Tired Of Democrats Use Of "Fascist"

They're not told any of that in their universe. Weird, huh?
Would you care to comment on how wrong you were in the post about the economy trending upwards when Trump took over.


"In short, there was no upward trajectory to the economy on anyone's radar when Trump took office."
 
The data shows wages were definitely on the rise in 2015 just as I was saying. The trend continued during the Trump administration.

Not a lie. Just data.

View attachment 1033847
Would you care to comment on how wrong you were in the post about the economy trending upwards when Trump took over.


"In short, there was no upward trajectory to the economy on anyone's radar when Trump took office."
 
Would you care to comment on how wrong you were in the post about the economy trending upwards when Trump took over.


"In short, there was no upward trajectory to the economy on anyone's radar when Trump took office."
I did. Wages were trending upwards. Is that not part of the economy? Are you going to deny that happened? What about unemployment? That was also improving.

I agree GDP growth was slow in 2016. It barely budged under Trump though. His best year got to 2.9% growth, then fell again to 2.4% in 2019.
 
The data shows wages were definitely on the rise in 2015 just as I was saying. The trend continued during the Trump administration.

Not a lie. Just data.

View attachment 1033847

The New York Times itself described Obama's economy this way in August 2016: "For three quarters in a row, the growth rate of the economy has hovered around a mere 1%. In the last quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, the economy expanded at feeble annual rates of 0.9% and 0.8%, respectively. The initial reading for the second quarter of this year, released on Friday, was a disappointing 1.2%."

And on January 27, 2017, after the government reported that GDP growth for all 2016 was a mere 1.6% — the weakest in five years — the Times announced that "President Trump's target for economic growth just got a little more distant."

That same month, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office forecast growth this year would be just 1.9%.

There were other signs of stagnation as well. Stocks had flatlined in 2016, with major indexes down slightly. Real median household income dropped that year, according to Sentier Research.

Growth had been so worrisomely slow throughout Obama's two terms in office that journalists started warning about "secular stagnation." They said the country was in a period of long, sustained, slow growth resulting from slow population and productivity growth.

In August 2016, the Times declared that "the underlying reality of low growth will haunt whoever wins the White House."

The next month, CBS News reported that "with U.S. economic growth stuck in low gear for several years, it's leading many economists to worry that the country has entered a prolonged period where any expansion will be weaker than it has been in the past."

In short, there was no upward trajectory to the economy on anyone's radar when Trump took office.

Now that the economy is outperforming everyone's expectations, Trump's critics want to pretend that the current boom was already baked in the cake.” Economic Boom: Media Rewrite History To Credit Obama Instead Of Trump
 
That was a Democrat production, showed by a Democrat President in the White House.


Did you vote for racists like Clinton and Biden?






Democrats have always been the racist,. and count on fools like you to lie about it.

Biden stating that he would only select a VP or Supreme Court Justice of one race proves it you moron.




And then, there is another racist you voted for.

There has never been a change in the Democrat bullwhip and lynching party.
Not Lee and David......

....how about Bill Clinton?
Did you vote for that life-long racist?????




  1. Not only was the Democrat Party the home of slavers, segregationists, the Jim Crow folks, and the KKK....but the folks who try to lie their way out of the stain that attaches to all Democrats by claiming that it all changed in the 1960's, and the Democrats reversed themselves....

    Clinton proves otherwise.


    His 40 or so years as Democrat, up to and including the fact that he is so popular to Democrats that he was given the keynote speech at Obama's 2012 convention....

    ...and for his entire political life he has been a racist.

    a. Governor Clinton was among three state officials the NAACP sued in 1989 under the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965. “Plaintiffs offered plenty of proof of monolithic voting along racial lines, intimidation of black voters and candidates and other official acts that made voting harder for blacks,” the Arkansas Gazette reported December 6, 1989.




    b. Bill Clinton had a Confederate flag-like issue, every year he was governor: 1979-1992 Arkansas Code Annotated, Section 1-5-107, provides as follows:

    (a) The Saturday immediately preceding Easter Sunday of each year is designated as ‘Confederate Flag Day’ in this state.

    (b) No person, firm, or corporation shall display an Confederate flag or replica thereof in connection with any advertisement of any commercial enterprise, or in any manner for any purpose except to honor the Confederate States of America. [Emphasis added.]

    (c) Any person, firm, or corporation violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).

    Bill Clinton took no steps during his twelve years as governor to repeal this law.
    Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy | The Gateway Pundit
www.thegatewaypundit.com






Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy

This blogpost now has sound…** Listen Here ** Here is a photo from Confederate Flag Day in Arkansas…State Capital in Little Rock, Arkansas, April 15, 2006. Yesterday, Hillary Clinton argued that South Carolina should remove the Confederate Flag from its statehouse grounds: “I think about how...
www.thegatewaypundit.com





www.thegatewaypundit.com



[Let's Stop Pretending the Confederate Flag Isn't a Symbol of RacismJust to refresh everyone's memories, we're talking about the official national flag that was used to represent the Confederate States of America during the Civil War. You know, that awkward time period when the South was vehemently fighting to keep slavery around as a means of economic prosperity for white plantation owners.

I've heard arguments time and again about how the Confederate flag is no longer representative of slavery, and how it's now indicative of "Southern pride and heritage." But I'm really over the whole "respect your heritage" mantra, especially when your heritage is hate.







www.huffingtonpost.com






Let's Stop Pretending the Confederate Flag Isn't a Symbol of Racism

In tiptoeing around what "Southern pride" is actually representative of and refusing to condemn the Confederate flag as the horrific reminder of human sl...

www.huffingtonpost.com





www.huffingtonpost.com
]








Gee....'til 1992,....

1617635095747.png







  1. Governor Clinton invited Orval Faubus to his inauguration and they exchanged an almost South American abrazo, embrace, Booknotes :: Home
Governor Orval Faubus, progressive New Deal Democrat, blocked the schoolhouse door to the Little Rock Central High School with the state’s National Guard rather than allow nine black students to attend.



  1. Clinton’s mentor was J. William Fulbright, a vehement foe of integration who had voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Orval Eugene Faubus, attended Bill Clinton’s 1979 gubernatorial inauguration, where the two pols hugged, as Arkansas Democrat-Gazette editorial page editor Paul Greenberg recalls.)
Know who Faubus was?
Yup...he used the National Guard to prevent blacks from going to school



c. Bill Clinton wrote his first letter, dated June 21, 1994, of congratulations to the UDC [Untied Daughters of the Confederacy] celebrating their 100th anniversary. Later Clinton wrote a letter September 8, 1994 letter of congratulation to the Georgia Division of the UDC celebrating their 100th anniversary, then August 9, 1995 welcoming to Washington, D.C. for their 1995 national convention. Each letter was given a full page with Clinton’s picture in the United Daughters of the Confederacy Magazine (UDC Magazine) giving legitimacy to the UDC.

For reference, the UDC magazine includes " a Ku Klux Klan praising book, not just the Klan of Reconstruction but the Klan of the 1920s, a book which recommends the racist books of Thomas Dixon, “The Clansman” ...
Anti-Neo-Confederate: Bill Clinton Enables Neo-Confederates & Betrays Carol Moseley-Braun: UPDATED

Gee....was that 150 years ago, you dunce?



d. "Clinton praised Arkansas’ late Democratic senator J. William Fulbright, a notorious segregationist who opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act. He also signed the Southern Manifesto, which denounced the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark Brown vs. Board of Education school desegregation decision in 1954. Clinton called Fulbright “My mentor, a visionary, a humanitarian.”Dems Need to Houseclean - Deroy Murdock - National Review Online

and....

Fulbright was a full-bore segregationist, voting against the 1957, 1960, 1964, and 1965 civil rights bills.
But...in 1993, Bill Clinton gave the Medal of Freedom award to a lifelong segregationist, Democrat Wm. J. Fulbright. And another life-long segregationist, Democrat Albert Gore, Sr. was in attendance.

How many years ago???????????


Hey...didn't Bill Clinton just recently speak at the Democrat National Convention?



2012.

That wasn't "50 or 150" years ago....was it?

__________________

… President Bill Clinton

argued that Colin Powell, promoted

to brigadier general during Mr.

Alexander’s tenure, was the product

of an affirmative action program.

http://cdn.virtuallearningcourses.com/ivtcontent/images/edw12_ch05_e.pdf



'BILL CLINTON: IN PAST, OBAMA WOULD BE 'CARRYING OUR BAGS'

Bill Clinton: In Past, Obama Would Be 'Carrying Our Bags'

If Obama so desperately wants examples of racist rhetoric being cast against him, there's none better than what Bill Clinton said of him only a few short years ago."
www.breitbart.com





www.breitbart.com

Wall Street and Washington, Two Wings of the Same Vulture

Economic race-traitors tell us, "The Democrats used to be on the side of White people and should never be forgiven for that."
 
The New York Times itself described Obama's economy this way in August 2016: "For three quarters in a row, the growth rate of the economy has hovered around a mere 1%. In the last quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, the economy expanded at feeble annual rates of 0.9% and 0.8%, respectively. The initial reading for the second quarter of this year, released on Friday, was a disappointing 1.2%."

And on January 27, 2017, after the government reported that GDP growth for all 2016 was a mere 1.6% — the weakest in five years — the Times announced that "President Trump's target for economic growth just got a little more distant."

That same month, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office forecast growth this year would be just 1.9%.

There were other signs of stagnation as well. Stocks had flatlined in 2016, with major indexes down slightly. Real median household income dropped that year, according to Sentier Research.

Growth had been so worrisomely slow throughout Obama's two terms in office that journalists started warning about "secular stagnation." They said the country was in a period of long, sustained, slow growth resulting from slow population and productivity growth.

In August 2016, the Times declared that "the underlying reality of low growth will haunt whoever wins the White House."

The next month, CBS News reported that "with U.S. economic growth stuck in low gear for several years, it's leading many economists to worry that the country has entered a prolonged period where any expansion will be weaker than it has been in the past."

In short, there was no upward trajectory to the economy on anyone's radar when Trump took office.

Now that the economy is outperforming everyone's expectations, Trump's critics want to pretend that the current boom was already baked in the cake.” Economic Boom: Media Rewrite History To Credit Obama Instead Of Trump
So 1.6% GDP growth is terrible but 2.4% is amazing? Is that what you’re saying?
 
So 1.6% GDP growth is terrible but 2.4% is amazing? Is that what you’re saying?
Are you beginning to realize that everything you believe is a lie?


Here is a little exercise that may be helpful to you.......


Try to channel those 'Good Germans' who believed everything Hitler told them, and were suddenly exposed to the truth when Eisenhower had them picked up in buses and trucks and taken to the death camps to see what they had been denying and claiming not to know about.


That's you.


Some 50 lies and hoaxes that have been exposed, and yet you pretend ignorance, and simple continue to lick the boots of the Party.

 
Last edited:
Are you beginning to realize that everything you believe is a lie?
I just don’t think an economy with dropping unemployment and rising wages is as disastrous as you claim.

Did Trump run promising we’d have GDP growth skyrocket to 2.4%?
 
I just don’t think an economy with dropping unemployment and rising wages is as disastrous as you claim.

Did Trump run promising we’d have GDP growth skyrocket to 2.4%?
Obama Democrat policies did a terrible job.

Trump's American policies produced a terrific economy.


Were you wrong/lying when you tried to take the credit from Trump and give it to Democrats?



As the Brown Bomber famously said, "you can run, but you can't hide."
 
Obama Democrat policies did a terrible job.

Trump's American policies produced a terrific economy.


Were you wrong/lying when you tried to take the credit from Trump and give it to Democrats?



As the Brown Bomber famously said, "you can run, but you can't hide."
Low unemployment and rising wages are terrible?
 
Hitler wasn't a socialist at all, you imbecile bumpkin.
Fascism and Communism Were Both RichKid Reichs

Netrix hacks believe political names mean something, when they're really disguises. Why not counter this word-wizardry by claiming that the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic and the People's Republic of China must have been established by Republicans and blame the GOP for both?

In a similar language lapse, the Diploma Dumbo media tell us that "oxymoron" must be something said by a moron. Actually, it's a clever pun and not at all what used to be called by intelligent media "a contradiction in terms." Parroting the media's definition of it is as stupid and slavish as believing that sincere must mean "sinful."
 
1. This quote from Saul Alinsky (late communist), mentor of Democrat lights like Hillary and Obama, in "Rules for Radicals" relates so well to the democrat party today, "accuse your opponent of what you are doing, to create confusion and to inculcate voters against evidence of your own guilt."?

Thus, the recent constant use of "fascists" for the other side.


2. Not only is the use of the term 'fascist' the complete oppostite of the truth, but it is appropriate to address it in the light of tomorrow's anniversary:
October 30th, 1922 Benito Mussolini becomes Premier of Italy




From David Ramsey Steele's essay on Fascism and Mussolini:


3. .".. achieving fame as an agitator among the Italian migratory laborers, he was referred to by a local Italian-language newspaper as "the great duce [leader] of the Italian socialists."
(Socialists.....would that be the current Democrats or current Republicans?)


