Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 68,504
- 58,747
- 3,615
Lies.That was started by anti-trump, (ie...never trumpers)
You are aware of that fact.......teach.
Two entirely different things.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lies.That was started by anti-trump, (ie...never trumpers)
You are aware of that fact.......teach.
The Trump cult have their panties in a wad over their dear leaders indictment.
Cults
View attachment 771343
GoodTherapy
https://www.goodtherapy.org › ... › PsychPedia
Members who wish to break free of a cult often have difficulty doing so ... Cults tend to be led by a charismatic and compelling leader who demands loyalty.
Well, if it spreads through the elite, especially politicians, I have no problem with that. It's time we said ENOUGH. Across the board.
So nothing in my post was incorrect, and you lied about that.What are you talking about, goofy? I said gather the facts and run with them. That's on your party to do. Go.
You people are so freakin' defensive. You make college snowflakes look like Stallone.
Get over yourself.
Describe your view of the beginnings of the dossier.Lies.
Two entirely different things.
That was started by anti-trump, (ie...never trumpers)
You are aware of that fact.......teach.
Explain with your obvious SPIN.......Go.Lies.
Two entirely different things.
Hillary.That was started by anti-trump, (ie...never trumpers)
You are aware of that fact.......teach.
So he's above the law. Okay.Yet you don’t believe 7 years of constantly trying to destroy Trump is ENOUGH! He’s out of office and it’s still not ENOUGH.
I have not seen it, so I will reserve judgement, as you wisely suggest.How do you know it’s bs?!
Yeah, that's why I started my post with "perfectly wrong".So nothing in my post was incorrect, and you lied about that.
So he's above the law. Okay.
Extreme irreversible TDS reply.
What..... you think Hillary started the dossier?Hillary.
As I said already, of course we don’t yet know the precise charges. The indictment is still under seal.You know the topic but you don’t know the charges or the evidence behind the charges. Correct?
Rather ----if there is evidence that is credible enough, sufficient enough that a crime has been committed, and...the Prosecutor's office believes it is persuasive enough to have a pretty good chance of conviction then......then....it would dereliction of duty to not file charges, make their case, and allow the defendant to respond.If you can't see that this entire investigation is primarily because of politics then you are willfully blind.
- I don't see how they can spin that when the money came from an LLC that Cohen ran that had nothing to do with the campaign.
Well, the nuance that the earnest poster BM does not mention is that Cohen now says it had everything to do with the campaign, and he has documents to prove it, and, if we are to believe last night's talking-heads there are corroborating witnesses to the purported allegations also.
- And if the money did not come from the campaign coffers then it cannot be proven it was campaign finance fraud.
Yeah, the political risk is notable. So stipulated. However, must we view our criminal law enforcement in this case through a political lens?.... it's political suicide. If they fail, we get President Trump 2.0. If they succeed, we get something far worse:
There was no trial by the grand jury. That's not what they do. So, let's see if there will be an actual trial in a court of law.no reason for a grand jury show trial
No, it doesn't.The GJ is a secret hearing that delivers a secret verdict
Link?That's up to the FEC which has reviewed the case already and determined no wrong doing.
Oh yeah, you can. Happens all the time. Listen to any of the talking-heads on the telly who were DA's. They will readily....only too happily.....tell you that in criminal trials they often -- often -- needed to rely upon sketchy characters with sketchy resume's with a history of lying if not actual crimes.He can't make a case with a witness that is clearly not credible.
That may be.The good part about it is, they just created probably over a million new Trump supporters!
I would think that if it were anything else, Fat Alvin would have let the public know what those other charges are.
Not this independent. Oops.I agree that this has energized his base, and nauseated independents who see this witch-hunt for what it is.
You’re as “independent” as Obama or Clinton or Brandon.Not this independent. Oops.
Why didn't you call BS on the Mueller witch hunt? Why didn't you call BS on the hearsay evidence used against trump?How do you know it’s bs?!
Because I'm a NeverTrumper? Weak sauce.You’re as “independent” as Obama or Clinton or Brandon.
SandersYou’re as “independent” as Obama or Clinton or Brandon.
No you're a democrat cultistBecause I'm a NeverTrumper? Weak sauce.