rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 308,044
- 261,805
- 3,615
- Thread starter
- #81
They could have increased fundingIt was the schools decisionWhen Title IX, giving women parity in sports funding was passed....There was outrage
Why fund women’s sports?...
That was not the question. The question was "why cut men's sports for the sake of women''s sports that can't field a full team because not enough female students are interested?"
Women's sports are great. Cutting men's sports for a political quota is not.
It was about equality of opportunity, funding, equipment and access to practice facilities
Title IX was mocked.......Today it is paying off
Yes, it really paid off for all those male wrestlers and male volleyball players who's teams got cut to meet the quotas.
Be happy for something, but don't ignore the consequences.
They could have just increased funding of women’s programs
As it was, women’s sports has received more funding, better training, better facilities
It is paying dividends
I have to throw a flag on that one. You've said multiple times that the schools "could have just increased funding of women's programs". Think it through a little more carefully and I think you'll grasp that to which I am objecting.
Instead, they just evenly distributed scholarships