Top 10 Scientific Proofs of God’s Existence

[ding]

it's 17 minutes long, I can't be expected to watch that, so where is the good part? If you don't point out at what time, I'll assume you have nothing again.

That's not my problem.

 

[ding]

Faith is not based on Fact

The definition of faith is having complete trust in something or someone. I never put complete trust in something or someone without good reason.

For instance I have complete trust that good comes from bad because that's what has happened in the past. Which is my basis for my faith in God. I'm pretty sure ancient Hebrews felt the same way.

 

[JoeBlow]

That's not my problem.

You never have a real point anyways, why should this be any different.

 

[ding]

You never have a real point anyways, why should this be any different.

I couldn't be happier for you to see it that way, Taz.

 

[Bezukhov]

Do these prove it was your particular version of God that was responsible?

 

[Meriweather]

Do these prove it was your particular version of God that was responsible?

How do you see God?

 

[BreezeWood]

Don't need to see any angels traveling through the cosmos to know that everything is made manifest by mind.

there is a distinction between celestial bodies -/- physiology and its spiritual content. most certainly the latter, physiology as dependent on the former.

try referring with an answer - what spiritual content without a corresponding physiology have you witnessed - than what you claim while in your closet with the door closed.

 

[Bezukhov]

How do you see God?

Answering a question with a question. I heard something about that when I was a kid.

Anyways, just sick of discussions like these. One can argue for a First Cause, with some conviction, till the cows come home. And that's about as far as one can go. Back to your question. Our universe is the creation of a hyper-dimensional 6th grader, and we're his/hers/its science project.

 

[Meriweather]

Answering a question with a question.

I wasn't answering your question. I was interested in how you see God so what I ask has some intelligence, meaning, and connectivity behind it...instead of mere ignorance. But never mind as I don't appear to be up to your standards...whatever they are.

 

[ding]

Do these prove it was your particular version of God that was responsible?

There is only one creator but there are many different perceptions of the creator.

God is not a mystery to be solved. God is a relationship to be entered into.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Many atheists want to have proofs of God's existence.
In my opinion the information from below is one of the bests in internet
Also, guys, read, think about and ask God for forgiveness of your sins
And begin to read the Holy Bible

Gods Existence-
I often get the “Prove to me God exists” question, usually from people who really do not desire any answers. However, there is occasionally a few who really want to know…This info is based upon about 6 hours of condensed note taking…Hopefully it will be instrumental in your ministry as well…
Technically, “Proof” (like a picture or video tape) is non-existent any more than I can technically “prove” that Washington was president…There are writings that can be cited that will support his presidency and are accepted as fact but technically I believe that Washington was president because I have read the accounts and writings of those present in that day who have documented the history and I believe what has been presented to me as fact. It is a given however, that History is MUCH different than Science.
I have had many of the same questions myself that people ask me concerning science and God. I am an analytical person and am not satisfied with only someone else’s experience and faith as a basis for my own beliefs. I believe that there is nothing wrong with faith, but blind faith without logical analysis or deductive reasoning can be very dangerous and even naïve in some circumstances. I have studied extensively on the subject of God’s existence and actually have a lot of material to reference (books, audio series, notes, etc)…Some of which is so deep that I don’t really understand it completely myself with examples dealing with Quantum Physics and such…but in my studies I have never been diligent enough to write down or organize my notes…Until now…
I do not take credit for any of this material, most all of it is taken from my notes and personal recollection of information that I have listened to and read from several sources…Some of the commentary is mine, but nearly all of the information in this outline comes from an audio series titled Top Ten Proofs by a Detroit radio host named Bob Dutko. If you are interested in owning the audio CD teachings on this subject, they can be purchased at this web-site (www.toptenproofs.com). There are several other topics of study that he addresses in this series but much of the “info” below comes from his audio CD titled top 10 proofs of God’s Existence.
I wrote this info in outline form in an attempt to shorten it and still relay the content. The content is almost completely referencing scientific justifications for God’s existence and not simply “faith based” revelation.
I believe, in order to establish any “faith” in God, there must first be an understanding of TRUTH that there IS A GOD…If a person has never had an “experience” justifying that “truth” then, for many, there must be legitimate scientific evidence presented in order for faith to have a foundation on which to build…Hopefully, this outline will be a basis for that.
So I start with the most simple of scientific questions:
What is science?
Science, by definition, is formulating a hypothesis or theory based upon observation, testing or the ability to make predictions.
I am convinced that a belief in God is, IN FACT, Scientific and that science DOES back up and prove that there is a God…Here are some of my reasoning’s for that belief system
1. The Scientific law –The First Law of Thermodynamics…
a. Scientific conservation of energy law which states that in the universe we have matter and energy and that matter or energy can be converted into each other but cannot be created from nothing. This law also states that matter or energy cannot be destroyed to the point where it ceases to exist, it can only take on different forms…
b. Now consider the entire universe and all of the matter and energy in it…if there is NO GOD…then Scientifically, the universe cannot exist…otherwise it would be a violation of the first law of thermodynamics because science states that “something” in our universe and within the laws of science cannot come from “nothing”…This is the FIRST law of thermodynamics and all scientific law about matter and energy are based upon this first laws foundation.
c. The Big Bang theory does not support this law. Science has proven that the universe is expanding and theorize that everything came from a small “dot” of compressed matter which exploded into what is now our expanding universe…The reason that they teach this theory and the fact that the universe came from the explosion of this compressed “Dot” is because of the first law of thermodynamics…without that compressed dot, the first law of thermodynamics collapses. But still, that theory is self defeating because the compressed “dot” that held the universe and exploded, still contradicts The First Law of Thermodynamics, because matter, regardless of how small or compact, according to scientific law, cannot come from nothing…
2. The Second Law of Thermodynamics-
a. Scientific Heat law- which states that everything will move toward a state of equilibrium. For instance, take a cup of hot coffee and a cup of ice and set them together on the same table…Assuming there are no outside influences (which is called a “closed system” in science and scientists who do not believe in God’s existence or influence would concur that the universe is a closed system), over time, both will equalize to the same temperature and reach a state of heat equilibrium.
b. Also within the Second Law of Thermodynamics is a principle that states that things move from order to chaos, degrade, become sloppier and ultimately move toward a state of entropy. A simple example of this is, if you were to have a stack of papers on your desk at work, as people walk by, and the wind blows, over time your desk will become messier as the papers slowly move from a state of order to mess, they will NEVER become straighter or neater over time as this would become a violation of the law of entropy within the second law of thermodynamics…with this law understood scientifically, if there were no God, and the universe is a closed system with no outside influence, when the “big bang” took place 15 billion years ago, the universe could not have gone from an explosion to order…this argument violates scientific law…Explosions cannot turn into order scientifically.
i. Considering these first 2 laws, occasionally scientists who believe in a closed system will argue under the first law of thermodynamics that perhaps all the matter in the universe always existed…However, the second law of thermodynamics invalidates that theory because if everything in the universe always existed, we would no longer have disparity of heat in the universe. Over the course of “forever” we would have achieved heat death and everything in the universe would be the same temperature based upon the second law of thermodynamics…But as we know, that is not the case in the universe…there are stars that burn at different temperatures and galaxies with varying heats depending upon their distance from their star. We also see comets which are balls of icy matter existing in the same universe …which are the equivalent of the hot coffee and ice cups on the same table…so they could not have been here forever because the second law of thermodynamics disproves that within a closed system without having reached a place of equilibrium by now not to mention the fact that the universe could not have reached this level of complexity from an explosion based upon the law of entropy within the second law of thermodynamics…
3. Based upon scientific law, “Life cannot come from Non-life”
a. This is called A-biogenesis and is unscientific.
i. Science, by definition, is formulating a hypothesis or theory based upon observation, testing or the ability to make predictions.
1. Discredit 1- Science is a hypothesis based upon observation- has anyone ever observed life coming into existence from non-life? The answer is no, it has never been observed in any laboratory in history.
2. Discredit 2- Is there any test that can be done that will produce life from non-life? The answer again is No.
3. Discredit 3- Is there any predictions that can be made that will produce life from non-life…Again, No…so based upon scientific law A-biogenesis is an unscientific hypothesis.
b. With this said, based upon the definition of science, the scientists who hold strongly to the belief that Life came from Non-life (a-biogenesis) are not being “scientific’ at all in their assessment of what they say they believe. But what seems even more controversial, is that they then accuse Christian beliefs of being unscientific.
c. Because life has NEVER came into being from non-life scientifically, believing that there is a God is in fact scientific because we know scientifically that the laws of science will not allow life to come from non-life. So it is a scientific conclusion that there must be a “being” capable of creating life from non-life.

.................................

Top 10 Scientific Proofs of God’s Existence

tattoopreacher.com

I don't have to use science to prove god doesn't exist because the bible has many errors in it which should be impossible as it claims it was from god in the first place.

2 Timothy 3:16-17

New International Version

​

"16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the servant of God[a] may be thoroughly equipped for every good work."

 

[ChemEngineer]

Faith is not based on Fact

You repeat one of the many lies of atheism.

"Anybody who has been seriously engaged in scientific work of any kind realizes that over the entrance to the gates of the temple of science are written the words: Ye must have faith. It is a quality which the scientist cannot dispense with. " — Max Planck

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You repeat one of the many lies of atheism.

"Anybody who has been seriously engaged in scientific work of any kind realizes that over the entrance to the gates of the temple of science are written the words: Ye must have faith. It is a quality which the scientist cannot dispense with. " — Max Planck

Faith doesn’t equate to fact in life not just religion. I have faith that Joe Biden won’t get re-elected. It is not based on fact as the election is three years away but faith that people have come to their senses.

 

[FA_Q2]

You repeat one of the many lies of atheism.

"Anybody who has been seriously engaged in scientific work of any kind realizes that over the entrance to the gates of the temple of science are written the words: Ye must have faith. It is a quality which the scientist cannot dispense with. " — Max Planck

Bullshit.

It is telling that modern theists want to pervert the word faith into something that it is not.

 

[Blues Man]

The only True God of the Holy Bible

But clearly the god of the OT and the god of the NT are not the same god.

Jews do not believe the god they worship walked the earth as Jesus so they do not worship the same god Christians do.

 

[Hollie]

You repeat one of the many lies of atheism.

"Anybody who has been seriously engaged in scientific work of any kind realizes that over the entrance to the gates of the temple of science are written the words: Ye must have faith. It is a quality which the scientist cannot dispense with. " — Max Planck

''In religion, faith is a virtue, in science, faith is a vise''. --- Jerry Coyne

​

 

[Hollie]

Page15 of another fraudulent, ''pwoof of the gods'', threads.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Bullshit.

It is telling that modern theists want to pervert the word faith into something that it is not.

Anger comes from the bosom of a fool. Why don't you try to say something intelligent and meaningful instead of simply spewing your hatefulness and ignorance.

Max Planck is the discoverer of quantum physics. You probably had no idea of that fact.

 

[Hollie]

Anger comes from the bosom of a fool. Why don't you try to say something intelligent and meaningful instead of simply spewing your hatefulness and ignorance.

Max Planck is the discoverer of quantum physics. You probably had no idea of that fact.

He never claimed to discover any gods. I'm sure you had no idea of that fact.

 

[FA_Q2]

Anger comes from the bosom of a fool. Why don't you try to say something intelligent and meaningful instead of simply spewing your hatefulness and ignorance.

Max Planck is the discoverer of quantum physics. You probably had no idea of that fact.

More misrepresentation.

No hate. No anger. No ignorance. Simple fact, you want to change the meaning of faith into something that it is not, period. I am well aware of who Max Plank is and who he is does not matter at all. Isaac Newton also thought you could turn lead into gold and spent most of his time trying to understand alchemy. I care not what he opined on the subject, it is not only irrelevant but utterly incorrect.