that he shot an unarmed man in the chest before he was attacked?

What did the eyewitness say

Travis told police Arbery “squared up” like he was going to attack.

He said Travis then fired the first shot into Arbery’s chest.”

No the eyewitness? Wait until the trial..

 

[Jitss617]

We have a video of the black attacking a man legally holding his weapon. Legally discharged his weapon after being attacked..

But the shooter told police he shot the victim in the chest before the victim started to attack.,

You are contradicting what the shooter told the police. How in a right mind can you do that?

It is easy. This poor deluded fool we are debating has created a narrative in his mind, and nothing will change it. The narrative of course, is based on fiction. Imagine him six hundred years ago, and you will see the worse of humanity. The Inquisition, Although they were better educated. He is the sort who would stand on the pier and scream that Christopher Columbus was going to fall off the edge of the world when they set sail. When they returned successful, he would stand and scream that they were lying because we can see with our own eyes the earth was flat.

Everybody with a brain knows when you run directly at somebody with a shotgun and try to attack them you’re going to get shot it is mine boggling that he did not shoot earlier.

 

[playtime]

We have a video of the black attacking a man legally holding his weapon. Legally discharged his weapon after being attacked..

But the shooter told police he shot the victim in the chest before the victim started to attack.,

You are contradicting what the shooter told the police. How in a right mind can you do that?

It is easy. This poor deluded fool we are debating has created a narrative in his mind, and nothing will change it. The narrative of course, is based on fiction. Imagine him six hundred years ago, and you will see the worse of humanity. The Inquisition, Although they were better educated. He is the sort who would stand on the pier and scream that Christopher Columbus was going to fall off the edge of the world when they set sail. When they returned successful, he would stand and scream that they were lying because we can see with our own eyes the earth was flat.

Everybody with a brain knows when you run directly at somebody with a shotgun and try to attack them you’re going to get shot it is mine boggling that he did not shoot earlier.

everybody with a brain knows that when a first person witness, especially one that was di-rectly involved & fully participated in a man's murder tells you what happened ... it probably did.

 

[SavannahMann]

We have a video of the black attacking a man legally holding his weapon. Legally discharged his weapon after being attacked..

But the shooter told police he shot the victim in the chest before the victim started to attack.,

You are contradicting what the shooter told the police. How in a right mind can you do that?

It is easy. This poor deluded fool we are debating has created a narrative in his mind, and nothing will change it. The narrative of course, is based on fiction. Imagine him six hundred years ago, and you will see the worse of humanity. The Inquisition, Although they were better educated. He is the sort who would stand on the pier and scream that Christopher Columbus was going to fall off the edge of the world when they set sail. When they returned successful, he would stand and scream that they were lying because we can see with our own eyes the earth was flat.

Everybody with a brain knows when you run directly at somebody with a shotgun and try to attack them you’re going to get shot it is mine boggling that he did not shoot earlier.

From the point of view of the victim, it may well have, in fact probably did, seem like a choice of definite, and probable futures. If I was in that situation, where doing nothing seemed like a certain death. And doing something seemed probable, you go with your best choice.

You know, like if you were chased by Blacks, you would not trust that they meant you no harm if you just cooperated. You would go down fighting and kicking and screaming. You might still die, but you will at least take one of them with you.

 

[Jitss617]

We have a video of the black attacking a man legally holding his weapon. Legally discharged his weapon after being attacked..

But the shooter told police he shot the victim in the chest before the victim started to attack.,

You are contradicting what the shooter told the police. How in a right mind can you do that?

It is easy. This poor deluded fool we are debating has created a narrative in his mind, and nothing will change it. The narrative of course, is based on fiction. Imagine him six hundred years ago, and you will see the worse of humanity. The Inquisition, Although they were better educated. He is the sort who would stand on the pier and scream that Christopher Columbus was going to fall off the edge of the world when they set sail. When they returned successful, he would stand and scream that they were lying because we can see with our own eyes the earth was flat.

Everybody with a brain knows when you run directly at somebody with a shotgun and try to attack them you’re going to get shot it is mine boggling that he did not shoot earlier.

everybody with a brain knows that when a first person witness, especially one that was di-rectly involved & fully participated in a man's murder tells you what happened ... it probably did.

All that matters is what allowed in court

 

[Jitss617]

We have a video of the black attacking a man legally holding his weapon. Legally discharged his weapon after being attacked..

But the shooter told police he shot the victim in the chest before the victim started to attack.,

You are contradicting what the shooter told the police. How in a right mind can you do that?

It is easy. This poor deluded fool we are debating has created a narrative in his mind, and nothing will change it. The narrative of course, is based on fiction. Imagine him six hundred years ago, and you will see the worse of humanity. The Inquisition, Although they were better educated. He is the sort who would stand on the pier and scream that Christopher Columbus was going to fall off the edge of the world when they set sail. When they returned successful, he would stand and scream that they were lying because we can see with our own eyes the earth was flat.

Everybody with a brain knows when you run directly at somebody with a shotgun and try to attack them you’re going to get shot it is mine boggling that he did not shoot earlier.

