Transgender fad Victims

[billyerock123]

No shit. They get propagandized into it.

no they don't ... its a choice they and their doctors
decides to do ...propagandize now that's too big of a word for you to use ...

 

[Manonthestreet]

no they don't ... its a choice they and their doctors
decides to do ...propagandize now that's too big of a word for you to use ...

 

[badger2]

first of all the choice of words you use is childish ...its a surgery, not mutilation...the reason they choose this is that they're not you, not your buddies not your church, but they choose to do this... as for the doctor's finances ... it's no different than a doctor doing a knee replacement or hip or shoulder replacement they get paid for it ... the person who is having this done goes through psychiatric sessions hormone therapy many years before the surgery ... that way they have titties and a pussy when they are done or in a woman's case no titties and a dick ... yes it cost money ... anything a doctor does cost money ... they don't work for free last I heard ... their political persuasion is not any of your business nor is it your right to call them things they aren't ... that too is childish ...

isn't it just like you repub-lie-tards to go after a trans community over the shooting of all the shooting by strait people that you choose to go after all trans community saying they are out to kill you ... with that kind of thinking all Republicans are out to kill babies in grade school ... see how insane that sounds you, idiot you are an ignorant moron ...
...

We'll call it scientifically, mutilation. We'll not allow the Schizo to play surgeon one minute and shrink the next. Thus, we can understand your propensity to play word games based on the signifier-signified. That's why we also call it politicized. We'll also scientifically claim that opposite-sex hormones are potential mutilation depending on the genome, and can only be defined as such if surgery leaves behind any original sex tissue that then becomes susceptible to cancers.

You don't seem to have the education that will allow you to process complex words and concepts by which to support the shrink's knowledge of the anaysand's genome, so we'll make note of your knowledge gap as a compromised scientific education.

 

[Polishprince]

first of all the choice of words you use is childish ...its a surgery, not mutilation...the reason they choose this is that they're not you, not your buddies not your church, but they choose to do this... as for the doctor's finances ... it's no different than a doctor doing a knee replacement or hip or shoulder replacement they get paid for it ... the person who is having this done goes through psychiatric sessions hormone therapy many years before the surgery ... that way they have titties and a pussy when they are done or in a woman's case no titties and a dick ... yes it cost money ... anything a doctor does cost money ... they don't work for free last I heard ... their political persuasion is not any of your business nor is it your right to call them things they aren't ... that too is childish ...

isn't it just like you repub-lie-tards to go after a trans community over the shooting of all the shooting by strait people that you choose to go after all trans community saying they are out to kill you ... with that kind of thinking all Republicans are out to kill babies in grade school ... see how insane that sounds you, idiot you are an ignorant moron ...
...

Actually, they don't have female genitalia at all when they are done. They have a Mutilated Penis.

Further, the physicians should have been able to discern the difference between someone who this is appropriate for and those who won't be better after the surgery/hormones. And if they can't discern the difference between someone who will benefit and those who won't, they shouldn't do it and be sued when the patient is dissatisfied.

 

[badger2]

Actually, they don't have female genitalia at all when they are done. They have a Mutilated Penis.

Further, the physicians should have been able to discern the difference between someone who this is appropriate for and those who won't be better after the surgery/hormones. And if they can't discern the difference between someone who will benefit and those who won't, they shouldn't do it and be sued when the patient is dissatisfied.

Yes, and since they are also not shrinks and may not be geneticists, patient sequelae may be mental and physical. Opposite-sex hormones even without the scalpel may be dangerous, depending on the particular genome. Russian roulette.

'Human patients again give a hint as to the complexities of gene regulation of sexual differentiation with more than 100 syndromes having sexual ambiguity (Pinsky et al, Genetic Disorders of Human Sexual Development, Oxford U. Press, N.Y. 1999).'
(Epstein, Inborn Errors of Development: The Molecular Basis of Clinical Disorders of Morphogenesis, p. 209 The Sexual Differentiation Pathway)

There is likely a notorious impoverishment of genetic vetting involved in this delirious crotch-clown trend that is hell-bent on betrayals of biological fate.

 

[Polishprince]

There is likely a notorious impoverishment of genetic vetting involved in this delirious crotch-clown trend that is hell-bent on betrayals of biological fate.

Well put.

I was watching a video on "Soft White Underbelly" where a dame told her story and reported that on her first appointment to the Gender Bender Clinic, she was immediately given massive dosages of testosterone because she said she felt like a dude.

Libs act as if they do a tremendous job of vetting the trannies, that just isn't the case.

BTW, the dame on SWU is now "de-transitioning"

 

[badger2]

Well put.

I was watching a video on "Soft White Underbelly" where a dame told her story and reported that on her first appointment to the Gender Bender Clinic, she was immediately given massive dosages of testosterone because she said she felt like a dude.

Libs act as if they do a tremendous job of vetting the trannies, that just isn't the case.

BTW, the dame on SWU is now "de-transitioning"

Not at all surprised. Is this video available?

 

[Polishprince]

Not at all surprised. Is this video available?

Absolutely. The Tranny Mafia hasn't cancelled it yet.

 

[badger2]

Absolutely. The Tranny Mafia hasn't cancelled it yet.

There's much here. Will have to go over the video several times more. Too late now to have first seen it with the sound turned off, the mistake can't really be corrected due to first-impression intuition. Must take more time to analyze the genetic links. This person's experience has much to give to others as far as de-transitioning therapy goes.

 

[badger2]

The patient's (post #148) polycystic syndrome goes into the Tranny Genetics / Psychopathology Archive:

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Polycystic ovary syndrome - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[badger2]

For the archive:

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

I think if one is born male or female, to pretend they are not is a mental disorder.

Sissying the Boys and Butching the Girls

They are failures at being what they were born to be. Malies should man up and females should be more feminine. Not having the guts to change, they hide from that truth by converting to the dysphoria cult.

 

[badger2]

Sissying the Boys and Butching the Girls

They are failures at being what they were born to be. Malies should man up and females should be more feminine. Not having the guts to change, they hide from that truth by converting to the dysphoria cult.

The subject in #148 apparently had what is called (who first made this call?) "chest dysphoria." Coupled with PCOS (polycystic ovary syndrome), there are genetic problems intertwined with physical-social problems.

Fortunately when we begin to analyze the genetics, they also link to things such as the polycystin protein of the bat genus, Rhinolophus, so we won't waste any opportunities to compare human polycystin with bat polycystin because SARS2 close relative virus is from Rhinolophus affinis.

The Wuhan psycho virologists were also studying mating-season genetics of bats, not simply their viruses.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The subject in #148 apparently had what is called (who first made this call?) "chest dysphoria." Coupled with PCOS (polycystic ovary syndrome), there are genetic problems intertwined with physical-social problems.

Fortunately when we begin to analyze the genetics, they also link to things such as the polycystin protein of the bat genus, Rhinolophus, so we won't waste any opportunities to compare human polycystin with bat polycystin because SARS2 close relative virus is from Rhinolophus affinis.

The Wuhan psycho virologists were also studying mating-season genetics of bats, not simply their viruses.

Believe in Science, Not Postmodern Scientists

The cronyvirus has been around for thousands of years. It usually stayed in China, because the Chinese are immune to it and didn't have much contact with the West. Adventurers such as Marco Polo brought enough of it to Europe to make Whites immune, too. It killed only people with defective immune systems, usually caused by old age.

Ignorance of nature caused the cure to become lethal, since auto-emissions at a pre-Lockdown level have wiped out all pandemics since 1920. That was what killed off the Spanish Influenza, the only plague in history that never returned.

 

[badger2]

Believe in Science, Not Postmodern Scientists

The cronyvirus has been around for thousands of years. It usually stayed in China, because the Chinese are immune to it and didn't have much contact with the West. Adventurers such as Marco Polo brought enough of it to Europe to make Whites immune, too. It killed only people with defective immune systems, usually caused by old age.

Ignorance of nature caused the cure to become lethal, since auto-emissions at a pre-Lockdown level have wiped out all pandemics since 1920. That was what killed off the Spanish Influenza, the only plague in history that never returned.

The problematic we see here is that SARS2 is a different virus from SARS1 and appears to be lab-made with American assistance. A different politics than influenza politics, a different science and genetics as well.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The problematic we see here is that SARS2 is a different virus from SARS1 and appears to be lab-made with American assistance. A different politics than influenza politics, a different science and genetics as well.

Decoy Bait. Distract to Hide.

 

[BothWings]

Living in a brick house, wearing clothes, or driving cars aren't natural


... in that they do not occur in nature.

Living things DO build nests, find ways to keep warm and travel to obtain necessities. What the hell are you smoking? What's that go to do with personal problems about gender identity?

 

[BackAgain]

Drug manufacturers have to put up a ton of disclaimers on their ads about possible or reported side-effects and contraindications, etc.

Trans surgery should require similar disclaimers and warnings:

“Lobbing off your penis may not be right for you. Possible side effects include: the dangers of acting on temporary delusions, the actual loss of your genitalia, severe depression, heightened risk of suicide, the belated realization that the surgery is not reversible and the belated realization that your sexual identity wasn’t your real problem in the first place. Seek professional therapy before doing something like this which you may very well regret.”

“Also, lobbing off your penis is not considered a reliable method to gain fame or advertising and endorsement deals. In fact, it is expected that your results may vary. Many patients report that lobbing off their penises changes nothing on their lives except that they suddenly have no genitals.”

“Ask your doctor is lobbing off your penis may be right for you. And get a second opinion. And a third. And maybe more.”

 

[badger2]

Decoy Bait. Distract to Hide.

No, one must be deeply read in coronaviruses to even attempt to decipher this plandemic's esoterica.

 

[badger2]

Drug manufacturers have to put up a ton of disclaimers on their ads about possible or reported side-effects and contraindications, etc.

Trans surgery should require similar disclaimers and warnings:

“Lobbing off your penis may not be right for you. Possible side effects include: the dangers of acting on temporary delusions, the actual loss of your genitalia, severe depression, heightened risk of suicide, the belated realization that the surgery is not reversible and the belated realization that your sexual identity wasn’t your real problem in the first place. Seek professional therapy before doing something like this which you may very well regret.”

“Also, lobbing off your penis is not considered a reliable method to gain fame or advertising and endorsement deals. In fact, it is expected that your results may vary. Many patients report that lobbing off their penises changes nothing on their lives except that they suddenly have no genitals.”

“Ask your doctor is lobbing off your penis may be right for you. And get a second opinion. And a third. And maybe more.”

Doctors and shrinks are both implicated, neither can be certain about outcomes.
Genomic Russian roulette. The unknown is being exp$loited and politically weaponized.