Yeah, comer has ZERO evidence joe biden recieved a penny from Hunter Biden.
Zero. I know, I've looked at all the published evidence, there isn't any.
Not one document implicates Joe Biden, that is the immutable, incontrovertible, indisputable, fact.
Not one.
Not one financial document produced by Comer has Joe Biden as beneficiary or signatory.
The Checks to Joe from James Biden are loan repayments, if the claim is otherwise, where is the proof?
Not one LLC lists Joe Biden as an officer in a Shell.
Not one LLC has been proven to be established for a corrupt purpose as none of the 10 or so legitimate reasons have been excluded.
Not one taped phone call implicates joe in any wrong doing.
Not one testimony against Joe is backed by hard evidence.
No testimony given by Joe's staff against him. Other testimony lacks corroboration.
No testimony by Joe's sons and daughters are made against him
Noting that every email and text presented do not have Joe Biden as a participant in the conversation and third party mentions of Joe is hearsay and some have been established as fake.
Noting that the chain of custody of the laptop is not clear cut, and has the potential for corruption.
In fact, all of the evidence thus far produced, it only proves that Hunter Biden did business abroad, that that business is not against the law, plus the fact that he generously shared his profits with other family members, but notably except his father.
SARs are not proof of wrongdoing, says so right on the Gov website. In fact, if someone deals with large sums doing business with foreign entities, SARs are common.
FBI FD-1023 reports are not evidence, they need to be corroborated, and none have been, to date. The testimony on the document, by Smirnov, he's been indicted.
IRS agents are not, by definition, true whistleblowers, their testimony is merely a disagreement with the prosecutors prosecutorial decisions, in which such disagreements are common, and not only that, their testimony was impeached by Weiss , Garland and Rep Goldman and Raskin.
That Yelena Baturina was not sanctioned is not a damning fact at all, as alleged, given that some 50 Russian/Ukrainian billionaires haven't been sanctioned, either, and she is merely one of many.
One 'whistleblower' is a fugitive, the other was indicted and the one who was indicted, his testimony was to be the centerpiece to tie all their suggestive 'evidence' together. It all fell apart with his indictment.
What I've been finding is that for every issue put forth by Republicans, regarding the Bidens, there is an innocent explanation. Oh, some things might look bad, but looking bad is not illegal.
The transcript details what services Hunter provided.
All of the 'evidence' thus far is suggestive in nature, and not conclusive.
But nothing on Joe Biden.
Nothing.
Zilch
Squat
Zip.
Nada, as in NadaGawdDamnThing.
No, you can't. I've heard all your arguments.
If US Attorney David Weiss can't find it, an attorney on the investigation for six years, you think you can?
Give me a break.
and Comer et al, are morons.
NONE of Hunter's clients received any political favors from Joe. there is NO 'influence peddling'. Riding off dad's coattails doesn't equal 'influence peddling'.
You guys on the right do not have a clue as to what constitutes proof.
