I am still unclear what the hypocrites are saying here.
They do support the Tea Party platform? They are saying they want a smaller government? They want less spending?
Well, that is what they are bragging about.
Please, someone. Let me know what their point is.
Excellent point. If Obama is actually cutting spending, and they applaud it, why do they hold such disdain for the tea parties for trying to do the same thing?
Mark
Because the Tea Bag Brotherhood wants to make all the cuts from the safety net, the Dems want a balance of cutting the waste and taxing the super wealthy.
the so-called super wealthy are already paying most of the tax bill. half of the country is paying nothing. NO ONE wants to cut safety nets for people who actually need them.
Do you want to continue to pay able bodied people to sit on their asses and do nothing?
The only people who pay NO taxes are the super wealthy, like the Rockefellers, the half of the country you lie about paying no taxes actually pay payroll taxes up the ass. The super wealthy not only pay no income taxes, they pay no payroll taxes either!!!
The only people who pay NO taxes are the super wealthy? ******* liar.
The bliss of complete ignorance!
Gary Allen The Rockefeller File Chapter 1 to 4
The Rockefellers began hiding their wealth from the public and the tax collector
-in trusts and foundations. As reported in the Washington Post:
For two generations, the great fortune passed down by John D. has been fractionated and made more complex by increasing layers of trusts and closely held companies, where no public reports are required, none volunteered, and all inquiries politely rebuffed.
The Rockefellers invented a scheme, used by the super rich today, whereby the more money you appear to give away, the richer and more powerful you become. Through the help of captive politicians, guided by some bright boys in the family law offices, legislation was written and passed
which would protect the Rockefellers and other elite super-rich from the repressive taxation they have foisted on everyone else.
The key to this system is giving up ownership but retaining control. For example, most people don't believe they really own something unless they retain title to it in their own name. The Rockefellers know this is a big mistake. Often
it is better to have your assets owned by a trust or a foundation-which you control-than to have them in your own name.
For example, when Judge Kenesaw Mountain Landis ordered Standard Oil broken up back in 1911, sly old John D. simply created some new foundations and gave his stock to them. The net effect was the same as if you took your wallet out of your right-hand pocket and put it in the left. In this case, however,
Rockefeller not only managed to avoid income taxes, but also escaped the probate, estate and inheritance taxes which have ravaged the wealth of those not in the know.
So three generations of Rockefellers have been - giving away millions of dollars - giving much of it to themselves. For example,
if a Rockefeller gives a million dollars worth of stock in the Titanic Oil Corporation to the Dogood Foundation, which the family controls, he is not really out one million bucks. All he has done is transfer title of the securities to an alter ego. Of course, the foundation may then give away some of the money, or, more likely, donate some of the stock's future earnings to some allegedly worthwhile cause. But, as the few investigations by Congress into this devious field have shown, in the case of the Rockefellers such bequests somehow end up increasing the Rockefeller financial or political power.
Own nothing. Control everything"
John D Rockefeller