4. Mussolini's election to the Executive was part of the capture of control of the Socialist Party by the hard-line Marxist left, ....The shift in Socialist Party control was greeted with delight by Lenin and other revolutionaries throughout the world. From 1912 to 1914, Mussolini was the Che Guevara of his day, a living saint of leftism. Handsome, courageous, charismatic, an erudite Marxist, a riveting speaker and writer, a dedicated class warrior to the core, he was the peerless duce of the Italian Left. He looked like the head of any future Italian socialist government, elected or revolutionary.

5. Mussolini and a group of adherents launched the Fascist movement (6) in 1919. Apart from its ardent nationalism and pro-war foreign policy, the Fascist program was a mixture of radical left, moderate left, democratic, and liberal measures...."
The Mystery of Fascism

by David Ramsay Steele
Then stop being a fascist and supporting fascists.

Very simple
 
Were you wrong/lying when you tried to take the credit from Trump and give it to Democrats?
I’m correct. Wages were rising and unemployment was falling. I refuse to accept that’s a terrible situation.

Can you explain how 1.6% GDP growth is terrible but 2.4% GDP growth is terrific?
 
You imbecile: Nazis= National Socialist German Worker's Party


Fascists, Communists, Socialists, Jacobins, Maoists.....Democrats..........all variations on a theme..



"Upon his return to Italy, young Benito was an undistinguished member of the Socialist Party. He began to edit his own little paper,La Lotta di Classe (The Class Struggle), ferociously anti-capitalist, anti-militarist, and anti-Catholic. He took seriously Marx's dictum that the working class has no country... he became something of a leftist hero. Before turning 30, Mussolini was elected to the National Executive Committee of the Socialist Party, and made editor of its daily paper, Avanti! The paper's circulation and Mussolini's personal popularity grew by leaps and bounds.

3. Mussolini's election to the Executive was part of the capture of control of the Socialist Party by the hard-line Marxist left, ....The shift in Socialist Party control was greeted with delight by Lenin and other revolutionaries throughout the world. From 1912 to 1914, Mussolini was the Che Guevara of his day, a living saint of leftism. Handsome, courageous, charismatic, an erudite Marxist, a riveting speaker and writer, a dedicated class warrior to the core, he was the peerless duce of the Italian Left. He looked like the head of any future Italian socialist government, elected or revolutionary.

4. In 1913, while still editor of Avanti!, he began to publish and edit his own journal, Utopia, a forum for controversial discussion among leftwing socialists. ...Two of those who collaborated with Mussolini on Utopia would go on to help found the Italian Communist Party and one to help found the German Communist Party. (3) Others, with Mussolini, would found the Fascist movement."
The Mystery of Fascism

by David Ramsay Steele





Pick up a book, you dunce.
All the Fascist Leaders Had Been in Combat, Unlike Our Sissyboy Right

Mussolini's Daddy wasn't rich. As it is everywhere, the Italian Socialists were run by bossy "Born to Rule" entitled snobs. They wouldn't promote Benito to the positions his talent merited, because his birth-class wasn't high enough.

After the French Revolution, the surviving aristocrats divided into two groups, both with the intent to keep commoners from ever guillotining them again. One was Fascism, which beat the Unfortunate Sons down to the point that it wouldn't dare even to think of fighting back. The other was Socialism, which pretended to be on the workers' side in order to trick them into giving the government totalitarian power.
 
Then stop being a fascist and supporting fascists.

Very simple
I can tell that you either didn't read the explanations of Fascism herein, or, as is usual for you, didn't understand any of it.

Fascism is one variation of Jacobinism, and Nazism, and Bolshevism, and Maoism.

That means it is of the Left as you are, and the Democrat Party is.


QED, I could not be a Fascist.


You should take notes.
 
I’m correct. Wages were rising and unemployment was falling. I refuse to accept that’s a terrible situation.

Can you explain how 1.6% GDP growth is terrible but 2.4% GDP growth is terrific?
No, simply a liar whose sees his role in life the boot-licking of the Democrat Party.

Am I right?
 
No, simply a liar whose sees his role in life the boot-licking of the Democrat Party.

Am I right?
This is just name calling.

Since when does anyone consider 2.4% GDP growth to be an economic boom?
 
Back
Top Bottom