tinydancer
Diamond Member
I can argue for the death penalty under most circumstances.
Or a topic I've been really thinking a lot about lately, but I wonder genuinely if we'd all be able to take different sides.
As a dual citizen, you folks know that I am very aware of your politics. But by my current distance, I hope it gives me a bit of an impartial view on some topics that are truly bi partisan, despite my conservative beliefs.
What concerns me is the seemingly endless candidates from Royal US families running for office in America. The encompasses both sides of the aisle.
The Clinton - Bush - Cuomo - Kennedy dynasties to name but a few.
Or a term limits topic. Good grief. From the outside looking in, the US Senate is run by a batch of doddering old fools who refuse to let go of power and move over to allow a new generation of public servants to rise to the top.
Or anti hunting vs pro hunting. Granted being pro hunting,that would be a personal Royal Rumble combined with Hell in the Cell win.
Game for anything gentlemen.
Or a topic I've been really thinking a lot about lately, but I wonder genuinely if we'd all be able to take different sides.
As a dual citizen, you folks know that I am very aware of your politics. But by my current distance, I hope it gives me a bit of an impartial view on some topics that are truly bi partisan, despite my conservative beliefs.
What concerns me is the seemingly endless candidates from Royal US families running for office in America. The encompasses both sides of the aisle.
The Clinton - Bush - Cuomo - Kennedy dynasties to name but a few.
Or a term limits topic. Good grief. From the outside looking in, the US Senate is run by a batch of doddering old fools who refuse to let go of power and move over to allow a new generation of public servants to rise to the top.
Or anti hunting vs pro hunting. Granted being pro hunting,that would be a personal Royal Rumble combined with Hell in the Cell win.

Game for anything gentlemen.
Last edited: