Catsnmeters
Gold Member
- Sep 19, 2022
- 14,471
- 5,618
- 208
I don't know. Did she note why in your source?Why did RBG intimate the R v W decision should have been left to state legislators?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't know. Did she note why in your source?Why did RBG intimate the R v W decision should have been left to state legislators?
Well of course new laws have no direct precedent but we are talking about the most recent overturning, not the initial law.Wait a minute... precedent you are showing in that link are constitutionally based laws that have passed muster in the court... the case of Roe V Wade was pushed down the throat of the nation without precedent... so it was a wrong that had to be corrected and it was as predicted by legal scholars ever since that day including justice Ginsburg....
Roe V Wade was established without precedent or a vote of the people..... it was a judicial dictate... we are not a dictatorship....
I wonder why you reject the label of retard while saying that fighting judicial activism and upholding the integrity of the Constitution is, itself, somehow, insanely, paradoxically “judicial activism.”The activism is likely striking Roe down.
Like I said work on getting your IQ up to 10 and then try learning to read English.There was before 50 years of constitutional precedent was changed by an activist court.
Except that didn't happen.I wonder why you reject the label of retard while saying that fighting judicial activism and upholding the integrity of the Constitution is, itself, somehow, insanely, paradoxically “judicial activism.”
It’s like newspeak out of IngSoc, 1984
Bad precedent belongs down in the sewers.Except that didn't happen.
50 years of constitutional precedent down the tubes. That's what happened.
Oh no...another poster who does not understand the constitution.Like I said work on getting your IQ up to 10 and then try learning to read English.
Once you manage it, if you manage it, you can try reading the constitution and you’ll learn that the word “abortion” never appears. Not once.
Oh no...another poster who does not understand the constitution.
He or she is also alive before having a heartbeat.I noticed that nobody ever answered my question. Once a baby has a heartbeat it's alive and killing it without cause is murder so still failing to see how this bill is too harsh because I do believe a baby has a heartbeat at this point.
He or she is also alive before having a heartbeat.
Life begins at fertilization, long before any muscles are created to move or any heart is created to pump blood or any lungs are created to breathe.How? Are they moving and breathing before then?
Yes. Good topic sentence, illiterate retard.
Unnecessary though, I already knew you didn’t understand the Constitution. I also didn’t need you to expound upon the specifics of why you are a profoundly illiterate retard.
Life begins at fertilization, long before any muscles are created to move or any heart is created to pump blood or any lungs are created to breathe.
The part where you implied that abortion rights existed under the Constitution of the United States, you fucking imbecile. Whereas anyone who reads the document knows your statement is a lie.So where was I wrong? Be specific please.
So you don't understand the 9th amendment? I tried to keep my explanation simple but maybe you want some links?The part where you implied that abortion rights existed under the Constitution of the United States, you fucking imbecile. Whereas anyone who reads the document knows your statement is a lie.
Trump doesn't care at all about the abortion issue. He sees the 6 week bans are counterproductive and by voicing an opinion to be more reasonable about it he hopes to gain support of more sensible voters. Sly move on his part. Those con-artist skills of his have an advantage.Donald Trump seems to be open to admitting that when a woman is pregnant whatever is in her womb is not always a "baby".
As a moderate conservative I believe that this is a good view and Desantis is too much of a conservative.
Being a conservative is fine but not too conservative.
Do you think a woman has a baby in her womb throughout the whole pregnancy?
Trump hits DeSantis on abortion, suggests 6-week abortion limit is ‘too harsh’
Former President Trump claimed many pro-lifers believe a six-week abortion ban is "too harsh," and criticized Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis for signing one.www.foxnews.com
I do. You don’t. Your nonsense is disregarded.So you don't understand the 9th amendment?
You think the constitution is nonsense?I do. You don’t. Your nonsense is disregarded.
Please desist with the faggotry of claiming your erroneous hallucinations are the United States Constitution. Thanks!You think the constitution is nonsense?
Not surprised.
You've exposed your ignorance for all to see. I guess we're done here.
Have a great day!