From the point of view of the victim, it may well have, in fact probably did, seem like a choice of definite, and probable futures. If I was in that situation, where doing nothing seemed like a certain death. And doing something seemed probable, you go with your best choice.

You know, like if you were chased by Blacks, you would not trust that they meant you no harm if you just cooperated. You would go down fighting and kicking and screaming. You might still die, but you will at least take one of them with you.

This is a dumb argument, let’s wait until the courts

 

[whutTHEYsay]

I think you should wait for the trial. Your grasping for air

The hearing yesterday is setting up the trial process. We received new information from that hearing which set up indisputable facts in the case.

One of the most significant new facts is TravisM telling police that he shot AA in the chest before the ‘wounded’ AA started to attack him.

This thread is not about the trial and it’s outcome - it is about you and documenting what you do when confronted with new facts.

it’s not going well for you.

 

[playtime]

We have a video of the black attacking a man legally holding his weapon. Legally discharged his weapon after being attacked..

But the shooter told police he shot the victim in the chest before the victim started to attack.,

You are contradicting what the shooter told the police. How in a right mind can you do that?

It is easy. This poor deluded fool we are debating has created a narrative in his mind, and nothing will change it. The narrative of course, is based on fiction. Imagine him six hundred years ago, and you will see the worse of humanity. The Inquisition, Although they were better educated. He is the sort who would stand on the pier and scream that Christopher Columbus was going to fall off the edge of the world when they set sail. When they returned successful, he would stand and scream that they were lying because we can see with our own eyes the earth was flat.

Everybody with a brain knows when you run directly at somebody with a shotgun and try to attack them you’re going to get shot it is mine boggling that he did not shoot earlier.

everybody with a brain knows that when a first person witness, especially one that was di-rectly involved & fully participated in a man's murder tells you what happened ... it probably did.

All that matters is what allowed in court

it will be. all this was testified to, under oath - during the preliminary hearing.

d'oh!

 

[Jitss617]

I think you should wait for the trial. Your grasping for air

The hearing yesterday is setting up the trial process. We received new information from that hearing which set up indisputable facts in the case.

One of the most significant new facts is TravisM telling police that he shot AA in the chest before the ‘wounded’ AA started to attack him.

This thread is not about the trial and it’s outcome - it is about you and documenting what you do when confronted with new facts.

it’s not going well for you.

Who said that?

 

[Jitss617]

We have a video of the black attacking a man legally holding his weapon. Legally discharged his weapon after being attacked..

But the shooter told police he shot the victim in the chest before the victim started to attack.,

You are contradicting what the shooter told the police. How in a right mind can you do that?

It is easy. This poor deluded fool we are debating has created a narrative in his mind, and nothing will change it. The narrative of course, is based on fiction. Imagine him six hundred years ago, and you will see the worse of humanity. The Inquisition, Although they were better educated. He is the sort who would stand on the pier and scream that Christopher Columbus was going to fall off the edge of the world when they set sail. When they returned successful, he would stand and scream that they were lying because we can see with our own eyes the earth was flat.

Everybody with a brain knows when you run directly at somebody with a shotgun and try to attack them you’re going to get shot it is mine boggling that he did not shoot earlier.

everybody with a brain knows that when a first person witness, especially one that was di-rectly involved & fully participated in a man's murder tells you what happened ... it probably did.

All that matters is what allowed in court

it will be. all this was testified to, under oath - during the preliminary hearing.

d'oh!

Probably won’t matter we have video and eye witness

 

[playtime]

We have a video of the black attacking a man legally holding his weapon. Legally discharged his weapon after being attacked..

But the shooter told police he shot the victim in the chest before the victim started to attack.,

You are contradicting what the shooter told the police. How in a right mind can you do that?

It is easy. This poor deluded fool we are debating has created a narrative in his mind, and nothing will change it. The narrative of course, is based on fiction. Imagine him six hundred years ago, and you will see the worse of humanity. The Inquisition, Although they were better educated. He is the sort who would stand on the pier and scream that Christopher Columbus was going to fall off the edge of the world when they set sail. When they returned successful, he would stand and scream that they were lying because we can see with our own eyes the earth was flat.

Everybody with a brain knows when you run directly at somebody with a shotgun and try to attack them you’re going to get shot it is mine boggling that he did not shoot earlier.

everybody with a brain knows that when a first person witness, especially one that was di-rectly involved & fully participated in a man's murder tells you what happened ... it probably did.

All that matters is what allowed in court

it will be. all this was testified to, under oath - during the preliminary hearing.

d'oh!

Probably won’t matter we have video and eye witness

ummmm... the eye witness - who shot the video --- confessed to arbery being shot trying to defend himself.

 

[Jitss617]

I think you should wait for the trial. Your grasping for air

The hearing yesterday is setting up the trial process. We received new information from that hearing which set up indisputable facts in the case.

One of the most significant new facts is TravisM telling police that he shot AA in the chest before the ‘wounded’ AA started to attack him.

This thread is not about the trial and it’s outcome - it is about you and documenting what you do when confronted with new facts.

it’s not going well for you.

Nothing in that BBC report says squaring up to fight lol you LIAR