Today's lesson on "Birthright Citizenship". NO EUROPEAN COUNTRY ALLOWS IT.

[Unkotare]

The poorly written 14th Amendment is the Democrat's favorite transformer tool. They take fragments of it and create whatever "Law" they want.

The Constitution can be amended if enough AMERICANS want it to be. I see a lot of people bitching about it, but not so many actually trying to change it.

 

[Unkotare]

Idk, they burned down The White House. ....

Before they were scooped up by the hand of God and literally thrown out of town.

 

[The Duke]

The Constitution can be amended if enough AMERICANS want it to be. I see a lot of people bitching about it, but not so many actually trying to change it.

Personally I don't see a need to.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

In America, the 14th Amendment was written for black Americans.
No one else.
May could also be applied to Irish indentured servants, maybe.

Where does it say that? Nowhere.

 

[Unkotare]

The tornado that stopped the burning of Washington | Constitution Center

As the United States capital of Washington, D.C. burned 201 years ago today, it was an act of nature that helped to drive the British from the besieged city, and possibly save it from more destruction.

constitutioncenter.org

 

[Rawley]

Are you serious? Did you ever study Civics?

Yup. It's clear you have never studied the law

 

[Unkotare]

Personally I don't see a need to.

I don't see much else being done, and an EO would end up in front of the SC in short order anyway, so...

 

[Rawley]

The Constitution can be amended if enough AMERICANS want it to be. I see a lot of people bitching about it, but not so many actually trying to change it.

Doesn't have to be. It just needs to be interpreted correctly.

 

[Unkotare]

Yup. It's clear you have never studied the law

Did you actually graduate from high school?

 

[Unkotare]

Doesn't have to be. It just needs to be interpreted correctly.

And who decides "correctly"?

 

[The Duke]

The tornado that stopped the burning of Washington | Constitution Center

As the United States capital of Washington, D.C. burned 201 years ago today, it was an act of nature that helped to drive the British from the besieged city, and possibly save it from more destruction.

constitutioncenter.org

You ever hear about the hurricane that sank a French invasion force? That happened, this is America.

 

[Unkotare]

You ever hear about the hurricane that sank a French invasion force? That happened, this is America.

And you know where the term "kamikaze" comes from, right? (long before WWII)

 

[The Duke]

And you know where the term "kamikaze" comes from, right? (long before WWII)

No, can't say I do.

 

[Unkotare]

No, can't say I do.

The Mongols learned.

Kamikaze of 1274 and 1281 | East Asia, Typhoons | Britannica

Kamikaze of 1274 and 1281, (1274, 1281), a pair of massive typhoons (tropical cyclones) that each wrecked a Mongol fleet attempting to invade Japan in 1274 and 1281. The storms destroyed most of the Mongol ships and dispersed the rest, forcing the attackers to abandon their plans and fortuitously

www.britannica.com

 

[DGS49]

What actually happens some time is that the top court makes a ruling on a controversial matter, the People hate it, and they demand a change to a law or, in this case, the Constitution.

THIS Supreme Court is unlikely to overturn a long-term precedent, even if it is Constitutionally incorrect. They don't want to rock the boat and cast a shadow over the citizenship of millions of Americans, even if they stipulate that the rule is only changed prospectively. So they will retain the reading of the 14th that has prevailed until now.

I suspect that more than half of the country thinks it's bullshit, but it requires a super-majority to pass a Constitutional Amendment, and with every ******* Democrat in the country fighting it, that will not happen.

 

[Rawley]

Did you actually graduate from high school?

******* brilliant. Fess up. you didn't come up with that one on your own.

 

[Rawley]

And who decides "correctly"?

Back to your abject ignorance of the law.

 

[Rawley]

What actually happens some time is that the top court makes a ruling on a controversial matter, the People hate it, and they demand a change to a law or, in this case, the Constitution.

THIS Supreme Court is unlikely to overturn a long-term precedent, even if it is Constitutionally incorrect. They don't want to rock the boat and cast a shadow over the citizenship of millions of Americans, even if they stipulate that the rule is only changed prospectively. So they will retain the reading of the 14th that has prevailed until now.

It wouldn't be retroactive.

I suspect that more than half of the country thinks it's bullshit, but it requires a super-majority to pass a Constitutional Amendment, and with every ******* Democrat in the country fighting it, that will not happen.

Plessy was on the books for 70+ years. Roe, 40+

The change in the law would not effect the lives of a single American. Which is one of the things they look at when considering stare decisis.

 

[Unkotare]

What actually happens some time is that the top court makes a ruling on a controversial matter, the People hate it, and they demand a change to a law or, in this case, the Constitution.

THIS Supreme Court is unlikely to overturn a long-term precedent, even if it is Constitutionally incorrect. They don't want to rock the boat and cast a shadow over the citizenship of millions of Americans, even if they stipulate that the rule is only changed prospectively. So they will retain the reading of the 14th that has prevailed until now.

I suspect that more than half of the country thinks it's bullshit, but it requires a super-majority to pass a Constitutional Amendment, and with every ******* Democrat in the country fighting it, that will not happen.

Not just every ******* democrat. There are almost certainly A LOT of Republicans who wouldn't be thrilled to see their parents stripped of their citizenship.

 

[Unkotare]

******* brilliant. Fess up. you didn't come up with that one on your own.

Serious question.