I've also posted objective studies. It just so happens that the people who usually conduct these studies or do this research are the authorities. Just because some piece of objective evidence comes from people in authority doesn't make it a fallacy of appealing to authority. It's only a fallacy if I appeal to authority without any corroborating, objective evidence. Also where is any of your objective evidence? Appeals to ignorance aren't better arguments.
I'm not. Feel free to question any evidence I present. My question is do you have any evidence whatsoever to support any of your arguments? The answer appears to be no.
I can easily support my position with ironclad evidence that is well established and known in the medical community.
XY/Penis/testosterone/body structure/larger lung capacity/etc = male/man
XX/Vagina/designed for child bearing/body structure/estrogen/less physical stature = female/woman.
There’s no need for studies. This is just fact. You’re like a flat earther here, demanding I prove the earth is round. The onus is on you to break through with definitive smoking gun proof. You have theories, maybes, hopes, “if you look at it this way” statements.
Meanwhile. Your attempt to portray some equivalence in the medical authority of our statements is as pretentious as it is oblivious. Again, you’re the niche, extreme fringe radical here. We’re not starting at 0-0.. my factual statement is up 1000-0, and you have to catch up
See, saying they clearly lack wisdom isnt an objective counter. I merely point to the DSM-5 as the source of my information, I'm more than happy to argue about what that information contains. I'm simply wondering what source you are getting your information from.
So your objection rest on an ad hominem?
If a psychologist purports a radical theory that is very stupid, then in this moment on this issue he’s being stupid. They may be intelligent, but intelligent people are wrong all the time.
If some credentialed fellow comes and tells me an apple is actually a banana.. and he’s serious, and his supporters shame me and fight with all the gusto to try to social engineer the claim that apples are actually bananas… they would be stupid to do that. They may be intelligent in some areas, but that is a stupid thing to suggest.
An apple is an apple, a banana is a banana.
A male is a man, a female is a woman.
There’s no need for credentials, we learn this in early elementary school.
Huh??
You’re asking me to provide evidence that you’re spouting theories?
Sure. What chromosomes and genitalia you have is objective. How we arrange those features into sex categories however is subjective.
Exactly… so you have a radical, subjective theory which most people and most biologists and clinical psychologists disagree with. That’s my point all along. Thank you for ceding that.